United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Did Elon Musk just confirm that the moon landings were faked?
Source:
Zero Hedge
URL Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017- ... nfirm-moon-landings-were-faked
Published: Jul 21, 2017
Author: hedgeless_horseman
Post Date: 2017-07-22 11:45:29 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3305
Comments: 6
Mother should I trust the government? Elon Musk just announced that SpaceX abandons propulsive landing plans for Red Dragon mission to Mars. In my opinion, we should not be surprised. NASA supposedly used propulsive landing for the Apollo missions to the moon...in 1969. I ask you to please click the following hyperlinks to read three articles, carefully, watch one 3-1/3 minute video, closely, and then draw your own conclusions about the Apollo Moon landings that we are told occured nearly 50 years ago. First, an article from RT, today: SpaceX abandons propulsive landing plans for Red Dragon mission to Mars “The reason we decided not to pursue that heavily is that it would have taken a tremendous amount of effort to qualify that for safety for crew transport,” Musk said. “That’s why we are not pursuing it. It could be something that we bring back later, but it doesn’t seem like the right way to apply resources right now.” Musk added that he did not think that propulsive landing was the best approach. Second, my article from ZeroHedge, last year, 2016: I like velcro and used to drink Tang, but about the moon, was NASA really full of horseshit? " My premise is that President Kennedy wasn't an aerospace engineer, he was a politician faced with the Russians and their satellites scaring the shit out of his constituency. He called our shot, but we couldn't make it. So they lied." http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-03/i-velcro-and-used-drink-tang-wa... Third, an article from Physics Professor, Dr. Oleg Oleynik, in 2012, and updated in 2017*: A Stereoscopic method of verifying Apollo lunar surface images "Thus, based on the above examples, this study concludes that the Apollo 15 photographic record does NOT depict real lunarscapes with distant backgrounds located more than a kilometre away from the camera." "These pictures were, without doubt, taken in a studio set – up to 300 metres in size. A complex panorama mimicking the lunarscape shows degrees of movement, such as horizontal and vertical changes to give an impression of imaginary distance to the objects and perspective." Fourth, a youtube video of the Apollo 11 astronaut press conference upon returning from the moon, July 20,1969*: Apollo 11 Television Press Conference * Hat tip to Cognitive Dissonance Do these three guys, who supposedly just came back from the moon with two of them landing and returning, look and sound like they just came back from the moon? And here is the full hour and half press conference. Listen to the actual words and sentence structure as well as the body language, which is screaming out-loud disingenuous... What do you think, now?
-Pink Floyd, Mother
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
I will give it a thorough looking over, thanks again for what you post. Without this guy Deckard on board LF, there would little reason to visit.
Seems like you and I are the only two here who find articles like this worthy of comment. Doesn't matter - I know folks here are reading them.
#5. To: Deckard, jeremiad (#3)
Doesn't matter - I know folks here are reading them. Yes, they are being read... But remember -- this is a small forum.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#3. To: jeremiad (#1)
I will give it a thorough looking over, thanks again for what you post.
Replies to Comment # 3. Seems like you and I are the only two here who find articles like this worthy of comment.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]