United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Bankrupt Illinois Slams Citizens with 32% Income Tax Hike, More to Come
Source:
Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... izens-32-income-tax-hike-come/
Published: Jul 8, 2017
Author: Warner Todd Huston
Post Date: 2017-07-08 07:53:43 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 4507
Comments: 16
As the state of Illinois edges near becoming the first U.S. state to ever be rated junk bond status, the Democrat-controlled legislature of the bankrupt state of Illinois has just voted to slam its citizens with a hefty 32 percent hike in state income taxes. After a series of delays, as a legislature obviously embarrassed by its own actions dithered, the State House finally approved of the Senate’s override of the governor’s veto with a 71-42 vote, burdening the state with a massive income tax hike. It was a vote that saw ten of the state’s Republican contingent abandon Republican values and join the Democrats in approval. Thursday’s vote permanently increases the state’s personal income tax rate from 3.75 percent to 4.95 percent. It also raises the burden on businesses, raising the rate from 5.9 percent to seven. It all amounts to a 32 percent hike for the average Illinoisan and a $5 billion tax hike overall. The new tax hike is all the more galling because Illinois already has the highest property taxes in the nation, a fact that often forces retirees out of their homes to flee to other states. This is also a situation not lost on the state’s black American population, either. Illinois is witnessing a growing number of its African-American citizens moving out of the state, with Chicago and Cook County residents leaving at the fastest rate. On Thursday, Illinois Democratic House leader Michael Madigan only needed three Republicans to jump ship and vote his way, but not only did he get a whopping ten to do so, he also got five others who didn’t even bother to vote. An additional five joined him in the early rounds of deliberations, so Democrat Madigan knew he had the Republican votes going into the matter. Thursday’s vote came after the House and the Senate passed the gigantic tax package this week only to have Illinois’ Republican Governor, Bruce Rauner, veto the bill. Despite the veto, on Wednesday the Senate voted to override the governor’s pen, sending the final vote back to the House. But all day Wednesday, Speaker Madigan could not get enough lawmakers together to make a quorum. The task of overriding the veto was put off until Thursday, but even then, the vote was temporarily halted when police put the capitol building into lockdown after discovering a mysterious white powder in the governor’s Capitol office. The shutdown only lasted a short time, and, in due course, the vote was back on. Finally, by early evening on Thursday, the deed was done, and the tax hike was approved. The state that is losing more citizens to out-migration than any other state, one with the lowest number of new jobs being created, and one losing business in droves just saddled its people with even higher taxes and with no budget reforms made and no cuts in spending implemented to boot. Indeed, there was even more spending included in the disastrous budget deal. Some of the earmarks added into the deal include $12.7 million for the construction of a new classroom building at the College of Lake County, $10 million for the construction of a city center campus at Joliet Junior College, $15 million for a Chicago Metra station, plus much more. The one thing the bill lacks is any cuts in spending or any budget reforms. This inadequacy does nothing to stave off the threat to the state’s bond rating which is already one of the poorest in the nation. As June began, S&P and Moody’s both downgraded Illinois to near junk, the lowest ever for a U.S. State. But even with the new budget finally approved, it isn’t likely that junk bond status can be avoided. Moody’s Investor Service warned on Wednesday that it will probably end up awarding Illinois with junk status despite the budget approval. In fact, Moody’s said its coming downgrade would be a result of what the state’s Democrats are doing. In its July 5 statement, Moody’s said: The decision to place the state’s ratings under review for Moody’s downgrade incorporates our expectation that the legislature will implement revenue increases, overriding the governor’s vetoes. The review will provide a limited amount of time for the Illinois General Assembly to finish voting on the measures, and for assessment of the plan’s credit implications. The review process will also address the likelihood of further deterioration in Illinois’ most pressing credit challenges: its severely underfunded pensions and a backlog of unpaid bills, which has doubled during the past year. Moody’s also slammed the Democrats’ contention that a higher income tax intake will allow Illinois lawmakers to borrow even more money to spend on pet projects and fat union kickbacks. Meanwhile, Illinois Republicans have a large number of their own to thank for this latest outrage inflicted on the state’s beleaguered citizens. According to the Chicago Tribune, the ten Republicans who left Republican principles behind to join the Democrats were as follows: Rep. Steve Andersson (65th District), Terri Bryant (115th), Mike Fortner (49th), Norine Hammond (93rd), David Harris (53rd), Chad Hays (104th), Sara Jimenez (99th), Bill Mitchell (87th), Reggie Phillips (110th), and Michael Unes (91st). Another five Republicans didn’t vote at all. That list includes Jeanne Ives (42nd), Robert Pritchard (40th), Nick Sauer (51st), Grant Wehrli (41st), Christine Winger (45th). Five more voted for the tax hike in the first go around as well. They include R. Pritchard (40th), John Cavaletto (107th), C.D. Davidsmeyer (100th), Charlie Meier (108th), and David Reis (109th). 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
#7. To: cranky (#0)
They are batshit crazy. Everyone with money and the big corporations who are still there will just flee. Who can blame them. I see New York and California ending up the same way, possibly Jersey too. At least NY/NJ do somewhat better at funding pension systems but IL/CA are totally screwed.
The public pension funds are the cause, and courts have ruled that they must be funded. But states cannot file for bankruptcy. So what does that mean? Will the court force the states to raise taxes to fund the pension?
I think they will. If you live there, flee now. Voters in states like NY/NJ/IL/CA just seem to have shite-for-brains to me. I'm sure they could give reasons for the way they vote or why they stay in these states but it is beyond my ability to imagine why they tolerate such bad management and high taxes and excessive restrictions on commerce and personal liberty.
Ever lived in NYC, or San Diego, or the San Francisco Bay area, Napa Valley, the Hollywood hills? These are spectacular places to live. One advantage of areas with large numbers of immigrants and workers whose wages are sinking and taxes are rising is that there is a surplus of pretty talented and pretty desperate labor. There are a lot of intelligent people living on the edge in NYC and California, and that's great for the wealthy. Sure there are all of these tax and budgetary issues, but those things really hit the upper middle class. Illinois is different. Chicago is...meh. It ain't NYC. It ain't California. There is neither the weather and beauty of Cali, nor the intense concentration of culture, art, science, media and money that is NYC. Chicago is basically a big, somewhat more economically diverse Detroit, so it lasted longer. But the crime spiraling out of control in Chicago now is what happened in Detroit in the late 60s and throughout the 70s and 60s. It killed Detroit. Chicago is dying the same way Detroit did, and there's just not enough intrinsically great about it that keeps people there. The weather sucks, and everything one can do in Chicago, one can do far better in New York City, or Washington DC, or LA, or San Francisco. Chicago outlived Detroit by a few decades, but its future is the same: death by violent crime, with nothing worthwhile enough to counterbalance it and keep people. The only big Midwestern cities that are really going to survive long term are Milwaukee and Minneapolis/St. Paul. Minnesota is not a low-tax state by any means, but they don't collect vast taxes to hand it out as pure patronage while the city burns. That's the difference. In Chicago, as in Detroit, there was a huge apparatus, but it didn't actually SERVE anything or anybody except itself. So it died. Chicago is Detroit circa 1972.
I've heard this before, Chicago as a Detroit meltdown in slow motion due to the long-term Democrat voting habits of the polity. People would never have guessed in the Sixties or Seventies that Detroit could be brought so low this way, to the point of entire suburbs getting ripped up to turn back into farmground.
Well, Minnesota is Democrat too, but Minneapolis/St Paul isn't going to die. There is a particular pathology to the Detroit/Chicago way that transcends mere partisan politics.
There are no replies to Comment # 14. End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestAs the state of Illinois edges near becoming the first U.S. state to ever be rated junk bond status, the Democrat-controlled legislature of the bankrupt state of Illinois has just voted to slam its citizens with a hefty 32 percent hike in state income taxes.
#9. To: Tooconservative (#7)
Everyone with money and the big corporations who are still there will just flee. Who can blame them.
#10. To: misterwhite (#9)
The public pension funds are the cause, and courts have ruled that they must be funded. But states cannot file for bankruptcy. So what does that mean? Will the court force the states to raise taxes to fund the pension?
#12. To: Tooconservative (#10)
Voters in states like NY/NJ/IL/CA just seem to have shite-for-brains to me. I'm sure they could give reasons for the way they vote or why they stay in these states
#13. To: Vicomte13 (#12)
Chicago is basically a big, somewhat more economically diverse Detroit, so it lasted longer. But the crime spiraling out of control in Chicago now is what happened in Detroit in the late 60s and throughout the 70s and 60s. It killed Detroit. Chicago is dying the same way Detroit did, and there's just not enough intrinsically great about it that keeps people there. The weather sucks, and everything one can do in Chicago, one can do far better in New York City, or Washington DC, or LA, or San Francisco.
#14. To: Tooconservative (#13)
Replies to Comment # 14.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]