[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: NKorea missile fear sets pre-emptive strike debate in Japan
Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/A/AS_JAPAN_NKOREA_PREEM
URL Source: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/storie ... AULT&CTIME=2017-09-01-23-30-16
Published: Sep 1, 2017
Author: NA
Post Date: 2017-09-03 07:30:05 by XDMAR
Keywords: None
Views: 3889
Comments: 23

TOKYO (AP) -- Japan is debating whether to develop a limited pre-emptive strike capability and buy cruise missiles - ideas that were anathema in the pacifist country before the North Korea missile threat.

With revisions to Japan's defense plans underway, ruling party hawks are accelerating the moves, and some defense experts say Japan should at least consider them.

Japan has a two-step missile defense system, including interceptors on destroyers in the Sea of Japan that would shoot down projectiles mid-flight and if that fails, surface-to-air PAC-3s on land.

In a pre-emptive strike, by Japanese definition, cruise missiles, such as Tomahawk, fired from destroyers or fighter jets would get the enemy missile clearly waiting to be fired, or just after blastoff from a North Korean launch site, before it approaches Japan.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

#1. To: XDMAR (#0)

Japan is debating whether to develop a limited pre-emptive strike capability and buy cruise missiles ...

A violation of US treaty.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-03   11:08:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: buckeroo (#1)

A violation of US treaty.

What treaty is that?

Japan had a prohibition of their own not to have nukes, out of acknowledgment of the terrible nature of them after WWII, but that was not part of any treaty I know of.

Japan most certainly has it's own military forces, and cruise missiles are a normal part of any military arsenal these days.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-09-03   13:38:20 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Pinguinite (#17)

It is all defensive. There are no offensive weapons in their arsenal. The USA defends Japan; that is why the USA has military might in Japan.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-03   13:55:09 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: buckeroo (#18)

It is all defensive. There are no offensive weapons in their arsenal.

However true that may be, a cruise missile in this case could be considered defensive.

And there's a reason the US has a "Defense Department" and yet to counterpart called "Offense Department".

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-09-03   13:59:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Pinguinite (#19)

And there's a reason the US has a "Defense Department" and yet to counterpart called "Offense Department".

BFD, the USA Department of Defense used to be called, the Department of War. Names are changed to ensure pablum feeds the masses.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-09-03   14:14:21 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 21.

#22. To: buckeroo (#21)

Point is, what qualifies as "defense" and "offense" is not clear.

I've never heard of any treaty binding Japan from having "offensive" weapons, and would be curious what Japan would receive in exchange for agreeing to it. I suspect that no such treaty exists.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-09-03 14:19:15 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com