[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki

The IMAGE of the BEAST Revealed (REV 13) - WARNING: Not for Everyone


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: Donald Trump ‘will conform with the Constitution or we will remove him’
Source: Raw Story
URL Source: http://www.rawstory.com/2017/01/ex- ... itution-or-we-will-remove-him/
Published: Jan 23, 2017
Author: David Edwards
Post Date: 2017-01-23 12:44:58 by Willie Green
Keywords: None
Views: 6048
Comments: 25

Richard Painter, the former chief ethics lawyer for President George W. Bush, warned on Monday that Donald Trump “will be impeached” if he continues refusing to conform to the U.S. Constitution.

In a Monday interview on Australia’s ABC News, Painter said that he hoped that Trump would “figure this out” when it came to understanding the Constitution’s ban on receiving profits from foreign governments and the protections it gives to the rights of Americans.

“He did what he needed to do to be a successful businessman, he figured that out and he now has to figure out how to be a successful president,” Painter explained. “But he is going to need to sell his business interests, he’s going to need to stop giving inflammatory speeches and not try to politicize our intelligence services.”

The former Bush adviser said the FBI and Director James Comey engaged in “illegal political activity before the election [and] we don’t want any more of that.”

“We want a president to be an effective president within the bounds set forth by the Constitution,” Painter continued. “A president who cannot do that will be impeached. But I don’t think Donald Trump is going to choose that route.”

Painter specifically cautioned Trump not to run afoul of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause, which bans presidents from receiving things of value from foreign governments.

“That also means the provisions of the constitution that protect Americans from discrimination based on their religious faith,” he continued. “We are not going to be keeping a registry of Muslims, we are not going to be deporting Muslims, we’re not going to be barring people from coming into our country because of their religion.”

“He is going to need to comply with the Constitution in order to be a good president, in order to remain as president. We will remove a president who cannot comply with the Constitution.”

Watch the video below from ABC 730.

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: Willie Green (#0)

“We will remove a president who cannot comply with the Constitution.”

Well, that would be a first.

Pinguinite  posted on  2017-01-23   12:48:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: Willie Green (#0)

Is that guy wearing a wig?

Fred Mertz  posted on  2017-01-23   12:56:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: Willie Green (#0)

Donald Trump ‘will conform with the Constitution or we will remove him’

The it will be the first time in history.

Not one president has been constitutional nor has one president been removed from office!

More lip service from elites who are terrified that trump is crashing their party for the benefit of the average man.

Justified  posted on  2017-01-23   13:00:28 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: Pinguinite (#1)

On both parts. You beat me to it.

Justified  posted on  2017-01-23   13:01:29 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: Fred Mertz (#2)

Either that or he paints it to cover the gray...

Willie Green  posted on  2017-01-23   13:32:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: Willie Green (#0)

We will remove a president who cannot comply with the Constitution.”

Oh yeah, like you pussies' did with obama?

You weak, bitch asses can't do anything but WHINE like the little girls you are.

calcon  posted on  2017-01-23   16:13:41 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: Willie Green (#0)

Painter specifically cautioned Trump not to run afoul of the Constitution’s Emoluments Clause, which bans presidents from receiving things of value from foreign governments.

Does that also apply to the tens of millions of dollars received by the Clinton foundation as an approved shadow government?

After reading his list of bogus subversive complaints and threats, I can well imagine why he was willing to work in the Bush "islam is a religion of peace" administration.

rlk  posted on  2017-01-23   17:10:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: calcon (#6)

Oh yeah, like you pussies' did with obama?

Like you pussies did with Bill Clinton! Impeached, but not tried nor removed, which equals NOTHING.

The D&R Party is a suicide cult!

Hondo68  posted on  2017-01-23   17:18:06 ET  (1 image) Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: hondo68 (#8)

Like you pussies did with Bill Clinton!

We didn't want you clinton supporters to have a meltdown.

I hope you marched with all the other pussies yesterday.

I can certainly can see you decked out in a pink pussy uniforms.

Got a new slogan for you dems masquerading as paulies.

"Pussies for paul"

calcon  posted on  2017-01-23   17:29:20 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: Willie Green (#0)

Willie Green (#0) ---- “We will remove a president ---

We? --- You and the author have a mouse in your pockets, willy?

tpaine  posted on  2017-01-23   18:54:12 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: Willie Green (#0)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/articlei#section9

Article 1, Section 9, Clause 8:

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

Note that the emoluments clause only involves an item given by a king, prince, or foreign state; foreign governments, not all foreign sources. History implies that it applies to appointed positions and not to elected positions.

http://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/articles/article-i/the-foreign-emoluments-clause-article-i-section-9-clause-8/clause/34

Scope. However, the text of the Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause is not limited to American ambassadors or even to American diplomatic personnel. Instead, the Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause applies to Offices of Profit or Trust under the United States: a substantially wider category. It is undisputed that this category applies to all officials holding appointed positions in the Judicial and Executive Branches of the national government.

What about the Legislative Branch? In 1792, the Senate asked Secretary of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton to compile a list of all persons holding Offices . . . under the United States and their salaries. Hamilton’s 1793 response included nonelected officials in each branch, including the Legislative Branch.

The question whether this category, and therefore the Constitution’s Foreign Emoluments Clause, reaches any or all federal elected positions—i.e., Representative, Senator, Vice President, President, and presidential elector—poses a difficult interpretive challenge. For example, Hamilton’s list did not include members of Congress or any other elected state or federal positions. Likewise, George Washington, while President, accepted and kept two diplomatic gifts, but he never asked for or received congressional consent. However, subsequent presidents, such as Andrew Jackson, in similar circumstances, sought congressional consent. Whose practice should we rely on?

Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.

Office. A right, and correspondent duty, to exercise a public trust. A public charge or employment. An employment on behalf of the government in any station or public trust, not merely transient, occasional, or incidental. The most frequent occasions to use the word arise with reference to a duty and power conferred on an individual by the government; and, when this is the connection, "public office" is a usual and more discriminating expression. But a power and duty may exist without immediate grant from government, and may be properly called an "office;" as the office of executor. Here the individual acts towards legatees in performance of a duty, and in exercise of a power not derived from their consent, but devolved on him by an authority which quoad hoc is superior.

An "assigned duty" or "function." Synonyms are "post", "appointment", "situation", "place", "position", and "office" commonly suggests a position of (especially public) trust or authority. Also right to exercise a public function or employment, and to take the fees and emoluments belonging to it. A public charge or employment, and he who performs the duties of the office is an officer. Although an office is an employment, it does not follow that every employment is an office. A man may be employed under a contract, express or implied, to do an act, or to perform a service, without becoming an officer. But, if the duty be a continuing one, which is defined by rule prescribed by the government, which an individual is appointed by the government to perform, who enters upon the duties appertain to his status, without any contract defining them, it seems very difficult to distinguish such a charge or employment from an office, or the person who performs the duty from an officer. In the constitutional sense, the term implies an authority to exercise some portion of the sovereign power, either in making, executing, or administering the laws.

Elected positions are not conferred by the government. They are conferred by the people.

nolu chan  posted on  2017-01-23   19:21:11 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: tpaine (#10)

You and the author have a mouse in your pockets, willy?

No... it's a hamster... you wanna play with it?

Willie Green  posted on  2017-01-24   14:09:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: Willie Green (#12)

Willie Green (#0) ---- “We will remove a president ---

We? --- You and the author have a mouse in your pockets, willy?

No... it's a hamster... you wanna play with it?

Please keep your homosexual dreams to yourself, willy.

tpaine  posted on  2017-01-24   18:52:40 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: tpaine (#13)

You're the one who's trying to imagine the mouse in my pocket, twinkletoes.

Willie Green  posted on  2017-01-24   21:35:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: tpaine (#13)

Willie the token LF negro.

If you treat that racist libtard shit stain like he deserves... he'll put you on ignore. It's what weak people do when they can't pass laws to silence what hurts their feelings.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-01-24   21:47:22 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: Willie Green (#14)

Willie Green (#0) ---- “We will remove a president ---

We? --- You and the author have a mouse in your pockets, willy?

No... it's a hamster... you wanna play with it?

Please keep your homosexual dreams to yourself, willy.

You're the one who's trying to imagine the mouse in my pocket, twinkletoes.

Nope, I asked you a snide question about your silly post. --- Thanks for outing yourself in reply.

tpaine  posted on  2017-01-24   21:56:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: tpaine (#16)

Nope, I asked you a snide question about your silly post.

Nope, you had to fantasize about it first before you even thought about asking or else you wouldn't have asked.

Willie Green  posted on  2017-01-25   10:17:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: hondo68 (#8)

Like you pussies did with Bill Clinton! Impeached, but not tried nor removed, which equals NOTHING.

Because of democrats.

A K A Stone  posted on  2017-01-25   10:23:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: Willie Green (#17)

The fact remains, you took my comment and made it part of your queer dreams, outing yourself, willy.

Congrats...

tpaine  posted on  2017-01-25   15:29:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: tpaine (#19) (Edited)

No... your comment was queer as a $3 bill to begin with, before I egged you on into outing YOURself.

Hell, you're not even man enough to spell my name correctly...
You always use that foo-foo, effeminate fairy spelling like you're trying to come-on to me...
Quit stalking me, you freak...
Go play with your own "mouse"

Willie Green  posted on  2017-01-25   15:40:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: Willie Green (#20)

Any one who can read knows my 'mouse in your pocket' comment is an old joke, hardly queer.

You're getting desperate, willy. Admit it, you're gay..

tpaine  posted on  2017-01-25   15:50:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: Willie Green (#20)

Willie

Dope; off the chain; tight as fuck; the shit.

" Man u know yo ass is Willie when they got u in the Jag wit like half a milly..."

-Sean Carter aka Jay Z aka Yung Hova aka Jigga aka El Presidente

#dope #tight #the shit #phat #off the chain.

by Tayshaun Garnett July 26, 2006

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Willie

The definition of a willy is a slang term for a penis. When you are referring to the genital organ that your boyfriend uses for sex and you want to use a slang term to refer to that male organ, the slang term you would use is an example of willy.

Willy dictionary definition

willy defined - YourDictionary

www.yourdictionary.com/willy

If you ... don't use exclamation points --- you should't be typeing ! Commas - semicolons - question marks are for girlie boys !

BorisY  posted on  2017-01-25   15:59:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: Willie Green (#20)

Quit stalking me,

Commenting on your political progressivism is NOT stalking, willy.

And YOU started our discussion about your fairylike proclivities, poor soul.

So a suggestion. Try putting a little more thought into your criticism of our republican form of government.

tpaine  posted on  2017-01-25   16:06:38 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: tpaine (#21)

Any one who can read knows my 'mouse in your pocket' comment is an old joke

Well then you gotta be pretty goddam old 'cause I sure as hell never heard it before...

So where'd you learn that one? Some private boarding school where buggery was your only extracurricular activity?

Willie Green  posted on  2017-01-25   16:44:09 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: Willie Green (#24)

Any one who can read knows my 'mouse in your pocket' comment is an old joke

Well then you gotta be pretty goddam old 'cause I sure as hell never heard it before...

So where'd you learn that one? Some private boarding school where buggery was your only extracurricular activity?

There you go again, making homo comments. Sad.

Below is an explanation of the phrase, unfortunately without its origins, but believe me, its older that my 80 years.

You got a mouse in your pocket?

A reply to a person who has used the word "we". The person making the reply is telling the speaker no one is effected by their statement other than them. Or, in an organization (work or volunteer positions), someone has just said that "we" all need to do something.

tpaine  posted on  2017-01-25   17:09:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com