Title: Feral Urban Woman Goes Berserk Because a Vet Brings a Service Animal Into a Restaurant Source:
[None] URL Source:[None] Published:Sep 22, 2017 Author:You Tube Post Date:2017-09-22 11:54:47 by no gnu taxes Keywords:None Views:4246 Comments:43
Im sorry but there is just no reason to bring an animal into a place you eat!
Its unhealthy.
HorseHillary!
How is it unhealthy? MOST Americans have pets in their house,and I'm going to go out on a limb and claim most Americans sometimes eat meals in their houses.
How is it unhealthy? MOST Americans have pets in their house,and I'm going to go out on a limb and claim most Americans sometimes eat meals in their houses.
Allergies to dogs, mostly to their saliva and the dead skin cells they shed. During some portions of the year, their fur does collect pollens so their presence can induce hay fever.
8% of the American population suffers from asthma at any given time. And that is a lot more than vets claiming they must have a furry animal to stroke to keep them calm.
There is probably a greater likelihood at any given time that a "service dog" will trigger someone else's asthma than that the service animal will actually be needed for any legitimate reason. Look at the size of that huge dog, he would probably trigger an asthma attack just walking past an asthma sufferer.
These dog people are very very selfish, as much so or more so than smokers even. At least you don't see smokers even trying to light up any more in a restaurant or bar. So smokers are better human beings than these despicable dog fetishists.
If you're going to serve them, these animals and their owners should be segregated in an area separate from the rest of the customers, preferably outside. Which is where animals belong.
Then that 8 percent need to stay home and quit irritating the other 92 percent.
I'd rather have the dogs stay home than the asthmatics and highly allergic.
I see no reason why that vet was in that restaurant with that huge dog. I think that vet had a phony service dog and didn't want to just leave him at home and couldn't leave him in the vehicle because someone would turn him in. So, bam, you've got some 120lb dog in a restaurant because "I love taking my doggie with me everywhere".
We haven't even mentioned people who are terrified by dogs, some of whom were attacked by dogs when they were children. I had a friend who many years ago kept a big very aggressive German shepherd named Bruiser, he loved that dog, he loved knowing how much it intimidated everyone. Until the day it tore half of his niece's face off for no good reason at a family gathering. She was not quite 5yo, had to have extensive facial reconstruction as a result. The dog was, of course, destroyed and he hasn't had the nerve to own a dog since (knowing what we all would think and say). Would you say that that little girl, now grown and with a scarred face, has a right not to be terrified in a restaurant by people bringing fake service dogs in the place?
I'm with the screaming bitch on this one: GTFO with the goddammed dogs! (Unless you're blind.)
We haven't even mentioned people who are terrified by dogs, some of whom were attacked by dogs when they were children.
Ok,so now everybody ELSE is responsible for some unknown individuals psychosis?
BTW,WHY was that guy your friend? You need to be more discrimminating.
As for your friend,someone needed to catch him away from the dog and beat him within an inch of his life. Preferably his brother or brother-in-law. The dog was only acting that way because he has been taught and encouraged to act that way. You obviously don't like dogs,but if you were to be honest with yourself you would know the dog wasn't to blame.
I do agree with you as far as "PTSD Dogs" goes,though. ESPECIALLY given the TRUTH that actual PTSD is pretty damn rare. The VA now awards it to everyone with a pulse that has been within 500 miles of a gunfight. They gave me a disability rating for PTSD,and I told them the absolute truth,which is that I haven't had a nightmare about my time in VN since I left there and only know maybe two people from my unit that did. Both of them were in rear echelon leadership decision role,and both of them had nightmares about some of the decisions they had to make for teams in the field that got overran. The truth is to any impartial outside observer they were totally blameless,but the sad,sad truth is people with honor are their own worse enemies when it comes to things like that.
The VA does this for a couple of reasons. One is they don't like being told they are not giving vets the proper treatment,and the other reason is it's job security for the shirks that work there.
As for me,I was already receiving pay for 100 percent service-connected disabilities,so it didn't cost them a dime because 100 percent of disability pay is all anybody gets. There is no more.
I'm with the screaming bitch on this one: GTFO with the goddammed dogs! (Unless you're blind.)
So,it's ok for someone that is blind to traumatize someone that is afraid of dogs. Gotcha.
How about this,bubba? If YOU are the one with the psychosis,how about YOU be the one that stays home? It is YOUR problem,not the worlds problem.
