United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Man jumps a California freeway with his motorcycle and lands in trouble
Source:
Auto Blog
URL Source: http://www.autoblog.com/2017/03/06/ ... ornia-motorcycle-freeway-jump/
Published: Mar 6, 2017
Author: Joel Stocksdale
Post Date: 2017-03-07 13:41:39 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3156
Comments: 21
Once again, southern California has become host to an unauthorized off-road stunt around public roads. A little more than a year after a man ripped through San Diego in a buggy, we now have a man who jumped a freeway with his motorcycle. The video was originally posted by Instagram user kyle_katsandris. On the page, the user has posted other photos and video of, presumably, his motorcycle stunts. However, the other jumps seem to take place in an off-road park, rather than on or near public roads. In the video, seen above, the rider powers up an embankment leading to the freeway, and sails over traffic on his way to a smooth landing on the opposing hills. In the video, no one was hurt, but we don't condone these unauthorized stunts that takes place in such close proximity to traffic. The stunt has attracted the attention of local law enforcement, too. According to CBS Los Angeles, both the California Highway Patrol and the Riverside County sheriff's department have launched investigations. We also reached out to the sheriff's department, and its media bureau told us the they haven't conclusively identified the rider but that "he or she could face county ordinance violations and possibly trespassing." Poster Comment: News Media Report: Watch as these programmed propaganda whores somberly pontificate about this act of courage - why....someone might have been hurt! Not realizing that the rider is a seasoned pro and has replicated jumps such as this countless times. Why, you can almost see these cowardly coiffed cretins pissing their pants at the thought of someone doing what he loves and happens to be extremely proficient at. It makes you wonder how they leave their homes because anything could happen to them out there in the big scary world. For crying out loud - some air-headed bimbo talking on a cell phone while driving is multitudes of times more dangerous than this well planned and executed stunt. Well, I'm sure the statists here will demand that authorities bring the entire weight of the criminal justice system down on this courageous individual because - conformity. I also heard that they may bring him up aon the charge of "filming without a permit" Oh for Pete's sake! When did people become such whining little pussies?
At the time of publishing, we're waiting for additional details from the department.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
(Edited)
Wow….look this jump by a “seasoned pro” [the LAST one he made in his short life]: Here is yet another one: There are more….all crashes, with injuries and deaths. So much for your “seasoned Pro” shit safely jumping….eh? You libertarian assholes are total idiots….you never think rationally!
Those guys at least assumed all the risk of injury and death to themselves. The libertarian poster boy who jumped the freeway exposed other people to risk. He socialized the risk, libertarians preach one thing and do another. Instead of lining up old cars for the jumps they ought to have a pen full of libertarians.
No, LIBERALtarians preach that the absolute freedom to do whatever they like... regardless if their freedoms restrict other people's freedom. In other words, those libtard drug addled hippie assholes are the most constitutionally protected people they know... fuck everyone else. They turn into Ray Charles when it comes to SEEING a victim
Who was being victimized in the video?
The motorcycle rider. I know it's a difficult concept for you to grasp, but the government doesn't own your body. As far as the drivers on the highway - the chance of them being injured is as likely as being hit by a meteor. If nanny-state cowards like you had your way - skydivers would be banned because they might be blown off course by the wind and land on someone, water-skiing would be outlawed because someone might lose control and plow into someone on the beach, hot air ballooning made illegal because they might land in a populated area. Life is full of risks - the motocross jumper assumed those risks. As far as I'm concerned, he has more balls in his little finger than do cringing little clovers like you - someone who has never even exceeded the speed limit. All men die - not every man lives.
Decktard ~ The motorcycle rider. When one of these dip shits doesn't make the jump... and he crashes into a tractor trailer, the side of the mountain.... or even a nun, walking her puppy up on the cliff, who do you think will have to respond and clean up his mess? Fire personnel? LE? Tow truck operators? EMS? When a secondary accident happens because of the mess in the road, is that not a victim? How about the tax paying citizens that have to foot the bill for all the public safety personnel, clean up, investigation... signs the municipality has to now put up restricting this behavior because if they don't and someone does cause a mass incident doing the same thing, your scumbag peers will SUE and win. Taxes go up... but no victims? Just the bike rider? FUCK YOU, Ray Charles. You, like always, can Monday morning QB an incident with blinders on... because you aren't responsible for any of the mess when playing stupid games wins stupid prizes. I have no problem with the idea of death... but if someone wants to defy death... do it at home, on personal property... and make sure your family cleans up your mess.
You're a pansy and a wuss, grandma.
Take your "pansy and wuss" elsewhere, libtard. It doesn't apply. I have no problem with dipshits doing dangerous things... just don't expect tax money to clean up your thrill mishap. So... by all means, walk out into a desolate part of the woods, put one round in a revolver and spin the cylinder... stuff that fucker in your tree hugging pie hole... and hopefully, you turn your head into a salsa bowl. Nobody need respond, clean up... the animals need food too. Cause when people win stupid prizes for playing stupid games is when I'm entertained.... but don't expect me to be victimized for your thrill seeking behavior over a public access road because as a LEO, I've gotta clean your salsa off the road.
There are no replies to Comment # 17. End Trace Mode for Comment # 17.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Watch as these programmed propaganda whores somberly pontificate about this act of courage….why....[because] someone might have been hurt! Not realizing that the rider is a seasoned pro and has replicated jumps such as this countless times. … you can almost see these cowardly coiffed cretins pissing their pants at the thought of someone doing what he loves and happens to be extremely proficient at.
Watch what happend as this “seasoned pro who has replicated his jump countless times….and was doing what “he loves to do and thought he was extremely proficient at:” Watch as these programmed propaganda whores somberly pontificate about this …. why...
One reason why is….I will lay you 10 to 1 the cretin [using your word] does not carry insurance and taxpayers would then pay millions of dollars for his care during the rest of his lifetime had he crashed and suffered sever injuries. Furthermore, a blown tire half way up his launch ramp could have easily caused him to land in the traffic on the freeway….killing many people. But you don’t give a shit about that happening….do you? Not as long as you libertarian assholes are free to whatever you wish to.
#2. To: Gatlin (#1)
You libertarian assholes are total idiots….you never think rationally!
#4. To: nativist nationalist (#2)
libertarians preach one thing and do another
#6. To: GrandIsland (#4)
They turn into Ray Charles when it comes to SEEING a victim
#7. To: Deckard GrandIsland (#6)
Who was being victimized in the video?
The correct question to ask is: Who was being endangered by this irresponsible act?
#8. To: Gatlin (#7)
Who was being endangered by this irresponsible act?
#15. To: Deckard (#8)
(Edited)
Who was being endangered by this irresponsible act?
#16. To: GrandIsland (#15)
#17. To: Fred Mertz (#16)
(Edited)
Replies to Comment # 17.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]