The Left's War On Christians
See other The Left's War On Christians Articles
Title: Praying repetitive words using Rosary beads is forbidden
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.bible.ca/cath-overview-false-teaching.htm
Published: Sep 16, 2017
Author: .bible.ca
Post Date: 2017-09-16 01:09:18 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 13021
Comments: 67
FACT: Catholics pray repetitive words with Rosary Beads that were first invented in 1090 AD, by "Peter the Hermit" and made popular by St. Dominic in 1208 AD. Catholics believe that Mary appeared to St. Dominic in 1208 AD, at the church of Prouille and revealed the Rosary Beads to him. From this time, Catholics prayed 15 sets of 10 consecutive "hail Marys" in a row (150 times), in the Rosary. However, in 2003 AD, Pope John Paul added a new set of Mysteries, so now it is 20 sets of 10 "Hail Marys", (200 times in the Rosary, in total.) Catholics will vainly appeal to Psalm 136 that alternates the same phrase 26 times with 26 different blessings God gives us. It is not 26 in a row as with the rosary! This is also a song, not a prayer. Revelation 4:8 has "angels singing" not "men praying". Matthew 6:7 o YES NO o "And when you are praying, do not use meaningless repetition as the Gentiles do, for they suppose that they will be heard for their many words. Matthew 6:7 
Historical note: Roman Catholics borrowed the idea of praying with beads from the pagan religions who were already using them hundreds of years before: In 456 AD, Hindus are thought to have introduced the concept of praying with beads to the world. The earliest reference to a rosary (boberkhas) is in their "Jain Canon" (456 AD) These boberkhas had various numbers of beads 6,9,12,18,36 (any sub-multiple of 108) Islam (610 AD) uses a rosary of 99 beads, one for each of the names of God. Buddhists have 108 prayer beads on the string. The Rosary is of pagan origin and no Christian prior to 1000 AD used beads to pray. Question #1: Did Jesus forbid repetitive prayer using Rosary Beads? Answer:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 56.
#7. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Ok,so why do you care? You're not Catholic,and nobody is requiring you to do it.
I have this thing for the truth Peter. Besides I like Vic and do not want to see him going the wrong direction. He cares about people.
You DO understand there are different "truths" for different people,right? I agree that the Catholic Church and it's most devout followers HAVE to be watched because they are power mad,and would take over and dominate the world again if they have the chance,but I honestly think that ship sailed away from them a couple of hundred years ago. Yeah,they dominate in South and Central America,but that's about the only place they have even the slightest chances of controlling governments. Their focus these days seems to be to gather leftist foot soldiers and accumulate and protect their wealth. If people want to give them their money and become their slaves,that's their own choice. There is no longer any government demanding they give allegiance to the Catholic Church.
No there are not different truths. Two opposing things cannot both be true. That was a dumb statement.
You are trying to claim there is only ONE truth in the whole world,and you know it?
sorry to intervene Pete but actually there is and it is Jesus Christ but he is not believed, even by some of those who say they believe him.
I have no doubt that is true for you,but it is NOT true for everyone.
Pete you both cannot be right. So it is either true or it isn't. Same as 2 + 2 only has one true answer. Two opposing views can never both be true.
HorseHillary! Just because it's not raining on you doesn't mean it isn't raining on someone else. Nor does it mean that if you are colorblind that no one else can see colors. I have known men married to women so ugly they were actually scary-looking,yet they were beautiful and sexy to those guys. Saying there is only one reality for everyone is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard. This is ESPECIALLY true when claiming that religion is fact,when even the religions refer to themselves "faiths".
I'm sorry I can't help you if you think we don't all live with gravity in this world, and that two opposing views can both be true. Sounds like some kind of ebonics or liberal new math.
There are no replies to Comment # 56. End Trace Mode for Comment # 56.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#9. To: sneakypete (#7)
#14. To: A K A Stone (#9)
I have this thing for the truth Peter.
#16. To: sneakypete (#14)
#18. To: A K A Stone (#16)
No there are not different truths. Two opposing things cannot both be true. That was a dumb statement.
#45. To: sneakypete (#18)
You are trying to claim there is only ONE truth in the whole world,and you know it?
#52. To: paraclete (#45)
sorry to intervene Pete but actually there is and it is Jesus Christ
#53. To: sneakypete (#52)
#54. To: A K A Stone (#53)
Pete you both cannot be right. So it is either true or it isn't. Same as 2 + 2 only has one true answer. Two opposing views can never both be true.
#56. To: sneakypete (#54)
Saying there is only one reality for everyone is one of the most ridiculous things I have ever heard.
Replies to Comment # 56.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]