LEFT WING LOONS
See other LEFT WING LOONS Articles
Title: Macron nixes French national anthem & walks out to EU SONG after win: ‘I’ll defend Europe!’
Source:
Geller Report
URL Source: http://pamelageller.com/2017/05/mac ... ng-win-ill-defend-europe.html/
Published: May 9, 2017
Author: Vincent Wood.
Post Date: 2017-05-09 11:11:06 by HomerBohn
Keywords: None
Views: 10111
Comments: 39
We surrender! Kill the men and rape all the women! EU and NWO forever? ‘I’ll defend Europe!’ Macron snubs French national anthem & walks out to EU song after win EMMANUEL Macron neglected his own nation’s musical emblem as he walked out to deliver his victory speech, instead heralding his victory with the EU’s Anthem of Europe. In the past French politicians have announced their victory to the sound of La Marseillaise, which has stood as their anthem for hundreds of years. But Mr Macron, who has gained support from major European figures including Jean-Claude Juncker and Angela Merkel, instead blasted the anthem of Europe ‘Ode to Joy’ from the speakers as he waved to adoring crowds of voters outside the Louvre museum. The show of allegiance with the faltering European project was condemned by the losing Front National, who have fought to remove France from the crumbling European bloc. Speaking to the public he said: “I’ll defend France, I’ll defend Europe, and will strengthen links between Europe and its people.” And while he later sang the French anthem with the crowd at the end of his speech, French voters on Twitter were quick to criticise his decision as a sign of European subservience. Written in 1824 by German Ludwig van Beethoven and based on a poem by countryman Friedrich Schiller in 1785, Ode to Joy was used as a stand in national anthem for Unified Team of Germany in the Olympics from 1956 to 1968, and later taken on by the EU in 1985.SNP MPs whistled then later sung the tune as a protest against Brexit in the House of Commons during the third reading of the Great Repeal Bill.It comes as British officials attempt to predict how the Europhile president will approach a Brexit deal.Mr Macron is a centrist populist who stands in favour of the European Union and has been a clear opponent of Brexit, branding it a “crime” in his manifesto. The show of allegiance with the EU was condemned by Front National On the campaign trail, he said that Britain would face “consequences” for leaving the EU and promised to take a tough stance in the divorce negotiations.In February, Mr Macron said: “If your Government decides to organise a Brexit, I will be pretty tough on it.“We have to preserve the rest of the European Union and not to convey the message that you can decide to leave without any consequences. ”He favours a hard Brexit which would leave Britain outside of the single market and protect the interests of EU members. French voters on twitter were quick to criticize his decision as a sign of European subservience. Poster Comment: when someone asks why are we going down the Islamic drain, we should always remember that non-Muslims are themselves making it happen voluntarily , and so only blaming the politicians, globalists, governments yada yada...is wrong. These fkers are themselves choosing the Islamic path!. The first order, and the major share of blame, goes to the non-Muslim public itself.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
#1. To: HomerBohn (#0)
Western civilization is dying out everywhere - Europe, the US, Japan - everywhere - due to cratered birth rates, due to birth control. The Pope was right all of those years ago. The Pill was the poison that killed our civilization. Given that nobody - literally nobody - ever notices that or says it (I'm a nobody) - tells me that there will be no halt to the decline. The future of the USA is to become Los Estados Unidos Norte Americanos - a Spanish-speaking extension of Latin America. Canada will eventually follow suit after that. El Canada. The future of Europe is Sharia 2070. The future of Japan is decay and immense suffering, and eventual repopulation by other races. The West has come to a dead end, and it isn't a matter of economics and policies, but penises, pussies and pills.
It would be impossible to refute your comments! Japan, however, is a one-race nation. Few could be accepted into the nation as citizens. Three Japanese prime minsters have commented that the problem with America is the slaves that became citizens. They stated that the negro population is a drag on American society. That being said, diversity is the most important ingredient in our national make-up.....right?
Japan is mono-racial now, and is now the fastest dying major civilization on earth. Property values are collapsing outside of the major cities because houses, whole villages, are being abandoned. There are 1 million fewer people in Japan than there were 5 years ago. This will accelerate, because the average age is rapidly creeping past the age of female fertility. Fewer people means fewer consumers, driving the economy down further. Also, the Japanese are the longest-lived major civilization on earth. There are more people over 65 than under 15. Which means that the ratio of old, sick retirees to workers is moving towards 1:1. That in turn means that every worker's salary will have to provide for himself and also be taxed at a level that will provide the entire living costs of an elderly person, including medical, housing - everything. That will absolutely crush the young and cause them to have fewer children. Indeed, the high cost of living is ALREADY the reason that the Japanese have few children. Japan is a traditional society - practically the model that American Christian conservatives want: they do not have babies out of wedlock. They do not have any appreciable immigration. And the net result is the death of a civilization. Japan has three choices, just three, not four or five. The Japanese can relax their beliefs about traditional marriage and have a lot of kids however, and provide financial support for that - they would consider this to be utterly immoral. They can open the doors to immigration, and thereby lose the cultural essence of Japan. This is contrary to their cultural beliefs about themselves. Or they can resort to socialistic wealth redistribution, transferring substantial wealth and security to married couples who have babies, making it easy for a women to stay home and raise children - in a reasonably sized and reasonably priced home, while the man works reasonable hours. This means taxing the society and redistributing the wealth to subsidize childbearing families. But that is contrary to their economic beliefs. So, they will either compromise on their moral beliefs, or they will compromise on their cultural beliefs, or they will compromise on their economic beliefs. If, instead, they choose the "purist" line and refuse to compromise on any of those things, they will have chosen the inevitable fourth way: poverty, the further collapse of the birth rate, a more and more rapidly-aging population, and a demographic death-spiral that will leave them with abandoned cities and strangling levels of government and taxes to support a dying and non-productive population of old people. The best of the three choices in most people's opinion is to just open up to immigration and sacrifice the culture. In my opinion, redistributive economics is preferable, as the culture is worth saving. The easiest thing to do, though, is to just die out and let future generations suffer, so that's what I expect they will do. In France in the 1800s we saw this. France was the first revolutionary country in Europe, and with the redistribution of the lands that were formerly the aristocrats, the French were the first fully middle class civilization, with the highest standard of living in Europe. As a result, the birth rate cratered. When Napoleon left office in 1815, France had 37 million people and Germany as a whole had about 11 million, while Britain had about 8 million. By 1914, 100 years later, the French population had grown by only 1 million people in 100 years, to 38 million. The British had grown to 40 million, and the Germans had grown to nearly 90 million. That was why Germany was able to overrun France in 1870, and again in 1940 - the population differential was too great, giving the Germans unanswerable economic and military power. Nuclear weapons have ended the age when a major country can simply overrun and occupy another major country. Nobody will force their way into Japan. In a way, this makes the Japanese future bleaker, for in the past, the depopulation crisis MEANT a military crisis and that could spur a country to make compromises to try to boost the birth rate. But now, there is really no danger of Japan being overrun by anybody, so there is nothing to push the Japanese with fear. Japan will sink into a slow malaise, get older and feebler, and the needs of the elderly will strangle out the dreams of the young. They will not change their moral code. They will not change their view on immigration. And they will not redistribute wealth to strongly incentivize childbearing. Instead, Japan will rot and wither, it will age, depopulate, and sink into a spiral of impoverishment and economic slavery of the young to serve the needs of the old. Japan's future is grim. This is because they have three inflexible principles that, when added together, are a poison that will certainly kill off the civilization. You cannot maintain moral purity in reproduction AND cultural purity AND a very high degree of wealth inequality that makes it too hard for the young to scale the wall. The result will be what Japan has ahead of it: the setting sun. It's self-inflicted. There are two "right" answers: either open up to immigration and dilute your culture, or understand that survival requires wealth redistribution and get on with it now, before the situation exacerbates. They won't. So they will inevitably suffer and die.
Japanese citizens had forgotten how to procreate.
They have not forgotten. Plenty of porn comes out of Japan, and the Japanese sleazy side of life is quite notorious. The Japanese have lots of sex, they just don't have babies. In this, they are no different from Europeans and Americans. We all have the pill. Sex is separated from childbearing. People have sex, but they don't have children. Why? Economics. Young men and women do not think they can support a family in the current economic climate. And they are right. They have a good bead on their finances. So, there are two things that can be done to prevent catastrophic depopulation: (1) Open the borders to a great deal of immigration. America has a positive birth rate overall because of Latino immigration. That's where the birth rate comes from. The white American fertility rate is 1.8, on a par with Europe, ahead of Japan's 1.2, but far behind the 2.1 needed to maintain a stable population. OR (2) Redistribute wealth from the older, accumulated wealth to the younger who can start families. Subsidize housing, subsidize food, subsidize schooling, pay much more for labor, so people can work less, so a woman can stay at home with her kids and have more of them. Those are the only two things that will work. People aren't having babies because of money. And the system is not changing naturally to alter that. The population is getting older and older, and less and less fertile. The Japanese, and white Americans, and Europeans, all still know how to have babies, and they practice at it a lot, but they don't have them because they can't afford it, because of the structures of their economies. To save the races - White European and Japanese, respectively - there has to be a redistributive change of the economic structure. Mass immigration will up the birth rate and prevent depopulation, but at the price of merely handing the country over to new people who are willing to live in much greater poverty and still have kids. The only way to save the Whites and the Japanese is to make the lives of young parents easier, and the only way to do that is to give them more money. Since the things that young people do are not considered as value as the knowledge and skills of older people, that means wealth redistribution, by government, through taxation and regulation, from the older and wealthier, to the younger and fertile, so they will have more babies. That rubs against the belief systems of the Japanese and the Americans and the Europeans. I don't personally think there will be any reform like that outside of Scandinavia. I think that the problem of infertility, aging and population replacement happens so slowly that people will cling to their beliefs about money until the tipping point is reached and the population is nearly majority immigrant, and then it will be politically impossible to redistribute in a way that encourages White reproduction. Japan won't allow the immigration, so they are simply going to crater into poverty and the enslavement of the young to serve the old. There will be redistribution in the end, through Social Security, but from the young to the old, further crushing the birth rate. People as societies love money and sex more than life and family, and you reap what you sow. Pleasure in the present no future. Because Japan doesn't have immigration, the rapidly accelerating decline is now visible. The decline is masked in America and Europe by mass immigration, such that Americans who are hard-boiled racists, who don't want to see a Latino future with Spanish language as the dominant one, will still simply refuse to see that whites in America are also in demographic decline, like the Japanese are. We are further up the curve, so it is not precipitous yet. Even American racists won't change their minds about economics, however, because they don't see the depopulation spiral. They will stand pat, rail ineffectively against immigration, refuse to permit redistribution of wealth to encourage white childbearing. And as time progresses America will go further down the curve, like Japan has, for the same reasons. But because of immigration and high Latino fertility, we will never see absolute population decline. We will, rather, see the very rapid replacement of the White majority with a Latin Hispanic majority. In Europe it is the same, except that the new future majority is Arabic and Muslim. In any case, Americans - even the most racist - are very wedded to an economic system, just as the Japanese are. And just like the Japanese, they refuse, and will continue to refuse, to admit that their race is going to die out BECAUSE OF the rigidity of that system, and its inevitable tendency to concentrate wealth in the older segment of the population. Without redistribution, the future of the Whites is to be minorities in Latin and Arabic lands. The future of the Japanese is destitution and slavery.
Wealth isn't distriputed you moron. It is fucking earned. You can't RE distribute something that was never distributed in the first place. So quite your new speak bullshit. Just come out and admit that you don't believe God answers prayers. That in your opinion he is impotent. That you have to STEAL stuff from what others earned to give to someone else to be successful. That is straight out of the pits of hell. You're a communist light. You don't teach christian doctrine but wealth theft and not working and being fruitful. The doctrine of demons.
You will rage. You will live. You will age. You will die. And you will discover how very wrong you were, how abusive, how evil.
There are no replies to Comment # 14. End Trace Mode for Comment # 14.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#2. To: Vicomte13 (#1)
#3. To: HomerBohn (#2)
#4. To: Vicomte13 (#3)
#9. To: HomerBohn (#4)
#10. To: Vicomte13 (#9)
Redistribute wealth from the older, accumulated wealth to the younger who can start families.
#14. To: A K A Stone (#10)
Wealth isn't distriputed you moron. It is fucking earned. You can't RE distribute something that was never distributed in the first place. So quite your new speak bullshit.
Replies to Comment # 14.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]