United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Video claims shooter dressed as police
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=LAS+VEGAS ... a=videos&iax=1&iai=qMxn7hpXmk4
Published: Oct 8, 2017
Author: Planet X Investigations
Post Date: 2017-10-08 15:41:01 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 57378
Comments: 186
Video claims shooter dressed as police Poster Comment: Video claims shooter dressed as police
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 51.
#1. To: A K A Stone (#0)
(Edited)
SMH. LOL.
Why the silly meaningless image?
"Planet X / Nibburu" https://www.google.com/search? source=hp&q=Planet+X+%2F+Nibburu Not a credible source.
https://www.google.com/search? source=hp&q=Planet+X+%2F+Nibburu Not a credible source. Says the person with the image from the credible source, pbase and Klingons. https://a4.pbase.com/o10/92/33392/1/166356364.c4kuLP7o.Klingons.jpg Why is pbase and Klingons more credible than Youtube? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNPrR9pP51E Las Vegas Cover Up: Video Shows 3 Extra Missing Windows On West Side of Mandalay Bay Hotel Qronos16 Antifa Literature Video footage of the Mandalay Bay’s exterior captured the morning after the massacre proves that three windows on the west face of the building were knocked out in addition to the two windows the media reported to be broken in the shooter’s suite and the adjacent room. - - - - - - - - - - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QO_wq9dv8Gc Mandalay Bay Casino: New Images and Questions *GRAPHIC* Headlines With A Voice - - - - - - - - - -
That three-missing-windows video is total crap. It could easily be faked. And it is distinctly unreal looking. The actual building has windows that are deep gold in color, yet we see a fully illuminated blue sky above. You could fake that video and the windows without a lot of software in a half hour or so. Take a look at the Qronos16 YouTube channel. It's stuffed full of every kind of kookery that you can name. Menacing asteroids, insidious solar storm, sinister earthquakery, false flaggotry, End Times babbling, Fukushima coverage. Oh, yeah, and highly professional coverage of the Vegas massacre. Do you seriously expect anyone to credit anything to a YouTube channel of such odious and hackneyed kookery? YouTube is not a repository of knowledge. It's the Wikipedia of video. And, no, adding 4 billion nutjobs to the internet does not necessarily create more knowledge. A lot of it is just wrong and stupid. Or lures to try to get clicks out of gullible people. People can make significant money doing this. This is bottom-feeding on YouTube, all in the wake of a human tragedy. So, yes, the loons and kooks are out in full force.
Youtube is not exactly a reliable source. It may be useful for discussion and consideration.
It's useful to discuss videos that may be fakes amid a stream of other contradictory videos? I don't think so.
It's useful to discuss videos that may be fakes amid a stream of other contradictory videos? It [Youtube] may be useful for discussion and consideration to determine whether some content about something or other is worth considering and researching. In the same way, reddit and 4chan cannot be taken at face value. In a thread full of unreliable videos, it may be useful to point out that contrary videos can be produced from Youtube. However, the one video I posted appears useful to get the geography and locate where the taxi driver was relative to the 32nd floor windows and in trying to figure out what area of the hotel is depicted in certain portions of her video. Whether one chooses to believe the flashes are muzzle shots or something else, they are not coming from the 32nd floor. There is a certain usefulness to that video. Youtube may be useful or entertaining. As proof of things, it is unreliable.
Unless it is fake. How do you know that that is the original video? I haven't found an original source of it.
lol.
Laugh all you want. If we have tons of contradictory YouTube videos based on this taxi driver video (and none of them prepared from the original video), then most of them must be wrong or scammers trying to draw clicks. The best you can say is that the ones you are posting are somehow better than the others. And you can't offer any evidence that they were not faked or that they were prepared using authentic undoctored footage. You're reaching into the YouTube jar and trying to draw out a winner almost at random, mostly based on how clickbaitish their titles are. Maybe there are no winners in the YouTube raffle; maybe all it has are the consolation prizes for dummies.
You want me to prove a negative? You can't prove they are fake. Someone on the internet will if they are fake. The taxi video has been there right from the start. The video chan posted lines up with it. They are not fake and you know it.
#53. To: A K A Stone (#51)
(Edited)
I know no such thing. And neither do you. And you're just blustering now because you finally realize you've been had by these YouTube scammers like the Niburu/Planet X cultists.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: VxH (#1)
#10. To: A K A Stone (#2)
(Edited)
Why the silly meaningless image?
#28. To: VxH, A K A Stone (#10)
[VxH #10] "Planet X / Nibburu"
Published on Oct 8, 2017
Published on Oct 3, 2017
#30. To: nolu chan, VxH, A K A Stone, misterwhite (#28)
#33. To: Tooconservative, VxH, A K A Stone, misterwhite (#30)
That three-missing-windows video is total crap. It could easily be faked.
#39. To: nolu chan (#33)
It may be useful for discussion and consideration.
#41. To: Tooconservative (#39)
It may be useful for discussion and consideration.
#44. To: nolu chan (#41)
However, the one video I posted appears useful to get the geography and locate where the taxi driver was relative to the 32nd floor windows and in trying to figure out what area of the hotel is depicted in certain portions of her video. Whether one chooses to believe the flashes are muzzle shots or something else, they are not coming from the 32nd floor. There is a certain usefulness to that video.
#48. To: Tooconservative (#44)
Unless it is fake.
#49. To: A K A Stone (#48)
#51. To: Tooconservative (#49)
And you can't offer any evidence that they were not faked
Replies to Comment # 51. They are not fake and you know it.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 51.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]