Title: Black Matriarch Demonstrates The Moral Myopia of Black Females Source:
Living On Stolen Time & Playing With Borrowed Money URL Source:https://lostapwbm.wordpress.com/tag/michael-grace-jr/ Published:Nov 8, 2016 Author:staff Post Date:2017-08-19 20:08:36 by Tooconservative Keywords:None Views:19517 Comments:66
Background: 28-year-old Michael Renard Grace Jr. and two accomplices entered a Pizza Hut in Charlotte, NC, with the purpose of robbing the establishment. Grace was armed. An employee in the restaurant saw Grace and his accomplices robbing the store and fired on Grace, killing him. The accomplices fled the scene.
Just another day in the life, right? Oh no. The black matriarch who raised Michael Renard Grace Jr. to rob fast food restaurants has to get her two cents in. This is a special treat for me, getting to intersect the Black Matriarchy with the corrective nature of the 2nd Amendment. I’m positively giddy.
“What is the policy of employees having guns on the premises?”
“Was he a security guard?”
“Was he back there cooking dough?”
“Was he back there throwing pizzas in the oven?”
“What was his position?”
“Why did he have a gun on the premises?”
Have you noticed that black females are very good at trying to sound smarter than they actually are? But these questions she’s asking just show where her little brain is headed: A wrongful death lawsuit. She couldn’t profit from her son’s life, because his life wasn’t worth anything, so she’ll be happy to profit from his death, or try to anyway.
Black matriarchs are very good at raising sons to not be shit, and then when the son meets his natural and rightful conclusion, she’s right there with her hand out, demanding to be compensated.
A couple of other examples of black women cashing in on raising ain’t shit black men: Cleta A. Jennings
“It was an act of desperation, but I do not believe he [Michael] would have hurt anyone.”
I want to respond to this and to the “why did he have a gun on the premises?” statement in one part. The man probably had a gun because he knows where he works, a Pizza Hut, is one of those places that tends to get robbed by men raised by idiots like Temia Hairston.
But this idiot whore is so morally short-sighted, that she expects this employee to put his life in the hands of her son, to leave his continued existence at his mercy, and whether or not he decides to let his victim live.
How about no?
That’s why he had a gun on the premises of the Pizza Hut, and why everyone should carry, concealed or open: Just in case you run across another Michael Renard Grace Jr. and he’s down on his luck, but rather than get a job, he decides he’s going to stick a gun in the face of somebody who’s barely better off than he is.
But this is the mentality that these black females have and it’s the mentality they transmit to their criminal sons; when things are going wrong in their own lives, they suddenly gain the inherent right to make things go wrong on everybody else’s life. When mama’s not happy because she had a bad day at work and comes home, and you try to show mama the picture you drew, and she slaps you across the face, that’s okay, because mama just upset because she had a bad day, therefore, her act of violence is justifiable. When mama’s son is short some money and runs into your place of business armed looking for cash, putting your life at risk, that’s okay because it was just an “act of desperation” which magically gives him the right to threaten your safety, your money, and your life.
Makes perfect sense, doesn’t it?
“This wasn’t a body shot. This was a head shot. A head shot is personal.”
“My son would have been facing jail time, instead of laying on a slab with a bullet hole in his head.”
Ms. Hairston, a slab is the proper place for your son, as it is for all robbers. If the law were truly just, the Pizza Hut employee, who not only protected himself, but protected all of your son’s future victims, would be able to file a lawsuit against you to collect the cost of the ammunition used to impose the moral discipline on your son that you were unwilling and unable to teach him while he was alive.
P.S. Did you notice that the man sitting next to her is quieter than a church mouse?
Poster Comment:
This is from last November but it is a pretty scrappy gun piece.
Stone should invite this writer to post here at LF.
I assume all these kids have starved to death by now.
The only positive takeaway.
"all just trying to feed their hungry children."
You know mama's the one gettin' all the goodies from Uncle Sam. She's on every government program and then some. Probably pulling in more cash and benefits than you and I combined.
Maybe she'll learn to stop shitting out crap like him. If not, shoot her too; let's nip this in the bud before a normal person gets hurt or killed by her spawn.
Did you notice that in the video, there seems to be an overweight black guy in a sweatshirt, hunched over unconcious on the sofa behind the "grieving parents"? You can see him at 01:40.
Did you notice that in the video, there seems to be an overweight black guy in a sweatshirt, hunched over unconcious on the sofa behind the "grieving parents"?
The video won't play on this computer. I'll try tomorrow.
The video won't play on this computer. I'll try tomorrow.
Dang. I forget, just how old is the computer you post with? Must be even older than Windows XP.
Of course, other than videos, you don't need a lot of computer horsepower to hang out on forum sites like LF.
If you were using Google's Chrome browser, you would be able to "fling" Youtube videos on to your TV (if you had a $35 Google Chromecast stick plugged into an HDMI port on your TV). I only mention it because this would be a pretty easy way to see vids without doing some big computer upgrade. If you load a YouTube thread on your Chrome browser, you can always put it onto your TV.
Hey, not everyone needs the latest and greatest. I resist that mindset. As I mentioned before, I use a 5yo 2.3GHz i7 quad-core CPU with 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD drive. Does everything I want very quickly running Apple's latest OS. In general, CPUs haven't advanced that much in speed over the last five years in numbers of cores or clock speed. GPUs have increased exponentially as usual but those are only important if you want to play video games or do video or animation rendering.
Linux remains a very decent option for older machines. They might be able to play videos on your hardware without any upgrades because they do focus on older hardware, unlike your neglected version of Windows that gets no upgrades in either security or newer technology like video services.
Hmmm. I do have a Roku device (which acts like a Google Chromecast stick) plugged into my TV. In the other room. Too much trouble.
The advantage to the Chrome/Chromecast solution is that Google pretty much is guaranteeing the two will continue to work into the future. I don't see that changing.
The Roku and other Android solutions are far from perfect. I had trouble flinging Android stuff to Roku but maybe I didn't have quite the right app "channel" or something. Anyway, I was disappointed. I've only had success flinging video via Apple's AirPlay where it just works with phones or tablets or Mac computers. The only comparable universal solution that Just Works is Google's Chrome/Chromecast solution.
I have the 2016 version of the quad-core Roku stick. Surprisingly powerful at decoding 1080p H.264 or 720p H.265. It will do some but not all 1080p H.265 videos. That is one amazing Roku stick for only around $40. That H.265 is a very demanding video codec for both CPU and GPU.
Roku is well-positioned to take advantage of the increasingly unplugged internet cable era. So is Apple. So is Amazon. I could only recommend those three to anyone. They play Directv subscriptions via internet, all the major pay-cable channels like HBO via internet, stream YouTube and other vids, have access to the various online media stores and clouds like Sony or Apple's iTunes.
I think neither Microsoft nor Sony is well-positioned to increase their dominance. I think people will start to rely more on compact streaming sticks and even the same capabilities like Roku or Kodi built in to their TVs to support cable TV services. I see Apple, Roku, Amazon positioned to increase their market dominance in this burgeoning market.
I'm changing now to a 20Mbps internet connection. Same price now with crappy CenturyLink for all speeds up to 20Mbps.
I think people will start to rely more on compact streaming sticks and even the same capabilities like Roku or Kodi built in to their TVs
I have a roku 3 I never use anymore.
I use the chromecast regularly.
Wife got a free Roku Tv when she bought a new car last year. I like that TV a lot. Way better than the neighbors smart TV which is a pain in the ass to watch anything but regular TV and youtube. Can't figure out how to add any streaming channels except the couple they gave you.
I don't usually sign in a Google/YouTube or link my other devices to a Google account.
I have a google account. I haven't used it except to get some downloads onto my samsung tablet from the play store. To complicated to side load it. Maybe it isn't complicated I just didn't feel like figuring it out.
Wife got a free Roku Tv when she bought a new car last year. I like that TV a lot. Way better than the neighbors smart TV which is a pain in the ass to watch anything but regular TV and youtube. Can't figure out how to add any streaming channels except the couple they gave you.
Supposedly, the Roku TVs from various small Asian manufacturers give a very comparable Roku experience to their streaming sticks and streaming boxes.
I do have, for instance, a Vizio smart TV. It can do Plex and other streaming stuff. It also spies on a small group of around 8x8 pixels at the lower-righthand corner of the screen and silently uploads that back to Vizio's marketing partners. They can identify with only a small number of uploaded 8x8 frames exactly what program you are watching. That is marketable information.
Needless to say, I've disabled wireless and internet access on my Vizio smart TV. Since all the spying by Vizio became public, they've done nothing to correct this. They are relying on the stupidity or indifference of their customer base to overcome any negative perception of their brand.
I have a google account. I haven't used it except to get some downloads onto my samsung tablet from the play store. To complicated to side load it. Maybe it isn't complicated I just didn't feel like figuring it out.
Google's not all bad. I rank Facebook as the absolute garbage pit of manipulation and commercialization of your data. Then Twitter is mostly innocuous except for their recent purges. And Apple is generally more conservative and less inclined to ban people but that is mostly because they are running iTunes and the Mac Store (for Mac apps) as neutral venues, immune to anything political.
Another really bad provider is Verizon as cellular network provider.
Google is somewhat invasive on multiple fronts but it does offer valuable services. I think that their data storage for various Android options are much more invasive. Apple is far less so. For instance, Google will operate as a free backup for your Android smartphone. And it can be tied to your desktop Chrome browser to synchronize bookmarks, even tabs, from your smartphone to your desktop. So Google can track you from device to device and entices you with those "cloud" features.
However, Google also stores a lot of stuff online like your actual GPS coordinates. They keep a lot of data. On the upside, they keep that data to themselves and don't sell it to other companies (at least not yet). In contrast, Apple does not retain that device so, for instance, when you upgrade from one iPhone to another newer iPhone, you have to let the GPS data accumulate day by day until the new iPhone learns your travel habits. This is because Apple does not store online in any way your location data. Unlike Google which does.
Well, you can kind of see how I rank these various corporate entities and how they operate. So far, Apple has been by far the most trustworthy. But then, for all I know maybe Apple's iCloud is thoroughly infested by NSA access and nothing stored on Apple's cloud is any real secret. We know that the feds bought a solution from an Israeli security company to break an older model of iPhone's encryption and security so they could access the iPhones of the two San Bernardino terrorists. What has happened since and whether the FBI is paying more to that company to crack the newer iPhones is something that no one really knows.
To continue with Verizon, they actually embed TCP/IP headers that contain an ID number for every HTTP request your phone or tablet makes. That means that every app or web browser request is accompanied with a unique customer ID, to facilitate other internet companies to track you all over the internet, as well as Verizon itself.
Facebook is worse than Verizon but not by much.
The whole goddamn internet is turning into a heavily censored version of spyware. When we read the internet, it's looking back and tracking what we do and say and where we go.
In the case of Verizon, they can track your cellphone signal and know everywhere you go, whether you have GPS turned on or not. They have pretty good location data just from triangulating your cell signal, even if you have your more accurate GPS phone sensor turned off. The only way to stop this is to power down your device and/or remove its battery.
And you can imagine pretty easily that Verizon gets away with it by allowing the feds unfettered access to their data.
Use TOR and forget the rant you described. I have used TOR for over a decade and have no BS tracking crap that you complain about.
I'm already VPNed and I am considering adding Tor as well, especially since I am upgrading to a 20Mbit broadband.
I am hesitant mostly because I don't trust the reliability of the prepackaged Tor clients for Firefox. I admit, I need to learn more about who creates these and maintains them.
BTW, I just learned the other day that DuckDuckGo maintains a Tor node for searches. I thought that was mighty white of them. Apparently they've done it for 4-5 years now and I had never heard that despite being a DDG guy and trying to never use Google or Bing or Yahoo.
Unfortunately, Stone does allow every search engine and spybot to ransack every thread and every single byte of the entire LF site. So it starts to defeat any attempts at privacy when everything you post here is indexed within minutes to Google and the other search engines and social spybots.
Unfortunately, Stone does allow every search engine and spybot to ransack every thread and every single byte of the entire LF site. So it starts to defeat any attempts at privacy when everything you post here is indexed within minutes to Google and the other search engines and social spybots.
ROTFL! So, you do know: how technically lame Stone is. Keep in mind that we anonymously post so your point is really cast, "way out in the weeds" for the discussion.
ROTFL! So, you do know: how technically lame Stone is. Keep in mind that we anonymously post so your point is really cast, "way out in the weeds" for the discussion.
Our web browsers still have characteristic "fingerprints", even across multiple platforms. VPN and Tor may no longer be enough and their use may attract more attention to determining your identity than if you didn't use them at all.
My browser fingerprint score never reaches 1500. Pretty piss poor. Any determined government agency could likely penetrate my identity and have a fair chance of tracking most of my traffic. However, I am using a crufty but latest version of Firefox on the Mac so that will affect my scores as it is not a terribly popular platform. If I spoofed my browser user agent, for instance, my score would soar.
The same results would apply to using Tor. Something worth considering.
So where do you get your Tor VM or do you just use an extension? Or a special install package just for Tor?
I'm not worried about it. They know who I am by me registering the website. If the government wants to talk to me they are free to come and talk to me. If they want to put me on trial they can do that too. IF they want to come and kill me. They can easily do that too.
I'm not worried about it. They know who I am by me registering the website. If the government wants to talk to me they are free to come and talk to me. If they want to put me on trial they can do that too. IF they want to come and kill me. They can easily do that too.
I'm not worried about it.
What about the rest of us? Are you reporting us to the government? Where is your commitment for anonymity for the whopping crowd of irregular 20 posters here?
I'm not worried about it. They know who I am by me registering the website. If the government wants to talk to me they are free to come and talk to me. If they want to put me on trial they can do that too. IF they want to come and kill me. They can easily do that too.
Not if you paid a few bucks extra for the private DNS registration that shields your identity.
You should worry more that they'll declare LF a hate site, you a hate leader, toss you off the internet by cancelling your libertysflame.com DNS registration, etc. We should see that happen to the 4um site before the same ax falls here at LF.
You should also worry about the general chilling effect of such online monitoring will have on all web sites, including yours. How long until Google refuses to publicly index pages at LF or delivers links to LF but conditions them with a warning that "the SPLC has determined that LF is a hate site...click if you wish to continue to LF, you Nazi fuck".
Yeah, that's a pretty chilling effect they can exercise via these whitelist/blacklist functions they've put in all the web browsers.
Again, how is this not a utility that should be subject to public regulation for equal and unbiased access.
You don't get to cut off someone's power or sewer/water service just because you think they're a Nazi or Confederate. Or an Antifa supporter. Why is the internet that much different?
What about the rest of us? Are you reporting us to the government? Where is your commitment for anonymity for the whopping crowd of irregular 20 posters here?
What i'm saying buckeroo is that there is nothing I can really do about the advance of the surveillance state. So there is no sense in being a paranoid schitzo like you.
They can find out who we all are anytime they want to and we can't do anything about it.
We're not doing anything illegal, immoral or un ethical. So why worry about it.
We're not doing anything illegal, immoral or un ethical. So why worry about it.
I really believe you understand the world as majiikal charms, faerie-tale princess(es) and "everything works out for the best."
But you deliberately avoid the fascist state watching every god-damned move you make, even if it is a keyboard stroke. If the state waterboards you, you will be the first to give every tid-bit of information to the state to save your own ass.
I really believe you understand the world as majiikal charms, faerie-tale princess(es)
“These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.”
Supposedly, the Roku TVs from various small Asian manufacturers give a very comparable Roku experience to their streaming sticks and streaming boxes.
I do have, for instance, a Vizio smart TV. It can do Plex and other streaming stuff. It also spies on a small group of around 8x8 pixels at the lower-righthand corner of the screen and silently uploads that back to Vizio's marketing partners. They can identify with only a small number of uploaded 8x8 frames exactly what program you are watching. That is marketable information.
Needless to say, I've disabled wireless and internet access on my Vizio smart TV. Since all the spying by Vizio became public, they've done nothing to correct this. They are relying on the stupidity or indifference of their customer base to overcome any negative perception of their brand.
I have a Samsung plasma tv,and have no problems of any sort when using my ROKU 3 with it.
Have a Vizio 24 inch smart tv out in my shop,but rarely watch it other than from the RCA HD antenna I put in out there. I get 43 channels from that.
I am hoping to get someone to dig a trench so I can run an ethernet cable out there so I can get streaming video this fall. Nice to have a enclosed area in your workshop where you can relax that has a refrigerator, tv,microwave,ac,heat,and full bath to take breaks in and relax when things aren't going your way.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
I reported myself to that fag human rights watch group a while back. I wanted them to go after me and call me a hate site. I'm not big enough pickings for them.
But the government can easily subpoena that info if they want to.
Not from a Panama holding company.
You might rightly suspect that NSA could penetrate that info but not much of anyone else, provided you're using a computer free of spyware and trojans.
