
Hillary Clinton just cant face the fact that Donald Trumps in the White House and shes not.
Ten months after her stunning defeat in the 2016 presidential race, the Democratic nominee would not rule out challenging the results if investigators turn up solid proof of Russian meddling in the election.
But when asked how she could do that, Clinton was stumped.
I dont know if theres any legal constitutional way to do that. I think you can raise questions, she told National Public Radio.
Clinton said if she had been elected president and the US intelligence community told her of Russias involvement, I wouldve never stood for it.
Even though it mightve advantaged me, I wouldve said, Weve got to get to the bottom of this. I wouldve set up an independent commission with subpoena power and everything else, she said in the interview published online Monday.
But later she admitted that theres no real mechanism to dispute the election results.
Basically I dont believe there [is a way].
But people are making those arguments. I just dont think we have a mechanism, she said.
Clinton beat Trump in the popular vote by 3 million votes but lost in the Electoral College an institution she said should be eliminated.
Now, I do believe we should abolish the Electoral College, because I was sitting listening to a report on the French election and the French political analyst said, `You know in our country the person with the most votes wins, unlike in yours. And I think thats an anachronism. Ive said that since 2000, she told NPR.