[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone

WEF Calls for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’

The OCCULT Burger king EXPOSED

PANERA BREAD Antichrist message EXPOSED

The OCCULT Cheesecake Factory EXPOSED


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles

Title: Is Trump Entering a Kill Box?
Source: Rue Lockwell
URL Source: https://lewrockwell.com/2017/07/patrick-j-buchanan/is-trump-through/
Published: Jul 28, 2017
Author: Paddy Buck
Post Date: 2017-07-28 13:14:20 by Anthem
Keywords: None
Views: 3431
Comments: 18

Given the bravery he showed in stepping out front as the first senator to endorse Donald Trump, Jeff Sessions deserves better from his boss than the Twitter-trashing he has lately received.

The attorney general has not only been loyal to Trump and his agenda, he has the respect and affection of ex-colleagues in Congress and, more broadly, of populists and conservatives nationally.

Trump’s tweets about Sessions are only demoralizing his base.

Yet the president is not wrong to be exasperated and enraged.

Time to buy old US gold coins

A yearlong FBI investigation into Russian hacking has failed to produce a single indictment. Yet the president watches impotently as a special counsel pulls together a lethal force, inside his own administration, whose undeclared ambition is to bring him down.

Trump’s behavior suggests that he sees the Mueller threat as potentially mortal.

How did we get to this peril point when there is no evidence that Trump or any senior aide colluded in the hacking? As for the June 2016 meeting with the Russians, called by Donald Trump Jr. when told by a friend that Moscow had dirt on Hillary Clinton, even that was no crime.

Foolish, yes; criminal, no. So, again, how did we get to where talk of impeachment and presidential pardons fills the air?

First, Attorney General Sessions, as a campaign adviser and surrogate for Trump who had met with the Russian ambassador, had to recuse himself from the investigation. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein then assumed oversight authority.

Trump then fired FBI Director James Comey and boasted to Russia’s foreign minister about having gotten the “crazy nut job” off his case. His Oval Office comments leaked. Comey then leaked notes of his meeting with Trump. Rosenstein then washed his hands of the mess by naming a special counsel.

And he chose a bulldog, ex-FBI Director Robert Mueller.

Hence, where are we? Despite zero evidence of Trump or his aides colluding in the hacking, a counterintelligence investigation is evolving into a criminal investigation. Mueller is now hiring veteran investigators and prosecutors specializing in white-collar crime.

This is not a witch hunt. It is an Easter egg hunt on the White House lawn, where the most colorful eggs are likely to be the tax returns and the financial records of Trump, who built a real estate empire in a town where winners brag about how they gutted the losers.

Every enemy of Trump is going to be dropping the dime on him to Mueller. Moreover, there is no history of special counsels being appointed and applauded by the press, who went home without taking scalps.

Trump understands this. Reports of his frustration and rage suggest that he knows he has been maneuvered, partly by his own mistakes, into a kill box from which there may be no bloodless exit.

What Trump needs is a leader at Justice who will confine the Mueller investigation to the Russian hacking, and keep Mueller’s men from roaming until they hit prosecutorial pay dirt.

Consider now Trump’s narrowing options.

He can fire Jeff Sessions. But that will enrage Trump’s base to whom the senator is a loyal soldier. And anyone Trump nominates as AG would not be confirmed unless he or she pledged not to interfere with Mueller.

He could direct Rosenstein to fire Mueller. But Rosenstein would assume the Elliot Richardson role in the Saturday Night Massacre, when that AG refused to fire Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox, resigned, and was canonized as a martyr by the Never-Nixon media.

Even if Trump finds a Justice Department loyalist to play the role of Solicitor General Robert Bork, who carried out Nixon’s orders and fired Cox, this would only mean Mueller’s departure. Mueller’s staff of prosecutors and investigators would still be there, beavering away.

When Archibald Cox was fired, Nixon ordered his entire office shut down. Yet, within days of the firestorm, it was up and running again with a new special prosecutor. And impeachment resolutions were blossoming in the House.

Another Trump option would be to leave Mueller alone and hope for a benign outcome. But from reports of his rage at the recusal of Sessions and unwillingness of Rosenstein to restrict Mueller to the Russian hacking scandal, Trump seems to sense that an unrestricted investigation represents a mortal threat to his presidency.

And all the talk of impeachment and pardons suggests that this city can also see what lies over the next hill. After all, we have been here before.

From his history, Mueller is not a man to be intimidated by charges of bias. These will only steel his resolve to pursue with his subpoena power every document he wants, including tax returns, until he has satisfied himself.

The president is unlikely to view this process with indulgence, and patience does not appear to rank high among his virtues.

We are headed for a collision between President Trump and Director Mueller.


Poster Comment:

I read somewhere that only three Roman Emperors died of natural causes. Most were killed. We're getting there.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Anthem (#0)

The Trump gang is just f'ing up as administrators - they're handing the 'Rats a "See you NEED us professional politicians in all offices at all times!" argument.

Morons.

Hank Rearden  posted on  2017-07-28   13:45:44 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Anthem (#0)

Trump needs to remove Sessions and put Giuliani in there. He should do it as soon as the Senate goes into recess, so that Giuliani is a recess appointment.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-07-28   14:00:06 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Hank Rearden (#1)

Trump has known since the day he won the election that he was a target. He even has his own security people supplementing the SS. I see the craziness as a "crazy like a fox" technique. Whether it works or not is anyone's guess.

Anthem  posted on  2017-07-28   14:00:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Vicomte13 (#2)

Sessions is untouchable.

Anthem  posted on  2017-07-28   14:01:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13 (#2)

He should do it as soon as the Senate goes into recess, so that Giuliani is a recess appointment.

The problem for you and Trump is that Giuliani is way too smart to accept any recess appointment.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-28   14:12:03 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Anthem (#4)

Sessions is untouchable.

I think Sessions might actually force Trump to fire him.

After all, Sessions was the only senator to back Trump for a long time and even campaigned across the country for him. Then he gave up his safe Senate seat to become Trump's AG.

I think we might see the same with Bannon, Priebus and others. They might force Trump to fire them directly and not simply submit resignations when asked for them or after Trump has belittled them on Twitter, a cowardly way to try to drive people out IMO.

For all his antics saying "Ya fahd" on his Apprentice show, Trump is actually loathe to fire anyone. He does more often try to torture people until they quit. But if they don't care if he's abusive (because Trump makes himself look like a nutjob), then they might stay on at the WH for a very long time.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-28   14:15:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Anthem (#4) (Edited)

Sessions is untouchable.

And useless. The presidency is being devoured by a ridiculous legal witch hunt that should be stopped, while Sessions decides to prosecute the drug war.

Congress is making a massive power play against Trump, while at the same time utterly destroying its credibility with the American people by demonstrating they are both baldfaced liars with regards to Obamacare AND incompetent, useless boobs, incapable of doing anything with their majority.

Net result: Republicans massively magnify the power of Congress over the Presidency in the next year. Republicans lose Congress to the Democrats in 2018. Democrats impeach Trump in 2019 but can't remove him. Democrats sweep the House, Senate, White House and state houses all across the country in 2020.

Democrats open the borders and fast-track citizenship for "dreamers" and many others, changing the electoral makeup of many states.

Republicans never hold the White House again until the end of the Republic. Republicans never control Congress again.

And all of this will have been done BY THE REPUBLICANS, because they are such arrogant, small minded fucks that they refuse to cooperate with each other.

We see it already.

And so everything Republicans believe in is being swept away because the Republicans choose to die on the hill of defending the honor of a drawling coward.

It's poetic, really.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-07-28   14:30:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: Tooconservative (#5) (Edited)

The problem for you and Trump is that Giuliani is way too smart to accept any recess appointment.

Not a problem for me at all. It's a problem for the Republicans that their character is to lie and fight civil wars. With the Obamacare fiasco, they have decided to be wiped out. So they will be.

Meanwhile, the Republican Party has decided to die on the hill of Jeff Sessions, a coward.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-07-28   14:36:49 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Vicomte13 (#8)

Meanwhile, the Republican Party has decided to die on the hill of Jeff Sessions, a coward.

And what has Sessions actually done? Refuse to fire Mueller?

Trump could fire Mueller. Instead he wants to make Sessions his henchman.

Trump is more powerful and far more immune to criticism than Sessions is. I'd say Trump is far more cowardly here than is Sessions or the congressional GOP.

If Trump wants to fire Mueller, then fire him. Otherwise, he should shut the hell up and stop issuing empty threats and making a fool of himself on Twitter.

Trump makes himself look more impotent and more petty every time he does this stuff. And I would say it makes Sessions feel more secure about his job now, in the same way that both Priebus and Bannon are feeling more secure in their jobs now that Mooch blew up and made some blustery cock-talk to that nice impartial journalist over at The New Yorker. But I guess Trump enjoys having Mooch as his Mini-me.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-28   14:49:35 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Tooconservative (#9)

What Sessions did was recuse himself from anything to do with Russia, then see all that has happened, and decide to stand pat with that decision. Sessions has the power, as head of the justice department, to limit his own recusal to a specific case, or even to decide that his self-recusal was unnecessary and step back in.

By doing what he did he allowed some underling, Rosen-whatever, to step in and slap a Special Prosecutor on Trump. Now the Special Prosecutor has gone hard- over partisan. Sessions could look at that, say "No way - total travesty of justice", step back in, fire Mueller and be done with it.

Instead, he flaps about at the sidelines, willing to allow a rogue prosecution to paralyze American government with an unjust and partisan witch hunt.

Jeff Sessions is a feckless contemptible coward. Trump SHOULD fire him.

If Sessions won't do it, Trump should fire Mueller, and fire Rosen-whatever while he's at it.

The Republican Congress has already blown itself up anyway because with power it is unable to square it's promises with actions. So the Republican Party are a bunch of dead men walking. Trump may as well burn it all to the ground for trying to destroy him.

You're right that Trump makes himself look impotent by his bluffs. He needs to simply take out the cancer with a series of firings, not on a Friday night but on a Monday morning, so the whole goddamned world can go ape-shit.

The people who voted for him will BACK HIM if he does that. As it is, he's letting these guys use procedures to paralyze the government and turn it against him. Cut off all of their heads at once and leave the government unmanned, unable to take action and paralyzed from the lack of anybody there to do anything at all, rather than allow them to sit there and use their energy and paychecks to come after him.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-07-28   15:00:37 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Vicomte13 (#10)

If Sessions won't do it, Trump should fire Mueller, and fire Rosen-whatever while he's at it.

You're still just complaining that Trump is as big a chicken about firing Mueller as Sessions is.

Trump has the power. And you keep telling us "Trump fights!". Yeah? Let's see Trump just fire Mueller himself instead of sneaking around badmouthing his most loyal staff and cabinet officials because they won't do the dirty job for him.

He could have fired Mueller on day one. Instead, he bitches about it on a weekly basis and does nothing except threaten to fire others because they won't fire Mueller for him.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-28   16:02:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Tooconservative (#11)

You're still just complaining that Trump is as big a chicken about firing Mueller as Sessions is.

Trump has the power. And you keep telling us "Trump fights!". Yeah? Let's see Trump just fire Mueller himself instead of sneaking around badmouthing his most loyal staff and cabinet officials because they won't do the dirty job for him.

He could have fired Mueller on day one. Instead, he bitches about it on a weekly basis and does nothing except threaten to fire others because they won't fire Mueller for him.

I agree with you here, actually. Trump DOES have the power. He can directly fire the special prosecutor, or he can use the firing of the special prosecutor as a litmus test of loyalty in the Justice Department. Direct Sessions to do it. If Sessions refuses, fire him. Then direct the first deputy to do it. And if refuses, fire him. Keep firing people until you find one who will. He then becomes attorney general.

This puts the Republican Congress in the position of either letting it go, or blowing themselves to pieces by going along with an investigation of Trump. When Nixon was impeached, Democrats controlled Congress. But now Republicans do. Therefore, the Republicans can stop anything further cold.

Trump can declare that the Special Prosecutor is engaging in a wholly inappropriate partisan witch hunt, as proven by the partisans he has hired. He can fire him directly, and thereby end it - and force Sessions into the position of backing him or resigning. In this way, Trump himself can directly take the action, and force the whole Justice Department chain of command to either ratify his act, by staying on and defending it, or resigning.

Then Congress will have to make ITS choice. Impeachment originates in the House, which the Republicans control. Do they pick it back up - and immolate themselves? Or do they let it go?

If they are smart they let it go and focus on legislation. They already have a very bad reputation.

If they are dumb, they will continue the fight against the President.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-07-28   16:12:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Vicomte13 (#12)

Direct Sessions to do it. If Sessions refuses, fire him. Then direct the first deputy to do it. And if refuses, fire him. Keep firing people until you find one who will.

And you think Trump will keep his hands clean by firing people that he has threatened with firing unless they fire someone else for him (that he could much more easily just fire himself).

I think you should stick to regulatory law if this is a sample of your best legal thinking.

Seriously, how can you even pretend that anyone would be fooled by this? It actually looks much worse than Trump just firing Mueller directly.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-28   17:10:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Vicomte13 (#12)

The corporate state hires and fires Congress. Congress can don a mere fig leaf to fire or force Trump out, if that's what the corporate state wants.

Nixon thought he had executive power. At the time the "Democrat controlled" Congress was full of conservative Democrats from the South, and the Republicans deserted him too, so it was not a partisan event. Nixon had pissed off the corporate state in a number of ways, some of them petty. His belief that he held some cards against the CIA went bust and his "antisemitism" caught up with him.

Anthem  posted on  2017-07-28   17:50:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: Tooconservative (#13)

And you think Trump will keep his hands clean by firing people that he has threatened with firing unless they fire someone else for him (that he could much more easily just fire himself).

I think you should stick to regulatory law if this is a sample of your best legal thinking.

Seriously, how can you even pretend that anyone would be fooled by this? It actually looks much worse than Trump just firing Mueller directly.

It has nothing to do with clean hands. It's a forced loyalty test. Fire Mueller for me. No. You're fired. Fire Mueller for me. No. You're fired.

I agree with you that Trump should fire Mueller himself. And that is likely to produce the same loyalty test. Will Sessions, or Rosenstein, or whomever, continue to serve a President who fired a special prosecutor, or will they resign in protest. If they continue to serve, in for a penny, in for a pound: they will be tasked with providing the robust legal argument before the Supreme Court that the Chief Executive has plenary power over the Executive Branch.

Argue for it or you're out.

That's fine.

As far as how things "look", I assert that it really doesn't matter. Right now you have a failing, flailing Presidency utterly mired in a bogus investigation, and a failing Congress under one party control. The Republican Party is like a salmon swimming upstream to spawn and die. The rotten flesh is already starting to fall off. They've gotten stuck below a dam of their own making, and they're just rotting away there.

They NEED Trump to clear the decks with grapeshot. The only question is, once he does, will they get in line behind him, or are they too far gone, too weak, to visionless, to be able to unite at all?

Trump only won because of disgruntled independents and Democrats in Michigan and Wisconsin turning on Hillary Clinton. The Republicans have power because the Democrats had nationalized health care and made everybody angry and Hillary was utterly corrupt.

In power, though, we see what the Republicans have done: fortify the swamp, maintain Obamacare. It's done for the Republicans if they won't move.

I personally don't think they will move. I think they are going to sit there and rot, pass nothing of importance, and lose the House and the Senate in 2018. I don't think that Trump has as much by way of balls as he had bluster. He has some balls, but not balls enough to fire Mueller, provoke a political civil war, and be willing to pull a Lincoln and use the FULL power of the Executive Branch (which includes the power to use the intelligence and investigative services to politically prosecute key enemies) to win the war. I think he's hoping that by roaring loudly as a billionaire he will be able to get people to do his bidding.

Nope. The Republicans are the personal pool boys of individual rich special interests in their districts. They're not going to break those ties to save Trump unless they think they have to. And he can't make them think they have to. But they might let HIM take the aggressive action, and then try to hold onto their offices.

We shall see.

Because I have such a low opinion of Republicans, I fully expect this to end in a heap of rubble, with Democrats sweeping to power and becoming the institutional party for the next generation. I don't like that. That's why I voted for Trump. But the Republican Party seems determined to make it happen, so I will still root for Trump to break the china - expecting that he won't - and just sit back and snipe at the gutless wonders as we move inexorably down the pass to the universal single payer health insurance that I've always supported. In the end, I expect to get what I want. It would have been grand if the Republicans were the ones to get the things done, because along the way their better angels might have used the power to save the babies too. But my logical mind tells me that will never happen.

So I'm content to watch the spectacle, watch the Republicans self-immolate and observe truly: Not my circus. Not my monkeys.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-07-28   18:29:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Anthem (#14)

The corporate state hires and fires Congress. Congress can don a mere fig leaf to fire or force Trump out, if that's what the corporate state wants.

Nixon thought he had executive power. At the time the "Democrat controlled" Congress was full of conservative Democrats from the South, and the Republicans deserted him too, so it was not a partisan event. Nixon had pissed off the corporate state in a number of ways, some of them petty. His belief that he held some cards against the CIA went bust and his "antisemitism" caught up with him.

Well, then it looks to me like the Democrats are the much stronger horse, long term. If the Republicans keep rotting on the bone that will become clearer and clearer.

Democrats have three massive advantages:

(1) They are right about social welfare. Republicans are unchristian idiots who can't count.

(2) They keep discipline - voting as a bloc in the minority to defend what they gain, and voting as a bloc as the majority to push through the changes they want.

(3) When they get elected, they do what they say they are going to do. They are reliable.

Over time, these three things are decisive. It is within the Republicans' power to have all three advantages, but they will not do it because of very deep seated character flaws.

Trump was their last hope - and they hate him because he's gauche. Spawning salmon rotting on the bone as they swim upstream to die. Pathetic.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-07-28   18:34:47 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Anthem (#14)

Nixon thought he had executive power.

He did. What he lacked was the personal courage to use it. When the Supreme Court ordered him to turn over the tapes, he needed to contest with them over the matter of Executive Privilege in the Jacksonian way. He needed to put down the booze and fight. Instead, he let himself be trapped by his own narrow vision, and went meekly into the night.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-07-28   18:37:36 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: Vicomte13 (#15)

It has nothing to do with clean hands. It's a forced loyalty test. Fire Mueller for me. No. You're fired. Fire Mueller for me. No. You're fired.

It's just stupid.

So I'm content to watch the spectacle, watch the Republicans self-immolate and observe truly: Not my circus. Not my monkeys.

Trump hurts himself this way far more than the GOP.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-07-28   18:51:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com