United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Mark Levin PROVES Obama Wiretapping on President Donald Trump | Fox & Friends 3/5/17
Source:
[None]
URL Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91fNfGjZdM0&feature=youtu.be
Published: Mar 5, 2017
Author: KagenOfficial
Post Date: 2017-03-05 10:00:37 by A K A Stone
Keywords: None
Views: 5160
Comments: 40
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 38.
#7. To: A K A Stone (#0)
Wow, this is a pretty compelling case that Trump and/or his surrogates are in bed with the Russians.
*WWBD? *What Would Buckeroo Do?
Why would a FISA judge authorize a warrant if there was no probable cause?
The president does not have the authority to instigate a wiretap, especially without probable cause. This is just more whining from Trump and his cult.
Since Chan is not here, “I’ll be your huckleberry” and set you straight. Let’s go to the law: (1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that— (A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at— Repeating for emphasis: Your false statement is just lying bullshit from a Paultard libertarian asshole.
Idiot! Your long-winded screed says nothing about a president arbitrarily ordering electronic surveillance on a political rival.
You can call it long-winded and you can call it a screed, but the one thing you can never call it….you can never call it untrue. I posted the law and proved you totally wrong….accept that!
There are no replies to Comment # 38. End Trace Mode for Comment # 38.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#9. To: Fred Mertz, buckeroo (#7)
#10. To: hondo68, buckeroo (#9)
#14. To: Fred Mertz (#10)
(Edited)
Why would a FISA judge authorize a warrant if there was no probable cause?
#15. To: Deckard (#14)
(Edited)
The president does not have the authority to authorize a wiretap.
BULLSHIT….you NEVER get anything right, why is that? In Chapter 36 of Title 50 of the US Code *War and National Defense", Subchapter 1, Section 1802, we read the following:
While (B) seems to contradict the underlying permissive nature of Section 1802 as it involves a United States person, what the Snowden affair has demonstrated all too clearly, is how frequently the NSA and FISA court would make US citizens collateral damage. To be sure, many pointed out the fact that Fox News correspondent James Rosen’s email notoriously captured in 2013 when the DOJ was investigating government leaks. The Associated Press was also infamously wiretapped in relation to the same investigation.
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;
(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and
(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately. ”Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order …”
Ahem….where am I wrong on this? This is just more whining from Trump and his cult.
#16. To: Gatlin (#15)
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)
#38. To: Deckard (#16)
Your long-winded screed …
Replies to Comment # 38.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]