[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"

Any suggestion that the USA and NATO are "Helping" or have ever helped Ukraine needs to be shot down instantly

"Real problem with the Palestinians: Nobody wants them"

ACDC & The Rolling Stones - Rock Me Baby

Magnus Carlsen gives a London System lesson!

"The Democrats Are Suffering Through a Drought of Generational Talent"

7 Tactics Of The Enemy To Weaken Your Faith

Strange And Biblical Events Are Happening

Every year ... BusiesT casino gambling day -- in Las Vegas

Trump’s DOGE Plan Is Legally Untouchable—Elon Musk Holds the Scalpel

Palestinians: What do you think of the Trump plan for Gaza?

What Happens Inside Gaza’s Secret Tunnels? | Unpacked

Hamas Torture Bodycam Footage: "These Monsters Filmed it All" | IDF Warfighter Doron Keidar, Ep. 225

EXPOSED: The Dark Truth About the Hostages in Gaza

New Task Force Ready To Expose Dark Secrets

Egypt Amasses Forces on Israel’s Southern Border | World War 3 About to Start?

"Trump wants to dismantle the Education Department. Here’s how it would work"

test

"Federal Workers Concerned That Returning To Office Will Interfere With Them Not Working"

"Yes, the Democrats Have a Governing Problem – They Blame America First, Then Govern Accordingly"

"Trump and His New Frenemies, Abroad and at Home"

"The Left’s Sin Is of Omission and Lost Opportunity"

"How Trump’s team will break down the woke bureaucracy"

Pete Hegseth will be confirmed in a few minutes

"Greg Gutfeld Cooks Jessica Tarlov and Liberal Media in Brilliant Take on Trump's First Day"

"They Gave Trump the Center, and He Took It"

French doors

America THEN and NOW in 65 FASCINATING Photos

"CNN pundit Scott Jennings goes absolutely nuclear on Biden’s ‘farce’ of a farewell speech — and he’s not alone"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

U.S. Constitution
See other U.S. Constitution Articles

Title: Women can't revoke consent to sex once underway, NC law states
Source: wbtv
URL Source: http://www.wbtv.com/story/35735579/ ... ex-once-underway-nc-law-states
Published: Jun 23, 2017
Author: Chris Dyches, Digital
Post Date: 2017-06-24 09:07:51 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 3960
Comments: 21

You hear the phrase 'no means no' thrown around when it comes to a woman's ability to protect herself from unwanted sexual advances, but in the state of North Carolina - no doesn't always mean no.

The Fayetteville Observer recently posted a story about a teenage girl who said she was at a party when a man pulled her into a bathroom to have sex. She initially consented, but told police when the sex turned violent, she told the man to stop. And he didn't.

The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled in 1979, in State v. Way, that women cannot revoke consent after sexual intercourse begins. 

State v. Way (297 N.C. 293) states that if [intercourse begins] with the victim's consent, no rape has occurred though the victim later withdraws consent during the same act of intercourse. 

A Mecklenburg County Democrat, Jeff Jackson, is looking to get the law changed.

“Legislators are hearing more and more about women who have been raped and are being denied justice because of this crazy loophole,” Jackson told the Fayetteville Observer. “North Carolina is the only state in U.S. where no doesn’t mean no.”

Jackson introduced Senate Bill 553 in late March, looking to change the bill to make it illegal to continue sex once consent is withdrawn.  The politician became concerned about this law when he was a prosecutor. Once he became a state lawmaker, he wanted to change things.

"Our office had a case where a woman was raped," Jackson told WBTV during an interview Friday. "But she initially consented to the penetration - but it turned violent. She said stop and what I learned is North Carolina law doesn't protect her under those circumstances. You don't get the right to say stop if sex turns violent."

If a person continues after consent is withdrawn, the bill seeks to make it an act of force and against the will of the victim.

"It's indefensible," Jackson said. "I have not met a single person who thinks that should be the law."

Since the bill was introduced, Jackson remains the only sponsor of the bill. Jackson wants his bill passed before the NC General Assembly session ends in a few days.

"I am having conversations with Republicans," the politician said. "And I am saying 'do you have any objections - if so, let's talk about it'."

Jackson's office says very few lawmakers are aware of North Carolina's rape law.

Representatives from the North Carolina Conference of District Attorneys say the law is still good and add other lawyers call their office to make sure the law is current and are stunned to find out it is.

If the bill is to be introduced by the time the session ends, Senate Bill 533 has to be amended. Jackson says he is working on that and is hopeful his bill will be introduced and passed very soon.

Jackson's bill is still in the Senate Rules and Operations Committee where it has been since April 3. If the bill moves forward and is passed, the bill looks to become law on December 1.?

Copyright 2017 WBTV. All rights reserved.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

#1. To: cranky (#0)

A Mecklenburg County Democrat, Jeff Jackson, is looking to get the law changed.

That figures. Any law that makes sense and holds people responsible for their own actions offends Dims and everything they stand for.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-06-24   9:33:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: sneakypete, misterwhite (#1)

That figures. Any law that makes sense and holds people responsible for their own actions offends Dims and everything they stand for.

Just because someone agrees to sex initially doesn't mean they have agreed to be violently fucked like some farm animal.

Consent does not mean consent to be raped violently.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-06-24   10:48:12 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Tooconservative (#3)

Consent does not mean consent to be raped violently.

Consent means it wasn't rape. If it got violent,that is criminal physical assault,not rape.

Nobody can have it both ways,not even women.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-06-24   18:06:49 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: sneakypete, Anthem, misterwhite, cranky (#12)

Consent means it wasn't rape. If it got violent,that is criminal physical assault,not rape.

In this state, once a woman says 'yes', she can't say 'no' any more.

The country has rightly turned away from such notions of consent, well before the current snowflake ask-before-you-touch era. We got rid of such laws decades ago. No one who actually cares about women has any desire to see such laws return.

I don't give a shit what some old crackpots on LF have to say about "what life was like in the good ol' days when men were men and women could be fucked like farm animals if some sly man just got them to say yes once". This law will not fly. This law will be repealed or struck down in very short order. So fume all you want about your good ol' days because such laws are now only a memory. And soon the last of those who think such laws are just will also be only a memory.

Roar on. Tick-tock.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-06-25   4:19:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Tooconservative (#13)

This law will not fly. This law will be repealed or struck down in very short order.

Not a law. A North Carolina State Supreme Court decision that's been in place for 38 years and only applies to North Carolina. The pending stte legislation is to negate the application of that decision.

Since I don't live in North Carolina, and since I believe in state's rights, this does not affect me in the slightest. Quite frankly, it's none of my business how another state decides to live.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-06-25   10:53:06 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: misterwhite (#16)

Since I don't live in North Carolina, and since I believe in state's rights, this does not affect me in the slightest. Quite frankly, it's none of my business how another state decides to live.

Well, you're certainly taking a lot of interest in something you say is none of your business.

I have to wonder if you have some personal history with sexual consent issues. Only a sick mind (or a guilty one) would defend this law.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-06-25   12:48:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Tooconservative, misterwhite (#18)

I have to wonder if you have some personal history with sexual consent issues. Only a sick mind (or a guilty one) would defend this law.

If there is anyone on this thread that seems to have personal history on this issue,it is you.

sneakypete  posted on  2017-06-26   6:59:59 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 21.

        There are no replies to Comment # 21.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 21.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com