[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"This Is How We Win a New Cold War With China"

"How Europe Fell Behind"

"The Epstein Conspiracy in Plain Sight"

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Bible Study
See other Bible Study Articles

Title: Other Religious Writings Can They Be From God, Too?
Source: Answers In Genesis
URL Source: http://www.answersingenesis.org/art ... v2/n4/other-religious-writings
Published: Dec 8, 2009
Author: Bodie Hodge
Post Date: 2009-12-08 00:45:52 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 11448
Comments: 33

The answer seems too simple: other alleged divine writings are not from God because they are not among the 66 books of the Bible and, in fact, they contradict the Bible. A Presuppositional Approach

This is a “presuppositional” approach, which means to presuppose that God exists and that His Word, the Bible, is the truth. This is the starting point or axiom.

God never tried to prove His existence or prove that His Word is superior to other writings. God simply opens the Bible with a statement of His existence and says His Word is flawless (Genesis 1:1; Proverbs 30:5). The Bible bluntly claims to be the truth (Psalm 119:160), and Christ repeated this claim (John 17:17).

In fact, if God had tried to prove that He existed or that His Word was flawless, then any evidence or proof would be greater than God and His Word. But God knows that nothing is greater than His Word, and therefore He doesn’t stoop to our carnal desires for such proofs.

The Bible also teaches us to have faith that God exists and that having faith pleases Him (Hebrews 11:6). Accordingly, we are on the right track if we start with God’s Word.

So how do we know that other religious writings are not from God? God Will Not Contradict Himself

In the Bible, we read that God cannot lie (Titus 1:2; Hebrews 6:18). This is significant because it means that God’s Word will never have contradictions. Though skeptics have alleged that there are contradictions in the Bible, every such claim has been refuted. This is what we would expect if God’s Word were perfect.

Yet the world is filled with other “religious writings” that claim divine origin or that have been treated as equal to or higher than the Bible on matters of truth or guidelines for living. In other words, these writings are treated as a final authority over the Bible.

Any religious writing that claims divine inspiration or authority equal to the Bible can’t be from God if it has any contradictions: contradictions with the Bible, contradictions within itself, or contradictions with reality. Examples of Contradictions in Religious Writings

A religious writing can be tested by comparing what it says to the Bible (1 Thessalonians 5:21). God will never disagree with Himself because God cannot lie (Hebrews 6:18). When the Bible was being written and Paul was preaching to the Bereans (Acts 17:11), he commended them for checking his words against the Scriptures that were already written. If someone claims that a book is of divine origin, then we need to be like the Bereans and test it to confirm whether it disagrees with the 66 books of the Bible. Paul’s writings, of course, were Scripture (2 Peter 3:16).

Religious books, such as Islam’s Koran, Mormonism’s Book of Mormon, and Hinduism’s Vedas, contradict the Bible; and so they cannot be Scripture. For example, the Koran in two chapters (Sura 4:171 and 23:91) says God had no son, but the Bible is clear that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God (Matthew 26:63–64).

The Book of Mormon says in Moroni 8:8 that children are not sinners, but the Bible teaches that children are sinful, even from birth (Psalm 51:5). Few would dispute that the Vedas and other writings in Hinduism are starkly different from the Bible.

Also, such religious writings contain contradictions within themselves that are unanswerable without gymnastics of logic. In the Koran, one passage says Jesus will be with God in paradise (Sura 3:45) and another states that He will be in hell for being worshiped by Christians (Sura 21:98).

The Book of Mormon, prior to the 1981 change, says that American Indians will turn white when they convert to Mormonism (2 Nephi 30:6). If such writings were truly from God, such discrepancies couldn’t exist.

Since such alleged holy books are not from the perfect God, who are they from? They are from deceived, imperfect mankind. Mankind’s fallible reason is not the absolute authority. God and His Word are. Other books may have tremendous value, such as historical insight; but they are not the infallible Word of God.

The Bible warns that false philosophies will be used to turn people from the Bible (Colossians 2:8). So people need to stand firm on the Bible and not be swayed (1 Corinthians 15:58; 2 Thessalonians 2:15).

So there are two options: place our faith in the perfect, all-knowing God who has always been there, or trust in imperfect, fallible mankind and his philosophies. The Bible, God’s Holy Word, is superior to all other alleged holy books. God will never be wrong or contradict Himself. So start with the Bible and build your faith on its teachings so that you please Him. Quick Comparison

Click for Full Text!

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

#2. To: A K A Stone, sneakypete (#0)

Archaeology, New Testament.

The science of archaeology has brought strong confirmation to the historicity of both the Old Testament (see ALBRIGHT, WILLIAM F.; ARCHAEOLOGY, OLD TESTAMENT) and the New Testament. Archaeological evidence for the reliability of the New Testament is overwhelming (see NEW TESTAMENT, DATING OF; NEW TESTAMENT, HISTORICITY OF). This evidence will be summarized in three parts: the historical accuracy of Luke, the testimony of secular historians, and the physical evidence relating to Christ’s crucifixion (see CHRIST, DEATH OF). Historical Accuracy of Luke. It was once thought that Luke, writer of the most historically detailed Gospel and of Acts, had concocted his narrative from the rambling of his imagination, because he ascribed odd titles to authorities and mentioned governors that no one knew. The evidence now points in exactly the opposite direction (see ACTS, HISTORICITY OF).

The Census in Luke 2:1–5. Several problems are involved in the statement that Augustus conducted a census of the whole empire during the reign of both Quirinius and Herod. For one, there is no record for such a census, but we now know that regular censuses were taken in Egypt, Gaul, and Cyrene. It is quite likely that Luke’s meaning is that censuses were taken throughout the empire at different times, and Augustus started this process. The present tense that Luke uses points strongly toward understanding this as a repeated event. Now Quirinius did take a census, but that was in A.D. 6, too late for Jesus’ birth, and Herod died before Quirinius became governor.

Was Luke confused? No; in fact he mentions Quirinius’ later census in Acts 5:37. It is most likely that Luke is distinguishing this census in Herod’s time from the more well-known census of Quirinius: “This census took place before Quirinius was governor of Syria.” There are several New Testament parallels for this translation.

Gallio, Proconsul of Achaia. This designation in Acts 18:12–17 was thought to be impossible. But an inscription at Delphi notes this exact title for the man and dates him to the time at which Paul was in Corinth (A.D. 51).

Lysanias, Tetrarch of Abilene. Lysanias was unknown to modern historians until an inscription was found recording a temple dedication which mentions the name, the title, and is in the right place. The inscription is dated between A.D. 14 and 29, easily compatible with the beginnings of John’s ministry, which Luke dates by Lysanias’ reign (Luke 3:1).

Erastus. In Acts 19:22, Erastus is named as a Corinthian who becomes a co- worker of Paul. If Luke were going to make up any names, this would seem to be the best place to do it. How would anyone know? In excavating Corinth, an inscription was found near the theater which reads, “Erastus in return for his aedileship laid the pavement at his own expense.” If these are the same men, then it explains why Luke would have included the detail that a prominent and wealthy citizen of Corinth had been converted and had given his life to the ministry.

In addition to these, Luke gives correct titles for the following officials: Cyprus, proconsul (13:7–8); Thessalonica, politarchs (17:6); Ephesus, temple wardens (19:35); Malta, the first man of the island (28:7; Yamauchi, 115–19). Each of these has been confirmed by Roman usage. In all, Luke names thirty- two countries, fifty-four cities, and nine islands without an error. This led the prominent historian Sir William Ramsay to recant his critical views:

"I began with a mind unfavorable to it [Acts], for the ingenuity and apparent completeness of the Tübingen theory had at one time quite convinced me. It did not lie then in my line of life to investigate the subject minutely; but more recently I found myself often brought into contact with the book of Acts as an authority for the topography, antiquities, and society of Asia Minor. It was gradually borne in upon me that in various details the narrative showed marvelous truth." [Ramsay, 8]

In full agreement, Roman historian A. N. Sherwin-White says, “For Acts the confirmation of historicity is overwhelming. . . . Any attempt to reject its basic historicity must now appear absurd. Roman historians have long taken it for granted” (Sherwin-White, 189). The critical theories spawned in the early 1800s that persist today are left without substantiation. Archaeologist William F. Albright says, “All radical schools in New Testament criticism which have existed in the past or which exist today are pre-archaeological, and are therefore, since they were built in der Luft [in the air], quite antiquated today” (Albright, 29). Geisler, N. L. (1999). Baker encyclopedia of Christian apologetics. Baker reference library (46–47). Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Books.

GarySpFC  posted on  2009-12-08   2:52:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: GarySpFC (#2)

Archaeology, New Testament.

Superstition ain't science,and when archeologists dig up copies of "The Weekly World News" 2000 years from now and prove that Elvis really did exist,that won't be proof that he impregnated the Loch Ness Monster.

BUT.....,there is nothing preventing you from creating a "Religious Issues" or "Religious History" ping list and pinging this thread with that.

I'll even go so far as to say it would be a popular ping list.

sneakypete  posted on  2009-12-08   5:48:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: sneakypete (#3)

Superstition ain't science,

No it isn't. But when the Bible makes a claim then it is backed up by archelogical evidence. Then that becomes physical support for the words found in Gods word the Bible. Then when that is multiplied several times or hundreds of times it adds even more support.

But no science can't prove or disprove the Bible. There is much scientific evidence to support the claims in the Bible and very little or none to support the man made theory of evilution.

It is impossible to please God without faith.

A K A Stone  posted on  2009-12-08   7:36:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: A K A Stone (#4)

It is impossible to please God without faith.

Fully agree. A lesson I've learned from experience

other alleged divine writings are not from God because they are not among the 66 books of the Bible and, in fact, they contradict the Bible.

This is where I would tend to stray from the evangelical. The Bible is the inspired word of God, yes. But when you look at the history of the Church (all denominations) and the way books were decided upon as well as during the times of major translations (KJV for example) some of the decisions were based on politics rather than faith. Course I suppose you could say that God caused those decisions to happen to I suppose.

But as for the general premises within the Bible itself (God is who He says He is, Christ is the Son of God who died for my sins and rose again, Holy Spirit, etc.) those are irrefutable to me.

nighttrain2008  posted on  2009-12-08   8:56:45 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: nighttrain2008 (#7)

This is where I would tend to stray from the evangelical. The Bible is the inspired word of God, yes. But when you look at the history of the Church (all denominations) and the way books were decided upon as well as during the times of major translations (KJV for example) some of the decisions were based on politics rather than faith. Course I suppose you could say that God caused those decisions to happen to I suppose.

Which ones are you referring to in particular? Books/letters that is.

Ronin  posted on  2009-12-08   9:24:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Ronin (#15)

Which ones are you referring to in particular? Books/letters that is.

There may be a few I suppose. Not saying a mistake was made at any of the conferences either at Nicea or when James I commissioned the translation he did. But at least with the KJV translation (whose history I'm more familiar with) there was a concerted effort to translate accordingly to maintain the divine right of kings was from God. Not saying I disagree with that either, as I don't, but it's just always made me curious if there were books that could have gotten in but political decisions made it otherwise

nighttrain2008  posted on  2009-12-08   10:27:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: nighttrain2008 (#17)

There may be a few I suppose. Not saying a mistake was made at any of the conferences either at Nicea or when James I commissioned the translation he did. But at least with the KJV translation (whose history I'm more familiar with) there was a concerted effort to translate accordingly to maintain the divine right of kings was from God. Not saying I disagree with that either, as I don't, but it's just always made me curious if there were books that could have gotten in but political decisions made it otherwise

The Council of Nicea was already a Catholic thing back then.

It had already gotten to and represented most of which Christ stood against, and not for what Christ stood for, namely simplistic faith in him, by then.

i.e., things had already been corrupted by then.

Ronin  posted on  2009-12-08   10:56:42 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 19.

#22. To: Ronin (#19)

The Council of Nicea was already a Catholic thing back then.

It had already gotten to and represented most of which Christ stood against, and not for what Christ stood for, namely simplistic faith in him, by then.

Have to admit readily I don't know a lot about the early history of the church. Been watching a documentary on BBC presented by Diarmaid MacCulloch that I've learned a lot from. The first 2-3 episodes dealt with early history and the rise of the Greek Orthodox and Roman Catholic.

You are right about one thing though. There's a lot of 'rules' now in churches and less about the simplistic faith in Christ.

nighttrain2008  posted on  2009-12-08 13:39:55 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com