politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: Police Officers: “We Didn’t Vote Republican To Get Stabbed In The Back”
Source:
Iowa Starting Line
URL Source: http://iowastartingline.com/2017/02 ... an-to-get-stabbed-in-the-back/
Published: Feb 13, 2017
Author: Pat Rynard
Post Date: 2017-02-13 12:17:37 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 883
Comments: 1
In the highly contentious battle to extinguish public worker rights, Iowa Republicans have attempted a divide-and-conquer approach to pit unions against each other. Their legislation splits public workers into two groups, one that’s “public safety workers,” and one that isn’t. The idea was to strip away nearly all collective bargaining rights from most public employees, but keep most of it for police and firefighters, who are politically more difficult to go after. It didn’t work. Hundreds of helmeted firefighters have flooded the Statehouse in the last week and police officers and sheriffs have lined up at committee hearings to speak against it. They don’t trust that this carve-out for their jobs will last long, nor do many of them feel it’s appropriate to deny the bargaining rights they have to fellow workers who have also had them for over 40 years. And several police officers and firefighters warned that Republicans’ plan to create a special “public safety” class for negotiations wouldn’t work in many cases. John Thomas, a police officer from Mitchellville, explained last week that some sheriff’s deputies wouldn’t get classified as “public safety” workers because there’s more jailers and clerks in the bargaining unit. The Republican bill only classifies workers as “public safety” employees if a majority of workers in a bargaining unit is made up of police or firefighters. That has many police officer, who voted for Republicans in large numbers this year, particularly upset. “It’s collective begging, that’s what it is,” Thomas labeled the bill at a subcommittee hearing. “Half of law enforcement folks I work with are Republicans. And we voted for Republicans because of conservative values. But we didn’t vote for Republicans to get stabbed in the back while we’re trying to dodge cars and bullets.” Even for those who do get covered as “public safety” workers, the other changes in the bill would still have damaging consequences. Removing the provisions for “just cause” firings means public workers could get the ax at whatever whim of their boss, with no potential recourse of action. Firefighters cautioned that could lead to a chilling effect on discussions over best safety practices. “After a fire … we sit down as a group, around a table and we talk about the fire,” explained Doug Neis, head of the Iowa Professional Fire Fighters union. “We talk about what went good, what went bad, and about how to improve. In those meetings we need to be able to be critical sometimes of our administration and the decisions they make. This bill removes just cause. Our members across the state will be fearful of speaking up and being critical when they need to … People are going to be in danger, our members and citizens.” Firefighters pack the Statehouse Even some sheriffs are concerned over what impact it will have on their departments and community. Dave Drew, the Republican sheriff from Woodbury County in conservative Northwest Iowa, told Republican legislators that he’s worried they’d target them next. “We stand as one,” Drew said of public workers. “It’s important to stand together. Because what you may give us or let us stay in, the firefighters and public safety, two years from now we may be out. We stand as one for the right reason: collective bargaining and Chapter 20 works.” Woodbury County Sheriff Drew address a committee Drew also questioned the rationale behind the “public safety” designation, pointing out that plenty of public workers beyond just police and firefighters contribute to keeping Iowans safe. “When we’re out cleaning up a scene, the troopers and the deputies and the firefighters, here comes the state plow to help to clear it off,” Drew continued. “They’re alongside us in the snow storms. I just can’t think of how this can be shredded apart.” The Iowa House will hold what is likely the last full public hearing on the collective bargaining bill tonight. Republicans are likely to vote it through both chambers quickly this week, just six or seven days after it was officially introduced. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Willie Green (#0)
Labor has the right to collective bargaining, and they need to stick together. Republicans have always had a tin ear about this, and if anything will cost them their majority over time, it will be their inability to understand that American workers are not simply another commodity for American business, that workers are the voters who power the republic, and the needs of people have to be treated as different, and above, simplistic profit and loss statements. You can't simply discard people: they vote. Now, the Republicans under Trump are shifting boundaries and amassing it as never before. By the time Trump is through, the courts will be weaker and the Executive branch will be stronger. If that serves the interests of the people, by protecting American jobs and restoring American industry, that's great. But if the Republicans cannot break their fetish for the Chamber of Commerce and its hatred for unionized labor, the net result will be that the lot of the American worker does not improve NEARLY as much as it ought to. And that will pave the way for a Democrat revival. And if the Democrats take back power after Trump has dramatically expanded Executive authority, well, the Republicans won't like that at all. The Republicans have one clear shot now to really restructure the country in a positive direction. Going after the unions before we have our employment back is not a positive step.
There are no replies to Comment # 1. End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Replies to Comment # 1.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]