The war on truth has reached a fever pitch as Google has made it their mission to annihilate the independent media. The New Media lead by the likes of Infowars, Breitbart, Natural News and many other great independent sites will have an uphill battle when it comes to getting their content in front of readers. Google has announced they will be doubling down on their Orwellian practice of making stories disappear from their monopolistic search engine. Outlined in their Gestapo like 160-page handbook, Google describes exactly how they plan to suppress any information they deem unfit for readers. Highlighted at the bottom of page 108 Google states:
● Pages that directly contradict well established scientific or medical consensus for queries seeking scientific or medical information, unless the query indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.
● Pages that directly contradict well-established historical facts (e.g., unsubstantiated conspiracy theories), unless the query clearly indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.
These two guidelines provided by Google should set off alarm bells to anyone who has a thirst for knowledge or anyone that has the audacity to examine both sides of a topic. Imagine only being able to see and hear the corporate narrative on such important issues like vaccines, 9/11, holistic health, the Kennedy assassination, climate change, banking alternatives, and many other important matters. And that is only scratching the surface.
This information from Googles handbook was first uncovered by Melissa Dykes at Truth Stream Media who made a great video that eloquently breaks down the importance of this complex issue. I highly recommend everyone watch it and more importantly support their work.
As bad as this news sounds there is a bright side. We have solutions people; we just have to break the habit of being slaves to the Google regime. First, we can stop using Google altogether and start using some great alternatives out there like Good Gopher, DuckDuckGo, Yandex, Searx.me and Qwant.com The second and most important thing we can do is go old school and start bookmarking sites again (something I have been doing for years). This will cut out the middle man (Google) and enable you to see all the great information from thousands of independent journalists that Google is trying to suppress.
Below you will find a comprehensive list of great sites broken down by category that do an excellent job in their respective field. I urge everyone to bookmark this page and make it their go to when searching for news on politics, health and prepping.
By no means is this list complete, there are thousands of great independent sites out there that I have inadvertently missed. If your favorite site is missing send me an email at govtslaves@protonmail.com and I will happily add it to the list if its worthy.
Interesting list. I may go visit some of the sites, just to piss them off.
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God.
Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt
I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
Ultimately, what is needed is an alternate DNS service or at least a website that can resolve current IP addresses to domains.
Silicon Valley is declaring war on the domain names of sites they don't like. They're doing this to the St*rmfr*nt bunch and to others.
With no domain name, the only way to make it to their site is via domain name.
Ultimately, someone needs to start a peer-hosted domain service (like a torrent service) that integrates with the various OSes so that ordinary users can host a domain service to keep all the blacklisted sites available to the public. Then Silicon Valley Lefties couldn't knock out major websites willy-nilly as they can now.
Google describes exactly how they plan to suppress any information they deem unfit for readers.
Highlighted at the bottom of page 108 Google states:
● Pages that directly contradict well established scientific or medical consensus [AKA LIES AND DISINFO]for queries seeking scientific or medical information, unless the query indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.
● Pages that directly contradict well-established historical facts (e.g., unsubstantiated conspiracy theories [and FAKE "history"]), unless the query clearly indicates the user is seeking an alternative viewpoint.
HA!!
Unbelievable. Censorship and Suppression-of-Truth.
WHO SUPPORTS THIS ANTI-LIBERTY POLICY?: Organs of the Dem-Left, New World Order "Elites", and yes, GOPe. And their bleating authoritarian toobags.
That photo of Trump with Christ-like thorns is really sacrilege. Though you disagree with many of us, you should confer a measure of respect to your fellow posters.
I get it -- it's a nasty, lonely, hopeless world at times. But the glass need not be as empty as you appear to want to make it. NOR as hopeless.
I know this will come off as another lecture (no, I can't help it) -- only you know what's messed up your 'tude and when it occurred in the past. I sincerely hope you reject the damage, reject the snowballing of cynicism for this world and start all over. Instead of feeding your spirit negative, toxic rot, feed it and your heart with the truth instead of further tearing it apart and willfully condemning yourself.
Brotherly advice: Sit in at a local bible-based Evangelical church and see how it affects you. If you feel nothing, no harm, no foul; If you do feel *something* maybe it's something to build on.
I just can't take any list that has "Freak Republic" on their "Do Not Watch List" seriously.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
I get it -- it's a nasty, lonely, hopeless world at times. But the glass need not be as empty as you appear to want to make it. NOR as hopeless.
Killjoy!
You are just determined to ruin ALL his fun,ain't ya?
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
Very interesting,but it seems obvious to me the article has been slanted to make Jews look worse,and to make Patton seem like a Nazi sympathizer.
For example,while it is true that I have personally known very few Jews as close friends and been in their houses and mixed with their families,I flat refuse to believe that the Jews of 1940's Europe were people who lived like "filthy animals" as the article implies,or that Patton thought they were filthy animals. Don't forget how backwards Eastern Europe was at the time due to the virtual slavery of both the Czars and later the Commissars.Chances are most of the "backwards" residents of the concentration camps that were overran were Slavs.
Not that Slavs are filthy people,either. They are not filthy by nature,but the plain fact is most of them were still virtually living in the 19th Century in the rural east,and you can't expect people to use toilets who have never seen a toilet before. Or even running water.
I am sure Patton took the required review of the camps right after they were liberated because he was required to visit them,and never went back again. I suspect if he had gone back 30 days later he would have seen big changes as the prisoners were exposed to and learned from the 20th Century.
I think Patton's biggest problems with Jews were related to his experiences with hard left US Jews,and their efforts to bring Communism to America. I share this viewpoint,but it is a bias against COMMUNISTS who just happen to be Jewish and in leadership roles for the most part are people who would personally benefit and profit from the creation of an American police state of the left.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.