[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

what a freakin' insane asylum

Sorry, CNN, We're Not Going to Stop Talking About the Russian Collusion Hoax

"No Autopsy Can Restore the Democratic Party’s Viability"

RIP Ozzy

"Trump floats 'restriction' for Commanders if they fail to ditch nickname in favor of Redskins return"

"Virginia Governor’s Race Heats Up As Republican Winsome Sears Does a Hard Reboot of Her Campaign"

"We Hate Communism!!"

"Mamdani and the Democratic Schism"

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: No charges to be filed in New Year’s Eve dog shooting in Taylor
Source: The News Herald
URL Source: http://www.thenewsherald.com/news/n ... 02-54b4-865c-5d7582dae614.html
Published: Jan 3, 2017
Author: Dave Herndon
Post Date: 2017-04-23 15:13:47 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 2224
Comments: 9

After an investigation into a shooting involving a 43-year-old resident and a loose dog, the Taylor police have determined there won’t be any charges filed against the man.

Police say the man was acting in self defense when he opened fire on the dog at about 11:30 a.m. Dec. 31.

Police, and Animal Control were called to the 22000 block of Mary Street to investigate the shooting.

The man told them that he saw two dogs in his yard as he was trying to go to his car. He said he tried to backtrack into the house when one of the dogs started to charge at him. The dog was aggressive, showing its teeth and growling. When he realized he couldn’t get back to the house before the dog would be near enough to bite him, he pulled out his handgun and fired a single shot at the dog.

The gun was legally registered.

After the shooting the man called police himself to report what happened.

Officers arrived and found the man shaken and crying.

The dog’s owner arrived shortly after. Apparently, a neighbor knew the dog and its 31- year-old owner and called her to the scene. Neighbors helped the woman load the dog in her car so she could take it to a local emergency vet.

The dog lived, and was expected to make a recovery. It was scheduled for surgery to remove a damaged eye Jan. 2.

Witnesses told police that the dogs had been loose in the neighborhood for at least an hour before the shooting.

The man at a neighboring house told police that prior to the shooting, the same dogs had come to his yard barking and growling at him and his dogs, which were fenced in his yard.

That man’s wife had gone to the store, so he kept an eye on the yard to make sure everything was ok for when she got home. He did not see the actual shooting though.

According to city records, Animal Control officers had previously warned the owners of the two pit bulls in question regarding the dogs getting out of their yard on more than one occasion.

The dogs reside at a home on Brian Street.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

#1. To: Gatlin, Justified (#0)

Witnesses told police that the dogs had been loose in the neighborhood for at least an hour before the shooting.

The woman should be charged for public endangerment and never allowed to own dogs again.

A few months in prison would be appropriate. This man was in serious danger as a result of her neglect.

According to city records, Animal Control officers had previously warned the owners of the two pit bulls in question regarding the dogs getting out of their yard on more than one occasion.

Well, well, well... Yet another "escape". How does this happen so routinely in so many of these stories?

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-23   15:24:03 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Tooconservative, Gatlin (#1)

Pit stories keep adding up. Its the breed not the training. The training can lesson the issue but it still can not remove the natural state of the dog which is to attack and kill with out fear or reason.

I think it was last year when I looked up the statics on dog mauling's and pits were like 80% of dog mauling's. Which is more than all other dog breeds combined.

Justified  posted on  2017-04-23   16:56:26 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Justified (#2)

Pit stories keep adding up. Its the breed not the training.

It may be the case that there is a certain instability in the breed making it, say, 10% more likely to attack indiscriminately without warning. So that would account for the greater number of pit bull attacks but it would merely mean that dogs of that breed are statistically more likely to cause trouble. And the other 90% would be stable dogs. But if we can't tell the difference and weed out this hypothetical difference, then all of them have to be considered potentially dangerous.

I guess my point is that not all pit bulls have to be dangerous for pit bulls to be a dangerous breed. It's almost beside the point. Even if 90% of all pit bulls were harmless (and perhaps they are), that fact would not help the victims of ongoing pit bull attacks or give us any more confidence that pit bulls are a safe dog breed.

Tooconservative  posted on  2017-04-23   17:03:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 3.

#4. To: Tooconservative (#3)

Not all pitbulls are super aggressive. Some have it trained or beaten out of them. But they are so far worst than other dogs that its becoming an epidemic. Where labs use to be the choice of people to own a dog now its becoming pit mixes which have shown to be unstable for human pet. I believe they are but 7% of the dog populations but cause like 70% of the problems. In this I say they must be insured for liability of damages and owners be held responsible for any damage done with prison time.

Justified  posted on  2017-04-23 17:11:30 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Tooconservative, Justified (#3) (Edited)

It may be the case that there is a certain instability in the breed making it, say, 10% more likely to attack indiscriminately without warning. So that would account for the greater number of pit bull attacks but it would merely mean that dogs of that breed are statistically more likely to cause trouble. And the other 90% would be stable dogs. But if we can't tell the difference and weed out this hypothetical difference, then all of them have to be considered potentially dangerous.
That’s good rational and exactly the same rational Deckard uses when considering that “1% of law enforcement officers (LEOs) are bad” and “the other 99% would be good LEOs . But if he can’t tell the difference and weed out the bad ones, then all of them have to be considered potentially dangerous. C'est ça - [Am I right]?

Where do I get the 1%. Statistics show less than 1 percent of LEOs run afoul of the law. “We’re finding the numbers are pretty constant,” said Neal Trautman, executive director of the National Institute of Ethics and author of How to be a Great Cop.

Gatlin  posted on  2017-04-23 18:09:39 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 3.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com