[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: States Revolt Against Feds: No More Refugees! (Tennessean) – Tennessee became the first state in the nation on Monday to sue the federal government over refugee resettlement on the grounds of the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The lawsuit, filed on behalf of several state lawmakers Monday morning in the western district of Tennessee, alleges that the federal government has violated the 10th Amendment, which says the federal government possesses only the powers delegated to it by the U.S. Constitution and that all other powers are reserved for the states. The charge that the federal government is not complying with the Refugee Act of 1980, based on the 10th Amendment, makes Tennessee’s lawsuit the first of its kind. Other states have sued the federal government over refugee resettlement but on different legal grounds. The nation continues to debate refugee resettlement and immigrant rights as it awaits President Donald Trump’s new travel ban. The ban, set to take effect Thursday, bars travel for many people from six Muslim-majority counties and is considered by Trump’s opponents to function essentially as a Muslim ban, although the administration denies this charge. The lawsuit argues that the federal government has unduly forced states to pay for the refugee resettlement program. The federal refugee act was designed to create a permanent procedure for the admission of refugees into the United States. The lawsuit asks the court to force the federal government to stop resettling refugees in Tennessee until all costs associated with the settlement are incurred by the federal government. “Plaintiffs will suffer significant and irreparable harm unless this Court intervenes,” the 15-page lawsuit states. The defendants named in the lawsuit include the U.S. Department of State; Secretary of State Rex Tillerson; the Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration; the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; and the Office of Refugee Resettlement. The state’s lawsuit is brought by the Thomas More Law Center, a Michigan-based legal group that has taken on several conservative legal causes in recent years. The selection of the Thomas More Law Center came after lawmakers overwhelmingly approved a resolution approving the lawsuit and after Tennessee Attorney General Herbert Slatery declined to initiate the case. Organizations such as the American Civil Liberties Union of Tennessee and the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition slammed the lawsuit, saying it will negatively affect the state’s refugee community and perpetuate a culture of fear. Hedy Weinberg, executive director of the ACLU in Tennessee, said the legislature’s decision is “not only very troubling, but unjust and wrong.” Stephanie Teatro, executive director of the immigrant rights coalition, said that amid the largest refugee crisis since World War II, the president has already brought the resettlement program to a halt. “Not wanting to be outdone by the federal government, our legislature is proceeding with this extreme lawsuit in hopes of locking the door and throwing away the key,” she said in a statement. “Though this lawsuit is bound to fail in the courts, its very filing assures Tennessee’s place in a very dark chapter of our country’s history,” she said. “But just as the courts will dismiss this lawsuit, Tennesseans will also reject this betrayal of our values and demand real leadership from our elected leaders.” Joining the lawsuit are Sen. John Stevens, R-Huntingdon, and Rep. Terri Lynn Weaver, R-Lancaster. “The Constitution does not allow the Federal Government to force me as the elected representative of the 24th Senate District to implement federal programs while they sit in Washington insulated from the consequences,” Stevens said in a news release. Weaver, who helped push the resolution in the House last year, said the legislation was among the most important measures she’s ever worked on. “The only way we can get back to our constitutional beginnings and the intent birthed by our Founding Fathers is to go and take it back,” Weaver said. “We are looking forward to linking arms with the Thomas More Law Center for the long haul to regain sovereignty for our great state.” Last month, Senate Majority Leader Mark Norris, R-Collierville, said the state’s lawsuit was on hold as he sought a meeting with members of Trump’s administration. Norris has not yet had the meeting. Norris said in the news release that he hopes the lawsuit is not seen as a criticism of the Trump administration. “We want to convey to the President that we support his efforts concerning immigration and refugee resettlement and believe this suit for declaratory relief is consistent with what would likely be his position regarding states like Tennessee which have withdrawn from the refugee resettlement program but are forced to continue paying costs associated with it,” he said. In the lawsuit, the Thomas More Law Center points to the fact that Tennessee opted out of the federal refugee resettlement program. Despite opting out, refugees have continued to be sent to Tennessee, with the federal government appointing Catholic Charities of Tennessee to administer the program. “Operation of the federal refugee resettlement program commandeers Tennessee’s funds through Medicaid with the threatened loss of nearly $7 billion, amounting to 20 percent of its overall state budget — money that is needed to fund services that are critical to the health and welfare of countless Tennesseans,” the lawsuit states. Holly Johnson, state refugee coordinator for Catholic Charities in Tennessee, said there aren’t special costs that fall on the state when it comes to resettling refugees. “The state doesn’t pay for any special services for them because they’re refugees. They’re not eligible for anything that you and I aren’t eligible for,” Johnson said Monday in a telephone interview. That means if a refugee meets the already existing eligibility requirements for TennCare, then the state may pay that benefit. Or if refugee children need to go to school, the state pays the same for the child’s attendance as anyone else at the school. But any benefits related to employment are paid for by the federal government, Johnson said. Catholic Charities resettled a little more than 2,000 refugees in Tennessee during the 2016 fiscal year, which started in October. The majority of those refugees came from countries not included in the president’s new travel ban.an Poster Comment: Stop ALL immigration without setting a date for reactivation. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
#1. To: IbJensen (#0)
Republicans and Democrats will never do that. And there's no third party. So that's not happening.
Out of the ashes of the incineration of this one party snake that has two heads, the time is rising fast when a third party of the true Constitutional, Republic right will mop up the floor with the worthless 'moderates' and leftist pansies we have allowed to rule and ruin our lives.
Wanna bet? The way this "game of thrones" is going to end is fairly obvious, if you think about it.
I pay no attention to the 'Game of Thrones', but are you intimating that the left will win, the right lose and America will descend into the same contaminated swamp that has engulfed Britain, Germany and most of Europe? The one bad thing about fascism is that, with a few exceptions, (Fugimori and Pinochet...and to a great extent Franco) it overthrew liberal so-called democracies and were never destined to rule for any appreciable time. This was due, of course, to the nincompoops like Mussolini and Hitler. What category Stalin and his brand of communism fell into is anyone's guess.
#7. To: IbJensen (#6)
Not exactly. Our swamp will be different. What we will have at the end of all the shouting is the following: Social Security continuing to be the national retirement and disability system, covering everybody. Universal public education, K through B.S. Universal Medicare, with Medicaid covering those who can't afford care under Medicare. Food stamps (or some similar program) and housing assistance for everybody below a certain income level. It will all be ramshackle and inefficiently run. Those will be the economic structural realities. How that happens in a partisan sense is a mere detail.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest |
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|