The Left's War On Christians
See other The Left's War On Christians Articles
Title: Praying repetitive words using Rosary beads is forbidden
Source:
[None]
URL Source: http://www.bible.ca/cath-overview-false-teaching.htm
Published: Sep 16, 2017
Author: .bible.ca
Post Date: 2017-09-16 01:09:18 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 9849
Comments: 67
FACT: Catholics pray repetitive words with Rosary Beads that were first invented in 1090 AD, by "Peter the Hermit" and made popular by St. Dominic in 1208 AD. Catholics believe that Mary appeared to St. Dominic in 1208 AD, at the church of Prouille and revealed the Rosary Beads to him. From this time, Catholics prayed 15 sets of 10 consecutive "hail Marys" in a row (150 times), in the Rosary. However, in 2003 AD, Pope John Paul added a new set of Mysteries, so now it is 20 sets of 10 "Hail Marys", (200 times in the Rosary, in total.) Catholics will vainly appeal to Psalm 136 that alternates the same phrase 26 times with 26 different blessings God gives us. It is not 26 in a row as with the rosary! This is also a song, not a prayer. Revelation 4:8 has "angels singing" not "men praying". Matthew 6:7 o YES NO o "And when you are praying, do not use meaningless repetition as the Gentiles do, for they suppose that they will be heard for their many words. Matthew 6:7 
Historical note: Roman Catholics borrowed the idea of praying with beads from the pagan religions who were already using them hundreds of years before: In 456 AD, Hindus are thought to have introduced the concept of praying with beads to the world. The earliest reference to a rosary (boberkhas) is in their "Jain Canon" (456 AD) These boberkhas had various numbers of beads 6,9,12,18,36 (any sub-multiple of 108) Islam (610 AD) uses a rosary of 99 beads, one for each of the names of God. Buddhists have 108 prayer beads on the string. The Rosary is of pagan origin and no Christian prior to 1000 AD used beads to pray. Question #1: Did Jesus forbid repetitive prayer using Rosary Beads? Answer:
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 31.
#7. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Ok,so why do you care? You're not Catholic,and nobody is requiring you to do it.
I have this thing for the truth Peter. Besides I like Vic and do not want to see him going the wrong direction. He cares about people.
You DO understand there are different "truths" for different people,right? I agree that the Catholic Church and it's most devout followers HAVE to be watched because they are power mad,and would take over and dominate the world again if they have the chance,but I honestly think that ship sailed away from them a couple of hundred years ago. Yeah,they dominate in South and Central America,but that's about the only place they have even the slightest chances of controlling governments. Their focus these days seems to be to gather leftist foot soldiers and accumulate and protect their wealth. If people want to give them their money and become their slaves,that's their own choice. There is no longer any government demanding they give allegiance to the Catholic Church.
Yes....However, do the brainwashed who've subsisted on nothing but propaganda, conditioning, and proven manufactured lies truly do so based on "free will" if what has been perceived as "free will" has been an illusion? Btw, here ARE still some South American provinces and villages who indeed "strongly suggest" contributions to the RCC, otherwise certain services and protection may not be available.
I often wonder the same about some prots.
Based on exactly what "propaganda, conditioning, and proven manufactured lies"? Can you kindly expound in detail your wonderment? And which sects of Protestantism? Thanks...
Cherry picking and spinning select verses of the Holy Bible while ignoring the parts that don't fit in with the lying propaganda of The Scofield Reference Bible, for instance... libertysflame.com/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=52773 The Scofield Reference Bible = junk scripture
The Scofield is not a translation, it is a set of study footnotes that promote dispensational millenarian views. The Scofield always included the full text of the King James Version (no apocrypha). Over the last few decades, Oxford published the Scofield notes attached to a half-dozen other bible translations (but the New Jerusalem bible probably is not on the list). The Scofield bible+footnotes were the first combo published as a bible since the Geneva bible back in the sixteenth century. Scofield attaching them to the KJV is rather ironic, considering that King James had one requirement of the Authorized Version: no footnotes. That was because of the Geneva's footnotes with its seditious talk about monarchs who became despots and thereby lost their divine right to rule the peasants; it was causing a lot of trouble among the colonists in America, especially those Presbyterian hotheads. For this reason, many European history scholars claim that Calvin was the father of America, because his seditious version of the Geneva bible justified deposing your lawful monarch as a corrupt tyrant. And we saw exactly this kind of language contained in our Declaration of Independence (which Jefferson largely cribbed from a congregational letter circulated among Presbyterians of the era).
Interesting observation. ...Many European history scholars claim that Calvin was the father of America, because his seditious version of the Geneva bible justified deposing your lawful monarch as a corrupt tyrant. Fascinating theory. Those "european scholars" wouldn't have happened to have originated from Vatican satellite Kingdoms? I don't recall Calvin's name popping up too often as an inspiration for the Founders and rallying cry (FOR CALVIN!!") to dump tea into Boston Harbor.
No, just your regular secular Euro historian types. This is the majority view over there. Those Presbyterians were the leading force in overthrowing the Church of England types and King George III. And that Geneva bible was in their hands for generations in Europe and here in the colonies after they were persecuted until they left England and came here. It's a telling quote that a waggish remark about the rising of the American colonies was that "Cousin America has eloped with a Presbyterian parson." They tittered about it. Until they lost the colonies for no good reason. They were spot on to blame the Presbyterian hotheads and that darned Geneva bible with its cursed footnotes.
#33. To: Tooconservative (#31)
Over there...THESE DAYS? Or back when? Those Presbyterians were the leading force in overthrowing the Church of England types and King George III. How the mighty and sane have fallen. It's a telling quote that a waggish remark about the rising of the American colonies was that "Cousin America has eloped with a Presbyterian parson." They tittered about it. Until they lost the colonies for no good reason. They were spot on to blame the Presbyterian hotheads and that darned Geneva bible with its cursed footnotes. The Geneva Bible (with its footnotes) -- a primary weapon of American rebellion? Ya learn something every day. Wasn't George Washington Episcopalian? Shame. The Founders and rebels never imagined their language was so careful about "religion" because of the several sect of Christianity and would eventually be used to eventually demonize them and well as Christianity and all Christians themselves. Too bad they didn't see fit to include the Name, Jesus Christ. This would have been a faaaar different America and Republic and prevented the Occultist/Pagan human-secularist cult from cratering the republic. Meh. The End Days and Time is nearly run out for them anyway.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#9. To: sneakypete (#7)
#14. To: A K A Stone (#9)
I have this thing for the truth Peter.
#20. To: sneakypete (#14)
If people want to give them their money and become their slaves,that's their own choice. There is no longer any government demanding they give allegiance to the Catholic Church.
#21. To: Liberator (#20)
(Edited)
do the brainwashed who've subsisted on nothing but propaganda, conditioning, and proven manufactured lies truly do so based on "free will" if what has been perceived as "free will" has been an illusion?
#22. To: hondo68 (#21)
(Edited)
I often wonder the same about some prots.
#23. To: Liberator, John Nelson Darby, The Scofield Reference Bible (#22)
(Edited)
#27. To: hondo68, Liberator (#23)
The Scofield Reference Bible = junk scripture
#30. To: Tooconservative (#27)
...We saw exactly this kind of language contained in our Declaration of Independence (which Jefferson largely cribbed from a congregational letter circulated among Presbyterians of the era.)
#31. To: Liberator (#30)
Fascinating theory. Those "european scholars" wouldn't have happened to have originated from Vatican satellite Kingdoms?
Replies to Comment # 31. Just your regular secular Euro historian types. This is the majority view over there.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 31.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]