[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!

Ok this is Funny

Walking Through 1980s Los Angeles: The City That Reinvented Cool

THE ZOMBIES OF AMERICA

THE OLDEST PHOTOS OF NEW YORK YOU'VE NEVER SEEN

John Rich – Calling Out P. Diddy, TVA Scandal, and Joel Osteen | SRS #232

Capablanca Teaches Us The ONLY Chess Opening You'll Ever Need

"How Bruce Springsteen Fooled America"

How ancient Rome was excavated in Italy in the 1920s. Unique rare videos and photos.

Reagan JOKE On The Homeless


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Women can't revoke consent to sex once underway, NC law states
Source: wbtv
URL Source: http://www.wbtv.com/story/35735579/ ... ex-once-underway-nc-law-states
Published: Jun 23, 2017
Author: Chris Dyches, Digital
Post Date: 2017-06-24 09:07:51 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 4758
Comments: 21

You hear the phrase 'no means no' thrown around when it comes to a woman's ability to protect herself from unwanted sexual advances, but in the state of North Carolina - no doesn't always mean no.

The Fayetteville Observer recently posted a story about a teenage girl who said she was at a party when a man pulled her into a bathroom to have sex. She initially consented, but told police when the sex turned violent, she told the man to stop. And he didn't.

The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in 1979, in State v. Way, that women cannot revoke consent after sexual intercourse begins. 

State v. Way (297 N.C. 293) states that if [intercourse begins] with the victim's consent, no rape has occurred though the victim later withdraws consent during the same act of intercourse. 

A Mecklenburg County Democrat, Jeff Jackson, is looking to get the law changed.

“Legislators are hearing more and more about women who have been raped and are being denied justice because of this crazy loophole,” Jackson told the Fayetteville Observer. “North Carolina is the only state in U.S. where no doesn’t mean no.”

Jackson introduced Senate Bill 553 in late March, looking to change the bill to make it illegal to continue sex once consent is withdrawn.  The politician became concerned about this law when he was a prosecutor. Once he became a state lawmaker, he wanted to change things.

"Our office had a case where a woman was raped," Jackson told WBTV during an interview Friday. "But she initially consented to the penetration - but it turned violent. She said stop and what I learned is North Carolina law doesn't protect her under those circumstances. You don't get the right to say stop if sex turns violent."

If a person continues after consent is withdrawn, the bill seeks to make it an act of force and against the will of the victim.

"It's indefensible," Jackson said. "I have not met a single person who thinks that should be the law."

Since the bill was introduced, Jackson remains the only sponsor of the bill. Jackson wants his bill passed before the NC General Assembly session ends in a few days.

"I am having conversations with Republicans," the politician said. "And I am saying 'do you have any objections - if so, let's talk about it'."

Jackson's office says very few lawmakers are aware of North Carolina's rape law.

Representatives from the North Carolina Conference of District Attorneys say the law is still good and add other lawyers call their office to make sure the law is current and are stunned to find out it is.

If the bill is to be introduced by the time the session ends, Senate Bill 533 has to be amended. Jackson says he is working on that and is hopeful his bill will be introduced and passed very soon.

Jackson's bill is still in the Senate Rules and Operations Committee where it has been since April 3. If the bill moves forward and is passed, the bill looks to become law on December 1.?

Copyright 2017 WBTV. All rights reserved.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

#1. To: cranky (#0)

A Mecklenburg County Democrat, Jeff Jackson, is looking to get the law changed.

That figures. Any law that makes sense and holds people responsible for their own actions offends Dims and everything they stand for.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-06-24   9:33:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: sneakypete, misterwhite (#1)

That figures. Any law that makes sense and holds people responsible for their own actions offends Dims and everything they stand for.

Just because someone agrees to sex initially doesn't mean they have agreed to be violently fucked like some farm animal.

Consent does not mean consent to be raped violently.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-06-24   10:48:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Tooconservative (#3)

Consent does not mean consent to be raped violently.

Consent means it wasn't rape. If it got violent,that is criminal physical assault,not rape.

Nobody can have it both ways,not even women.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-06-24   18:06:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: sneakypete, Anthem, misterwhite, cranky (#12)

Consent means it wasn't rape. If it got violent,that is criminal physical assault,not rape.

In this state, once a woman says 'yes', she can't say 'no' any more.

The country has rightly turned away from such notions of consent, well before the current snowflake ask-before-you-touch era. We got rid of such laws decades ago. No one who actually cares about women has any desire to see such laws return.

I don't give a shit what some old crackpots on LF have to say about "what life was like in the good ol' days when men were men and women could be fucked like farm animals if some sly man just got them to say yes once". This law will not fly. This law will be repealed or struck down in very short order. So fume all you want about your good ol' days because such laws are now only a memory. And soon the last of those who think such laws are just will also be only a memory.

Roar on. Tick-tock.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-06-25   4:19:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Tooconservative (#13)

This law will not fly. This law will be repealed or struck down in very short order.

Not a law. A North Carolina State Supreme Court decision that's been in place for 38 years and only applies to North Carolina. The pending stte legislation is to negate the application of that decision.

Since I don't live in North Carolina, and since I believe in state's rights, this does not affect me in the slightest. Quite frankly, it's none of my business how another state decides to live.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-06-25   10:53:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: misterwhite (#16)

Since I don't live in North Carolina, and since I believe in state's rights, this does not affect me in the slightest. Quite frankly, it's none of my business how another state decides to live.

Well, you're certainly taking a lot of interest in something you say is none of your business.

I have to wonder if you have some personal history with sexual consent issues. Only a sick mind (or a guilty one) would defend this law.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-06-25   12:48:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Tooconservative, misterwhite (#18)

I have to wonder if you have some personal history with sexual consent issues. Only a sick mind (or a guilty one) would defend this law.

If there is anyone on this thread that seems to have personal history on this issue,it is you.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-06-26   6:59:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 21.

        There are no replies to Comment # 21.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com