[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"There’s a Word for the West’s Appeasement of Militant Islam"

"The Bondi Beach Jihad: Sharia Supremacism and Jew Hatred, Again"

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Robert Mueller Stocks Staff with Democrat Donors
Source: Lifezette
URL Source: http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/ ... -stocks-staff-democrat-donors/
Published: Jun 13, 2017
Author: Brendan Kirby
Post Date: 2017-06-13 07:57:18 by HomerBohn
Keywords: None
Views: 4655
Comments: 45

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich sparked a mini-meltdown in the media Monday with a tweet challenging the fairness of the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

Gingrich, who also appeared on “The Laura Ingraham Show,” pointed to the early hires special counsel Robert Mueller has made.

“Republicans are delusional if they think the special counsel is going to be fair,” he tweeted. “Look who he is hiring.check fec [sic] reports. Time to rethink.”

He's not wrong about the donations. Four top lawyers hired by Mueller have contributed tens of thousands of dollars over the years to the Democratic Party and Democratic candidates, including former President Barack Obama and President Donald Trump's 2016 opponent, Hillary Clinton.

One of the hires, Jeannie Rhee, also worked as a lawyer for the Clinton Foundation and helped persuade a federal judge to block a conservative activist's attempts to force Bill and Hillary Clinton to answer questions under oath about operations of the family-run charity.

Campaign-finance reports show that Rhee gave Clinton the maximum contributions of $2,700 in 2015 and again last year to support her presidential campaign. She also donated $2,300 to Obama in 2008 and $2,500 in 2011. While still at the Justice Department, she gave $250 to the Democratic National Committee Services Corp.

Rhee also has contributed to a trio of Democratic senators: Mark Udall of New Mexico, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island.

James Quarles, who worked on the Watergate investigation as a young prosecutor, has an even longer history of supporting Democratic politicians. He gave $1,300 to Obama in 2007 and $2,300 in 2008. He also gave $2,700 to Clinton last year.

He has supported a number of other Democratic candidates, including Van Hollen, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), former Rep. John Spratt (D-S.C.), former Vice President Al Gore, 2004 presidential candidate John Kerry, former Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), and Colorado congressional candidate Gail Schwartz.

In addition, Quarles gave money to former Sen. John Walsh (D-Mont.) and three current Democratic senators — Ron Wyden of Oregon, Ed Markey of Massachusetts, and Robert Menendez of New Jersey. He chipped in $300 to the DNC Services Corp. $300 in 2012.

Quarles did donate to a couple of GOP politicians — $250 to then-Sen. George Allen (R-Va.) in 2006 and $2,500 to Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) in 2015.

Andrew Weissmann, a former Justice Department lawyer who now is at Jenner & Block, contributed $2,300 to Obama in 2008 and $2,000 to the DNC Services Corp. in 2006. Weissmann served as chief of the Justice Department's criminal fraud section and worked on the Enron fraud case.

A fourth lawyer on Mueller's staff, Michael Dreeben, donated $1,000 to Clinton 2006 and $250 to Obama in both 2007 and 2008. He was deputy solicitor general and has appeared many times before the Supreme Court.

Media pundits generally dismissed concerns over the Democratic Party ties of the staff Mueller is building. Several Trump critics noted that Gingrich previously had tweeted that Mueller was a "superb choice to be special counsel" and that his reputation was "impeccable for honesty and integrity."

Journalist Paul Vale, who has written for the Huffington Post and The Times of London, tweeted, "Boiled cabbage Gingrich lays out the White House plan to discredit career lawman Mueller — all in the service of his babbling paymaster."

CNN anchor John King on Monday asked the network's chief congressional correspondent, Manu Raju, if it should be a concern.

"No, because Bob Mueller is the one who's in charge of this investigation and will ultimately decide how to proceed, and there is some oversight over him by [Deputy Attorney General] Rod Rosenstein, even though there is a special counsel," he said.

.


Poster Comment:

Looks like a potential enemy or enemies will be delving into the phony Russian hacking away to give the election to Trump rather than the more deserving Hillary.

This can't fly! Larding up the staff with Clintonians should be enough to cry foul and dissolve the investigators.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

#1. To: HomerBohn (#0)

This can't fly! Larding up the staff with Clintonians should be enough to cry foul and dissolve the investigators.

But, you see, it WILL fly. Democrats FIGHT. They are brave - wrong, but brave. They ALWAYS fight. They never, ever quit. Like rust, they don't sleep. They press on. If they win, they impose. If they lose, they obstruct. But they never, never, never quit.

Republicans, by contrast, don't fight for anything except a very few things. Republicans will fight over anything that redistributes the wealth of the super rich. Not you and me, but the economic alphas. They will fight for them. Anything else? They treat it as politics and bargain and shift.

They don't like Trump, because he's a populist, so they view the investigation of Trump as weakening him, so they can get their way.

Democrats fight all the time. I suppose Republicans do too, in their way, but what they are fighting for is not what they SAY they are fighting for when they run for office.

Republicans could stop the Special Prosecution instantly, by refusing to fund it. They won't do it. And therefore Democrats will run amok with it, because the Republicans refuse to do the one thing that will stop them.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-06-13   8:11:24 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)

Republicans will fight over anything that redistributes the wealth of the super rich. Not you and me, but the economic alphas.

These economic alphas are subject to a progressive tax system which forces them to pay a higher tax rate on their income. I don't see you complaining about that unfair system.

Now if we had a flat tax on every dollar earned, then the economic alphas would benefit no more from a tax cut than the economic omegas. Would that finally please you?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-06-13   8:39:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: misterwhite (#2)

These economic alphas are subject to a progressive tax system which forces them to pay a higher tax rate on their income. I don't see you complaining about that unfair system.

Now if we had a flat tax on every dollar earned, then the economic alphas would benefit no more from a tax cut than the economic omegas. Would that finally please you?

If you read what I have consistently said about taxes, you would see me complaining about our unfair system for years.

I want to see a flat tax on every dollar of wealth. (Just taxing "dollars earned" is itself an unfair system unless you STOP taxing land and cars and boats and planes, and only tax their growth in value about the original purchase price).

If we just tax NEW wealth, including capital gain, on an ongoing basis, that would be a fair system, but it would not produce adequate revenue to run the government. To some extent we have to tax existing wealth (which is what a property tax is: a tax on existing wealth).

If you're going to tax SOME existing wealth, then to be fair you have to tax ALL forms of it, at the same rate.

So, one flat tax on each new dollar however derived - that's fair. And if you're going to tax property at all, then to be fair you have to tax all wealth in whatever form at the same rate: stock portfolios, art collections, gold hoards and houses all need to be taxed at the same property tax rate.

I have ALWAYS called for a fair and equal system. Now, I don't expect you to have carefully followed anything that I've ever said. Why would you. But since you haven't, you should be careful before making a swingeing general attack on my unfairness about something, when I actually have a decades-old published view of the matter - right here on this site and on Free Republic and elsewhere, that very consistently calls for uniform taxation of everything, because that's the only thing that is fair.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-06-13   8:50:35 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Vicomte13 (#3)

uniform taxation of everything, because that's the only thing that is fair.

No it's not fair. You're penalizing those who invest rather than blowing their money on trips, booze, gambling and whoring. You're discouraging the type of behavior we want and need.

"I have ALWAYS called for a fair and equal system."

Fine. Then call for a flat tax on all income and the elimination of the property tax. Why should homeowners foot the entire bill for the community?

You seek "fairness" by compounding the problem -- tax everything ... to be "fair". Taxing wealth is not fair. It's redistribution from the haves to have nots. Don't confuse your feelings of compassion with fairness.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-06-13   10:02:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: misterwhite (#5)

Fine. Then call for a flat tax on all income and the elimination of the property tax. Why should homeowners foot the entire bill for the community?

Because I want a fair tax policy, not a stupid one.

The tax rates required to fund the government WITHOUT property and wealth taxation are so high they would destroy the economy.

38% flat taxes? Insane.

We can't cut the government back far enough to be able to pay for it with a straight economic activity tax.

Government does too much to just fund it with the active economy. You have to tax property. And once you realize that you have to tax houses, then there is no justification to NOT taxing corporate securities ownership.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-06-13   13:34:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Vicomte13 (#9)

38% flat taxes? Insane.

No. It's honest. The government is currently collecting 38%, just through different means. Once people see firsthand how much the government takes from them, they'll demand cuts to the budget.

By the way, Ted Cruz proposed a 10% flat tax. Why do you need four times as much?

"And once you realize that you you you have to tax houses, then there is no justification to NOT taxing corporate securities ownership."

No. You don't have to tax houses. Spread that revenue collection among ALL the people of the state. They all benefit, so they should all pay. Isn't that "fair"?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-06-13   14:18:43 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: misterwhite (#11)

Spread that revenue collection among ALL the people of the state. They all benefit, so they should all pay. Isn't that "fair"?

Sure. Trouble is, the bottom third have only a couple of percentage points of the national wealth and income.

The flat taxes I have proposed tax them, but 2.9% of $15,000 a year is just not very much money.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-06-13   20:23:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Vicomte13 (#15)

"Trouble is, the bottom third have only a couple of percentage points of the national wealth and income."

And I'll bet they suck up a disproportionate share of federal benefits. The least they can do is pay the same percentage as the rest of us. If that's too much, then they can join our voices in demanding lower rates.

As it is, that bottom third (more like the bottom 48%) have nothing to lose by demanding more. Doesn't cost them a dime if taxes go up to pay for their demands.

Now, if you're willing to take away the voting rights of anyone receiving federal benefits (other than SS and Medicare), then I'm willing to listen to your proposal.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-06-14   9:39:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 16.

#18. To: misterwhite (#16)

Take away voting rights? La la land stuff. Not worth wasting the time to type about.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-06-14 23:15:29 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 16.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com