[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Saint Nicholas The Real St. Nick

Will Atheists in China Starve Due to No Fish to Eat?

A Thirteen State Solution for the Holy Land?

US Sends new Missle to a Pacific ally, angering China and Russia Moscow and Peoking

DeaTh noTice ... Freerepublic --- lasT Monday JR died

"‘We Are Not the Crazy Ones’: AOC Protests Too Much"

"Rep. Comer to Newsmax: No Evidence Biden Approved Autopen Use"

"Donald Trump Has Broken the Progressive Ratchet"

"America Must Slash Red Tape to Make Nuclear Power Great Again!!"

"Why the DemocRATZ Activist Class Couldn’t Celebrate the Cease-Fire They Demanded"

Antifa Calls for CIVIL WAR!

British Police Make an Arrest...of a White Child Fishing in the Thames

"Sanctuary" Horde ASSAULTS Chicago... ELITE Marines SMASH Illegals Without Mercy

Trump hosts roundtable on ANTIFA

What's happening in Britain. Is happening in Ireland. The whole of Western Europe.

"The One About the Illegal Immigrant School Superintendent"

CouldnÂ’t believe he let me pet him at the end (Rhino)

Cops Go HANDS ON For Speaking At Meeting!

POWERFUL: Charlie Kirk's final speech delivered in South Korea 9/6/25

2026 in Bible Prophecy

2.4 Billion exposed to excessive heat

🔴 LIVE CHICAGO PORTLAND ICE IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER 24/7 PROTEST 9/28/2025

Young Conservative Proves Leftist Protesters Wrong

England is on the Brink of Civil War!

Charlie Kirk Shocks Florida State University With The TRUTH

IRL Confronting Protesters Outside UN Trump Meeting

The UK Revolution Has Started... Brit's Want Their Country Back

Inside Paris Dangerous ANTIFA Riots

Rioters STORM Chicago ICE HQ... "Deportation Unit" SCRAPES Invaders Off The Sidewalk

She Decoded A Specific Part In The Bible

Muslim College Student DUMBFOUNDED as Charlie Kirk Lists The Facts About Hamas

Charlie Kirk EVISCERATES Black Students After They OPENLY Support “Anti-White Racism” HEATED DEBATE

"Trump Rips U.N. as Useless During General Assembly Address: ‘Empty Words’"

Charlie Kirk VS the Wokies at University of Tennessee

Charlie Kirk Takes on 3 Professors & a Teacher

British leftist student tells Charlie Kirk facts are unfair

The 2 Billion View Video: Charlie Kirk's Most Viewed Clips of 2024

Antifa is now officially a terrorist organization.

The Greatness of Charlie Kirk: An Eyewitness Account of His Life and Martyrdom

Charlie Kirk Takes on Army of Libs at California's UCR

DR. ALVEDA KING: REST IN PEACE CHARLIE KIRK

Steven Bonnell wants to murder Americans he disagrees with

What the fagots LGBTQ really means

I watched Charlie Kirk get assassinated. This is my experience.

Elon Musk Delivers Stunning Remarks At Historic UK March (Tommy Robinson)

"Transcript: Mrs. Erika Kirk Delivers Public Address: ‘His Movement Will Go On’"

"Victor Davis Hanson to Newsmax: Kirk Slaying Crosses Rubicon"

Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk

Charlotte train murder: Graphic video captures random fatal stabbing of young Ukrainian refugee

Berlin in July 1945 - Probably the best restored film material you'll watch from that time!


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: Pat Buchanan: Trump’s Wall Says to the World “This Is OUR Country, WE Decide Who Comes Here”
Source: VDare
URL Source: http://www.vdare.com/articles/what- ... untry-we-decide-who-comes-here
Published: Jan 26, 2017
Author: Patrick J. Buchanan
Post Date: 2017-01-26 19:31:18 by nativist nationalist
Keywords: None
Views: 4450
Comments: 27

“Something there is that doesn’t love a wall,” wrote poet Robert Frost in the opening line of “Mending Walls.”

And on the American left there is something like revulsion at the idea of the “beautiful wall” President Trump intends to build along the 1,900-mile border between the U.S. and Mexico.

The opposition’s arguments are usually rooted in economics or practicality. The wall is unnecessary. It will not stop people from coming illegally. It costs too much.

Yet something deeper is afoot here. The idea of a permanent barrier between our countries goes to the heart of the divide between our two Americas on the most fundamental of questions.

Who are we? What is a nation? What does America stand for?

Those desperate to see the wall built, illegal immigration halted, and those here illegally deported, see the country they grew up in as dying, disappearing, with something strange and foreign taking its place.

It is not only that illegal migrants take jobs from Americans, that they commit crimes, or that so many require subsidized food, welfare, housing, education and health care. It is that they are changing our country. They are changing who we are.

Two decades ago, the Old Right and the neocons engaged in a ferocious debate over what America was and is.

Were we from the beginning a new, unique, separate and identifiable people like the British, French and Germans?

Or was America a new kind of nation, an ideological nation, an invented nation, united by an acceptance of the ideas and ideals of Jefferson, Madison, Lincoln and Dr. King?

The Old Right contended that America existed even before the Revolution, and that this new nation, this new people, wrote its own birth certificate, the Constitution. Before Washington, Madison and Hamilton ever went to Philadelphia, America existed.

What forced the premature birth of the nation–was the Revolution.

We did not become a new nation because we embraced Jefferson‘s notion about all men being “created equal.” We became a new people from our familial break with the Mother Country, described in the declaration as a severing of ties with our “brethren” across the sea who longer deserved our loyalty or love.

The United States came into being in 1789. The Constitution created the government, the state. But the country already existed.

When the Irish came in the mid-19th century to escape the famine and the Germans to escape Bismarck’s Prussia, and the Italians, Jews, Poles, Greeks, Slovaks came to Ellis Island, they were foreigners who became citizens, and then, after a time, Americans.

Not until decades after the Great Migration of 1890-1920, with the common trials of the Depression, World War II and Cold War, were we truly forged again into one united nation and people.

By 1960, almost all of us shared the same heroes and holidays, spoke the same language and cherished the same culture.

What those with memories of that America see happening today is the disintegration of our nation of yesterday. The savagery of our politics, exemplified in the last election, testifies to how Americans are coming to detest one another as much as the Valley Forge generation came to detest the British from whom they broke free.

In 1960, we were a Western Christian country. Ninety percent of our people traced their roots to Europe. Ninety percent bore some connection to the Christian faith. To the tens of millions for whom Trump appeals, what the wall represents is our last chance to preserve that nation and people.

To many on the cosmopolitan left, ethnic or national identity is not only not worth fighting for, it is not even worth preserving. It is a form of atavistic tribalism or racism.

The Trump wall then touches on the great struggle of our age.

Given that 80 percent of all people of color vote Democratic, neither the Trump movement nor the Republican Party can survive the Third Worldization of the United States now written in the cards.

Moreover, with the disintegration of the nation we are seeing, and with talk of the breakup of states like Texas and secession of states like California, how do we survive as one nation and people?

Old Europe never knew mass immigration until the 20th century.

Now, across Europe, center-left and center-right parties are facing massive defections because they are perceived as incapable of coping with the existential threat of the age–the overrunning of the continent from Africa and the Middle East.

President Trump’s wall is a statement to the world: This is our country. We decide who comes here. And we will defend our borders.

The crisis of our time is not that some Americas are saying this, but that so many are too paralyzed to say it, or do not care, or embrace what is happening to their country.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)

Pat Buchanan: Trump’s Wall Says to the World “This Is OUR Country, WE Decide Who Comes Here”

That's a novel approach. Let's try it.

rlk  posted on  2017-01-26   20:29:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: rlk, A Pole, Vicomte13 (#1)

Pat Buchanan paved the way for Trump's victory. At the time people were worried about free trade but every authority said it would be great as people accepted it but 2 decades later that free trade has proven not to have been the boon it was sold as.

Pericles  posted on  2017-01-27   2:02:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Pericles (#3)

Pat Buchanan paved the way for Trump's victory.

Also Ross Perot.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-01-27   9:39:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Vicomte13 (#4)

Also Ross Perot.

Ross Perot was the closest thing we'll ever see to a political God. He had enough brains and money to buy and sell entire continents. He had a sense of proportion to realize he didn't need any more. He was the most serious and honest man we'll ever see in politics. His difficulty was that he demanded respect, not accolades of flattery, but simple respect. He deserved it. His failure was the people in this country's failure. He couldn't deal with spoiled brats.

rlk  posted on  2017-01-28   5:27:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: rlk (#9)

Perot gave us 8 years of Bill Clinton (and almost gave us 8 years of Hillary). The man thought more about his daughter's wedding than the people of the United States.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-28   10:29:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: misterwhite (#10) (Edited)

Perot gave us 8 years of Bill Clinton.

No. The people who voted for H W Bush did that. H W Bush was clearly a turd. In the election, we had the opportunity to elect Perot, but Republican assholes, the kind whose heads are screwed on with bolts, put party above country and above common sense and voted for the turd instead of voting for Perot.

So Clinton won - and was actually a better president than H W Bush had been or would have been had he been re-elected. .

Republicans who voted for H W Bush were the problem: they should have voted for Perot.

Perot was right. With Trump, Perot's ideas finally won. Unfortunately, thanks to those same Republicans, we had to live through two terms of W first, followed by Obama.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-01-28   10:33:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Vicomte13 (#11)

"In the election, we had the opportunity to elect Perot"

Yep. And 19% of the voters took advantage of that opportunity. Just enough to take the election away from Bush -- a favorite to win with an 89% approval rating.

So much a favorite to win that the Democrats couldn't find a serious contender to run against him. The best they had was some unknown named Bill Clinton -- who quickly became famous when Jennifer Flowers came forward.

"Republicans who voted for H W Bush were the problem: they should have voted for Perot."

And all along I thought that the Republicans who voted for Perot were the problem: they should have voted for Bush.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-28   10:55:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: misterwhite (#12)

And all along I thought that the Republicans who voted for Perot were the problem: they should have voted for Bush.

Yep, all along you were wrong.

Had there been no Perot, Bush would have won. Good thing there was a Perot. We did not need any more of H W Bush.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-01-28   11:46:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: Vicomte13 (#13)

"Had there been no Perot, Bush would have won. Good thing there was a Perot. We did not need any more of H W Bush."

Yeah. 8 years of Bill Clinton with a possibility of 8 more with Hillary was much better for our country. We were overdue for an impeachment.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-28   12:17:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: misterwhite (#14)

Yeah. 8 years of Bill Clinton with a possibility of 8 more with Hillary was much better for our country. We were overdue for an impeachment.

8 years of Clinton WAS better than letting H W Bush have power again, yes, absolutely.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-01-28   18:47:05 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Vicomte13 (#18)

years of Clinton WAS better than letting H W Bush have power again, yes, absolutely.

Clinton appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer to the U.S. Supreme Court along with 373 other federal judges.

Plus, Clinton revitalized the Community Reinvestment Act, planting the seeds of the mortgage meltdown to follow.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-28   19:10:11 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: misterwhite (#20)

Clinton appointed Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen Breyer to the U.S. Supreme Court along with 373 other federal judges.

Plus, Clinton revitalized the Community Reinvestment Act, planting the seeds of the mortgage meltdown to follow.

An H W Bush put Souter on the Court. Breyer was easily better than Souther.

H W Bush lied about taxes.

He launched two wars and didn't finish either one of them.

And he left the economy in bad shape.

Clinton left the economy in good shape.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-01-28   19:19:19 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 22.

        There are no replies to Comment # 22.


End Trace Mode for Comment # 22.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com