[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Trump Says He’s ‘Ready’ to Slap Tariffs on Every Chinese Good Imported to the U.S.

NEWS Nucor Earnings Double As Trump Tariffs Lift Steel Prices

The ACLU Has Basically Quit Defending The Constitution

“Stop Fingering Me Bro”: Man Sues After Cops Publicly Sodomize Him Looking for a Plant

Road Raging Cop Beats Innocent Cancer Patient for Telling Him to Slow Down

Estimated 5,000 to 7,000 service members to march in Trump's military parade: Source

Getting conservatives and Libertarians to agree on tariffs

34,704.92 33,685.03 10,300.00

1 House Republican's chilling warning on Trump and Russia

REVISITED: 'I'm a queen and I demand to be treated like a queen!' How Congresswoman involved in race row on plane was chauffeured a block to Congress and was nearly banished from an airline before

The problems with libertarianism. : philosophy

JUDGE JEANINE: Whoopi Goldberg Started Cursing at Me! She Said F-You! F-You! Get the F-ck Out of This Building! (VIDEO)

The Vegas Massacre Exposé: What Really Happened?

Trump under siege from the PNAC crowd for seeking peace with Russia

JOINT NFL-NFLPA STATEMENT - Anthem Policy Standstill Agreement

Reagan on Libertarians & Conservatives VS "Liberal Fascists"

CONTROVERSIAL JEWISH NATION-STATE BILL PASSES INTO LAW

Men Have Forgotten God

Trump: I'll be Vladimir Putin's 'worst enemy' if US-Russia relationship 'doesn't work out'

The great dollar dump: Russia liquidates US Treasury holdings

Humanity Crucified on a Cross of Iron - Eisenhower

President of the United States to Entire World: "THE REAL ENEMY, THE FAKE NEWS MEDIA" (July 19 Tweet)

Planning and Conservation League v. Padilla (Draper) Division SF (18 Jul 2018); CalExit Prop 9 Off Ballot

State of New York v. Mnuchin, SDNY 18-cv-6427 (17 Jul 2018)

The Eruption of the Shills

Legalizing Pot Sales Means...Higher Home Values?

If You Value The Reputation Of Your Restaurant, Maybe You Should Stop Serving Cops

Trump,Putin,and politics

Non-citizens legally register to vote in San Francisco school elections

Why Libertarianism is wrong

Nunes declares war on the media

First Win for Trump-Putin Summit: Agreement to Restrain Iran in Syria

Update: Mueller Suspected of Giving Podesta Brothers Immunity to Indict Manafort and Is HIDING THIS FROM PUBLIC

Crowdstrike Analyst Who Ran Forensics on DNC Server Used to Work For Mueller at FBI

Bill Maher vs. an intelligent Christian (Maher loses). *mirror*

Ladies Professional Golf Association using facial recognition technology to surveil fans and spectators

The world’s most nutritious foods

Papa John's founder 'isn't going quietly,' lawyer says — Schnatter just dragged Kanye West into fight with the board

New Kentucky Law Puts Limits on Drone Spying, Will Help Thwart Federal Surveillance Program

What To Learn From The Social Justice Warrior Who Was Eaten By His Own Mob

Is the Media the “Enemy of the People”?

Well, I think I am going to have to schedule a surgery

War...

Las Vegas Police Body Cam: Cop Fires Through Windshield

3 Problems With Libertarianism - After Economics

Brazile, Rice, Obama Gave Russian Hackers Free Rein

The irrational hysteria over Trump and Putin

John Brennan Misses Communist Russia

The Latest: Trump says he misspoke on Russia meddling

Cop Charged After Video Shows Him Execute Unarmed Mother by Shooting Her in the Head


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: In victory for Trump, Supreme Court dismisses travel ban case
Source: USA Today
URL Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news ... ses-travel-ban-case/752401001/
Published: Oct 10, 2017
Author: Richard Wolf and Gregory Korte
Post Date: 2017-10-11 09:22:55 by Tooconservative
Keywords: None
Views: 148
Comments: 6

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court dismissed a major challenge to President Trump's travel ban on majority-Muslim countries Tuesday because it has been replaced by a new version, sending the controversy back to the starting block.

The ruling is a victory for the Trump administration, which had asked the court to drop the case after Trump signed a proclamation Sept. 24 that replaced the temporary travel ban on six nations with a new, indefinite ban affecting eight countries. That action made the court challenge moot, the justices ruled.

"We express no view on the merits," the justices said in a one-page order.

The decision effectively wipes the record clean in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, one of two federal appeals courts that had struck down major portions of Trump's travel ban. That case began in Maryland.

A separate case from the 9th Circuit, based in California, remains pending because it includes a ban on refugees worldwide that won't expire until later this month. But the Supreme Court is likely to ditch that case, which began in Hawaii, as well.

The challengers in both cases already have renewed their lawsuits in the lower courts, starting the legal process anew. In Maryland, a federal district court has scheduled a new hearing for next week.

But the new travel ban and the Supreme Court's order vacating the 4th Circuit appeals court judgment puts the administration in a somewhat stronger position, at least for now.

The 4th Circuit case was brought by the International Refugee Assistance Project, which argued that banning travel from six majority-Muslim countries violated the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of religion.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented from the court's action. She would have dismissed the case but in a way that would have preserved the appeals court ruling against the ban, rather than vacating it.

Under its original schedule, the court would have heard the case Tuesday, but had delayed oral argument after Trump replaced his earlier order. The new version followed a three-month review of immigration procedures.

The latest travel ban targets five countries included in two previous versions — Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen — as well as Chad, North Korea and Venezuela. Unlike the earlier bans, it treats some countries and types of travelers, such as students or tourists, differently than others.

The administration told the justices last week that the new ban is "based on detailed findings regarding the national security interests of the United States that were reached after a thorough, worldwide review and extensive consultation."

The ban's challengers argued that the case against the last version should go forward because many of the same travelers and their families are adversely affected — not just for 90 days, but indefinitely.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the 4th Circuit challenge on behalf of the refugee group, had said charges of anti-Muslim discrimination still applied "despite some new window dressing" — a reference to the addition of North Korea and Venezuela.

Hawaii, which brought the 9th Circuit challenge, warned the justices that elements of the earlier ban still could be revived, since Trump has said he wants a "much tougher version."

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Tooconservative (#0)

banning travel from six majority-Muslim countries violated the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of religion.

So OUR constitutional first amendment freedom of religion protects the right of some Muslim living in Syrian -- with no documents -- to freely enter the United Sta Sta States?

But it doesn't protect the right of a U.S. citizen to refuse service on religious grounds.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-10-11   9:48:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: misterwhite (#1)

Well, the Court is a little cowardly here, saying that Trump changed his EO so the original case from the Fourth Circuit is moot. Pretty elementary lawyering.

The Hawaii case continues but it looks pretty bad for them at this point.

In the end, I think Trump wins this one. And, since he's already paid the full freight on immigration restrictions in these cases, he has no incentive whatsoever to liberalize his policies at all. He is, in fact, moving to greatly restrict refugee status, immigrant visas, children rushing our border unaccompanied, etc.

The libs will rage but they made Trump pay the price for his policies. And now Trump is going to get his money's worth out of it. Sessions is all too willing to help as he has been tarred and feathered by the same libtards for years on these policies.

They're going to regret they tried to pull this shabby trick on Trump. They've hurt their own cause ultimately. And Stephen Miller remains in the WH, pointing this out to Trump over and over.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-10-11   10:01:27 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Tooconservative (#2)

And Stephen Miller remains in the WH

May he forever stay.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-10-11   10:52:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Tooconservative (#2)

That's right. It's one thing to whine and kvetch about Alsace-Lorraine, but if you cross the border and actually try to grab it, and have to be pushed back out by force, with loss andcost, there's no reason for the victor to just stop at the Rhine and call it all fair.

No, no. You continue across the Rhine with the momentum of victory, and you bite a big chunk out of the hide of the people who started it. There's no "going back to go". It's we go back to go, and you start $200 down.

Trump won, now he exploits the win.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-10-11   10:52:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13 (#4)

Trump has paid the full freight, he may as well enjoy the ride.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-10-11   11:08:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Tooconservative (#5)

Damn right!

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-10-11   13:55:23 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com