Title: CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: 'We Blew Up WTC7 On 9/11' Source:
Your News Wire URL Source:http://yournewswire.com/cia-911-wtc7/ Published:Jul 15, 2017 Author:Baxter Dmitry Post Date:2017-07-15 11:46:40 by Hondo68 Keywords:Follow the money, classic controlled demolition, many loose ends Views:51528 Comments:108
79-year-old retired CIA agent, Malcom Howard, has made a series of astonishing claims since being released from hospital in New Jersey on Friday and told he has weeks to live. Mr. Howard claims he was involved in the controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7, the third building that was destroyed on 9/11.
Mr. Howard, who worked for the CIA for 36 years as an operative, claims he was tapped by senior CIA agents to work on the project due to his engineering background, and early career in the demolition business.
Trained as a civil engineer, Mr. Howard became an explosives expert after being headhunted by the CIA in early 1980s. Mr. Howard says has extensive experience in planting explosives in items as small as cigarette lighters and as large as 80 floor buildings.
The 79-year-old New Jersey native says he worked on the CIA operation they dubbed New Century between May 1997 and September 2001, during a time he says the CIA was still taking orders from the top. Mr. Howard says he was part of a cell of 4 operatives tasked with ensuring the demolition was successful.
Mr. Howard says the World Trade Center 7 operation is unique among his demolitions, as it is the only demolition that we had to pretend wasnt a demolition job. He claims he had no problem going through with the deception at the time, because when you are a patriot, you dont question the motivation of the CIA or the White House. You assume the bigger purpose is for a greater good. They pick good, loyal people like me, and it breaks my heart to hear the shit talk.
But even he admits that now, looking back, Something wasnt right.
No good has come from this. This isnt the America we envisioned.
Explaining how the building was bought down, Mr. Howard says, It was a classic controlled demolition with explosives. We used super-fine military grade nanothermite composite materials as explosives. The hard part was getting thousands of pounds of explosives, fuses and ignition mechanisms into the building without causing too much concern. But almost every single office in the Building 7 was rented by the CIA, the Secret Service, or the military, which made it easier.
Mr. Howard explains that WTC 7 was loaded with explosives in strategic places in the month leading up to the day that changed the course of American history. On September 11th, while the North and South towers burned, fuses were ignited in World Trade Center 7, and nanothermite explosions hollowed out the building, destroying the steel structure, removing the reinforcements, and allowing the office fires to tear through the rest of the building, hollowing it out like a shell.
World Trade Center 7 collapsed into its own footprint at 5:20pm, seven hours after the destruction of WTC 1 and 2. The building shocked witnesses by coming down at the speed of freefall, indicating that it encountered zero resistance on the way down.
Mr. Howard and his colleagues had done their job.
When the building came down, it was such a rush. Everything went exactly to plan. It was so smooth. Everybody was evacuated. Nobody was hurt in WTC 7. We were celebrating. We kept watching replays of the demolition, we had the whiskey and cigars out, and then all of a sudden the strangest thing happened. We all started to worry that it looked a bit too smooth. We watched the tape again and again and again and we started to get paranoid. It looked like a controlled demolition. We thought shit, people are going to question this. And then we heard that people from the street were reporting that they heard the explosions during the afternoon. When we were told that the BBC botched their report and announced to the world that the building collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did At that point we really thought the gig was up.
According to the official 9/11 report issued by the government, WTC 7 collapsed due to uncontrolled fires that were caused by debris that floated over from WTC 1 and 2, which had been hit by passenger planes. If the official narrative was true, WTC 7 would be the first tall building in the world to ever collapse due to uncontrolled fires, and the only steel skyscraper in the world to have collapsed into itself, due to office fires.
Mr. Howard and his colleagues feared the public would see through the official narrative and rise up against the government, demanding to be told the truth.
There were so many loose ends, so much evidence left behind. We thought the public would be all over it. We thought there would be a public uprising that the media couldnt ignore. Theyd be funding investigations and demanding to know why they were being lied to. We thought theyd find chemical composites in the area that would prove Building 7 was blown up.
We thought there would be a revolution. It would go all the way to the top, to President Bush. Hed be dragged out of the White House.
But none of that happened. Almost nobody questioned anything. The media shot down anyone who dared question anything they were told.
Follow the money
Mr. Howard claims he has no direct knowledge about the destruction of North and South Towers of the World Trade Center, explaining that CIA operations are very specific and that it is common to be working on a larger project while only understanding a small piece of the puzzle.
But he has advice for investigators seeking to understand the entire puzzle and work out who was behind the most devastating attack on American soil in history.
Follow the money.
When you want to find out who is behind something, just follow the money. Look at the trades made just before 9/11. These are the guys that knew what was coming. The sons of CIA agents, government officials. Close relatives of the most powerful men in America. Cheney, Rumsfeld. They all got rich. It wasnt just the contracts awarded to their friends in the construction business and the wars and the kickbacks.
It was insider trading.
Many countries including Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan and Monaco launched insider trading investigations in the wake of the 9/11 attacks, believing that if they could prove Al-Qaeda operatives profited on the stock market then they could prove the terror organization was behind the attacks.
Italys foreign minister, Antonio Martino, said: I think that there are terrorist states and organizations behind speculation on the international markets. German central bank president, Ernst Welteke, said his researchers had found almost irrefutable proof of insider trading.
Even CNN reported that regulators were seeing ever-clearer signs that someone manipulated financial markets ahead of the terror attack in the hope of profiting from it.
Mr. Howard says that a serious study of who profited on the stock market from 9/11 would tear the heart out of the oligarchy in America.
There is only one organization that spans the entire world, and let me tell you now, it isnt and it never was al-Qaeda.
Its the CIA.
There could never be a real investigation. The entire shadow government, as you call them now, are implicated.
The 79-year-old, spending his final weeks at home, said he doesnt expect to be taken into custody following his confession because then theyd have to go after everyone else. They will just use the media to attack me. They are all on the payroll to suppress everything around 9/11.
I notice a complete lack of details. No named co-conspirators, no sources for the explosives, no indication of any knowledge about the structure of WTC 7, etc.
For that matter, this guy tells us nothing about his CIA career at all. Assuming he even had one.
I notice a complete lack of details. No named co-conspirators, no sources for the explosives, no indication of any knowledge about the structure of WTC 7, etc.
The important mission was/is to make the intention and presence of islamic jihadists flying airplanes full of people into buildings irrelevant.
It seems to me that some of you have just taken too many pills, period.
I think your fascination with the Matrix is because you wish there really was a magic pill that you could persuade people to take so they would finally agree with your crackpot theories and ideas.
And that just is not going to happen. No one is going to take your crazy pills or subscribe to your ignorant debunked crackpot conspiracy theories.
I tried for years to figure out why the third tower collapsed. Any ideas?
Fire, I think.
I've always suspected that the materials in the towers were not up to spec, that that is what doomed all three when they were supposed to withstand fire and aircraft crashes.
A little like the Titanic being an unsinkable ship. Until it suddenly sank and killed a thousand people.
Who knows, maybe They sank the Titanic too and blamed it on that innocent iceberg that happened to be drifting past. You know, Them. It's always Them, isn't it?
"I tried for years to figure out why the third tower collapsed. Any ideas?"
Fire, I think.
Interesting theory even if a little wild. Some sort of fire?
And why the buildings 6 and 5 that were in between and much closer suffered much less damage (mostly by debris and demolished later in the cleanup)? Were they fireproof?
And why the buildings 6 and 5 that were in between and much closer suffered much less damage (mostly by debris and demolished later in the cleanup)? Were they fireproof?
They were no more fireproof than WTC 7 or the two big towers. But they were very small buildings compared to the towers.
Surely you recognize these are fundamentally different types of buildings from the three towers.
Meh. Soon I'll end up with my own unprovable CT theories, like the Truther nuts.
I tend to accept the official explanations mostly because I'm sick of the Truther nutjobs and their endless novel theories and their "experts" out to make a quick buck off these mentally ill misfits.
I am most skeptical of the claims that the buildings were of impeccable construction with all materials up to spec. I've never had that much confidence in the promises of perfect designs and even less confidence in the corrupt NYC building trades.
Maybe the towers would have stood if the designs were executed to the architect's specs and they actually had the materials of the quality they were supposed to have. But if they didn't...
Don't be too shocked. We find out on a regular basis that suppliers cheat on materials or that bridges or buildings were not properly assembled as they should have been. And those big towers, if ever collapsing even a few inches, would then pancake downward inevitably, just from the momentum and their sheer mass.
I am most skeptical of the claims that the buildings were of impeccable construction with all materials up to spec.
Maybe the towers would have stood if the designs were executed to the architect's specs and they actually had the materials of the quality they were supposed to have.
Yeah - I guess the QC on these buildings was much better than here.
Yes, I know you are equipped with endless lists of links. No doubt, you're scouring them now so you can start posting them all again in a Truthy linkfest.
You've done it to death.
BBC Reporting Building 7 Collapse before it happened. (If this does't wake you up nothing will)
Not really. You don't bother to check your old links before you post them or you would know that that video has been pulled from YouBoob. Maybe it's Them, silencing another profound Truthery.