United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Lesbian couple get divorce after politically charged battle (editors note they weren't actually married as there is no such thing as homo pervert marriage)
Source:
MSN
URL Source: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/le ... AZg8O?li=BBnbfcL&OCID=AVRES007
Published: May 11, 2017
Author: Sheila Burke
Post Date: 2017-05-11 08:12:59 by HomerBohn
Keywords: None
Views: 9502
Comments: 37
( In this June 24, 2016 photo, Erica Witt, left, cries as she is denied same-sex parenting rights during a Knox County Circuit Court hearing in Knoxville, Tenn. Judge Greg McMillan opined that because she is a woman who legally…
NASHVILLE, Tenn. — A judge has granted a divorce decree to a lesbian couple after a custody battle that was targeted by dozens of conservative Tennessee lawmakers who tried to intervene in the case.
Loading...
The same-sex divorce and custody case became a political flashpoint after a Knoxville judge initially ruled that one of the women had no parental rights to a child conceived by artificial insemination because she did not meet the legal definition of "husband."
The judge changed his mind, granted the divorce and approved a plan for Sabrina and Erica Witt to split custody. The attorneys for the two women did not respond to calls seeking comment Wednesday.
Their divorce came May 2 as the state Legislature was pushing through a bill that gay rights groups say encourages judges to deny rights to same-sex couples when defining words such as "husband" and "wife" or "father" and "mother."
The case of the two women whose marriage fell apart became not just a private family matter but one where state officials repeatedly butted in.
Dozens of Tennessee lawmakers filed court papers to intervene in the case. They were represented by the head of Family Action Council of Tennessee, which supports one-man, one woman marriage. The lawmakers argued that they had to protect their ability to set domestic policy.
However, Knox County Circuit Court Judge Greg McMillan repeatedly refused to let them intervene. The Tennessee attorney general's office also got involved in the divorce case, arguing that Tennessee law should not be interpreted in a way that runs afoul of the U.S. Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage.
One of the state's largest LGBT rights organizations says the legislators should have minded their own business and not interfered in one of the most important and personal decisions a couple can make.
"What's next?" Chris Sanders, executive director of the Tennessee Equality Project, asked. "Are they going to pick and choose other marriages and other divorces to get involved in? It's really startling."
But David Fowler, president of Family Action Council, said in an email that the judge was right the first time when he initially decided against one of the women and ruled that the Supreme Court decision on gay marriage couldn't be broadened in the Tennessee case.
The lawmakers are appealing the judge's decision denying them intervention in the case.
Fowler has said publicly that his organization is challenging the assumption that the Supreme Court ruling legalizing gay marriage changed state laws. It supported a newly enacted statute that tells Tennessee judges to use the "natural and ordinary meaning" of words that are otherwise undefined in state law. Those words include "husband" and "wife."
The new law tries to circumvent the protections that the U.S. Supreme court gave to same-sex couples, Sanders said.
Four married lesbian couples expecting children through artificial insemination filed a lawsuit Monday over concerns that the new law could strip them of their parental rights.
Poster Comment:
Two things decided to "make a child" to create a foundation for the pseudo "family" and "marriage". The child shares DNA with only one of them. There is no father in the picture for obvious reasons. The "Mothers" are angry, irrational violent man-hating feminists and lesbians. What could possibly go wrong?(1 image)
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 37.
#11. To: HomerBohn (#0)
This is actually a disincentive to getting married for a gay man or a lesbian who is contributing their DNA to an offspring. If the marriage goes sour, they have to share the child or even lose it or, if they die, their partner can take the child away and cut off the DNA donor's own family from any contact. So if they just don't tie the knot, they have complete control over the child's custody in any event. This is not necessarily a win-win for gay marriage. It could lead to a decrease of some types of gay marriages once they realize what is involved.
It's certainly a lose-lose situation for the unfortunate offspring. He or she doesn't have parents, per se, rather he has two mentally disturbed perverts who are play acting the roles of father and mother. Further, these 'parents' are rapidly heading for a 'crack up' (npi) as they daily look in a mirror at themselves and eventually realize how filthy is their absurd method of lovemaking. Ingesting of bodily fluids as well as fecal matter causes more than mere indigestion.
Lesbians are generally "cleaner" than either hetero couples or (especially) homo men. It somewhat spoils the argument you're trying to make. Do you disapprove of them more because they're perverted or because you consider their sexual habits unhygienic?
Both. You're not a lesbian are you? How healthy can eating shit be for one and lapping up vaginal secretions as part of a 'love' act? It sounds not only disgraceful and sinful, but very unhealthy as one should be careful about what they swallow. Who knows if the vagina someone is attracted to has been sanitized? Some lesbians are untidy.
I'm really not sure how much buttlicking the average lesbian does. I don't think I want to google that. Who indeed? LOL I assume you have to be joking. Otherwise, I want to hear a lot more about these properly sanitized vaginas. Sounds like a riot.
I'm really not sure how much buttlicking the average lesbian does. I don't think I want to google that. No problem. Just ask HomberBohn. I'm pretty sure he has both videos and 8x10 color glossies. BTW,is "Bohn" German for "Simpson"? That boy has sum problems.
Sleazy Pete probably has a hard drive full of downloaded perversion. He should hope there aren't any children included in his collection.
And you sound jealous at the possibility.
It's too bad that this website hasn't more attendees. Hopefully that will be remedied in short time. Meanwhile don't waste your time responding to anything I post.
Why? Does reading it cut into your time downloading and watching homo porn?
There are no replies to Comment # 37. End Trace Mode for Comment # 37.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#13. To: Tooconservative (#11)
This is not necessarily a win-win for gay marriage.
#20. To: HomerBohn (#13)
Ingesting of bodily fluids as well as fecal matter causes more than mere indigestion.
#23. To: Tooconservative (#20)
Do you disapprove of them more because they're perverted or because you consider their sexual habits unhygienic?
#29. To: HomerBohn (#23)
How healthy can eating shit be for one and lapping up vaginal secretions as part of a 'love' act?
Who knows if the vagina someone is attracted to has been sanitized?
#30. To: Tooconservative, HomerBohn (#29)
How healthy can eating shit be for one and lapping up vaginal secretions as part of a 'love' act?
#31. To: sneakypete (#30)
#33. To: HomerBohn (#31)
leazy Pete probably has a hard drive full of downloaded perversion.
#36. To: sneakypete (#33)
#37. To: HomerBohn (#36)
Meanwhile don't waste your time responding to anything I post.
Replies to Comment # 37.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]