[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
Opinions/Editorials Title: Advice To Future Spree Shooters If we must have a mass shooting incident arise every year or so, we might as well point them in the right direction. After all, the media tells us that these are the biggest source of firearm homicides, and since the media are on the right side of history, they can’t possibly be wrong. And so, for the aspiring shooters that are fans of mine (and I imagine there’s more than a few!), allow me to suggest a few places for you to commit your rampage. As a general rule, these are places that might actually benefit society by being massacred. And so, here are a few suggestions with pros and cons for each choice stated: I’ve said it before, and I will surely say it again in the future: the soft sciences (as they’re done today, at the very least) are responsible for an overwhelmingly large percentage of what we in the alt-right/manosphere/whatever complain about: From feminism to made-up sexual identities to critical theory to safe spaces, pretty much all of this nonsense comes from these organized “give me stuff” studies departments at universities around the world. Indeed, this has largely been the case for the past century, and one might argue that a direct intellectual lineage can be drawn from the theories of the Frankfurt School (which coined the term “Critical theory”) in the 1920s, all the way down to the shrieking Social Justice Warriors, embittered minorities, and white masochists of today. Or from Margaret Mead’s massively fraudulent work in Samoa to the utterly gormless and miserable interactions between men and women in 2016. Or from the massively fraudulent (surprise!) works of Alfred Kinsey and John Money to…well, you get the idea. So, seeing as these people are responsible for a good chunk of what’s wrong with the world today…would it really be wrong to shoot a few of them? Personally, I’d prefer a limited spree shooting, sparing all the students and most of the teachers, and only shooting the professors that are simultaneously promoting this nonsense and being revoltingly hypocritical about it. No matter what variation you choose, this is an exceptional choice due to most “New Left” academics being not only soft and in poor physical condition, but literally being conditioned to abhor violence to the extent that they will not even use it to defend themselves. A bit of caution though: Do understand that if you are a white heterosexual male, you will go down in infamy and likely be used as the impetus for a gun control or surveillance bill. In contrast, if you’re a person of color, these people will defend you and whitewash your actions with their dying breaths. Your otherwise omni-present white privilege (that the media blames for shootings in the first place, and they CAN’T be wrong) does not apply here. On that note… We all hate “fake news”, don’t we? And besides, considering how the shooter of Mr. Scalise was more than likely egged on by the media, they might give you a pass! At the very least, they won’t be laughing when they get shot (in contrast to how they laughed at the “dumb rednecks” who died). I was honestly debating to just pick the judicial branch (After all, they are probably the most powerful entity in the United States today), but since there’s only nine of them, that would hamstring your efforts to break Mr. Paddock’s high score. Hence why I threw the legislature in as well. While they’re both just two parts of the “Cathedral,” they are very prominent and powerful ones. Seeing as I still have some affection for the United States against all reason, I do resent how any idea of checks and balances has been thrown out the window by two groups of public officials who are in desperate need of term limits. The cons, however are obvious: You would, to put it bluntly, have the wrath of God put upon you as you undoubtedly failed and were messily killed. Plus that’d be the nail in the coffin for any semblance of America as a free country. I’d probably skip this one. This more or less ties into the first one, for whatever academia theorizes, the SPLC puts into action. In addition to their philosophical malfeasance that comes from the same roots as #1, they’re just plain hypocritical: A multi million dollar “non-profit” that has on numerous occasions lied about the topics it discusses, if any one organization can be said to represent modernity, this enormously wealthy organization spewing hate and lies under a thin veneer of love and tolerance is it. Shooting up the SPLC might present a bit more of a challenge–seeing as this non-profit is, in fact, a for-profit, I would assume that its employees are a bit more proactive and “on the ball” than a university sociology department, and will put up more of a fight. On the plus side, since it is such a large organization, you’ll go down in history, and if you’re a Person of Color, the people you shoot will excuse your crimes in a similar manner as the sociology department. And those are my four suggestions for places a shooter could go instead of a mall, theater, or hotel full of innocents. Should you have any other suggestions, feel free to suggest them in the comments section. Let us re-purpose this great tradition for a good cause! Or, you know, solve the massive mental health problem the US has that expresses itself violently with firearms, but who has time for that? Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Tooconservative (#0)
STUUPID Article.
The proverbial Lone Wolf, who's so popular in government CT's! Obviously just one cog in the Fake News cult.
In TLC's comment section, not here at LF. I thought it was a fun and outrageous piece. Certainly it doesn't go as far as some of the BLM SJWs do.
This crap ain't clever enough to qualify as satire... It's just ignorant horsecrap.
Then don't read it. The writer is sort of a fitness/fighting guru, hangs out with Milo Yiannopoulos and Gavin McInnes and other alt-Right types. He writes for InfoWars and other outlets, has a YouTube channel, etc.
LOL!!! Mr. Flabby-Abs looks more like he hangs out with Alt-Gender types...
Well, some of the marginal MMA types have those pudgy builds and carry some extra weight. You also find that bodybuilders who do display abs and big muscles look a lot the same way between their competitions and photo shoots. They would say they are work horses, not show horses. Anyway, I'm not trying to sell you on this guy. I was merely describing him as an alt-Right type and what his general appeal is considered to be. Personally, I think that any real boxer or MMA types would kick his ass in 5 seconds flat, probably with one punch. He's a guru to a bunch of pussies like Gavin McInnes and his weird little Proud Boy cult or to Milo.
In other words, the irrelevant fringe that nobody's ever heard of...
Pretty much. The alt-Right has such small numbers that they exist far more in libmedia as a bogeyman than as any mass movement with much appeal to their supposed demographic.
|
|
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
