[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
LEFT WING LOONS Title: DHS Officers Humiliate Judges by Enforcing Immigration Laws, Declares Judge The judges cry of outrage came when he could not block the orderly repatriation of an illegal immigrant who has two drunk driving convictions, plus a U.S. wife and three children. We are unable to prevent [Andres] Magana Ortizs removal, yet it is contrary to the values of this nation and its legal system, complained Judge Stephen Reinhardt, who wishes to extend citizens rights to illegal foreign migrants. He said: We are compelled to deny Mr. Magana Ortizs request for a stay of removal because we do not have the authority to grant it. We are not, however, compelled to find the governments action in this case fair or just.
The governments decision to remove Magana Ortiz diminishes not only our country but our courts, which are supposedly dedicated to the pursuit of justice. Magana Ortiz and his family are in truth not the only victims. Among the others are judges who, forced to participate in such inhumane acts, suffer a loss of dignity and humanity as well. I concur as a judge, but as a citizen I do not. The judge, who was appointed not elected in 1980 and is married to a former top leader in the ACLU, also lamented the authority of ordinary DHS agents to enforce the law despite protests from well-paid, high-status civil rights lawyers: On January 25, 2017, the President [Donald Trump] signed a series of executive orders dismantling the system of priorities that had previously guided Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol in determining whom to deport. The orders also gave far greater authority to individual agents and officers, who are now removing non-citizens simply because they are here illegally, regardless of whether they have committed any offense. In light of the breadth of these orders and the lack of any apparent limit on agents discretion, the undocumented must now choose between going to work, school, hospitals, and even court, and the risk of being seized. In contrast, the new Supreme Court Justice appointed by Trump, Neil Gorsuch, has a more humble vision of his job as a judicial referee, saying in a 2013 award ceremony that: As my daughters remind me, donning a [judicial] robe doesnt make me any smarter
It serves as a reminder of whats expected of uswhat [Irish philosopher Edmund] Burke called the cold neutrality of an impartial judge. It serves, too, as a reminder of the relatively modest station were meant to occupy in a democratic society. In other places, judges wear scarlet and ermine. Here, were told to buy our own plain black robes and I can attest the standard choir outfit at the local uniform supply store is a good deal. Ours is a judiciary of honest black polyester. The judges on Reinhardts Ninth Circuit are expected to release soon a decision blocking Trumps Executive Orders limiting the entry of people from six terror-prone Muslim countries. The decision is based on a Hawaiian case, in which an Egyptian-born Islamic cleric claimed his constitutional rights were infringed by Trumps efforts to reduce Islamic jihad in the United States. The courts decision may have been delayed by the Islam-inspired bloody attacks in Manchester and London, at least one of which was conducted by the sons of Muslim refugees and migrants from Libya. Reinhardts intemperate language, said Andrew Arthur, a former immigration judge, suggests that the courts decisions are political biased. There is no cold neutrality in the Ninth Circuits ruling, Arthur wrote about the courts preliminary ruling in the Hawaii case. It is personal, visceral, and vindictive. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: cranky (#0)
Good. Maybe we should deport those judges as well. Si vis pacem, para bellum Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God. Never Pick A Fight With An Old Man He Will Just Shoot You He Can't Afford To Get Hurt I am concerned for the security of our great nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within." -- General Douglas MacArthur
Yes you should deport all those who do not uphold the law, that starts with violating immigration laws
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|