[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
Status: Not Logged In; Sign In
LEFT WING LOONS Title: Chelsea Clinton's chief of staff whines: 'Just like her mother Chelsea Clinton never gets a break Earlier this week, you probably saw a story about Chelsea Clinton receiving a lifetime achievement award. The Hill ran it with some dubious language, and many people missed the fact that it was an award from Lifetime the television network. Failing to capitalize the L led to a firestorm about privilege, and how a woman who has achieved virtually nothing could be granted and award for her non-existent achievements. Carefull reading spared some of us who are inclined to agree with that sentiment. Like her mother before her, Chelsea Clinton is a victim Now, however, were being treated to the opposite argument - one weve heard all too often. Like her mother before her, Chelsea Clinton is a victim. Just like Hillary, she can never catch a break. Everyone ignores her greatness, her largesse, and her status as the next big thing in favor of beating her down. Yesterday, the following Tweet appeared: Why does Chelsea Clinton need a chief of staff? If youre unfamiliar with Bari Lurie, shes Chelsea Clintons chief of staff. Why does Chelsea Clinton need a chief of staff? I have no idea. The LA Times article she shared is largely an acknowledgement of the idea that Chelsea is - thanks to her last name - headed for a turn in the political spotlight. Its centerpiece is the idea that shes just like dear old mom: a perpetual victim. When it comes to accepting prizes for charitable contributions, Chelsea is in no way an outlier. Everyone in her income bracket has a shelf full of honors. Luncheon ceremonies are a way to publicly thank big-name benefactors, get them to show up to the event, and therefore attract other donors and media interest. Ivanka Trump, for example just picking someone at random here is no stranger to vanity awards. She has been honored by organizations such as the European School of Economics and the Diamond Empowerment Funds GOOD Awards. (Tagline: Diamonds do good.) But Chelsea, like her mother, never gets a break unlike Ivanka and her father. The Lifetime achievement mistake was an error of capitalization that became a convenient Internet cudgel at a time when Democrats are focused on resistance, uneasy about class politics, and searching for the next generation of leaders. Meanwhile, in the real world, the Trump administration announced that Ivanka would be getting her own White House office and high-level security clearance despite her fathers insistence that none of his children would enjoy such privileges after his election. Nepotism is a charge that the Trumps find easy to circumnavigate. Not so for the Clintons. Hear that? Donald and Ivanka are being given a break. Im not sure where this break is coming from, since the daily political drumbeat is one of absolute media hatred targeting their careers and brands but, apparently, theres a break out there somewhere. Chelseas entire life is a break. Its a privileged existence predicated upon the lucky circumstance of bearing the Clinton moniker Heres the problem. Until Trump ran for President, he was a private citizen dealing with the same bureaucratic nonsense we all face - a regulatory labyrinth aided and expanded by, you guessed it, the Clinton family. Whatever you may think of Ivanka and her father theyve lived a life in the private sector, and theyve done very well there. They havent achieved their fortune by leeching off the hard work of taxpayers. They employ thousands of people, insure thousands of families, and theyve built multiple international businesses that contribute to the overall economy. Bill, Hillary, and the rest of their clan, have done none of that. Theyre lives are 100% constructed around the exploitation of their various public offices. In a word, theyre takers on a global level. Chelsea never gets a break? Please. Chelseas entire life is a break. Its a privileged existence predicated upon the lucky circumstance of bearing the Clinton moniker. For Democrats desperate to find their next great white hope, heres a piece of advice. Youd be better served looking for someone who has succeeded in real life. Americas fascination with the political bubble is long gone. Well wait while you look. Poster Comment: Chelsea is just another subversive Democrat, seeking to overthrow America, just as all Democrats seek to overthrow America. The war against this country is being waged by the traitors to America...........Democrats, and NOT Russia, or Iran. Chelsea is also an incredibly ghastly looking, but typical, Democrat female. Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread Top Page Up Full Thread Page Down Bottom/Latest
#1. To: HomerBohn (#0)
Because she is going to be sworn in as a new congresscritter just as soon as Mr and Mrs Bubba can find a safe congressional seat to buy for her. Preferably one in the northeast,and close to their money. BOYCOTT PAYPAL AND CLOSE YOUR PP ACCOUNTS NOW! ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO,TOO! ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION! Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
PLEASE! Who can forget about Bubbette! commandeering an office right in the WH? One,IIRC,is normally used by the VP. That's where she had her doublewide parked when she demanded the FBI deliver over 1,000 Confidential FBI "raw" background files to her. Files she had no legal right whatsoever to even see,never mind have possession over. The same 1,000+ files she refused to hand back to the FBI when she left the WH. The same files that are at the root of the 200+ million dollar fortune the Clinton Crime Family has today. BOYCOTT PAYPAL AND CLOSE YOUR PP ACCOUNTS NOW! ENCOURAGE OTHERS TO DO SO,TOO! ISLAM MEANS SUBMISSION! Why is democracy held in such high esteem when it’s the enemy of the minority and makes all rights relative to the dictates of the majority? (Ron Paul,2012) American Indians had open borders. Look at how well that worked out for them.
|
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]
|