[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

"Analysis: The Final State of the Presidential Race"

He’ll, You Pieces of Garbage

The Future of Warfare -- No more martyrdom!

"Kamala’s Inane Talking Points"

"The Harris Campaign Is Testament to the Toxicity of Woke Politics"

Easy Drywall Patch

Israel Preparing NEW Iran Strike? Iran Vows “Unimaginable” Response | Watchman Newscast

In Logansport, Indiana, Kids are Being Pushed Out of Schools After Migrants Swelled County’s Population by 30%: "Everybody else is falling behind"

Exclusive — Bernie Moreno: We Spend $110,000 Per Illegal Migrant Per Year, More than Twice What ‘the Average American Makes’

Florida County: 41 of 45 People Arrested for Looting after Hurricanes Helene and Milton are Noncitizens

Presidential race: Is a Split Ticket the only Answer?

hurricanes and heat waves are Worse

'Backbone of Iran's missile industry' destroyed by IAF strikes on Islamic Republic

Joe Rogan Experience #2219 - Donald Trump

IDF raids Hezbollah Radwan Forces underground bases, discovers massive cache of weapons

Gallant: ‘After we strike in Iran,’ the world will understand all of our training

The Atlantic Hit Piece On Trump Is A Psy-Op To Justify Post-Election Violence If Harris Loses

Six Al Jazeera journalists are Hamas, PIJ terrorists

Judge Aileen Cannon, who tossed Trump's classified docs case, on list of proposed candidates for attorney general

Iran's Assassination Program in Europe: Europe Goes Back to Sleep

Susan Olsen says Brady Bunch revival was cancelled because she’s MAGA.

Foreign Invaders crisis cost $150B in 2023, forcing some areas to cut police and fire services: report

Israel kills head of Hezbollah Intelligence.

Tenn. AG reveals ICE released thousands of ‘murderers and rapists’ from detention centers into US streets

Kamala Harris Touts Mass Amnesty Offering Fast-Tracked Citizenship to Nearly Every Illegal Alien in U.S.

Migration Crisis Fueled Rise in Tuberculosis Cases Study Finds

"They’re Going to Try to Kill Trump Again"

"Dems' Attempts at Power Grab Losing Their Grip"

"Restoring a ‘Great Moderation’ in Fiscal Policy"

"As attacks intensify, Trump becomes more popular"

Posting Articles Now Working Here

Another Test

Testing

Kamala Harris, reparations, and guaranteed income

Did Mudboy Slim finally kill this place?

"Why Young Americans Are Not Taught about Evil"

"New Rules For Radicals — How To Reinvent Kamala Harris"

"Harris’ problem: She’s a complete phony"

Hurricane Beryl strikes Bay City (TX)

Who Is ‘Destroying Democracy In Darkness?’

‘Kamalanomics’ is just ‘Bidenomics’ but dumber

Even The Washington Post Says Kamala's 'Price Control' Plan is 'Communist'

Arthur Ray Hines, "Sneakypete", has passed away.

No righT ... for me To hear --- whaT you say !

"Walz’s Fellow Guardsmen Set the Record Straight on Veep Candidate’s Military Career: ‘He Bailed Out’ "

"Kamala Harris Selects Progressive Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Running Mate"

"The Teleprompter Campaign"

Good Riddance to Ismail Haniyeh

"Pagans in Paris"

"Liberal groupthink makes American life creepy and could cost Democrats the election".


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Economy
See other Economy Articles

Title: In the Shopping Cart of a Food Stamp Household: Lots of Soda
Source: New York Times
URL Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/13/ ... food-stamp-snap-soda.html?_r=0
Published: Jan 13, 2017
Author: ANAHAD O’CONNORJAN
Post Date: 2017-01-14 17:35:33 by misterwhite
Keywords: None
Views: 4730
Comments: 32

What do households on food stamps buy at the grocery store?

The answer was largely a mystery until now. The United States Department of Agriculture, which oversees the $74 billion food stamp program called SNAP, has published a detailed report that provides a glimpse into the shopping cart of the typical household that receives food stamps.

The findings show that the No. 1 purchases by SNAP households are soft drinks, which accounted for about 10 percent of the dollars they spent on food. “In this sense, SNAP is a multibillion-dollar taxpayer subsidy of the soda industry,” said Marion Nestle, a professor of nutrition, food studies and public health at New York University. “It’s pretty shocking.”

For years, dozens of cities, states and medical groups have urged changes to SNAP, or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, to help improve nutrition among the 43 million poorest Americans who receive food stamps. Specifically, they have called for restrictions so that food stamps cannot be used to buy junk food or sugary soft drinks.

But the food and beverage industries have spent millions opposing such measures, and the U.S.D.A. has denied every request, saying that selectively banning certain foods would be unfair to food stamp users and create too much red tape.

While the report, published recently, suggests that a disproportionate amount of food stamp money is going toward unhealthful foods, the U.S.D.A. said it was unfair to single out food stamp recipients for their soft drink consumption.

The report compared SNAP households and non-SNAP households. While those who used food stamps bought slightly more junk food and fewer vegetables, both SNAP and non-SNAP households bought ample amounts of sweetened drinks, candy, ice cream and potato chips. Among non-SNAP households, for example, soft drinks ranked second on the list of food purchases, behind milk.

“Sweetened beverages are a common purchase in all households across America,” Kevin Concannon, the U.S.D.A. under secretary for food, nutrition and consumer services, said in an interview. “This report raises a question for all households: Are we consuming too many sweetened beverages, period?”

The report was based on data from an unnamed, nationwide grocery chain, which provided the U.S.D.A. with monthly records of food items bought in 2011 by more than 26 million households, about three million of them food stamp recipients. The grocery chain identified and tracked SNAP households by their use of SNAP benefit cards at the checkout aisle. One limitation of the report was that it could not always distinguish when SNAP households used their benefits, other money or a combination of the two to pay for transactions.

Nonetheless, the report provides a striking look at the foods American households typically buy.

Across all households, the report found, “more money was spent on soft drinks than any other item” — a finding that reflects the fact that, while consumption of sugary drinks is lower today than it was a decade ago, the United States still consumes more sugary drinks than almost any other developed country, studies show.

The U.S.D.A. report found that milk, cheese, potato chips, beef, cold cereal and baked bread were among the top purchases for all households. It indicated that all Americans bought ample amounts of desserts, salty snacks, candy and other junk foods. But the SNAP households spent slightly less money on nutritious foods, including fruits and vegetables, beans, eggs, nuts and seeds.

Over all, the report found, SNAP households spent about 40 cents of every dollar at the grocery store on “basic items” like meat, fruits, vegetables, milk, eggs and bread. Another 40 cents of every dollar was spent on “cereal, prepared foods, dairy products, rice and beans.” Lastly, 20 cents of each dollar was spent on a broad category of junk foods that included “sweetened beverages, desserts, salty snacks, candy and sugar.”

SNAP households spent 9.3 percent of their grocery budgets on soft drinks alone. That was slightly higher than the 7.1 percent figure for households that do not receive food stamps.

(More at the link)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: All (#0)

BWAHAHAHAHA!

The author is clueless. Everyone knows that food stamp recipients buy soda because they can easily resell it to another store and pocket the cash.

Soda is the currency for the food stamp poor.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-14   17:38:04 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: misterwhite (#0)

obviously it is time for the next step in prohibition, we have prohibited alcohol with disastarous results, we have prohibited drugs with disastarous results, now is the time to prohibit sugar and grab the golden ring

paraclete  posted on  2017-01-14   19:26:24 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: misterwhite (#1)

Everyone knows that food stamp recipients buy soda because they can easily resell it to another store and pocket the cash.

Soda is the currency for the food stamp poor.

How do YOU know that?

buckeroo  posted on  2017-01-14   19:28:21 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: buckeroo (#3)

"How do YOU know that?"

Because I'm Mr. Mensa.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-15   10:16:59 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: paraclete (#2)

"obviously it is time for the next step in prohibition, we have prohibited alcohol with disastarous results, we have prohibited drugs with disastarous results, now is the time to prohibit sugar and grab the golden ring"

No. It's time to limit food stamp purchases to certain healthy foods.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-15   10:22:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: misterwhite (#5) (Edited)

It's time to limit food stamp purchases to certain healthy foods.

It isn't bad enough these people have to rely on help, you want to interfere in their lives? Interventions are not a good thing and they may not achieve their objectives. Where I come from we have a massive intervention in welfare to prevent people in some communities buying alcohol with their benefits, some people are very resentful of this and it cannot be said to be a success

paraclete  posted on  2017-01-15   16:12:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#7. To: paraclete (#6)

FEEDING THE ANIMALS CAUSES DEPENDENCY... libtard.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-01-15   22:22:30 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#8. To: misterwhite (#5)

Personally, all these lazy shitbags should only be able to buy cigarettes, Soda, high sodium foods and alcohol with EBT cards. So they medically vapor lock before 35

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-01-15   22:25:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#9. To: GrandIsland (#8)

You worry freedom minded Americans.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-01-15   22:30:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#10. To: buckeroo (#9)

You worry freedom minded Americans.

Freedom isn't defined by being fed/supported by another. Asshole.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-01-15   22:58:43 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#11. To: GrandIsland (#10)

You think "freedom" is a free paycheck from the state or US government. I think you are insane.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-01-15   23:03:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#12. To: buckeroo (#11)

You think "freedom" is a free paycheck from the state or US government. I think you are insane.

You're the insane asshole that thinks I get anything for free. I work a set amount of hours for my paycheck... and my pension is paid from PRIVATELY OWNED MUTUAL FUNDS. Asshole

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-01-15   23:06:51 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#13. To: GrandIsland (#12)

You were a twenty year elementary cross walk guard. You did nothing that contributed to any of us.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-01-15   23:12:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#14. To: buckeroo (#13)

Negative, turd smoker. For 20 years, when you sheep called for help... I helped you helpless, lazy dysfunctional souls.

I earned what I get, asshole.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-01-15   23:44:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#15. To: GrandIsland (#7)

FEEDING THE ANIMALS CAUSES DEPENDENCY... libtard

Let me ask you something, do you still look after your native americans or have they died from neglect?

In some enlightened places, people are not just left to starve or to exist in abject poverty, because this creates certain social problems of which I'm sure you are very aware. You want to hang a handle on me that suggests it is unenlightened to help those who might need it, however those of us with an IQ above 50 do understand that not everything can be obtained by shooting it.

The lower social classes might be welfare dependent but surely this is better than having them rioting, looting, stealing and causing property damage.

paraclete  posted on  2017-01-16   0:23:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#16. To: paraclete (#6)

I sure do hope you're being sarcastic.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-16   9:17:02 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#17. To: GrandIsland (#8)

"So they medically vapor lock before 35"

With our luck they'd only become sick, and we'd have to pay for their medical bills the rest of their miserable lives.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-16   9:19:00 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#18. To: paraclete (#15)

"In some enlightened places, people are not just left to starve or to exist in abject poverty"

But why is the solution a handout from the federal government?

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-16   9:20:48 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#19. To: misterwhite (#1)

The author is clueless. Everyone knows that food stamp recipients buy soda because they can easily resell it to another store and pocket the cash.

They could not beat wholesale price.

And at 10% just means that the system is being abused. Go figure a government program being abused! Im shocked!!!

Justified  posted on  2017-01-16   9:22:39 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#20. To: Justified (#19)

"They could not beat wholesale price."

Of course they can. They get the soda for free. Anything they sell it for is pure profit and cash in their pocket.

"And at 10% just means that the system is being abused."

By "the system" you mean the taxes on my hard- earned money. I say stop the abuse by not allowing soda to be purchased with food stamps, saving $7.5 billion per year.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-16   9:43:19 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#21. To: paraclete (#15)

Let me ask you something

And here's your answer... FEEDING THE ANIMALS CAUSES DEPENDENCY.

That fact you can't wash away with your sympathy and liberal WEAKNESS. Your idiology/WEAKNESS is what has caused what we have today.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-01-16   12:00:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#22. To: misterwhite (#18) (Edited)

But why is the solution a handout from the federal government?

a better question is who do you think that handout should come from? those eight billionaires who have half the wealth? don't hold your breath.

We no longer have societies that look after all members of the society at a local level so a taxing government whether state or federal should be the ones who are helping. Very few people want to be poor and live off handouts but without employment opportunity what are you going to do?, the answer isn't let them starve as might have been the case in earlier capitalist economies. It isn't deport them to some far away place, because you can no longer do that

To help people isn't ideological weakness, to make sure that every individual can reach their potential isn't ideological weakness, to say that the poor should rot without concern or help is ideological weakness

paraclete  posted on  2017-01-16   16:30:45 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#23. To: All, *2016 The Likely Suspects* (#22)

ping

paraclete  posted on  2017-01-16   16:34:15 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#24. To: paraclete (#22)

"We no longer have societies that look after all members of the society at a local level"

Yeah, because higher and higher government taxes made that all but impossible.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-16   17:36:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#25. To: misterwhite (#24)

Yeah, because higher and higher government taxes made that all but impossible.

my point, and so those who take away the money have a responsibility to look after the needy and to tax the wealthy. You live in a society where the reverse happens and yet you don't see the need to help the needy, you think those who have nothing are a curse

paraclete  posted on  2017-01-16   18:54:14 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#26. To: misterwhite (#20)

Of course they can. They get the soda for free. Anything they sell it for is pure profit and cash in their pocket.

They would be much better off sell just about anything else than soda.

Yes they should not allow them to buy anything but just the basics but you know progressives on both sides of the political spectrum will never allow this to happen.

Justified  posted on  2017-01-16   22:09:25 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#27. To: paraclete (#25)

you think those who have nothing are a curse

They should only curse you libtards. YOU PAY FOR THEM... don't ask me to. They are a lazy dependant curse.

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-01-16   22:27:01 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#28. To: GrandIsland (#27)

YOU PAY FOR THEM..

I don't pay for them, I stopped buying battleships and F35 long ago, I never cease to be amazed that you think that the poor are a curse, in fact it is you who are the curse

paraclete  posted on  2017-01-17   7:59:16 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#29. To: Justified (#26)

"They would be much better off sell just about anything else than soda."

Yeah ... but ... well, that's what they do. $7.5 billion worth. Every year.

misterwhite  posted on  2017-01-17   9:09:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#30. To: paraclete (#28)

in fact it is you who are the curse

If I'm a curse, don't fucking ask me to pay for what makes you feel good. Asshole

I'm the infidel... Allah warned you about. كافر المسلح

GrandIsland  posted on  2017-01-17   22:45:10 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#31. To: GrandIsland (#30)

You are not a curse, GI. You are too phunney.

buckeroo  posted on  2017-01-17   22:46:13 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#32. To: buckeroo (#31)

You are not a curse, GI. You are too phunney

You misspelled it, that's phonney

paraclete  posted on  2017-01-18   2:49:34 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com