United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Bankrupt Illinois Slams Citizens with 32% Income Tax Hike, More to Come
Source:
Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... izens-32-income-tax-hike-come/
Published: Jul 8, 2017
Author: Warner Todd Huston
Post Date: 2017-07-08 07:53:43 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 4229
Comments: 16
As the state of Illinois edges near becoming the first U.S. state to ever be rated junk bond status, the Democrat-controlled legislature of the bankrupt state of Illinois has just voted to slam its citizens with a hefty 32 percent hike in state income taxes. After a series of delays, as a legislature obviously embarrassed by its own actions dithered, the State House finally approved of the Senate’s override of the governor’s veto with a 71-42 vote, burdening the state with a massive income tax hike. It was a vote that saw ten of the state’s Republican contingent abandon Republican values and join the Democrats in approval. Thursday’s vote permanently increases the state’s personal income tax rate from 3.75 percent to 4.95 percent. It also raises the burden on businesses, raising the rate from 5.9 percent to seven. It all amounts to a 32 percent hike for the average Illinoisan and a $5 billion tax hike overall. The new tax hike is all the more galling because Illinois already has the highest property taxes in the nation, a fact that often forces retirees out of their homes to flee to other states. This is also a situation not lost on the state’s black American population, either. Illinois is witnessing a growing number of its African-American citizens moving out of the state, with Chicago and Cook County residents leaving at the fastest rate. On Thursday, Illinois Democratic House leader Michael Madigan only needed three Republicans to jump ship and vote his way, but not only did he get a whopping ten to do so, he also got five others who didn’t even bother to vote. An additional five joined him in the early rounds of deliberations, so Democrat Madigan knew he had the Republican votes going into the matter. Thursday’s vote came after the House and the Senate passed the gigantic tax package this week only to have Illinois’ Republican Governor, Bruce Rauner, veto the bill. Despite the veto, on Wednesday the Senate voted to override the governor’s pen, sending the final vote back to the House. But all day Wednesday, Speaker Madigan could not get enough lawmakers together to make a quorum. The task of overriding the veto was put off until Thursday, but even then, the vote was temporarily halted when police put the capitol building into lockdown after discovering a mysterious white powder in the governor’s Capitol office. The shutdown only lasted a short time, and, in due course, the vote was back on. Finally, by early evening on Thursday, the deed was done, and the tax hike was approved. The state that is losing more citizens to out-migration than any other state, one with the lowest number of new jobs being created, and one losing business in droves just saddled its people with even higher taxes and with no budget reforms made and no cuts in spending implemented to boot. Indeed, there was even more spending included in the disastrous budget deal. Some of the earmarks added into the deal include $12.7 million for the construction of a new classroom building at the College of Lake County, $10 million for the construction of a city center campus at Joliet Junior College, $15 million for a Chicago Metra station, plus much more. The one thing the bill lacks is any cuts in spending or any budget reforms. This inadequacy does nothing to stave off the threat to the state’s bond rating which is already one of the poorest in the nation. As June began, S&P and Moody’s both downgraded Illinois to near junk, the lowest ever for a U.S. State. But even with the new budget finally approved, it isn’t likely that junk bond status can be avoided. Moody’s Investor Service warned on Wednesday that it will probably end up awarding Illinois with junk status despite the budget approval. In fact, Moody’s said its coming downgrade would be a result of what the state’s Democrats are doing. In its July 5 statement, Moody’s said: The decision to place the state’s ratings under review for Moody’s downgrade incorporates our expectation that the legislature will implement revenue increases, overriding the governor’s vetoes. The review will provide a limited amount of time for the Illinois General Assembly to finish voting on the measures, and for assessment of the plan’s credit implications. The review process will also address the likelihood of further deterioration in Illinois’ most pressing credit challenges: its severely underfunded pensions and a backlog of unpaid bills, which has doubled during the past year. Moody’s also slammed the Democrats’ contention that a higher income tax intake will allow Illinois lawmakers to borrow even more money to spend on pet projects and fat union kickbacks. Meanwhile, Illinois Republicans have a large number of their own to thank for this latest outrage inflicted on the state’s beleaguered citizens. According to the Chicago Tribune, the ten Republicans who left Republican principles behind to join the Democrats were as follows: Rep. Steve Andersson (65th District), Terri Bryant (115th), Mike Fortner (49th), Norine Hammond (93rd), David Harris (53rd), Chad Hays (104th), Sara Jimenez (99th), Bill Mitchell (87th), Reggie Phillips (110th), and Michael Unes (91st). Another five Republicans didn’t vote at all. That list includes Jeanne Ives (42nd), Robert Pritchard (40th), Nick Sauer (51st), Grant Wehrli (41st), Christine Winger (45th). Five more voted for the tax hike in the first go around as well. They include R. Pritchard (40th), John Cavaletto (107th), C.D. Davidsmeyer (100th), Charlie Meier (108th), and David Reis (109th). 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
#4. To: cranky (#0)
My e-mail to the RINO Bob Pritchard: The Taxpayer Accountability and Budget Stabilization Act of 2011 was supposed to be temporary. Now it's back? Why? Because it was so successful? You were given $25 billion under that tax increase. What did you do with it? The state’s pension debt and backlog of bills have grown. People and corporations are leaving. Illinois is at junk bond status. My property taxes keep rising. And you guys can't even pass a budget? For three years? You're killing us and the rest of the state. This can't go on. Where are we supposed to get another $1000 per year? Cut spending. Find a way. ------------------------------------------------------ His Response: From: Bob Pritchard Thank you for your comments about the budget and tax increase. I understand your deep frustration with my vote but after careful thought, I felt it was the right decision for citizens and Illinois. I don’t like taxes any more than you and wish there were better options to get the state back on track. The majority in the legislature would not allow spending cuts alone to balance the budget. I concluded that the longer this impasse in budget talks continued—now in our third year--the worse the fiscal deterioration of our state became. I comment further about the budget and my vote in this issue of my electronic newsletter. http://www.pritchardstaterep.org/2017/07/pritchards-perspective-for-july- 3rd.html#more
I love that weasel word "alone", because it pretends that there were ANY. Were there ANY spending cuts? I know there was various NEW spending. But cuts? Doubt there was a single one. What's the alternative? Default on the debt. That will mean that the investors, who chose to invest in something at junk status, get screwed. They took a risk to get higher interest. If the state defaults, they lose. As it stands, the investors win, because the state won't default. So, they just get higher and higher interest payments, while the people of Illinois get higher and higher taxes - there's no real RISK to the bond investors at all! (So why give them higher interest?)
Oh sure. The State Legislature proposed and agreed to $2 billion in "spending cuts". They still have to vote on the specific spending cuts to specific programs, but they all agreed they should cut spending by $2 billion. So, to answer your question. No, there are no spending cuts nor will there be. Ever. This so-called "budget" merely kicks the can down the road for a few years,
There are no replies to Comment # 6. End Trace Mode for Comment # 6.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
To: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Sent: Fri, Jul 7, 2017 10:55 am
Subject: Re: Tax Increase
#5. To: misterwhite (#4)
The majority in the legislature would not allow spending cuts alone to balance the budget.
#6. To: Vicomte13 (#5)
Were there ANY spending cuts?
Replies to Comment # 6.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]