The Establishments war on Donald Trump
See other The Establishments war on Donald Trump Articles
Title: Harvard Study Reveals Huge Extent of Anti-Trump Media Bias
Source:
HeatStreet
URL Source: https://heatst.com/culture-wars/har ... tent-of-anti-trump-media-bias/
Published: May 19, 2017
Author: Heat Street Staff
Post Date: 2017-05-19 16:46:56 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 1183
Comments: 2
A major new study out of Harvard University has revealed the true extent of the mainstream media’s bias against Donald Trump. Academics at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy analyzed coverage from Trump’s first 100 days in office across 10 major TV and print outlets. They found that the tone of some outlets was negative in as many as 98% of reports, significantly more hostile than the first 100 days of the three previous administrations: The academics based their study on seven US outlets and three European ones. In America they analyzed CNN, NBC, CBS, Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal. They also took into account the BBC, the UK’s Financial Times and the German public broadcaster ARD. Every outlet was negative more often than positive. Only Fox News, which features some of Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters and is often given special access to the President, even came close to positivity. Fox was ranked 52% negative and 48% positive. The study also divided news items across topics. On immigration, healthcare, and Russia, more than 85% of reports were negative. On the economy, the proportion was more balanced – 54% negative to 46% positive: The study highlighted one exception: Trump got overwhelmingly positive coverage for launching a cruise missile attack on Syria. Around 80% of all reports were positive about that. The picture was very different for other recent administrations. The study found that President Obama’s first 100 days got a good write-up overall – with 59% of reports positive. Bill Clinton and George W Bush got overall negative coverage, it found, but to a much lesser extent than Trump. Clinton’s first 100 days got 40% positivity, while Bush’s got 43%: Trump has repeatedly claimed that his treatment by the media is unprecedented in its hostility. This study suggests that, at least when it comes to recent history, he’s right. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: cranky (#0)
Which was a lunatic decision his critics in the counterculture had been praying for. Hillary, Obama, and the jihadists suddenly heaped praise on him.
Of course the media hates him. They considered him one of them for decades,and now they see him as a traitor.
In the entire history of the world,the only nations that had to build walls to keep their own citizens from leaving were those with leftist governments.
The study highlighted one exception: Trump got overwhelmingly positive coverage for launching a cruise missile attack on Syria.
#2. To: cranky (#0)
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]