[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Sorry, CNN, We're Not Going to Stop Talking About the Russian Collusion Hoax

"No Autopsy Can Restore the Democratic Party’s Viability"

RIP Ozzy

"Trump floats 'restriction' for Commanders if they fail to ditch nickname in favor of Redskins return"

"Virginia Governor’s Race Heats Up As Republican Winsome Sears Does a Hard Reboot of Her Campaign"

"We Hate Communism!!"

"Mamdani and the Democratic Schism"

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Subway Shop Sues Utah Town & Police After Employee Cleared of Drugging Officer’s Drink
Source: The Daily Sheeple
URL Source: http://www.thedailysheeple.com/subw ... drugging-officers-drink_082017
Published: Aug 10, 2017
Author: RT.com|
Post Date: 2017-08-11 08:56:16 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 7172
Comments: 27

The owners of a Subway sandwich shop are suing the Layton City Police Department in federal court for waiting too long to publicly disavow false allegations that an employee drugged a police officer’s lemonade last year.

A Subway sandwich shop in Layton, Utah, filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against the town and police department on Tuesday, alleging they wrongly accused an employee of drugging an officer’s drink last year.

In August 2016, Layton officers accused Tanis Ukena, an 18-year-old employee, of lacing a sergeant’s lemonade with methamphetamine and THC, a psychoactive compound found in marijuana.

Moments after taking a few sips of his drink, the unnamed officer reported that he felt impaired and had trouble driving and answering questions. An ion scanner test later showed the presence of drugs in the drink, but the lawsuit claims that the test that was conducted has a “known high false positive rate,” according to the Salt Lake Tribune.

Ukena was arrested and booked into the Davis County Jail on one count of surreptitiously administering a poisonous substance, a second degree felony. After that, Ukena received multiple death threats and Dallas Buttars and Kristin Myers, the franchise owners, said their business dropped 30 percent.

The story made national headlines, and Buttars and Myers said that several other employees quit after being grilled by police. In total, they claim their business lost $300,000 due to the incident.

“My life has been changed forever. It will never be the same,” Myers said, according to the Associated Press“It’s always going to be known as the store that drugged the cop.”

The state crime lab conducted several tests of the drink and said the “initial test results could not be duplicated,” according to Deseret News. The police did not find any evidence the officer was drugged, even after conducting searches with a drug-sniffing dog and testing the officer’s blood and urine.

After two months, the state crime lab concluded that there was nothing illicit in the officer’s drink, and Layton police announced Ukena would not be charged.

The lawsuit alleges that the police department told reporters that the officer had been drugged “before it knew whether any crime had been committed, and before it knew whether anyone had in fact been poisoned,” according to the Salt Lake Tribune.

Robert Sykes, the attorney representing the franchise owners, claims the police had evidence that the officer was not drugged well before the tests came back from the state crime lab, yet they did nothing to clear the owners or employees.

“Don’t keep these people on the hook and don’t keep the public in ignorance for two months,” Robert Sykes, the attorney representing the franchise owners, said, according to Deseret News“They may have had probable cause to arrest him. But they didn’t have license to defame him or other people, especially in light of what they knew. Especially in light of what they knew when they defamed him. They knew that there were no drugs found.”

Layton City Attorney Gary Crane said the officers did nothing wrong and that he was “very surprised” by the lawsuit.

“We stand behind our police officers 100 percent. I’ve gone over all of the evidence and the officers did their jobs in protecting not only the public, but individual businesses like Subway,” Crane said, according to Deseret News.

Ukena is currently serving a mission for the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The officer who became ill still works for the department. Police still do not know what caused the officer to become sickened that day.


Poster Comment:

Comment from the site:

The cop knew that the department would take his side and nothing would be done to him when it was determined that the Subway employee had not roofied him.

My take: this piglet was trying to set up a lawsuit against Subway and maybe LDS in the hope that a couple of deep-pocket defendants would settle out of court. Or, it could have been like dav1bg said - this particular Subway franchise pissed off the local cops and this piglet was looking for payback.

In either case the piglet obviously wasn't too smart (surprise, surprise).

Hope this lawsuit burns the Layton PD to the ground. And file federal civil rights charges against the piglet and his department.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#2. To: Deckard (#0)

"The cop knew that the department would take his side ..."

Sure. Why wouldn't they? Especially when the test came back positive.

But to their credit, the state subjected the sample to further testing and the state admitted they were wrong.

What should the state have done that they didn't?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-08-11   10:09:13 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: misterwhite (#2)

But to their credit, the state subjected the sample to further testing and the state admitted they were wrong.

What should the state have done that they didn't?

It seems they should not have made a public announcement stating with certainty that the cop was drugged, when the field test they used is known to have a high false positive rate.

But regardless of whether they did anything wrong or not, the fact that the business suffered very serious financial losses due to the now known errant belief that was publicized on the part of the police & city means that civil compensation is warranted.

By publicly filing the lawsuit, the business is obtaining publicity that redeems their reputation which will help them recover their business standing with the community. The business would likely accept reduced compensation in return for the city giving a full & very public apology. It would be better if the mayor has a press release at the business while having lunch there.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-08-11   15:51:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Pinguinite (#3)

"It seems they should not have made a public announcement stating with certainty that the cop was drugged, when the field test they used is known to have a high false positive rate."

Really? Every announcement or article I've read about circumstances like these are filled with a thousand "allegedlies". Hard to believe they's make an exception in a case like this.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-08-11   16:18:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: misterwhite (#4)

Really? Every announcement or article I've read about circumstances like these are filled with a thousand "allegedlies". Hard to believe they's make an exception in a case like this.

Maybe. But the fact remains he was cleared of what he was arrested for, and did suffer injury. And innocent people who get injured by another party are generally entitled to compensation regardless of whether malice was a factor.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-08-11   21:13:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Pinguinite (#8)

Maybe. But the fact remains he was cleared of what he was arrested for, and did suffer injury.

I believe that's true of everyone charged with wrongdoing and later cleared. Assuming the Layton City Police Department was careful and never stated for a fact that he did it, I don't know what else they could have done. Are you suggesting that the charges, the arrest and the trial should all be kept secret until the verdict?

He'll have his day in court, and we'll see what a jury says.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-08-12   11:15:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: misterwhite (#13)

He'll have his day in court, and we'll see what a jury says.

No, there will be no trial for the kid as that's settled. The business will likely also have it's case settled out of court.

Think of it as a sort of a "no contest" plea bargain in civil court. In the same way innocent people charged with a crime sometimes accept a plea bargain to avoid the risk of a most serious punishment, the city will probably do the same to avoid the risk of a more expensive settlement. Whether they could or should have done things differently doesn't matter much.

Happens all the time. It's how the wonderful, best in the world legal system works in America.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-08-12   11:45:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Pinguinite, misterwhite (#16)

The business will likely also have it's case settled out of court.

Think of it as a sort of a "no contest" plea bargain in civil court. In the same way innocent people charged with a crime sometimes accept a plea bargain to avoid the risk of a most serious punishment, the city will probably do the same to avoid the risk of a more expensive settlement. Whether they could or should have done things differently doesn't matter much.

Whether they could, or should, have done things differently will be relevant to a claim of some violation of constitutional rights in a Federal civil rights case.

nolu chan  posted on  2017-08-12   17:15:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 22.

        There are no replies to Comment # 22.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com