New World Order
See other New World Order Articles
Title: Tucson cosmetology student under investigation for giving free haircuts
Source:
Tucson News Now
URL Source: http://www.tucsonnewsnow.com/story/ ... rce=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
Published: Feb 11, 2017
Author: Kristin Haubrich
Post Date: 2017-02-11 13:55:28 by Hondo68
Keywords: Arizona State Board, of Cosmetology, Bureaucratic nanny state
Views: 14668
Comments: 53
A local cosmetology student who gives free haircuts to the homeless is now in trouble with the state board. (Source: Tucson News Now) TUCSON, AZ (Tucson News Now) - A local cosmetology student is being investigating for giving free haircuts to homeless in the community. Juan Carlos Montesdeoca has given dozens of free haircuts to the homeless at the Santa Rita Park over the past few months. “Out of the kindness of my heart. Out of the memory of my mom, because she lost her hair,” Juan Carlos Montesdeoca said. Montesdeoca thought he was doing a good deed for Tucson by offering the haircuts, a service many homeless hadn’t received in a long time. “About seven months was the longest one, another lady was about two years without a basic trim.” He too has been homeless in the past. When his Regency Beauty school closed its doors last September, he felt compelled to offer his services for free. But now, the Arizona State Board of Cosmetology is investigating a complaint against him for practicing without a license. (Official complaint from the Arizona State Board of Cosmetology. Source: Juan Carlos Montesdeoca) Tucson News Now spoke over the phone to Donna Aune, the board's executive director, who declined to comment because it is an active investigation. But she said they stand by the words written in the state statue that says in part “A person shall not perform or attempt to perform cosmetology without a license or practice in any place other than in a licensed salon.” Montesdeoca said he wasn’t aware of this regulation and is now worried that the haircuts he offered for free could now cost him his future in cosmetology. “They can suspend – even before I even try to get a license, they can say no. That would be very very unfortunate,” Montesdeoca said. Aune said they also have very detailed statue on sanitation and health safety. She said working outside a licensed salon and using an unlicensed person, is a “real risk.” For more information on current Arizona law regarding this, CLICK HERE. Poster Comment: Private charity is bad, but government wealth-spread is good? Rogue Outlaw haircuts, without government certification! The end of civilization. It takes thousands of hours of government training and supervision to cut a hair! /s 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
#1. To: hondo68 (#0)
(Edited)
What complete horse shit! What about the parents who give their kids haircuts - are they lawbreakers too? My dad gave us kids haircuts until we were in our teens. I'm sure nolu chan can post a 1,000,000 word legal ruling that justifies this crap.
2. Display a sign or in any way advertise or hold oneself out as a cosmetologist, aesthetician or nail technician or as being engaged in the practice or business of cosmetology, aesthetics or nail technology without being licensed pursuant to this chapter. 3. Knowingly make a false statement on an application for a license pursuant to this chapter. 4. Permit an employee or another person under the person's supervision or control to perform cosmetology, aesthetics or nail technology without a license issued pursuant to this chapter. 5. Practice or attempt to practice cosmetology, aesthetics or nail technology in any place other than in a salon licensed pursuant to this chapter unless the person is requested by a customer to go to a place other than a salon licensed pursuant to this chapter and is sent to the customer from the salon, except that a person who is licensed pursuant to this chapter may practice, without the salon's request, cosmetology, aesthetics or nail technology in a health care facility, hospital, residential care institution, nursing home or residence of a person requiring home care because of an illness, infirmity or disability. 6. Obtain or attempt to obtain a license by the use of money other than the prescribed fees or any other thing of value or by fraudulent misrepresentation. 7. Provide any service to a person having a visible disease, pediculosis or open sores suggesting a communicable disease until the person furnishes a statement signed by a physician licensed pursuant to chapter 13 or 17 of this title stating that the disease or condition is not in an infectious, contagious or communicable stage. 8. Operate a salon or school without being licensed pursuant to this chapter. 9. Violate any provision of this chapter or any rule adopted pursuant to this chapter. 10. Ignore or fail to comply with a board subpoena. 11. Use the title of " aesthetician" , " cosmetologist" or " nail technician" or any other title or term likely to be confused with " aesthetician" , " cosmetologist" or " nail technician" in any advertisement, statement or publication unless that person is licensed pursuant to this chapter. C. A person who violates this section is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor.
Geez man STFU already! You channeling nolu spam now? The problem with government shills like you two is that you are too submissive to think for yourselves and need daddy government to tell you what to do. It's really pathetic watching you genuflect before the almighty State. This law is overly broad, capricious and arbitrary and makes anyone who cuts hair without approval from the State a criminal.
Read it again. This time let your mind automatically engrain the essential left-to-right straight line processing of the printed words without the use of your finder to physically track or point under each of the words you read. That way, you will find the law is quite specific and easy to understand….try it:
You are correct, in that: A person who violates this law is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor. Attaboy….you got that part right! And Gatlin continues to cheer the police state. I think the thing I despise most about you is your condescending attitude and your slave-like obedience to laws like this and your apparent support of such laws. It's nanny-state morons like you who are the pussies of society. Florida Sheriffs Used SWAT-Style Attack to Enforce Barbershop License “With some team members dressed in ballistic vests and masks, and with guns drawn, the deputies rushed into their target destinations, handcuffed the stunned occupants—and demanded to see their barbers’ licenses,” the court wrote. The raid was one of several deputies carried out against minority-owned barbershops and salons in 2010. The justices said the deputies went too far in using a SWAT-like approach just to check whether barbers were licensed. In fact, inspectors from Florida’s Department of Business and Professional Regulation (DBPR) had inspected Strictly Skillz only two days prior to the raid and found everything in order. I'm sure Gatlin approves.
Trump has expressed unflinching support for police by pledging to stand up for our Law Enforcement. While on the other hand:
#13. To: Gatlin. loves criminals, supports anything they do (#11)
There, you've admitted that DJT supports law breaking police. You support ISIS McCain of Panama, your Senator, the traitor. You love criminal scumbags. Why?
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest“A person shall not perform or attempt to perform cosmetology without a license or practice in any place other than in a licensed salon.”
#3. To: Deckard, nolu chan (#1)
I'm sure nolu chan can post a 1,000,000 word legal ruling that justifies this crap.
Not needed….a copy of the state law will suffice. A. A person shall not:
1. Perform or attempt to perform cosmetology, aesthetics or nail technology without a license in that category issued pursuant to this chapter, or practice in a category in which the person does not hold a license.
B. An instructor shall not render cosmetology, aesthetics or nail technology services in a school unless the services are directly incidental to the instruction of students.
#6. To: Gatlin, nolu chan (#3)
(Edited)
1. Perform or attempt to perform cosmetology, aesthetics or nail technology without a license in that category issued pursuant to this chapter, or practice in a category in which the person does not hold a license.
#7. To: Deckard (#6)
This law is overly broad, capricious and arbitrary …
Nah, the law is neither overly broad, capricious nor arbitrary. A person shall not: Perform or attempt to perform cosmetology, aesthetics or nail technology without a license in that category issued pursuant to this chapter, or practice in a category in which the person does not hold a license.
There now….what is there about that you find so hard to understand? … anyone who cuts hair without approval from the State a criminal.
You are correct, in that: A person who violates this law is guilty of a class 1 misdemeanor.
Attaboy….you got that part right!
#9. To: Gatlin, hondo 68, Stoner, A K A Stone (#7)
(Edited)
… anyone who cuts hair without approval from the State a criminal.
#11. To: Deckard, A K A Stone (#9)
(Edited)
And Gatlin continues to cheer the police state.
I cheer and fully support Donald Trump’s oft-repeated “law and order’’ refrain. 
You, Deckard, are a person who rebels against any authority, established order, or government rules and supports a political philosophy that advocates self-governed societies based on voluntary institutions….a political philosophy called, anarchism.
Replies to Comment # 11. 
Trump has expressed unflinching support for police
End Trace Mode for Comment # 11.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]