[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

what a freakin' insane asylum

Sorry, CNN, We're Not Going to Stop Talking About the Russian Collusion Hoax

"No Autopsy Can Restore the Democratic Party’s Viability"

RIP Ozzy

"Trump floats 'restriction' for Commanders if they fail to ditch nickname in favor of Redskins return"

"Virginia Governor’s Race Heats Up As Republican Winsome Sears Does a Hard Reboot of Her Campaign"

"We Hate Communism!!"

"Mamdani and the Democratic Schism"

"The 2nd Impeachment: Trump’s Popularity Still Scares Them to Death"

"President Badass"

"Jasmine Crockett's Train Wreck Interview Was a Disaster"

"How Israel Used Spies, Smuggled Drones and AI to Stun and Hobble Iran"

There hasn’T been ... a single updaTe To This siTe --- since I joined.

"This Is Not What Authoritarianism Looks Like"

America Erupts… ICE Raids Takeover The Streets

AC/DC- Riff Raff + Go Down [VH1 Uncut, July 5, 1996]

Why is Peter Schiff calling Bitcoin a ‘giant cult’ and how does this impact market sentiment?

Esso Your Butt Buddy Horseshit jacks off to that shit

"The Addled Activist Mind"

"Don’t Stop with Harvard"

"Does the Biden Cover-Up Have Two Layers?"

"Pete Rose, 'Shoeless' Joe Reinstated by MLB, Eligible for HOF"

"'Major Breakthrough': Here Are the Details on the China Trade Deal"

Freepers Still Love war

Parody ... Jump / Trump --- van Halen jump

"The Democrat Meltdown Continues"

"Yes, We Need Deportations Without Due Process"

"Trump's Tariff Play Smart, Strategic, Working"

"Leftists Make Desperate Attempt to Discredit Photo of Abrego Garcia's MS-13 Tattoos. Here Are Receipts"

"Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands"on After Harvard Refuses to Meet Demands

"Doctors Committing Insurance Fraud to Conceal Trans Procedures, Texas Children’s Whistleblower Testifies"

"Left Using '8647' Symbol for Violence Against Trump, Musk"

KawasakiÂ’s new rideable robohorse is straight out of a sci-fi novel

"Trade should work for America, not rule it"

"The Stakes Couldn’t Be Higher in Wisconsin’s Supreme Court Race – What’s at Risk for the GOP"

"How Trump caught big-government fans in their own trap"

‘Are You Prepared for Violence?’

Greek Orthodox Archbishop gives President Trump a Cross, tells him "Make America Invincible"

"Trump signs executive order eliminating the Department of Education!!!"

"If AOC Is the Democratic Future, the Party Is Even Worse Off Than We Think"

"Ending EPA Overreach"

Closest Look Ever at How Pyramids Were Built

Moment the SpaceX crew Meets Stranded ISS Crew

The Exodus Pharaoh EXPLAINED!

Did the Israelites Really Cross the Red Sea? Stunning Evidence of the Location of Red Sea Crossing!

Are we experiencing a Triumph of Orthodoxy?

Judge Napolitano with Konstantin Malofeev (Moscow, Russia)

"Trump Administration Cancels Most USAID Programs, Folds Others into State Department"

Introducing Manus: The General AI Agent

"Chinese Spies in Our Military? Straight to Jail"


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

United States News
See other United States News Articles

Title: Cop Directing Traffic Opens Fire on Innocent Family in Van, Shooting the Dad
Source: Free Thought Project
URL Source: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/co ... g-the-dad/#uh8GdUT3EW3Ic0MH.99
Published: Mar 6, 2017
Author: Claire Bernish
Post Date: 2017-03-06 08:56:25 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 3232
Comments: 29

Atlanta, GA — A North Carolina family narrowly escaped with their lives when an off-duty Atlanta police supervisor opened fire at their vehicle while directing traffic — because they made a wrong turn.

Forty-six-year-old Noel Hall, his wife, sons, grandson, and another passenger were leaving a motocross event at the Georgia Dome, where, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation told 11Alive Sergeant Mathieu Cadeau “was conducting traffic and ordered Hall to go one direction down Northside Drive, but reportedly, Hall wanted to go another direction. The GBI, which has taken over the investigation, said Hall then drove toward the officer, at which point Cadeau opened fire, injuring Hall.”

Hall disputes GBI’s claims he drove at Cadeau, saying “at no point did we realize this man was a police officer.”

“First thing we want to make very clear is, that at no point did we realize this man was a police officer, he never presented hisself [sic] in any such way,” Hall wrote in a statement on the inexplicable shooting. “Yes, he had a vest on, however, from our point of view there was nothing on it to indicate or state who he was, he never identified himself, we did not see a badge and most certainly did not see his weapon. We were already in the turn lane and in the process of turning when he approached us by walking in front of our van, we did not drive toward him as been stated.”

Hall continued, “We came to a complete stop and at the point when we did start moving, we made a turn to the right, around and away from the officer. It is unclear to us as of why he chose to shoot, as we had already moved past him, when he fired at us, but it was absolutely unjustified.”

Further, even the Atlanta Police Department remains skeptical, reiterating Wednesday their office has never claimed Hall targeted Cadeau with the van.

Initial reports said Hall drove toward the supervisor, who “was wearing his uniform and reflective vest,” after being directed to a different route. Cadeau then opened fire without warning, hitting and injuring Hall — who then drove several blocks until a family member on board managed to reach emergency services.

Hall’s injuries weren’t serious, but the shaken up family has grave concerns about Cadeau’s indiscriminate and gratuitous firing of a deadly weapon into their Ford F350 van — particularly with the number of children inside. He stated,

“We are very fortunate and thankful that I (Noel) did not sustain any life threatening injuries from the gunshot wound, as we are also very fortunate and thankful that none of the other family members were hit. The officer shot at me through the drivers window, the bullet entering and exiting me twice, then through and out the passenger window, just missing my wife’s head, who was seated in the passenger seat by only inches. Also in the van were 2 of our sons, one sons girlfriend and our 2 year old grandson, so it could have very easily went through the passenger area of the van, hitting any of them.”

Considering Cadeau fired on the van while directing overflow traffic from a popular event, bystanders on foot and in other vehicles were also fortunate to be spared.

Notably, neither the Atlanta Police Department nor the Georgia Bureau of Investigation have accused Hall of accelerating toward the supervisor or targeting him maliciously with the vehicle — simply that he began driving toward Cadeau.

Indeed, Atlanta police haven’t indicated the supervisor cop felt threatened during the incident, at all.

Hall lamented the allegations he drove toward Cadeau, asserting never, at any point, “would I have done anything to put them in harms way, just as I would never had intentionally made a move to cause harm or possibly take another’s life.”

GBI is now handling the investigation into why an officer in a supervisory position on the job fired his service weapon into a family vehicle when the driver didn’t opt for the officially-sanctioned route — but didn’t put anyone in danger.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 29.

#2. To: Deckard (#0)

"Hall disputes GBI’s claims he drove at Cadeau, saying “at no point did we realize this man was a police officer.”

A non-denial denial. No one asked if he realized Cadeau was a police officer (who, by the way, was wearing his uniform and reflective vest).

So, from the get-go, the driver is lying.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-06   9:36:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: misterwhite, A K A Stone (#2)

The cop-worship is strong with you two.

Deckard  posted on  2017-03-06   9:38:07 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Deckard (#3)

The cop-worship is strong with you two.

Why do you feel the need to lie about me?

There are plenty of times where I side against the police.

But I'm not just going to side against the police because of a reflex to automatically take their side. If you're honest you know that. I judge each case individually.

I haven't taken a position on this particular incident. I just asked if something the person who is the subject of this article is quoted as saying. I noticed you didn't answer the question.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-03-06   9:46:37 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: A K A Stone (#6)

I haven't taken a position on this particular incident. I just asked if something the person who is the subject of this article is quoted as saying. I noticed you didn't answer the question.

The family released a statement, according to the news. You can find it on one of the links in the article.

What's lacking here is any motive for the man to try to run down the cop, or any one else for that matter. He wasn't leaving the scene of a crime, so there is no motive for a fast getaway as there is when someone robs a bank, for example. He had numerous members of his family in the car which further erases any motive to try to injure or kill anyone why leaving a motorcross event. The guy lives in NC and attended an event in Atlanta, so he may have been unfamiliar with the preferred traffic patterns while leaving those events. Desiring to leave by an alternate street is a common thing, and it could be that traffic was clear to do so at that particular moment. But even if he was plainly wrong about wanting to leave by an improper street, shooting at such a person is not a legit means of traffic control, and as the bullet went through both the driver and passenger door windows, it's clear the cop could not have been in any danger whatsoever at the time he fired his gun.

The only question to really investigate is if the driver did try to run over the cop or was driving aggressively toward him instead of just driving normally. It's possible he could have done so, even with no motive, but as mentioned, as the cop was in no danger when he fired, this is probably not much of a consideration. It's also possible the cop responded emotionally and not rationally to a driver leaving by an unapproved exit and that was the reason he fired.

BAC levels for the driver were under the legal limit according to the news. No word on whether the *cop* might have been drinking. He was off-duty, afterall.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-03-06   12:07:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: Pinguinite (#13)

"What's lacking here is any motive for the man to try to run down the cop"

The motive? Because the cop was in the way.

"it's clear the cop could not have been in any danger whatsoever at the time he fired his gun."

Does the cop need to be run over before he can shoot?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-06   13:05:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: misterwhite (#17)

The motive? Because the cop was in the way.

Wow. That's the best motive you can come up with? And you wonder why people don't take you seriously?

Does the cop need to be run over before he can shoot?

You do realize you are implying he could have legally fired at the car as it was driving away after passing him, right?

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-03-06   13:13:41 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Pinguinite (#19)

"You do realize you are implying he could have legally fired at the car as it was driving away after passing him, right?"

I'm saying he jumped out of the way and fired.

"That's the best motive you can come up with?"

You asked for a motive. I gave you one.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-06   13:24:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: misterwhite (#20)

I'm saying he jumped out of the way and fired.

There's nothing suggesting any jumping occurred. That the bullet went through both driver and passenger windows makes it plain that at the time of firing, the cop was in no danger whatsoever. In fact, the cop pretty much must have been on his feet when he fired for the bullet to hit the drivers shoulder and just miss his wife's head, so whatever evasive action the cop claims to have needed to make certainly didn't include any "diving out of the way".

You asked for a motive. I gave you one.

Fair enough. And if that's the best one you can come up with, the case looks very bad for the cop.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-03-06   13:36:38 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Pinguinite (#22)

"didn't include any "diving out of the way".

I never said that. I said "jumped" out of the way.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-06   13:51:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: misterwhite (#25)

I never said that. I said "jumped" out of the way.

My point is that whatever evasive action the cop might have seen fit to take did not require him to lose his footing. "Diving out of the way" is more consistent with avoiding a car that is being driven by someone intent upon inflicting harm or death, so if the cop didn't need to do that, then ....

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-03-06   14:00:47 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: Pinguinite (#26)

"Diving out of the way" is more consistent with avoiding a car that is being driven by someone intent upon inflicting harm or death"

Yeah. That's what bullfighters do all the time.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-06   16:19:57 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: misterwhite (#27)

That's what bullfighters do all the time.

Well, according to the news reports, the guy wasn't driving a bull. But could just be a case of sloppy reporting.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-03-06   16:56:02 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Pinguinite (#28)

"Well, according to the news reports, the guy wasn't driving a bull. But could just be a case of sloppy reporting."

Or Fake News.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-03-07   9:26:56 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 29.

        There are no replies to Comment # 29.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 29.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com