LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Macron nixes French national anthem & walks out to EU SONG after win: ‘I’ll defend Europe!’
Source:
Geller Report
URL Source: http://pamelageller.com/2017/05/mac ... ng-win-ill-defend-europe.html/
Published: May 9, 2017
Author: Vincent Wood.
Post Date: 2017-05-09 11:11:06 by HomerBohn
Keywords: None
Views: 8310
Comments: 39
We surrender! Kill the men and rape all the women! EU and NWO forever? ‘I’ll defend Europe!’ Macron snubs French national anthem & walks out to EU song after win EMMANUEL Macron neglected his own nation’s musical emblem as he walked out to deliver his victory speech, instead heralding his victory with the EU’s Anthem of Europe. In the past French politicians have announced their victory to the sound of La Marseillaise, which has stood as their anthem for hundreds of years. But Mr Macron, who has gained support from major European figures including Jean-Claude Juncker and Angela Merkel, instead blasted the anthem of Europe ‘Ode to Joy’ from the speakers as he waved to adoring crowds of voters outside the Louvre museum. The show of allegiance with the faltering European project was condemned by the losing Front National, who have fought to remove France from the crumbling European bloc. Speaking to the public he said: “I’ll defend France, I’ll defend Europe, and will strengthen links between Europe and its people.” And while he later sang the French anthem with the crowd at the end of his speech, French voters on Twitter were quick to criticise his decision as a sign of European subservience. Written in 1824 by German Ludwig van Beethoven and based on a poem by countryman Friedrich Schiller in 1785, Ode to Joy was used as a stand in national anthem for Unified Team of Germany in the Olympics from 1956 to 1968, and later taken on by the EU in 1985.SNP MPs whistled then later sung the tune as a protest against Brexit in the House of Commons during the third reading of the Great Repeal Bill.It comes as British officials attempt to predict how the Europhile president will approach a Brexit deal.Mr Macron is a centrist populist who stands in favour of the European Union and has been a clear opponent of Brexit, branding it a “crime” in his manifesto. The show of allegiance with the EU was condemned by Front National On the campaign trail, he said that Britain would face “consequences” for leaving the EU and promised to take a tough stance in the divorce negotiations.In February, Mr Macron said: “If your Government decides to organise a Brexit, I will be pretty tough on it.“We have to preserve the rest of the European Union and not to convey the message that you can decide to leave without any consequences. ”He favours a hard Brexit which would leave Britain outside of the single market and protect the interests of EU members. French voters on twitter were quick to criticize his decision as a sign of European subservience. Poster Comment: when someone asks why are we going down the Islamic drain, we should always remember that non-Muslims are themselves making it happen voluntarily , and so only blaming the politicians, globalists, governments yada yada...is wrong. These fkers are themselves choosing the Islamic path!. The first order, and the major share of blame, goes to the non-Muslim public itself.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
#1. To: HomerBohn (#0)
Western civilization is dying out everywhere - Europe, the US, Japan - everywhere - due to cratered birth rates, due to birth control. The Pope was right all of those years ago. The Pill was the poison that killed our civilization. Given that nobody - literally nobody - ever notices that or says it (I'm a nobody) - tells me that there will be no halt to the decline. The future of the USA is to become Los Estados Unidos Norte Americanos - a Spanish-speaking extension of Latin America. Canada will eventually follow suit after that. El Canada. The future of Europe is Sharia 2070. The future of Japan is decay and immense suffering, and eventual repopulation by other races. The West has come to a dead end, and it isn't a matter of economics and policies, but penises, pussies and pills.
It would be impossible to refute your comments! Japan, however, is a one-race nation. Few could be accepted into the nation as citizens. Three Japanese prime minsters have commented that the problem with America is the slaves that became citizens. They stated that the negro population is a drag on American society. That being said, diversity is the most important ingredient in our national make-up.....right?
Japan is mono-racial now, and is now the fastest dying major civilization on earth. Property values are collapsing outside of the major cities because houses, whole villages, are being abandoned. There are 1 million fewer people in Japan than there were 5 years ago. This will accelerate, because the average age is rapidly creeping past the age of female fertility. Fewer people means fewer consumers, driving the economy down further. Also, the Japanese are the longest-lived major civilization on earth. There are more people over 65 than under 15. Which means that the ratio of old, sick retirees to workers is moving towards 1:1. That in turn means that every worker's salary will have to provide for himself and also be taxed at a level that will provide the entire living costs of an elderly person, including medical, housing - everything. That will absolutely crush the young and cause them to have fewer children. Indeed, the high cost of living is ALREADY the reason that the Japanese have few children. Japan is a traditional society - practically the model that American Christian conservatives want: they do not have babies out of wedlock. They do not have any appreciable immigration. And the net result is the death of a civilization. Japan has three choices, just three, not four or five. The Japanese can relax their beliefs about traditional marriage and have a lot of kids however, and provide financial support for that - they would consider this to be utterly immoral. They can open the doors to immigration, and thereby lose the cultural essence of Japan. This is contrary to their cultural beliefs about themselves. Or they can resort to socialistic wealth redistribution, transferring substantial wealth and security to married couples who have babies, making it easy for a women to stay home and raise children - in a reasonably sized and reasonably priced home, while the man works reasonable hours. This means taxing the society and redistributing the wealth to subsidize childbearing families. But that is contrary to their economic beliefs. So, they will either compromise on their moral beliefs, or they will compromise on their cultural beliefs, or they will compromise on their economic beliefs. If, instead, they choose the "purist" line and refuse to compromise on any of those things, they will have chosen the inevitable fourth way: poverty, the further collapse of the birth rate, a more and more rapidly-aging population, and a demographic death-spiral that will leave them with abandoned cities and strangling levels of government and taxes to support a dying and non-productive population of old people. The best of the three choices in most people's opinion is to just open up to immigration and sacrifice the culture. In my opinion, redistributive economics is preferable, as the culture is worth saving. The easiest thing to do, though, is to just die out and let future generations suffer, so that's what I expect they will do. In France in the 1800s we saw this. France was the first revolutionary country in Europe, and with the redistribution of the lands that were formerly the aristocrats, the French were the first fully middle class civilization, with the highest standard of living in Europe. As a result, the birth rate cratered. When Napoleon left office in 1815, France had 37 million people and Germany as a whole had about 11 million, while Britain had about 8 million. By 1914, 100 years later, the French population had grown by only 1 million people in 100 years, to 38 million. The British had grown to 40 million, and the Germans had grown to nearly 90 million. That was why Germany was able to overrun France in 1870, and again in 1940 - the population differential was too great, giving the Germans unanswerable economic and military power. Nuclear weapons have ended the age when a major country can simply overrun and occupy another major country. Nobody will force their way into Japan. In a way, this makes the Japanese future bleaker, for in the past, the depopulation crisis MEANT a military crisis and that could spur a country to make compromises to try to boost the birth rate. But now, there is really no danger of Japan being overrun by anybody, so there is nothing to push the Japanese with fear. Japan will sink into a slow malaise, get older and feebler, and the needs of the elderly will strangle out the dreams of the young. They will not change their moral code. They will not change their view on immigration. And they will not redistribute wealth to strongly incentivize childbearing. Instead, Japan will rot and wither, it will age, depopulate, and sink into a spiral of impoverishment and economic slavery of the young to serve the needs of the old. Japan's future is grim. This is because they have three inflexible principles that, when added together, are a poison that will certainly kill off the civilization. You cannot maintain moral purity in reproduction AND cultural purity AND a very high degree of wealth inequality that makes it too hard for the young to scale the wall. The result will be what Japan has ahead of it: the setting sun. It's self-inflicted. There are two "right" answers: either open up to immigration and dilute your culture, or understand that survival requires wealth redistribution and get on with it now, before the situation exacerbates. They won't. So they will inevitably suffer and die.
They are not christian. They are not dead but still there. Millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions millions and millions and millions and millions and millions and millions millions and millions and millions. The millions comment is totally accurate. They have that many groups of millions of people. They aren't fucking dying out.
There are no replies to Comment # 5. End Trace Mode for Comment # 5.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
#3. To: HomerBohn (#2)
#5. To: Vicomte13 (#3)
And the net result is the death of a civilization.
Replies to Comment # 5.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]