[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Freepers Still Love war Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump "The Democrat Meltdown Continues" "Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process" "Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working" "Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts" "Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands "Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies" "Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk" KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel "Trade should work for America, not rule it" "The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP" "How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap" ‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’ Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible" "Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!" "If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think" "Ending EPA Overreach" Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED! Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing! Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy? Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia) "Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department" Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent "Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail" Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly "Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them" ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson! "The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent" 7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza? What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225 EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start? "Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work" test "Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working" "Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly" "Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home" "The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity" "How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy" Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes Status: Not Logged In; Sign In United States News See other United States News Articles Title: the worst flood in recorded history Source: ABC News URL Source: [None] Published: Aug 28, 2017 Author: Barry Midyet Post Date: 2017-08-28 00:31:07 by interpreter Keywords: None Views: 20876 Comments: 128 The news today is that the worst flood in recorded history is occurring right now, and right here (in my neck of the woods, the Houston/ Galveston area). Moreover, as with all of the other major events of the last 25 years, I predicted it. (See my book, The Revelation: A Historicist View and turn to the section on the seven last plagues, Plague# 4). I very plainly said that hurricanes and major weather events including floods would wax much worse in 2017. Katrina was just a dress rehearsal, folks. But Thank God I was fully prepared because like I advised everyone on earth to do, I am completely stocked up on distilled water and can goods, and mosquito spray, and (provided the police give me my gun back) on bullets also. And with all this water to breed in, I'm pretty sure the Aedes from Hades will be here next. And I am making that prediction once again, right here, right now. So get ready folks for much worse before the 7 last plagues are mitigated. Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread   Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest #1. To: interpreter (#0) Moreover, as with all of the other major events of the last 25 years, I predicted it. You really ARE ... out of your fuckin' mind. buckeroo  posted on  2017-08-28   0:36:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #2. To: interpreter (#0) (Edited) Boy, you must be a hoot at parties. Do you prefer chicken bones or tea leaves? Hank Rearden  posted on  2017-08-28   1:16:07 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #3. To: Hank Rearden (#2) Do you prefer chicken bones or tea leaves? He probably casts norse runes paraclete  posted on  2017-08-28   2:42:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #4. To: interpreter (#0) Moreover, as with all of the other major events of the last 25 years, I predicted it. (See my book, The Revelation: A Historicist View and turn to the section on the seven last plagues, Plague# 4). I very plainly said that hurricanes and major weather events including floods would wax much worse in 2017. Katrina was just a dress rehearsal, folks. Did you predict this? As I recall, you predicted something significant happening during the total eclipse. Maybe the flooding was that prediction, only you were a bit ahead of God's timetable. Again. And of course, failed to state where it would happen, along with what exact "it" was going to be. Petty details, I know, but still..... It's pretty safe to say that there is some kind of climate record set somewhere in the USA every year, whether it's temperature, rainfall, snowfall or any one of a hundred other metrics. If you want bragging rights about making predictions, you'll have to start naming places, events AND times. For example: I predict your house (a place) will be illuminated by the sun (an event) tomorrow. It will happen sometime around dawn (time). Can you top that one? Pinguinite  posted on  2017-08-28   3:04:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #5. To: Pinguinite (#4) (Edited) Actually, as you yourself admit, Harvey did in fact form during the eclipse, or perhaps a day afterward. But there is no law against being a day or so ahead of God's timetable. Because in no Bible prophecy anywhere in the Bible does any prophet state the exact date and/or exactly how a prophesied event would take place, and neither did Jean Dixon or Hal Lindsay or Nastrodamus or anyone else you care to name, so why in the hell do you say the utterly ridiculous things you say? But I come very very close to the exact day unlike anyone else in history. And if you want to read exactly what I said, then buy my book and turn to page 71. And there is no way in hell your prediction is going to come true. I dont have a house because I choose to be homeless like Jesus was. That takes the cake (the raspberry one). interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   3:42:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #6. To: buckeroo (#1) You really ARE ... out of your fuckin' mind. No, it is you who are completely out of your mind because everyone of my predictions are very well documented. interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   4:09:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #7. To: interpreter (#0) False teachers and liars say stuff like that. People who are christian know the truth. 17 Now the flood was on the earth forty days. The waters increased and lifted up the ark, and it rose high above the earth. 18 The waters prevailed and greatly increased on the earth, and the ark moved about on the surface of the waters. 19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth, and all the high hills under the whole heaven were covered. 20 The waters prevailed fifteen cubits upward, and the mountains were covered. You are a liar and a dumb ass. A K A Stone  posted on  2017-08-28   8:19:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #8. To: interpreter, Pinguinite (#0) You had plenty of other comments to make here over the last few weeks, about the eclipse, about other stuff. Yet you made no prediction of any major rainfall/hurricane in your own backyard. Now you want to claim that you predicted it generically 25 years ago in your crappy book. In the Bible, prophecies were very specific. And a real prophet in the Old Testament predicted accurately the wrath of God falling on Israel for being disobedient. I don't see how you can claim to be anything more than a guesser who tries to claim credit after the fact. Tooconservative  posted on  2017-08-28   8:33:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #9. To: Tooconservative (#8) The poser claims to be a christian. But doesn't know about the flood in the Bible. I don't know why we bother responding to an obvious head case. A K A Stone  posted on  2017-08-28   8:43:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #10. To: A K A Stone (#9) I prophesy that at some point he will make you so mad, you will make his account go poof. Or not. See, I'm a prophet too. I predicted with 100% accuracy that you will or will not zot him. Next in my plan for immense wealth: write a book about my magical superpowers. Tooconservative  posted on  2017-08-28   8:54:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #11. To: interpreter (#0) The news today is that the worst flood in recorded history is occurring right now I seem to recall one that was even worse -- involving Noah and an ark? misterwhite  posted on  2017-08-28   9:31:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #12. To: interpreter (#6) No, it is you who are completely out of your mind because everyone of my predictions are very well documented. Throughout history, it's delusional weirdos who create deathcults like that Allah shit. Hank Rearden  posted on  2017-08-28   9:59:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #13. To: interpreter (#5) Actually, as you yourself admit, Harvey did in fact form during the eclipse, or perhaps a day afterward. But there is no law against being a day or so ahead of God's timetable. Oh, so you are indeed claiming credit for predicting the hurricane as part of the eclipse! I looked it up and Harvey was already a named storm before you posted your prediction. But I guess you like to give yourself as much leeway as required to make yourself right. Certainly you need to. And there is no way in hell your prediction is going to come true. I dont have a house because I choose to be homeless like Jesus was. That takes the cake (the raspberry one). Oh, well, when I said "house" I certainly didn't necessarily mean you were a home owner. One's "house" could be an apartment, or if you are indeed homeless, it would/could mean the bridge overpass or cardboard box you would be sleeping under. Anything you sleep under could be considered one's "house", even if it's a tree, so my prediction stands true. See how that works? I can do what you do too. Here's the deal. You made a decision to come on to a public forum and make extremely open ended predictions, like how someone might be born during an eclipse, which on any day in a country the size of the USA happens about 11,000 times, with or without any eclipse. That's a voluntary step on your part that makes you open to criticism. And that's simply what you're getting. We all have our quirks, and yours is a need for attention. Pinguinite  posted on  2017-08-28   10:42:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #14. To: A K A Stone (#7) False teachers and liars say stuff like that. People who are christian know the truth. 17 Now the flood was on the earth forty days. The waters increased and lifted up the ark, and it rose high above the earth. 18 The waters prevailed and greatly increased on the earth, and the ark moved about on the surface of the waters. 19 And the waters prevailed exceedingly on the earth, and all the high hills under the whole heaven were covered. 20 The waters prevailed fifteen cubits upward, and the mountains were covered. You are a liar and a dumb ass. As I told my son-in-law and many others who have pointed out the same thing, you are partly right. But the key words in my post is/are "recorded history". The general consensus of most all historians and world history books is that recorded history began in or about 2600 BC. While I don't doubt the validity of the Great Flood recorded in Genesis, it occurred a little bit before that and Genesis itself was not written until hundreds of years after the Great Flood, so most historians do not consider it part of recorded history. It is what is considered to be "proto" and/or "oral" history, meaning it was passed down for generations before it was recorded. And in the process, as always happens, it has been "romanticized". For example, archeologists know that while there was indeed a great flood in UR (where Abraham and the Jews came from) and it occurred about when the Bible says it did, it did not cover "the entire earth". Saying so is like saying the earth is flat. I only state provable historical and scientific facts, guys. Technically, I probably should have said the flooding in Texas is of Biblical proportions and is the worst flood since the Great Flood. But it is too late to change it now, so I'm sticking with what I said. Barry Midyet interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   10:54:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #15. To: Tooconservative (#8) (Edited) You had plenty of other comments to make here over the last few weeks, about the eclipse, about other stuff. Yet you made no prediction of any major rainfall/hurricane in your own backyard. Now you want to claim that you predicted it generically 25 years ago in your crappy book. In the Bible, prophecies were very specific. And a real prophet in the Old Testament predicted accurately the wrath of God falling on Israel for being disobedient. I don't see how you can claim to be anything more than a guesser who tries to claim credit after the fact. Actually, in my previous prediction/thread on LF, I said an earthshaking event would occur during the eclipse over America a few days ago. What that major event was, as I now know, is a tropical depression formed in the Gulf of Mexicoo. Seemingly harmless at first, it soon grew into a hurricane and flood of Biblical proportions. And I did not write my book 25 years ago. It was copyrighted on December 31, 2016. But it's main purpose is indeed to fully explain why I made all my predictions of the last 25 years, and why they all came true. And of course to make my predictions for 2017, and also to predict what is coming beyond 2017 and exactly when it will occur. And no one who has actually read my book has ever made fun of it because it is very serious stuff that no one in their right mind can deny. And if you were to actually read it, you too would change your tune. In fact, I'll give you and anyone on LF a money-back guarantee. I'll even let you have it for free if you cover the shipping, and you can pay me later (or else return it if you dont absolutely love it). Just email me at barrymidyet@gmail.com Barry M interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   11:45:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #16. To: Hank Rearden (#12) Throughout history, it's delusional weirdos who create deathcults like that Allah shit. I couldn't agree you more Hank. The "allah" that Muslims worship is actually Satan, and not God. And Islam is definitely 100% a deathcult, and most all Muslims (and especially ISIS) are definitely delusional. Well said. interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   12:06:57 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #17. To: Pinguinite (#13) Oh, so you are indeed claiming credit for predicting the hurricane as part of the eclipse! I looked it up and Harvey was already a named storm before you posted your prediction. But I guess you like to give yourself as much leeway as required to make yourself right. Certainly you need to. Oh, well, when I said "house" I certainly didn't necessarily mean you were a home owner. One's "house" could be an apartment, or if you are indeed homeless, it would/could mean the bridge overpass or cardboard box you would be sleeping under. Anything you sleep under could be considered one's "house", even if it's a tree, so my prediction stands true. See how that works? I can do what you do too. Thanks for confirming that Harvey did indeed form during the eclipse. But I personally (and probably most of the world) did not find out about it till the next day because the news media was focused on the eclipse mostly and also the threat of nuclear war, and (as far as the channels I was watching) never once mentioned the itsy-bitsy teenie weeny tropical depression that formed in the Gulf that day. "Oh, well, when I said "house" I certainly didn't necessarily mean you were a home owner. One's "house" could be an apartment, or if you are indeed homeless, it would/could mean the bridge overpass or cardboard box you would be sleeping under. Anything you sleep under could be considered one's "house", even if it's a tree, so my prediction stands true. See how that works? I can do what you do too." Well, I live on a boat, and at the present moment in time, I have no earthly idea if its still there or not, so I may very well have to sleep under a bridge at some point, but right now there are numerous homeless shelters being set up by the state and FEMA, et al, for all the homeless people displaced by Harvey so I am not worried about it at all. No matter what happens to my boat, I thank God that I and all my relatives and neighbors and friends are still alive and kicking. And as for a baby being born during the eclipse, what I actually said was a baby born in 2017 (possibly during the eclipse) will live to be 1000 years old. That narrows down your "11,000 babies" remark considerably dont you think? interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   12:51:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #18. To: interpreter (#17) Thanks for confirming that Harvey did indeed form during the eclipse. I confirmed no such thing. I instead confirmed that Harvey was already named, and it was named PRIOR to the eclipse. What defines a "forming" in the case of this storm is actually very ambiguous. Harvey is a low pressure system, so it's actual origins go back to when that low pressure system first formed, which may have been a month ago or more. The difference between a simple low pressure system and a hurricane is simply a matter of arbitrary categorizing by man. Well, I live on a boat, and at the present moment in time, I have no earthly idea if its still there or not, so I may very well have to sleep under a bridge at some point, but right now there are numerous homeless shelters being set up by the state and FEMA, et al, for all the homeless people displaced by Harvey so I am not worried about it at all. No matter what happens to my boat, I thank God that I and all my relatives and neighbors and friends are still alive and kicking. Do know that in spite of my criticisms, I don't wish you or your family or neighbors any harm. I hope you recover well. And as for a baby being born during the eclipse, what I actually said was a baby born in 2017 (possibly during the eclipse) will live to be 1000 years old. That narrows down your "11,000 babies" remark considerably dont you think? No, it actually does quite the reverse. That "possibly" clause renders the eclipse event moot, so we now have to multiply 11,000 by 365 which gives us about 4 million babies to watch grow up, and only if and when all of them die, which would not happen even if there was a full scale nuclear war, would we know if that prediction comes true. Which means it's a certainty that you need not be concerned about being proven wrong while you still draw breath. AND.... there have been predictions, not based on religious beliefs, but instead based on medical science advancements that some people already born or who will be in the very near future will live 1000 years. I've no idea if that's the basis of your claim or not. Pinguinite  posted on  2017-08-28   15:17:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #19. To: interpreter, Pinguinite (#17) [Pinguinite #13] Oh, so you are indeed claiming credit for predicting the hurricane as part of the eclipse! I looked it up and Harvey was already a named storm before you posted your prediction. [interpreter #17 to Pinguinite #13] Thanks for confirming that Harvey did indeed form during the eclipse. The eclipse occurred on August 21st. Harvey reached tropical storm status on August 17. It degenerated to a tropical wave on August 19th. It redeveloped by August 23rd, regained tropical storm status on August 24th, and became a hurricane on August 24th. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Harvey The eighth named storm, third hurricane, and the first major hurricane of the 2017 Atlantic hurricane season, Harvey developed from a tropical wave to the east of the Lesser Antilles, reaching tropical storm status on August 17. The storm crossed through the Windward Islands on the following day, passing just south of Barbados and later near Saint Vincent. Upon entering the Caribbean Sea, Harvey began to weaken due to moderate wind shear and degenerated into a tropical wave north of Colombia early on August 19. The remnants were monitored for regeneration as it continued west-northwestward across the Caribbean and the Yucatán Peninsula, before redeveloping over the Bay of Campeche on August 23. Harvey then began to rapidly intensify on August 24, regaining tropical storm status and becoming a hurricane later that day. While the storm moved generally northwestwards, Harvey's intensification phase stalled slightly overnight from August 24–25, however Harvey soon resumed strengthening and became a category 4 hurricane late on August 25. Hours later, Harvey made landfall near Rockport, Texas, at peak intensity. nolu chan  posted on  2017-08-28   15:56:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #20. To: Pinguinite (#18) "And as for a baby being born during the eclipse, what I actually said was a baby born in 2017 (possibly during the eclipse) will live to be 1000 years old. That narrows down your "11,000 babies" remark considerably dont you think?" "No, it actually does quite the reverse. That "possibly" clause renders the eclipse event moot, so we now have to multiply 11,000 by 365 which gives us about 4 million babies to watch grow up, and only if and when all of them die, which would not happen even if there was a full scale nuclear war, would we know if that prediction comes true. Which means it's a certainty that you need not be concerned about being proven wrong while you still draw breath. AND.... there have been predictions, not based on religious beliefs, but instead based on medical science advancements that some people already born or who will be in the very near future will live 1000 years. I've no idea if that's the basis of your claim or not." You are constantly contradicting yourself. I am merely combining what Jesus said with what scientists are saying. They are predicting that a baby (one baby) will be born this year who will live to be 1000 years old, and not 4 million. You say the darnest things. And if hurricane Harvey formed before the eclipse, then how come no one knew about it? That's just as crazy as saying that I said (or scientists or whoever) that 4 million babies born this year will live to be 1000. You need to get off whatever you are smoking. interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   16:33:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #21. To: nolu chan (#19) Thank you for that info. So if I understand your post correctly, Harvey existed, but was still a tropical wave on August 21st? That's probably why I never heard of it until after the eclipse. I rest my case. But I think its even more impressive that I predicted it before I even heard of it. Barry M interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   17:05:18 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #22. To: interpreter, Pinguinite (#20) [interpreter] And if hurricane Harvey formed before the eclipse, then how come no one knew about it? My very bestest swag is that they failed to read the weather advisories issued by the National Hurricane Center. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/al09/al092017.public_a.001.shtml NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER WEATHER ADVISORY TROPICAL STORM HARVEY ZCZC MIATCPAT4 ALL TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM CCB BULLETIN Potential Tropical Cyclone Nine Intermediate Advisory Number 1A...Corrected NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL AL092017 200 PM AST Thu Aug 17 2017 CORRECTED DUE TO PARTIAL RE-TRANSMISSION OF OLD ADVISORY... ...HURRICANE HUNTER AIRCRAFT ENROUTE TO INVESTIGATE THE DISTURBANCE... SUMMARY OF 200 PM AST...1800 UTC...INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------- LOCATION...13.1N 55.1W ABOUT 295 MI...475 KM E OF BARBADOS ABOUT 410 MI...660 KM E OF ST. LUCIA MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...35 MPH...55 KM/H PRESENT MOVEMENT...W OR 270 DEGREES AT 17 MPH...28 KM/H MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...1007 MB...29.74 INCHES WATCHES AND WARNINGS -------------------- CHANGES WITH THIS ADVISORY: None. SUMMARY OF WATCHES AND WARNINGS IN EFFECT: A Tropical Storm Warning is in effect for... * Martinique * St. Lucia * Barbados * St. Vincent and the Grenadines A Tropical Storm Watch is in effect for... * Dominica A Tropical Storm Warning means that tropical storm conditions are expected somewhere within the warning area, in this case within 24-36 hours. A Tropical Storm Watch means that tropical storm conditions are possible within the watch area, in this case within 24-36 hours. For storm information specific to your area, please monitor products issued by your national meteorological service. DISCUSSION AND 48-HOUR OUTLOOK ------------------------------ At 200 PM AST (1800 UTC), the disturbance was centered near latitude 13.1 North, longitude 55.1 West. The system is moving toward the west near 17 mph (28 km/h) and this motion is expected to continue for the next couple of days. On the forecast track, the disturbance should move through the Windward Islands and into the eastern Caribbean Sea on Friday. Maximum sustained winds are near 35 mph (55 km/h) with higher gusts. The disturbance is expected to become a tropical cyclone later today or tonight, and it could become a tropical storm before reaching the Windward islands. Satellite imagery indicates the disturbance is close to becoming a tropical cyclone. An Air Force Reserve Hurricane Hunter Aircraft is currently en route to investigate the system. * Formation chance through 48 hours... high...near 100 percent * Formation chance through 5 days...high...near 100 percent The estimated minimum central pressure is 1007 mb (29.74 inches). HAZARDS AFFECTING LAND ---------------------- WIND: Tropical storm conditions are expected to first reach the Lesser Antilles within the warning area by early Friday, making outside preparations difficult or dangerous. Tropical storm conditions are possible in the watch area on Friday. RAINFALL: The disturbance is expected to produce rainfall totals of 2 to 4 inches across portions of the Windward Islands from Martinique southward to Grenada. These rains could cause life-threatening flash floods and mudslides. NEXT ADVISORY ------------- Next complete advisory at 500 PM AST. $$ Forecaster Beven NNNN - - - - - - - - - - 17 Aug 2017 TROPICAL STORM HARVEY http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/al09/al092017.public_a.002.shtml 18 August 2017 http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/al09/al092017.public_a.003.shtml http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/al09/al092017.public_a.004.shtml http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/al09/al092017.public_a.005.shtml - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TROPICAL STORM HARVEY 23 Aug 2017 http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/al09/al092017.public_a.012.shtml http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/al09/al092017.public_a.013.shtml 24 August 2017 http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/al09/al092017.public_a.014.shtml http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/al09/al092017.public_a.015.shtml - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HURRICANE HARVEY 24 August 2017 http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/archive/2017/al09/al092017.public_a.018.shtml? ZCZC MIATCPAT4 ALL TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM BULLETIN Hurricane Harvey Intermediate Advisory Number 18A NWS National Hurricane Center Miami FL AL092017 700 PM CDT Thu Aug 24 2017 ...HARVEY MOVING NORTHWESTWARD TOWARD THE TEXAS COAST... ...LIFE-THREATENING AND DEVASTATING FLOODING EXPECTED NEAR THE COAST DUE TO HEAVY RAINFALL AND STORM SURGE... [snip] nolu chan  posted on  2017-08-28   17:29:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #23. To: interpreter (#21) So if I understand your post correctly, Harvey existed, but was still a tropical wave on August 21st? That's probably why I never heard of it until after the eclipse. I rest my case. It was a Tropical Wave until the 24th, three days after the eclipse. Harvey was reported as a Tropical Storm on the 17th. It degenerated to a Tropical Wave on August 19th, two days BEFORE the eclipse. It redeveloped on August 23rd, two days AFTER the eclipse, intensified to a Tropical Storm on August 24th, three days AFTER the eclipse, and later on August 24th, intensified into Hurricane Harvey, three days AFTER the eclipse. From two days before the eclipse, until three days after the eclipse, Harvey failed to be intense enough to qualify as a Tropical Storm. nolu chan  posted on  2017-08-28   17:36:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #24. To: nolu chan (#22) My very bestest swag is that they failed to read the weather advisories issued by the National Hurricane Center. I dont think that is the case at all. I for one, because I live on the water, and on a boat no less, I listen to the marine weather reports broadcast from the National weather Service for the Texas Gulf Coast (transmitted from Hitchcock TX) virtually everyday on my marine radio, and I never heard one word about Harvey until a day or so AFTER the eclipse. And before that if there were any weather reports about Harvey, I cant pick up any weather reports from the Carribbean so it is a moot point. So I'm pretty sure that most everyone in my area were completely in the dark about any tropical storm in the area until after the eclipse. interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   18:31:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #25. To: interpreter (#20) You need to get off whatever you are smoking. For someone who claims to be so scholarly, you certainly seem to have a reading comprehension issue. I did not say your claim was that 4 million babies were going to live 1000 years. But since you did not qualify which one of these 4,000,000 was going to live 1000 years, then your prediction that one of them would live that long would mean we would need to watch all 4 million to see if any of them would live 1000 years to verify your prediction as true. If only one does, you win, so proving you wrong on that prediction would be quite a formidable task. In fact, it's ultimately impossible as tracking them all is impossible. So you're safe. And if hurricane Harvey formed before the eclipse, then how come no one knew about it? Seeing how the name "Harvey" was bestowed upon it, it's safe to say that someone, somewhere, did know about it. Though I suppose it's possible these storms could be naming themselves somehow! Pinguinite  posted on  2017-08-28   19:00:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #26. To: Pinguinite (#25) (Edited) Actually, if you had any reading comprehension at all, you would know that I predicted one baby born during the eclipse, and probably born in Tulsa, Oklahoma to parents who were there to pay their taxes, would/will live to be 1000 years old and I even specified that it would occur around high noon. How many babies do you think were born at high noon in Tulsa, Oklahoma? Probably one, maybe two. Yet yet you somehow turned that into 11,000 babies, and if that were not bad enough you somehow turned that into 11 million babies or whatever it was you said. I never said any of that --you did. And that's why I said you need to give up whatever you are smoking and try to pay attention. Else I am probably going to quit talking to you, because I am up to my neck in alligators right now and dont have time for any of your nonsense or anyone else's. And as for someone somewhere knowing about Harvey, I am sure that is a true statement. But it is/was someone in the Carribbean area, probably NOAA (who I think are the guys who get to name hurricanes), and not anyone in Texas that I know of, or at least no one on the weather channels/ TV stations that I regularly listen to, who never mentioned one word about Harvey until the day after the eclipse. I have said that about 5 times now, and I am getting very tired of having to continuously repeat myself for you guys (and especially you) over and over again. Barry M interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   20:20:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #27. To: interpreter (#26) Else I am probably going to quit talking to you, because I am up to my neck in alligators right now and dont have time for any of your nonsense or anyone else's. Then it's *probably* time we wrap this up. I've better things to do as well. Actually, if you had any reading comprehension at all, you would know that I predicted one baby born during the eclipse, and probably born in Tulsa, Oklahoma to parents who were there to pay their taxes, would/will live to be 1000 years old and I even specified that it would occur around high noon. Key word: Probably. Probably in Tulsa, and [probably] by inference, there to pay taxes. But if not in Tulsa, then were they elsewhere to pay taxes or elsewhere for any reason at all? That leaves a ton of leeway, and the way you've been claiming credit for things, "probably" is a big escape hatch. To me, predictions are only worth as much as they can be proven wrong by future events, and yours cannot. Enough said. You can have last word if you want. Pinguinite  posted on  2017-08-28   21:12:42 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #28. To: nolu chan (#23) (Edited) I do have to say that you do your homework/research before you post. But I still will have to dispute one of your points, and I suspect it is because you live in New York City or somewhere and I live right here in the epicenter of this event. And I heard on the TV a few minutes ago that it is the 3rd 1000-year storm in 3 years. Think about that for a minute. Storms that used to occur once every thousand years are now occurring at least once a year (as I predicted in my book). Anyhow, if my memory serves me correctly, your timetable is not quite correct. The tropical wave once called Harvey strayed down to Texas and began to regroup and strenghthen a bit during the eclipse, and within a day or so began to be mentioned for the first time ever on the local weather stations. And within a day or two it became a a full-fledged tropical storm, and then within a day or so it became full-fledged hurricane, and the next day it became a category 4 hurricane. It all happened pretty quick and surprised a lot of people, and I myself was very fortunate to be able to buy some gasoline for my car before all the gas stations ran out of gas, and then after a hell of a lot of rain that night (at least 14 to 15 inches in every city in the area) everything was closed the next day and everything is still closed. It all happened very quickly. And about 15 to 20 thousand people in low-lying areas have been rescued so far, often from their roofs, and total rainfall from the storm is expected to be 50 inches before its over, causing another 15 to 20 thousand to seek to be rescued. But only about half of the 911 callers are able to get through, and many many people have drowned. So there you have it, straight from the epicenter of the latest plague that God/ Mother Nature has sent upon the Earth. And anyone who knows anything about history knows that most of the earth's earthshaking events have occurred during an eclipse. Everyone used to know that, but today that rather obvious fact (if there ever was one) is very often poo-pooed for some reason. Barry Midyet interpreter  posted on  2017-08-28   22:21:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #29. To: interpreter (#28) And anyone who knows anything about history knows that most of the earth's earthshaking events have occurred during an eclipse. You are an ignorant asshole. buckeroo  posted on  2017-08-28   23:44:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #30. To: interpreter (#28) I do have to say that you do your homework/research before you post. But I still will have to dispute one of your points, and I suspect it is because you live in New York City or somewhere and I live right here in the epicenter of this event. I have not called New York home for more than 50 years. I do not live any where near it. I live much closer to you. I heard on the TV a few minutes ago that it is the 3rd 1000-year storm in 3 years. Think about that for a minute. Storms that used to occur once every thousand years are now occurring at least once a year (as I predicted in my book). Yeah, not to mention how may times the press has declared the Crime of the Century, the Trial of the Century, the Fight of the Century, and so on and so forth. When is the last time anyone saw a news story about the fourth, fifth, or sixth biggest storm of the century? Anyhow, if my memory serves me correctly, your timetable is not quite correct. I assuredly did not go by memory. The tropical wave once called Harvey strayed down to Texas and began to regroup and strenghthen a bit during the eclipse, and within a day or so began to mentioned for the first time ever on the local weather stations. As I posted previously at #19, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Harvey The eighth named storm, third hurricane, and the first major hurricane of the 2017 Atlantic hurricane season, Harvey developed from a tropical wave to the east of the Lesser Antilles, reaching tropical storm status on August 17. The storm crossed through the Windward Islands on the following day, passing just south of Barbados and later near Saint Vincent. Upon entering the Caribbean Sea, Harvey began to weaken due to moderate wind shear and degenerated into a tropical wave north of Colombia early on August 19. The remnants were monitored for regeneration as it continued west-northwestward across the Caribbean and the Yucatán Peninsula, before redeveloping over the Bay of Campeche on August 23. Harvey then began to rapidly intensify on August 24, regaining tropical storm status and becoming a hurricane later that day. While the storm moved generally northwestwards, Harvey's intensification phase stalled slightly overnight from August 24–25, however Harvey soon resumed strengthening and became a category 4 hurricane late on August 25. Hours later, Harvey made landfall near Rockport, Texas, at peak intensity. That description conforms to the NOAA/NHC weather notices, of which I quoted one in its entirely and linked to nine more, indicating the storm status of the alerts, and the dates. And within a day or two it became a a full-fledged tropical storm, and then within a day or so it became full-fledged huricane, and the next day it became a catagory 4 hurricane. It became a tropical storm on 17 August. It fell below a tropical storm on 19 August. It became a tropical storm again on August 24. It became a Hurricane on 25 August. It is a matter of record. It all happened pretty quick and surprised a lot of people, and I myself was very fortunate to be able to buy some gasoline for my car before all the gas stations ran out of gas, and then after a hell of a lot of rain that night (at least 14 to 15 inches in every city in the area) everything was closed the next day and everything is still closed. It all happened very quickly. It was lower than a tropical storm from 19 Aug to 24 Aug. The eclipse was on 21 Aug. The storm started to regain strength on the 23 Aug and resumed tropical storm status the next day. Later that day, it became a hurricane for the first time. For precise times, see the official times cited below. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Harvey Harvey was downgraded to a tropical depression at 21:00 UTC on August 19; six hours later, based on continued data from a reconnaissance aircraft, it was declared an open tropical wave. Early on August 20, the NHC began monitoring the remnants of Harvey for redevelopment. Although the effects of strong upper-level winds and dry air were expected to limit development in the near-term, conditions were expected to become more conducive to tropical storm and hurricane conditions when the disturbance entered the northwestern Caribbean Sea, and especially in the Bay of Campeche. Despite an increase in convective organization, the disturbance still lacked a well-defined center as it approached the Yucatán Peninsula. While traversing inland, satellite images and surface observations indicated that the circulation became better defined. A reconnaissance aircraft investigating the remnants of Harvey around 15:00 UTC on August 23 indicated that it once again acquired a well-defined center, and the NHC upgraded it to a tropical depression accordingly. The system began to slowly consolidate amid an increasingly favorable environment, attaining tropical storm intensity by 06:00 UTC on August 24. Later that morning, Harvey began to undergo rapid intensification as an eye developed and its central pressure quickly fell. By 17:00 UTC, the storm was upgraded to the third hurricane of the season. Slight entrainment of dry air slowed the intensification process, however, by the next day, Harvey was able to quickly strengthen into a major hurricane by 19:00 UTC. Further deepening occurred as the storm approached the coast of Texas, with Harvey becoming a Category 4 hurricane at 23:00 UTC, based on reconnaissance aircraft data. Around 03:00 UTC on August 26, the hurricane made landfall at peak intensity at Rockport with winds of 130 mph (215 km/h) and an atmospheric pressure of 938 mbar (27.7 inHg). Those times are UTC. Texas is on CDT and is UTC -5. So there you have it, straight from the epicenter of the latest plague that God/ Mother Nature has sent upon the Earth. And anyone who knows anything about history knows that most of the earth's earthshaking events have occurred during an eclipse. Well, this event did not occur during an eclipse. It was not even of tropical storm strength from two (2) days before the eclipse, to three (3) days after the eclipse. I'm older than you and have lived through no earth shattering events or plagues during any eclipse, but I do recall Carol and Edna. In 1954, the East Coast was especially naughty and Hurricane Carol (1-minute sustained wind, 115 mph) formed on August 25th and dissipated on September 1st. Then Hurricane Edna (1-minute sustained wind, 125 mph) formed on September 2nd and dissipated on September 15th. Carol caused 72 fatalities. Edna directly caused 20 fatalities, and 9 indirect. nolu chan  posted on  2017-08-28   23:50:33 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #31. To: nolu chan (#30) Well, with you I am giving up (for now) because as usual you have done much much research and I have done none, but that is simply because I do not have any time to do any research on anything because I am in the middle of the biggest storm in recorded history. All I can do is go by memory and by my eyes and ears and what I am seeing and hearing even as I type this. 9 trillion gallons of water have been dumped on Southeast Texas, and Rescuers have now rescued over 3000 people from the floodwaters and that figure is expected to double before its over. And it is very evident that it all started with an eclipse, and any knowledgable student of history can tell you that most all earthshaking events were fulfilled during, or started during an eclipse. Do you want me to list them for you? If that is what you want, I can do that. And as for 1000-year floods, a few years ago, it was a 500-year flood occurring every year. Now it is a 1000-year floods occurring every year. For God's sake, how much worse do things have to get before you become a believer and realize that God is unhappy with the US, and is punishing us just as He did with the Israelites?? We must repent and rejoin the Paris agreement for starters. Then we must repeal the 1965 Immigration Reform Act that let Muslims in. Then we must overturn the Same Sex Marriage decision and the Roe vs Wade decision for two other starters. Then, and only then, will we see the seven last plagues begin to be mitigated, and receive some relief. interpreter  posted on  2017-08-29   1:42:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #32. To: interpreter (#31) Well, with you I am giving up (for now) because as usual you have done much much research and I have done none, but that is simply because I do not have any time to do any research on anything because I am in the middle of the biggest storm in recorded history. Everything is bigger in Texas. http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/441964/The-biggest-storm-in-history-batters-the-Philippines The biggest storm in history batters the Philippines A MONSTER 235mph “super typhoon” confirmed as the ­biggest storm in history was last night feared to have claimed thousands of lives. By Nathan Rao PUBLISHED: 00:01, Sat, Nov 9, 2013 Typhoon Haiyan ripped into the Philippines, forcing millions to flee their homes in terror. The storm’s astonishing power ­unleashed giant 45ft waves, flooding coastal areas including tourist destinations with 16in of lashing rain. [snip] Can't touch those monster storms in the Pacific. All I can do is go by memory and by my eyes and ears and what I am seeing and hearing even as I type this. I don't know why your memory is all you can go on, when my post that you are responding to linked and quoted the official weather center data. Harvey failed to be a Tropical Storm from two days before the eclipse to three days after the eclipse. That may be inconvenient for the eclipse caused it theory, but that is the breaks of Naval air. And it is very evident that it all started with an eclipse, and any knowledgable student of history can tell you that most all earthshaking events were fulfilled during, or started during an eclipse. Do you want me to list them for you? If that is what you want, I can do that. It is not obvious at all that earthshaking events almost always occur during an eclipse. And as for 1000-year floods, a few years ago, it was a 500-year flood occurring every year. Now it is a 1000-year floods occurring every year. For God's sake, how much worse do things have to get before you become a believer and realize that God is unhappy with the US, and is punishing us just as He did with the Israelites?? We must repent and rejoin the Paris agreement for starters. You do realize that claims of more than one 1,000 year storm every thousand years is an irrational claim. If there were such a storm every day, it would be a daily storm. Weather happens. God does not cause storms, or touchdowns, or make footballs carom off goalposts to punish naughty kickers. Nor does He deflate Tom Brady's balls. And honest to Buddha, spare us the Paris agreement. Then we must repeal the 1965 Immigration Reform Act that let Muslims in. Then we must overturn the Same Sex Marriage decision and the Roe vs Wade decision for two other starters. Then, and only then, will we see the seven last plagues begin to be mitigated, and receive some relief. I'm not sure why the Immigration and Nationality Act, amendments of 1965 has such high priority. I'll provide the content and you can identify the most seriously offending provision(s). Well, heck, I uploaded to Scribd and their computer flagged it for a copyright violation. It's a Federal law, and a dumb computer program. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-79/pdf/STATUTE-79-Pg911.pdf 79 Stat. 911, H.R. 2580, P.L. 89-236 (3 Oct 1965). Immigration and Nationality Act, amendments. I would be for overturning (not reversing) Obergefell and Roe. Those were issues best left to the States and of questionable Federal jurisdiction. However, it should be noted that this would result in States making up their own mind, and many had permitted abortion and gay marriage. Texas would be free to do its thing, and California could do its thing. Advocating Federal jurisdiction is advocating for Federal government authority to decide the issue for all. Look where that got us. Then, and only then, will we see the seven last plagues begin to be mitigated, and receive some relief. Oh noes, not this plague thing again. Why would an all-loving god punish all for the whimsical acts of the nine? The good of the many outweighs the whimsy of the few. nolu chan  posted on  2017-08-29   4:00:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #33. To: nolu chan (#32) Oh noes, not this plague thing again. Why would an all-loving god punish all for the whimsical acts of the nine? The good of the many outweighs the whimsy of the few. biblehub.com/kjv/matthew/24.htm goldilucky  posted on  2017-08-29   7:38:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #34. To: nolu chan (#32) OK, I will try to answer all your nitpicking. The storm in the Phillipines was also a 1000-year storm. "You do realize that claims of more than one 1,000 year storm every thousand years is an irrational claim. If there were such a storm every day, it would be a daily storm." No, it is not an irrational claim, and it is pretty much all reputable scientists who are saying that and I am just quoting them. And I'm pretty sure they are not irrational, and I don't understand why you or any rational person would say that. What they mean is, storms that used to occur once in a thousand years are now occurring every year. Sounds rational to me. "Weather happens. God does not cause storms," That is not true and is just as irrational as your previous statement. But perhaps I should rephrase it for you and then you will understand where I am coming from. Mother Nature causes storms, and mother nature and God are pretty much one and the same. "And honest to Buddha, spare us the Paris agreement." Most irrational statement yet. What do you think is causing these 1000-year storms to come every year nowadays? At least 95% of it is man-made pollution, as almost all reputable scientists say, and about 5% of the cause is God's fury (I say). "I'm not sure why the Immigration and Nationality Act, amendments of 1965 has such high priority. I'll provide the content and you can identify the most seriously offending provision(s)." The most offending provision is the entire thing and the entire idea/reasoning behind it that caused such an abborition and has made God so very mad. Until 1965, only Judeo-Chritians were allowed into our nation (officially, but a few non-Christians/Muslims snuck in undetected, beginning with the African slaves some of which were Muslims). And that is how our founders, who wrote the original immigration laws, intended it to be forever. Then LBJ came along, along with his followers/partners in crime in Congress and changed everything. Now we let in Muslims, atheists, Buddhists, anyone who wants to come. Since that year (1965), our nation has steadily gone down-hill. First, we took prayer out of schools (because they might offend the newcomers) and our schools went to hell. Then crime started increasing (a natural result of Godless schools). Now let's fast forward a bit to today. We are being attacked almost daily (on our own soil) by Muslims and other non-believers, but Muslims mainly and we definitely need to ban them. But we cant (according to the stupid alt- left judge in San Francisco). The only leg the alt-left judges are standing on (legally) is the Immigration Reform Act of 1965 which says we have to let Muslims in. So we must immediately repeal it if our nation is to survive. And I mean no offense to peaceful Buddhists like you who don't go around killing everybody, and when we get around to creating new immigration laws, I suppose we could make an exception for you guys. More later.. interpreter  posted on  2017-08-29   9:30:32 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #35. To: interpreter (#0) I live in SE Houston near Nasa. At 1900 on Saturday I put out a redneck rain gauge in my back yard. I was full Sunday morning at 0400. I emptied it. I has filled up 2 more times since. XDMAR  posted on  2017-08-29   10:28:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #36. To: interpreter (#34) The most offending provision is the entire thing and the entire idea/reasoning behind it that caused such an abborition and has made God so very mad. I have come to the conclusion that God does not get angry. At all. Not even close. When someone becomes very angry, say a co-worker, fried or family member, the common Christian response is something like "We need to pray for Joe. He's having a very bad day". The reason for that kind of response is that we intuitively recognize that such a state of anger is a sign of distress, insecurity and ultimately, weakness. And clearly, the reason people get angry is because things happen to them that are out of their control which they once erroneously considered within their control. And that most certainly is a weakness. So, if God gets angry at man, it could only be because God is insecure and weak, possessing a false sense of control over man, which quite naturally contradicts all the positive attributes ascribed to him of being infinitely wise, loving, and perhaps most intriguing of all (depending on ones faith, perhaps) completely knowledgeable of all each of us will ever do. Please explain how God could or would become angry at us with anything we could possibly do when he knows in advance all that we will do, and why we will do those things? No, God does not get angry and to suggest so is to suggest he is weak. The reason Christianity and many other major faiths portray God as subject to anger is simply because of the practice of something called "personification". That is when one attributes certain human qualities upon another thing. People get angry so people decided that God must get angry too. It's also a very convenient way for historic religious leaders and kings to control the masses, as few things can be more influential on behavior than convincing a people that an all powerful deity is going to eradicate them for all eternity to a place of eternal torment. If they don't behave. No, God does not get angry. That's simply not possible, as the qualities of complete wisdom, love, patience and knowledge all prevent that. Of course this contradicts the standard Judeo-Christian thinking, but it's one point where Judeo-Christian thinking is wrong. Christianity is a good faith overall in terms of the morality it teaches, and people do well to subscribe to it. But on some doctrinal points such as the belief that God gets angry or has ever gotten angry, it is in error. Calamity and tragedy do serve a very pragmatic purpose and are generally beneficial for us in spiritual terms. Unfortunately, most people cannot fathom how that could be, so in the natural human search for satisfying answers, "God must be angry with us" is a common erroneous explanation that humans have historically settled upon. I am completely satisfied that God has no care one way or the other what laws a country decrees. Each of us are on this earth for the purpose of spiritual growth, and whatever circumstances or hardships we endure, even tragic ones, aid us in that growth. It's as simple as that. Obviously you won't agree with this. Indeed, it's readily apparent that people have an enormous ability to believe what we wish to believe, up to and including the point of inventing myriads of explanations for why things are the way they are, and subscribing to them with utmost fervor. That certainly explains why there are such enormous differences between the major faiths. (But then again, perhaps I've simply invented that explanation to satisfy my own need for understanding). The trick is to always be open minded about things, which is no small undertaking. And that's what I strive to do. Pinguinite  posted on  2017-08-29   12:37:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #37. To: XDMAR (#35) I live in SE Houston near Nasa. At 1900 on Saturday I put out a redneck rain gauge in my back yard. I was full Sunday morning at 0400. I emptied it. I has filled up 2 more times since. I hear you bro. I live just a few miles down the road from you (in League City) and I dont have a rain guage at the moment, but wish I did. So 3 full rain guages, that would be about 15 to 18 inches? Santa Fe has been the hardest hit and I have a daughter living there (along with my son-n-law and two grand daughters, and they keep moving to higher ground but the flood, continuously getting higher, keeps finding them and there is now no place in Santa Fe that is safe. Me and my other daughter are planning on rescuing them today, somehow, some way. My other son-n-law has a big truck, and I have a boat, so I am praying that with God's help we can pull it off. interpreter  posted on  2017-08-29   12:41:08 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #38. To: Pinguinite (#36) That is among of the stupidest remarks I have heard on this crazy site. Yes, God is love, but His love is a very tough love. For every verse that talks about God's love there are 2 to 3 times as many that talk about God's wrath and the need to fear God. I know because I counted them. You cannot pick just 2 or 3 verses out of the Bible and build your entire theology around them. You have to read the entire Bible bro. interpreter  posted on  2017-08-29   12:53:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #39. To: interpreter (#37) Good luck XDMAR  posted on  2017-08-29   12:57:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #40. To: interpreter (#37) I have a boat don'T forgeT a shoTgun the obomba looTers will geT you love boris If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys ! BorisY  posted on  2017-08-29   13:09:26 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply   #41. To: nolu chan (#32) (Edited) As for the rest of your post, I am glad that we fully agree on some things, i.e, the need to overturn Obergefell and Roe. As for Roe, if we cannot succeed in overturning the whole thing, we definitely need (at the minimum) to overturn the part that allows partial-birth abortions and third trimester abortions when the baby is fully formed and fully capable of living outside the womb. That is murder (taking the life of another human being), pure and simple and there can be no debate, and no if ands or buts. As for your last remark, God is NOT an all-loving God. He hates a lot of things, and a lot of people (like ISIS for example), and we are repeated told in the Bible about the need to fear God and His wrath. And despite your view of things, God often punishes a whole nation or city, etc. for the sins of a few. He is like that sometimes if He gets mad enough, and we must constantly fear Him else we too will feel His wrath. interpreter  posted on  2017-08-29   13:26:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply         .       .       . Comments (42 - 128) not displayed. Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register]  Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com