Title: Hugh Hefner, Founder Of Playboy, Dead At 91 Source:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/hugh-hefner-founder-playboy-dead- URL Source:https://www.yahoo.com/news/hugh-hef ... er-playboy-dead-031914304.html Published:Sep 27, 2017 Author:Stephanie Marcus Post Date:2017-09-28 04:40:50 by XDMAR Keywords:None Views:2159 Comments:42
Playboy founder and legendary ladies’ man Hugh Hefner has died at the age of 91, according to Playboy Enterprises.
The magazine said he was surrounded by loved ones and “peacefully passed away today from natural causes at his home.”
Guys like Hefner don't want virgins. And they wouldn't encounter any in their line of work. Virgins are pretty unpopular overall.
The women who show up to pose for Larry Flynt at Hustler or Hefner are slutty enough to show themselves to millions of people naked for money. They are a variety of prostitute and not attractive enough to make it in legit modeling, nothing more.
The women who show up to pose for Larry Flynt at Hustler or Hefner are slutty enough to show themselves to millions of people naked for money. They are a variety of prostitute and not attractive enough to make it in legit modeling, nothing more.
I used to think along those lines. But modeling is itself a skill -- somewhat at least, as it's more than simply being physically attractive. And I've never quite been able to understand the qualitative difference between a traditional model and a playboy model. Both are being paid to show off their physical beauty. The difference may largely be only in what a culture considers acceptable.
But more to the point, It's natural for women to want to be physically attractive to men. I think I read one quote by a playboy model about how she wouldn't be so attractive for the rest of her life so why not show it off while she can? Something along that line of thinking.
and not attractive enough to make it in legit modeling, nothing more.
Now that sounds disingenuous. Playboy models absolutely are attractive.
Now that sounds disingenuous. Playboy models absolutely are attractive.
They aren't the thoroughbreds of modeling. They'll never be in fashion mag shoots or on runways in Paris, Rome, London or New York. Or the cover of SI.
Melania Trump was a top model. She did that racy pic on Donald's plane but was already virtually retired. Earlier in her career she did do that supposedly artsy lesbo photo shoot using what looked like cheap equipment. But she was very young then, trying to get any kind of work apparently.
Your classic thoroughbreds would be Cheryl Tiegs or Naomi Campbell or Brooke Shields (child model) or Cybill Shepherd. I can't think of any others offhand but they made the big money, in demand for years. They were in the business of making every American woman neurotic about their looks for decades.
The women in Playboy were airbrushed to death, not in great shape, posed in certain postures. The ones in Hustler were the real dogs, especially those wide-open beaver shots, a Flynt specialty. No serious model is ever going to do the wide-open beaver shot because it looks like a cheesy pic from a gynecology textbook.
Airbrushing is not confined to nude models. It's practiced throughout the modeling industry.
And some of the well known "super models" ...some... are not women I, for one, consider particularly superior in beauty, though I do consider Melania Trump very top notch. Women are different, and what us guys prefer is also different, of course.
But I don't think it's honest to suggest that a shapely hot woman suddenly becomes ugly when she takes her clothes off. That is simply not how natural human biology works. There are cultural lines that are crossed at that point, but I think many guys that claim to be offended are simply in denial, clinging to religious dogma of whatever sort, and simply ashamed of how such a site makes them feel.
