[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
United States News Title: Trump Is Losing His Support Base After Attacking the Syrian Government Although it is widely speculated that one of Trumps aims in striking Syria was to garner further domestic public support for a political career off to a horrendous start, the result may, in fact, cost him a significant portion of his original support base. While Democrats and the media have rushed to praise or at least failed to condemn the presidents decision to launch yet another illegal strike on a sovereign nation, many of his original supporters have begun to express their dissatisfaction with the American president. A good example of this can be seen with one of Trumps stalwart allies, United Kingdom Independent Party (UKIP) leader Nigel Farage. He has sharply criticized Trump for his decision to bomb Syria. I think a lot of Trump voters will be waking up this morning and scratching their heads and saying where will it all end? Farage stated, before adding, As a firm Trump supporter, I say, yes, the pictures were horrible, but Im surprised. Whatever Assads sins, he is secular. According to the Telegraph, Farage is only one of many far-right Trump supporters who has expressed their distaste for Trumps decision to strike the Assad government. The others include Milo Yiannopolous, Katie Hopkins, right-wing vlogger Paul Joseph Watson, Ann Coulter, and others from within the UKIP circle. Paul Joseph Watson, a highly popular Youtube commentator who also works as an editor for Alex Jones Infowars, shared a tweet stating the following: If [Donald Trump] started a war with Russia and Syria because of an emotional reaction, then hes not fit to have the nuclear codes. Hard to argue with this, Watson captioned the retweet. Guys, I cant vehemently oppose destabilizing the Syrian government for 6 years and then support it just because Trump did it, he also stated. Most importantly, Watson said, I guess Trump wasnt Putins puppet after all, he was just another deep state/Neo-Con puppet. Im officially OFF the Trump train. Yiannopolous called the decision to strike Syria FAKE and GAY. Coulter ironically stated: Trump campaigned on not getting involved in Mideast. Said it always helps our enemies & creates more refugees. Then he saw a picture on TV. [emphasis added]. These pro-Trump pundits are not alone in their criticism of Trumps military strike. As one Twitter user stated in response to Trumps recent assertion that the U.S. should stay out of Syria: What I am saying is the same thing, and pretty much everyone else who voted you in. [emphasis added]. A Trump-supporting war veteran expressed his dissent over the strike, stating: From a veteran, we need to stay out of Syria, NOT OUR PROBLEM! I did not vote for you for this! Jobs, Wall, Security. [emphasis added] As one alt-right user astutely noted: The AltRight is portrayed as bloodthirsty, ignorant and vicious yet every Alt Right person on Twitter right now is campaigning against war. It appears many Trump supporters were not necessarily simply out of loyalty to Trump, but also, at least in part, due to a strong distaste for Hillary Clintons policies, particularly regarding Russia and Syria. Most surprising, however, is the fact that many of them have stuck to these principles, and Trumps recent decision to strike Syria has not changed their mindset on the Syrian war and/or Russia. In this context, Trump supporters are actually proving more principled and honest than Obama and Clinton supporters considering many Obama supporters appreciated his anti-Iraq war stance only to stay silent as he bombed seven nations in a six-month period. Trump may start to unite Democrats and corrupt politicians behind him, but he ultimately may be losing the significant section of his voter base that voted him in as the antithesis to Clinton not her alter-ego. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Trump hit Syria because the Syrians gassed a bunch of kids. He was horrified and offended by it, and - unlike most of us - had the power to be able to punish them for what they did. So he did. Chances are that Syria won't use poison gas again, so Trump will have achieved his objective. If people like that, that's good. If they don't, well, they're not the one making the decision. He is, and I'm sure he doesn't regret it. If you saw his speech, he was truly offended by the killing of the children, so he punished Syria for doing it. It's no more, or less, than that. You may not like it. You may want to see something deeper in it. But there very probably is not anything deeper in it than that.
You may not like it. What's not to like? If Hillary, McCain and ISIS are happy, all is well. /s
There are no replies to Comment # 7. End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest |
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|