The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles
Title: Democrats Spooked by Drop in Colorado Voter Registration Amid Trump Probe Into Voter Fraud
Source:
Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... -trump-probe-into-voter-fraud/
Published: Jul 16, 2017
Author: Adam Shaw
Post Date: 2017-07-16 08:25:56 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 1713
Comments: 7
Democrats are apparently spooked by a sudden drop in voter registrations in the key swing state of Colorado, with Democratic National Committee Chairman Tom Perez arguing that it is connected to President Trump’s investigation into electoral fraud in the 2016 election — and promising to fight back against it. According to the Denver Post, approximately 3,400 Colorado voters canceled their registrations after the Trump administration sought voter info from the states. The Post notes that the number is hardly enormous, representing only 0.09 percent of the state’s 3.7 million voters.Trump’s Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity has asked states to hand over data from their voter rolls, reportedly including felony convictions, military status, and voter history. The move has seen pushback from a number of liberal states such as California, New York, Virginia, and Connecticut, as well as some red states such as Oklahoma and Kentucky. Officials told the Post that while one reason given by those withdrawing was a lack of trust in Trump’s commission, another was that they didn’t realize how much of their information was public under state law. However, even though that would suggest the withdrawals coincide with reporting about the commission rather than being directly caused by the commission, it hasn’t stopped the Democrats from hitting the panic button. McClatchy reports that the Democratic National Committee and the Colorado Democratic Party have launched an effort to persuade Democrats to stay on the voter rolls. “If you unregister, you are giving a victory to proponents of voter suppression,” Perez said in an interview with the outlet Friday, adding that they see this as the party’s new rally crying. “That’s our message,” Perez said. “And we’re out there delivering that message in every way possible.” The red alert appears not to have filtered down to all Democratic officials, with others telling the outlet that they have not seen widespread examples of voters withdrawing their registrations in other states. Democrats have frequently jumped on any effort to crack down on possible illegal voting, or to clean up the voter rolls, and cried “voter suppression” even when such cries are baseless. Failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in May blamed voter suppression, particularly in Wisconsin, as part of her laundry list of reasons she lost the election. But Perez told McClatchy that they weren’t looking to panic voters, only that they are “concerned.” “What we’re seeing in Colorado, we hope that doesn’t spread elsewhere,” said one DNC official. “That’s why we’re working on educating voters across the country about this. We’re not trying to incite panic, but the DNC itself is monitoring this situation and is concerned by what we’re seeing.” Trump has repeatedly claimed that he believes he would have won the popular vote if illegal votes were discounted. Democrats and left-leaning media outlets have accused Trump of making the claim without evidence — but are now opposing his administration’s investigation. Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who serves as vice chairman of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, told Breitbart News Daily this week that the amount of opposition to the probe is “extraordinary.” “It’s truly extraordinary that they are trying to stop the commission from even beginning. These lawsuits are intended to stop the gathering of data and stop the meeting of the commission. It does make you think that some people out there don’t want us to see what amount of voter fraud there is,” said Kobach. He also discussed reports of people withdrawing from the voter rolls and posited a number of reasons why that could be. “It could be, actually, people who are not qualified to vote, perhaps someone who is a felon and is disqualified that way, or someone who is not a U.S. citizen saying, ‘I’m withdrawing my voter registration because I am not able to vote.’ It could be a political stunt – people who are trying to discredit the Commission and withdrawing temporarily because they are politically active but planning to get back on the voter rolls before the election next November,” he said. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: cranky (#0)
Donald Trump won the popular vote as well as the electoral college. By this I mean the REAL popular vote - the votes of real flesh and blood human beings who are American citizens entitled to vote. The Democrat fraud machine churned out millions of false votes. THIS is why the Electoral College is vital: it acts as a series of firewalls across the country that confines the fraud to specific large Democrat urban areas. So, the Democrats can blow the doors off the vote in California, with fake voters, but it has no effect on the overall general election (though it does affect the composition of Congress out of California).
I'm pretty sure that is an unprovable assertion. But even if true, how would that change anything? The democrap party and the msm will never concede trump is legitimate, let alone might have a mandate. that's my story and i'm sticking to it
It doesn't matter if they concede anything. Trump has the power. If the investigations he directs uncover things, he can send in federal supervision (under Republican control), override federalism and states rights to control elections in corrupt Democratic enclaves, assert federal supremacy over state and local government, and rip the corrupt party operators right out of there and into federal penitentiaries for voter fraud, and then have federal election officials supervise elections in the rotten Democrat boroughs. Then the Democrats will scream federalism! Federalism! States rights! Just like they did when they were protecting slavery and Jim Crow. But when states rights are used to abuse people (like slaves and blacks), or are used to cover up fraudulent election processes, the federal government has superior power and can and should kick in the door and say "You no longer have that right because you abused it corruptly". Trump has the power, through investigations of corruption, to federalize elections in corrupt areas. And he should. Drive forward with the investigations. Expose the corruption and then PROSECUTE the partisans, and take away state and local control of rotten boroughs and put it in the hands of federal oversight in those areas. It's deliciously ironic, and it's the only way to really cut off the head of the snake. The Democrats control the local machine, and that controls everything...unless the federal government comes in with federal supremacy and blots out the state and local rule - because it's corrupt. A nice statist solution to a problem of local government. They can hate Trump all they like, but he has the power to appoint the commissions and launch the investigations, and declare the emergencies and send in the officials. He IS. And that's great.
As far as the "unprovable assertion", so what? The whole Russia thing is hot air. If you simply assert something over and over and over again, it becomes an issue, and a "fact", even if it isn't true. I'm just behaving like the Democrat I so often get accused of being. The Trump Russia thing is bullshit, but the Democrats manufactured 3 million fraudulent votes in the last election and brought illegal aliens to the polls. Hillary Clinton and the Democrats also lost the popular vote. The majority of the American people rejected her. Prove me wrong. Can't. So I'm right. That's how our government works now. No reason for me to refrain from taking the same approach. it's a winner.
The way I read it, Congress certifies the Electoral College vote. If Congress believes that voter fraud exists in a state, they can reject that state's electoral college votes by a simple majority in both houses. I would say that refusing to submit voter information to the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity would qualify as a good reason to consider the rejection of that state's electoral college votes. And I would let the states know that.
Now THIS is a story. The DNC is concerned. Concerned over losing the millions of illegal votes that have put them over the top in several crucial elections over the years. CONCERNED and hoping that honesty, integrity, and election law enforcement "doesn't spread"... That's why they are "educating voters," aka ILLEGAL PAWNS on how best finding loopholes with which to elude state and federal law. The fedgoob needs to investigate DNC-Marxist Tom Perez for aiding and abetting FRAUD. Ain't it funny that ONLY after Trump became President that the GOP is FINALLY addressing the obvious?
Just as a matter of power, it has some precedent. Lincoln sent in the Army to supervise some elections.
#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
Donald Trump won the popular vote as well as the electoral college.
#3. To: cranky (#2)
#4. To: cranky (#2)
#5. To: cranky (#0)
#6. To: cranky (#0)
(Edited)
“What we’re seeing in Colorado, we hope that doesn’t spread elsewhere,” said one DNC official. “That’s why we’re working on educating voters across the country about this. We’re not trying to incite panic, but the DNC itself is monitoring this situation and is concerned by what we’re seeing.”
#7. To: Vicomte13, cranky (#3)
Trump has the power, through investigations of corruption, to federalize elections in corrupt areas.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]