[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".

"Enter Harris, Stage Lef"t

Official describes the moment a Butler officer confronted the Trump shooter

Jesse Watters: Don’t buy this excuse from the Secret Service

Video shows Trump shooter crawling into position while folks point him out to law enforcement

Eyewitness believes there was a 'noticeable' difference in security at Trump's rally

Trump Assassination Attempt

We screamed for 3 minutes at police and Secret Service. They couldn’t see him, so they did nothing. EYEWITNESS SPEAKS OUT — I SAW THE ASSASSIN CRAWLING ACROSS THE ROOF.

Video showing the Trump Rally shooter dead on the rooftop

Court Just Nailed Hillary in $6 Million FEC Violation Case, 45x Bigger Than Trump's $130k So-Called Violation

2024 Republican Platform Drops Gun-Rights Promises

Why will Kamala Harris resign from her occupancy of the Office of Vice President of the USA? Scroll down for records/details

Secret Negotiations! Jill Biden’s Demands for $2B Library, Legal Immunity, and $100M Book Deal to Protect Biden Family Before Joe’s Exit

AI is exhausting the power grid. Tech firms are seeking a miracle solution.

If you need a Good Opening for black, use this.

"Arrogant Hunter Biden has never been held accountable — until now"

How Republicans in Key Senate Races Are Flip-Flopping on Abortion

Idaho bar sparks fury for declaring June 'Heterosexual Awesomeness Month' and giving free beers and 15% discounts to straight men

Son of Buc-ee’s co-owner indicted for filming guests in the shower and having sex. He says the law makes it OK.

South Africa warns US could be liable for ICC prosecution for supporting Israel

Today I turned 50!

San Diego Police officer resigns after getting locked in the backseat with female detainee

Gazan Refugee Warns the World about Hamas

Iranian stabbed for sharing his faith, miraculously made it across the border without a passport!

Protest and Clashes outside Trump's Bronx Rally in Crotona Park

Netanyahu Issues Warning To US Leaders Over ICC Arrest Warrants: 'You're Next'

Will it ever end?

Did Pope Francis Just Call Jesus a Liar?

Climate: The Movie (The Cold Truth) Updated 4K version

There can never be peace on Earth for as long as Islamic Sharia exists

The Victims of Benny Hinn: 30 Years of Spiritual Deception.

Trump Is Planning to Send Kill Teams to Mexico to Take Out Cartel Leaders

The Great Falling Away in the Church is Here | Tim Dilena

How Ridiculous? Blade-Less Swiss Army Knife Debuts As Weapon Laws Tighten


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

International News
See other International News Articles

Title: Pat Buchanan: Trump’s Wall Says to the World “This Is OUR Country, WE Decide Who Comes Here”
Source: VDare
URL Source: http://www.vdare.com/articles/what- ... untry-we-decide-who-comes-here
Published: Jan 26, 2017
Author: Patrick J. Buchanan
Post Date: 2017-01-26 19:31:18 by nativist nationalist
Keywords: None
Views: 3769
Comments: 27

“Something there is that doesn’t love a wall,” wrote poet Robert Frost in the opening line of “Mending Walls.”

And on the American left there is something like revulsion at the idea of the “beautiful wall” President Trump intends to build along the 1,900-mile border between the U.S. and Mexico.

The opposition’s arguments are usually rooted in economics or practicality. The wall is unnecessary. It will not stop people from coming illegally. It costs too much.

Yet something deeper is afoot here. The idea of a permanent barrier between our countries goes to the heart of the divide between our two Americas on the most fundamental of questions.

Who are we? What is a nation? What does America stand for?

Those desperate to see the wall built, illegal immigration halted, and those here illegally deported, see the country they grew up in as dying, disappearing, with something strange and foreign taking its place.

It is not only that illegal migrants take jobs from Americans, that they commit crimes, or that so many require subsidized food, welfare, housing, education and health care. It is that they are changing our country. They are changing who we are.

Two decades ago, the Old Right and the neocons engaged in a ferocious debate over what America was and is.

Were we from the beginning a new, unique, separate and identifiable people like the British, French and Germans?

Or was America a new kind of nation, an ideological nation, an invented nation, united by an acceptance of the ideas and ideals of Jefferson, Madison, Lincoln and Dr. King?

The Old Right contended that America existed even before the Revolution, and that this new nation, this new people, wrote its own birth certificate, the Constitution. Before Washington, Madison and Hamilton ever went to Philadelphia, America existed.

What forced the premature birth of the nation–was the Revolution.

We did not become a new nation because we embraced Jefferson‘s notion about all men being “created equal.” We became a new people from our familial break with the Mother Country, described in the declaration as a severing of ties with our “brethren” across the sea who longer deserved our loyalty or love.

The United States came into being in 1789. The Constitution created the government, the state. But the country already existed.

When the Irish came in the mid-19th century to escape the famine and the Germans to escape Bismarck’s Prussia, and the Italians, Jews, Poles, Greeks, Slovaks came to Ellis Island, they were foreigners who became citizens, and then, after a time, Americans.

Not until decades after the Great Migration of 1890-1920, with the common trials of the Depression, World War II and Cold War, were we truly forged again into one united nation and people.

By 1960, almost all of us shared the same heroes and holidays, spoke the same language and cherished the same culture.

What those with memories of that America see happening today is the disintegration of our nation of yesterday. The savagery of our politics, exemplified in the last election, testifies to how Americans are coming to detest one another as much as the Valley Forge generation came to detest the British from whom they broke free.

In 1960, we were a Western Christian country. Ninety percent of our people traced their roots to Europe. Ninety percent bore some connection to the Christian faith. To the tens of millions for whom Trump appeals, what the wall represents is our last chance to preserve that nation and people.

To many on the cosmopolitan left, ethnic or national identity is not only not worth fighting for, it is not even worth preserving. It is a form of atavistic tribalism or racism.

The Trump wall then touches on the great struggle of our age.

Given that 80 percent of all people of color vote Democratic, neither the Trump movement nor the Republican Party can survive the Third Worldization of the United States now written in the cards.

Moreover, with the disintegration of the nation we are seeing, and with talk of the breakup of states like Texas and secession of states like California, how do we survive as one nation and people?

Old Europe never knew mass immigration until the 20th century.

Now, across Europe, center-left and center-right parties are facing massive defections because they are perceived as incapable of coping with the existential threat of the age–the overrunning of the continent from Africa and the Middle East.

President Trump’s wall is a statement to the world: This is our country. We decide who comes here. And we will defend our borders.

The crisis of our time is not that some Americas are saying this, but that so many are too paralyzed to say it, or do not care, or embrace what is happening to their country.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

#1. To: nativist nationalist (#0)

Pat Buchanan: Trump’s Wall Says to the World “This Is OUR Country, WE Decide Who Comes Here”

That's a novel approach. Let's try it.

rlk  posted on  2017-01-26   20:29:00 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: rlk, A Pole, Vicomte13 (#1)

Pat Buchanan paved the way for Trump's victory. At the time people were worried about free trade but every authority said it would be great as people accepted it but 2 decades later that free trade has proven not to have been the boon it was sold as.

Pericles  posted on  2017-01-27   2:02:04 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Pericles (#3)

Pat Buchanan paved the way for Trump's victory.

Also Ross Perot.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-01-27   9:39:46 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: Vicomte13 (#4)

Also Ross Perot.

Ross Perot was the closest thing we'll ever see to a political God. He had enough brains and money to buy and sell entire continents. He had a sense of proportion to realize he didn't need any more. He was the most serious and honest man we'll ever see in politics. His difficulty was that he demanded respect, not accolades of flattery, but simple respect. He deserved it. His failure was the people in this country's failure. He couldn't deal with spoiled brats.

rlk  posted on  2017-01-28   5:27:58 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: rlk (#9)

Perot gave us 8 years of Bill Clinton (and almost gave us 8 years of Hillary). The man thought more about his daughter's wedding than the people of the United States.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-28   10:29:10 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: misterwhite (#10) (Edited)

Perot gave us 8 years of Bill Clinton.

No. The people who voted for H W Bush did that. H W Bush was clearly a turd. In the election, we had the opportunity to elect Perot, but Republican assholes, the kind whose heads are screwed on with bolts, put party above country and above common sense and voted for the turd instead of voting for Perot.

So Clinton won - and was actually a better president than H W Bush had been or would have been had he been re-elected. .

Republicans who voted for H W Bush were the problem: they should have voted for Perot.

Perot was right. With Trump, Perot's ideas finally won. Unfortunately, thanks to those same Republicans, we had to live through two terms of W first, followed by Obama.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-01-28   10:33:28 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: Vicomte13 (#11)

"In the election, we had the opportunity to elect Perot"

Yep. And 19% of the voters took advantage of that opportunity. Just enough to take the election away from Bush -- a favorite to win with an 89% approval rating.

So much a favorite to win that the Democrats couldn't find a serious contender to run against him. The best they had was some unknown named Bill Clinton -- who quickly became famous when Jennifer Flowers came forward.

"Republicans who voted for H W Bush were the problem: they should have voted for Perot."

And all along I thought that the Republicans who voted for Perot were the problem: they should have voted for Bush.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-28   10:55:23 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: misterwhite (#12)

And all along I thought that the Republicans who voted for Perot were the problem: they should have voted for Bush.

Yep, all along you were wrong.

Had there been no Perot, Bush would have won. Good thing there was a Perot. We did not need any more of H W Bush.

Vicomte13  posted on  2017-01-28   11:46:27 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


Replies to Comment # 13.

#14. To: Vicomte13 (#13)

"Had there been no Perot, Bush would have won. Good thing there was a Perot. We did not need any more of H W Bush."

Yeah. 8 years of Bill Clinton with a possibility of 8 more with Hillary was much better for our country. We were overdue for an impeachment.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-28 12:17:52 ET  Reply   Untrace   Trace   Private Reply  


End Trace Mode for Comment # 13.

TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com