New World Order
See other New World Order Articles
Title: Rethinking Facebook-Join the Revolution At Seen.Life
Source:
The Common Sense Show
URL Source: http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2 ... n-the-revolution-at-seen-life/
Published: Mar 28, 2016
Author: Dave Hodges
Post Date: 2016-12-20 10:56:08 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 5712
Comments: 33
I HAVE SHIFTED FROM FACEBOOK TO SEEN.IS, WHICH IS A MORE PROFESSIONAL AND LESS INVASIVE VERSION OF FACEBOOK. JOIN THE MULTITUTDES OF PEOPLE WHO ARE TIRED OF BEING SPIED UPON AND BANNED FOR EXPRESSING LEGITIMATE POLITICAL VIEWS. Many of us in print and broadcast media are rethinking our association with Facebook. Several of our journalistic brothers and sisters have been censored and/or otherwise treated unprofessionally by this entity. Facebook has become replete with trolls who patrol the cyber corridors of this monolithic entity chastising and censoring whoever exposes the liberal, anti-human, depopulation agenda of the New World Order. Whether it is gun control, criticism of NWO puppet Obama or anything that the Mark Zuckerberg people disagree with, they will kick your Facebook account to the curb for daring to express a legitimate political opinion. Mark Zuckerberg, the creator of Facebook emphasized three times in a single interview with David Kirkpatrick in his book, The Facebook Effect “You have one identity, and the days of you having a different image for your work friends or co-workers and for the other people you know are probably coming to an end pretty quickly. Having two identities for yourself is an example of a lack of integrity.” Who appointed Mr. Zuckerberg to be the moral police and the judge of integrity? It sounds like Zuckerberg can take his place with Soros, Gates, Turner, et al., and the rest of the global elite who think they have the right to treat humanity as their own personal property and view the masses as a disposable commodity. Whistle blower, Julian Assange, once stated that “Facebook in particular is the most appalling spying machine that has ever been invented. Here we have the world’s most comprehensive database about people, their relationships, their names, their addresses, their locations and the communications with each other, their relatives, all sitting within the United States, all accessible to US intelligence. Facebook, Google, Yahoo – all these major US organizations have built-in interfaces for US intelligence. It’s not a matter of serving a subpoena. They have an interface that they have developed for US intelligence to use.” Never before in American cyber history do we see such an arrogant and agenda serving entity operating their propaganda so far in the open as we do with Facebook. This propaganda end of the New World Order is being blatantly exposed. A couple of days ago, famed researcher and highly respected journalist, Jon Rappoport was banned from sharing his articles on Facebook. In this instance of blatant censorship, Jon’s banned article was merely a review of certain aspects of American presidents ranging from Nixon to Obama. Like so many of us that understand history and can see the tyrannical path that Obama is trying to take us down, Rappoport identified Obama’s unconstitutional missteps. And for daring to tell the truth, Facebook banned Rappoport for the mere expression of a legitimate personal opinion. Readers may recall when members of Infowars.com and the popular talk show host, Michael Rivero were banned in December of 2012, until the public outcry for Facebook to reinstate their respective accounts backed Facebook into a corner from which they acquiesced and reinstated the previously banned media figures. Facebook’s does not apply their holier than thou attitude to their own corporate behavior. As Zuckerberg talks about rectifying Americans lack of integrity through timely Facebook exposure, Facebook fails to pay its own fair share of taxes as a result of tax loopholes and deductions. Facebook paid no income tax for the fiscal year 2012, despite reaping $1.1 billion in U.S. corporate profits. While Americans have just been subjected to higher taxes, billion-dollar corporations like Facebook, General Electric, Boeing and Wells Fargo have all been able to avoid paying any corporate income taxes, reports Citizens for Tax Justice. In a recent interview with CNN, Reddit.com co-founder Alex Ohanian explains that he won’t be investing in Facebook, the largest technology IPO in the history of the Internet. Facebook founder, Zuckerberg, has stated that he expects to make billions of dollars off of the site’s initial public offering, Ohanian says that he won’t be investing in Facebook in order to enrich Zuckerberg. Ohanian’s reasons for avoiding Facebook as an investment vehicle is tied to the fact that he strongly believes that Facebook’s stance in favor of the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act, CISPA, is very dangerous to the viability of the internet. I applaud Ohanian’s stance as it is clear that Ohanian respects free speech. It is safe to say that Facebook and CISPA are two birds of a feather as they both support blatant censorship regarding views which differ from their own. Tax evasion, legal or not, seems to be a trait of Facebook personnel, both past and present. Not only does Facebook not pay taxes while the rest of America is suffering under crushing tax increases, Zuckerberg’s former co-founder, Eduardo Saverin, renounced his U.S. citizenship back in August of 2012 in order to pay less tax. I guess that birds of a feather Facebook together. Can it be said that Facebook is a shining example of duplicity and censorship? I think so and I welcome being banned by the monolith because soon Zuckerberg will learn the lesson the phrase “pride goeth before the fall.” Someday, Facebook will face some very stiff competition and the millions who have been irritated by the trolls which send warning messages for sending simple personal messages could very well be looking for new jobs. Technology is fleeting and Facebook could someday go the way of Myspace. A couple of nights ago, I was trying to send an invitation to former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney through Facebook’s messaging system for the purpose of inviting her to appear on my talk show. Facebook blocked my invitation with a popup which said my ability to message has been suspended. Yet, I was able to send messages to other people on Facebook, just not Congresswoman McKinney. Before attempting to message Congresswoman McKinney, I contacted a mutual acquaintance Lorie Meacham, about assisting her help in procuring McKinney as a guest on my talk show in order to discuss her knowledge of government sponsored child sex trafficking (e.g. Dyncorp). As I was online with Meacham, I tried to message McKinney and was blocked. To me, this means that Facebook was monitoring our communication and proactively blocked me. Isn’t interesting that I was blocked because I was interested in the topic of child sex trafficking? Coincidence? Perhaps. Lorie Meacham reported today that she is unable to message me either as the censorship of the free expression of ideas continues.. None of this is surprising given Facebook’s long associations with organizations like In Q tel which is the communications arm of the CIA. Here is a short video which helps the viewer understand the origins of Facebook and who it truly serves and how and why this organization got its start. Let my hypothesize with some of you who have no problem giving Facebook any and all information about yourself because “you have nothing to hide.” What if Facebook is a big data mining device? It is, read your service agreement. What if this information in conjunction with other data is ever used to determine your loyalty to the government? It could, again, read your service agreement. What if this data would someday be used to decide who lives and dies based upon your threat matrix score? If you don’t think this is possible google the MIAC Report and all of a sudden, I start looking more like Paul Revere than a mentally ill conspiracy theorist. I have also had issues with my personal settings on Facebook. In my life, I have only lived in two areas (Denver and Phoenix) and reported that to Facebook as I was setting up my account. Yet, Facebook has me listed of visiting some third location called “Ready Aim Fire” in New Jersey. Given my Second Amendment advocacy, should I consider this to be an example of Facebook humor or is this a thinly veiled threat from our unapproachable Facebook overlords who will charge me $89 to investigate? Please note, I have never been to New Jersey and I am unable to reset this feature. Lorie Meacham also related to me of a same-day Facebook exchange she was having with a friend in New Zealand about the recent FBI arrest of Malcolm X’s grandson as he was planning to go to Iran. The conversational text between the two parties was erased by Facebook for being “abusive.” Lorie and I are still trying to make sense how a conversation can be considered to be abusive as long as both parties are willing participants? The short answer is that it is not abusive and constitutes, yet, another example of blatant censorship. These actions are taking place because Facebook has obviously instructed its trolls to censor certain stories as was the case with Jon Rappoport. That same night and wanting to achieve some measure of privacy, Lorie and I decided to take the conversation off of Facebook to the phone. This is where our evening became very weird. Lorie and I were talking about the possibility of discussing these censorship events on my show and our call was immediately terminated (I was on a land line) and we could not re-establish a connection. I have subsequently related these stories to Julie Telgenhoff. Julie sponsors one of the most dynamic groups on Facebook entitled, A Sheep No More. Julie has indicated that her members have recently experienced difficulty sharing articles with other Facebook members. Most of the articles are critical of the Obama administration as well as espousing views which run contrary to the New World Order (Agenda 21, etc.). This should demonstrate to everyone which side of the fence that Facebook sits on. Since I aired my frustration with Facebook on my talk show, All of us would be wise to review our Facebook terms of service. Facebook reserves the right to gather all internet habits that you have. They reserve the right to share your data with anyone. They are creating profiles which they are allegedly sharing with the government. To the trolls who work for this entity, do you really think that you are going to have a seat at the table of the New World Order? Do you think they will let you hang out with them under Denver International Airport in the vast expanse of tunnels which runs through the mile high state when their contrived set of disasters are visited upon us? Or will you trolls end up like so many Brown Shirts from the past in which you will be cast aside without a second thought upon the stockpile of humanity? And to all of us, we have bigger fish to fry than Facebook. Venting our indignation against such a tool of censorship and oppression is a waste of time. We need to keep directing our attention on the gardeners, not their tools. For it is the gardeners who are trying to erase most of humanity from the planet. History is filled with examples in which a problem is just a solution in disguise. The research on intention as a force in the universe has clearly demonstrated that if we think about the things that don’t want, we will get more of what we don’t want. As we call attention to the great level of injustice which presently dominates world affairs, let’s simultaneously call attention to the fact that there is a spiritual solution to every problem. I choose to not the let the Facebook issue dominate my thoughts. I have exposed Facebook for what it is, now let Mr. Zuckerberg own his own Karma. Realize that Facebook only has the power to ban a few of us, but if we don’t give Facebook more attention than what they deserve, our collective messages of freedom, self-determination and ultimate empowerment will push forward like a giant tsunami. Subsequently, if Facebook tries to ban and censor everyone who expresses humanity’s inherent desire for freedom, they will be left with no customers and they will die a natural death. Even the dumbed down sheeple lament the fences that keeps them in their pre-designed pastures. There was freedom before Facebook and there will be freedom after the demise of Facebook. Freedom will always win out over tyranny, so express yourself without fear. Freedom is the wellspring of creativity. The globalists only know how to destroy. We in the freedom movement will push humanity forward in creative ways never before imagined and eventually the corporate despots will be swept away by the forces which will propel humanity to a higher plane of existence. Facebook’s Zuckerberg, The Self-Perceived Purveyor of Integrity and Morality
FACEBOOK ALLOWS AN ASSASSINATE DONALD TRUMP PAGE, BUT WON’T ALLOW THE FOLLOWING?
Julian Assange Assessment of Facebook
Rules For Thee but Not For Me
Reddit Co-Founder Dissociates From Involvement With Facebook
My Recent Personal Experiences With Facebook
More Facebook Transgressions
My phone disconnect from Lorie Meacham and the seemingly instantaneous monitoring and censorship should not be surprising given the fact that Facebook’s origins are tied to the CIA’s In-Q-tel (refer to the above video).
I personally do not need Facebook to deliver my message especially with what is coming. Mark my words, in some future date, not too far from now, most people are going to forget about Facebook and will have moved on to the next toy. Conclusion
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
So we have seen.is, seen.life, and unseen.life. If they can't even get the name of their website straight, why should I believe anything they say?
If they can't even get the name of their website straight, why should I believe anything they say? The site is called Seen Life. The use of the term "unseen" was to emphasize the privacy one can expect from the site. You're really not too bright, are you? That wasn't the term. The term was unseen.life, a website. And what about seen.is? What's up with that?
Do I really need to explain to you what a link is, and how to click on it? Never mind. The article is about a social media site that offers more privacy and no censorship As opposed to Facebook, which offers NO privacy and complete censorship. I just thought some folks here may be interested in those features. suggest you google it and follow some of the links the guy who runs this might have a shady past
So I registered at this site and there is absolutely nothing on the opening page EXCEPT an offer to UPGRADE TO PREMIUM. Well done Dexter!!!
Thank you for bumping the thread. So I registered at this site and there is absolutely nothing on the opening page EXCEPT an offer to UPGRADE TO PREMIUM. I didn't have any problems. Either you didn't sign up at the site, or you are lying. Oh wait - you are lying either way. Attaboy - way to stay classy!! Hey Kook! Your website is typical upgrade scam. Whatta schmuck!! Greetings! Your unseen.is account is now ready to use, your email was successfully validated. With Unseen, you get secure chat, calling and email with 10MB of storage. To fully take advantage of your Icelandic email account, you should upgrade to premium and you'll get two premium accounts, each with IMAP/POP3 capability and 2 GB of storage for only $49 per year. Or you can take advantage of our lifetime account special of one time payment of $99 for FIVE accounts. With lifetime, you never get another bill from Unseen for the premium service with those accounts. It's quite a deal. Because your are a new users, we'll give you an additional 10% off if you use this coupon code within ten days of establishing your new account: xxxxxxxxx
With Unseen, you get secure chat, calling and email with 10MB of storage. No one is forcing you to upgrade. Anything else you care to whine about? But by all means, stay with Facebook. We all know you're a big fan of the NSA and approve of censorship. KooK, you said I was lying and I wasn't. Anyone can do what I did to prove that you are promoting a scam. It seems, yet again, you've spammed decent people with Fake News. Let me ask you crackpot, who, besides you, would forward CC information to an Icelandic email/forum scam? Carry on, whack job.
Seriously? You have yet to prove anything with your post, and as a matter of fact you haven't EVER proven anything with any of your posts here. There is no scam Sparky. No one is forcing you to upgrade. If you don't like the site, don't use it. Simple enough for you? ...you've spammed decent people with Fake News. Well first of all, that you categorize yourself as "decent people" is laughable. Secondly - you seem to have a lot in common with Hillary and the dead MSM, pushing the "fake news" meme. ...forward CC information to an Icelandic email/forum scam? Huh? Now you're just making shit up. KooK, I understand reading comprehension isn't your strong suit, but the above is obvious; it's an Icelandic email account and in order to take full advantage one should upgrade to premium. Given that there is now zero content upon opening an account, I suppose a premium bump is my only option, eh? . It's dopes like you that give life to Nigerian letter scams.
There is no content because YOU HAVEN'T ADDED ANY! You (allegedly) just signed up. You'd see the same thing if you signed up at Facebook for the first time. To fully take advantage of your Icelandic email account, you should upgrade to premium Once again, no one is holding a gun to your head. When I click onto the link it reads Seen.life.
KooK, when I open up Liberty's Flame I see content w/o doing a bloody thing. Why would anyone use YOUR credit card scam from Iceland, a scam that has at lease 3 different names? What a bag o' douche UR.
Good grief, are you really that clueless? Why would anyone use YOUR credit card scam from Iceland, I don't own the site. I posted this for those who may be interested in an alternative to Facebook. I think most folks here (with the exception of you) are savvy enough to decide on their own whether or not to subscribe to the site. We're done here - as usual you've made no useful contribution to the thread. KooK, a normal person wouldn't posit an Icelandic credit card scam as an alternative to Crackbook. Again, you've demonstrated a complete inability to filter out Fake News.
Any news of alternatives to creepy left-wing Facebook should be explored by all of us who are effectively excluded from Facebook politically or who want a service that is not so creepy and invasive and so willing to sell all your most private info to any comer with a checkbook (including the feds and foreign governments).
I joined the site - keeping a low profile so far, but I like what I've seen. 99% conservatives, gun owners, Trump supporters with a smattering of "conspiracy theorists". From the looks of it, no topic is taboo. Did you decide to go premium ($49) or lifetime ($99) or a free account? Just curious how valuable you think it is. I'm a little leery due to my experience with being a Hushmail subscriber.
I just have a free account. The setup is almost identical to Facebook. I still have Facebook but I really only use that to keep in touch with my kids and relatives who are far away. It remains to be sen how valuable it is - I've gotten a couple dozen "friend" requests. I'm still somewhat leery myself - being the conspiracy theorist that I am, I can see the government monitoring the site to keep tabs on dissenters. But now that Trump is president, I'm sure all of the NSA spying on Americans will be ending soon. Yeah, that was sarcasm. I'm still waiting for the Russian tape of him in the hotel room with hookers.
Smart folks and who can blame them?
It's going to be a total letdown if we don't get the full Peepeegate video on YouBoob. It would be even better if the Russian whores were peeing on copies of Obama's birth certificate. Or on Hitlery's infamous Russian "reset" button. But perhaps that is too much to hope for. : )
I found it a bit of a chore to cancel a Hushmail account.
If they can't even get the name of their website straight, why should I believe anything they say? December 15, 2014 at 3:33pm [UPDATE #1: I got a message today, purportedly from one of the directors of seen/unseen's parent company 'Unseen, ehf', threatening legal action for libel if I don't remove this note. I've therefore taken the time to edit the note to make it clear which information comes from publicly-available sources, and which is opinion. UPDATE #2: Thanks to Marko Mikael Lumivuori I have learned that the website in question has since changed its address to "SEEN.LIFE". If nothing else has changed however, I still recommend you avoid it for the reasons stated below. Read on!] Calling fans of SEEN.IS and UNSEEN.IS [and now SEEN.LIFE] social network... you might be being scammed, and if so, the scammer thinks you're stupid. Want to hear more? Read on, and then PLEASE SHARE this note. Don't believe me and don't want to read something you might not like? Goodbye and good luck! "Unseen, ehf", the company whose name appears at the bottom of the seen/unseen signup pages (scroll down to the bottom, you'll see it), has as its CEO a man named Chris Kitze. If you look at his LinkedIn page (https://www.linkedin.com/in/chriskitze) you'll see that as well as being CEO of Unseen, he is one of several directors of - amongst others - a company called iNome. According to his own blurb, he serves "on the board of directors of this rapidly growing personal intelligence company. An early investor, [he] joined the board to bring [his] experience in internet commerce and finance to help management guide the company to even greater success." The Wikipedia entry for iNome (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inome) is very interesting as it details class action lawsuits the company has been embroiled in for its breaches of data protection laws and for automatically enrolling people into marketing programmes without their permission. There's much more there too, read it yourself and find out how badly Kitze's company appears to want to use your personal information for gain, and how little it seems the company he still invests in cares about how it does so. Want your private cellphone number made available without your consent? iNome, part-owned and directed by Chris Kitze, CEO of Unseen, ehf, can probably fix it for you, based on past behaviour. Then there's the matter of security. Now I'm no encryption expert, but some of those who *are* have serious questions about both the actual security of seen/unseen and the deliberate misrepresentation of it in their FAQs (http://cryto.net/~joepie91/blog/2014/04/19/why-you-should-stay-away-from-unseen.is/). It's an additional shame then that unseen.ehf only offer their strongest security to those who are willing to give their credit card details, which seems dubious to me given iNome's record, and exploitative since it's being promoted on the back of a perceived lack of security elsewhere. So that's the appeal to reason. Now here's the appeal to emotion (with a bit more reason thrown in). As stated in their introductory text, seen.is and unseen.is are both operated by the people behind the website BeforeItsNews.com (BIN). Look harder and you'll see that Chris Kitze is in fact the publisher (http://beforeitsnews.com/contributor/pages/0/004/bio.html). BIN is known for allowing the spread of untrue and scaremongering news stories, a policy which Kitze attempts to defend here: http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/08/why-are-there-so-many-fake-stories-on-before-its-news-3011970.html. From this response - basically stating that he's proud of the fact that there is no editorial control or fact-checking, and anyone can post anything there - I believe that there is no way in which any reasonable person could consider the website a reliable 'news' site. Amongst the works of fiction hosted on BeforeItsNews are many which are those focussed on - frankly - lies about Facebook's security and privacy concerns. There is much to criticise Facebook about, but these criticisms do not justify spreading lies; a cause worth fighting for will only be undermined if those who fight for it lie about it in order to further their aims. BIN was, it seems, the first site upon which the latest scare story spread, concerning the Facebook privacy "bombshell" on January 1st 2015 - a story that has been established by independent researchers to be false (http://www.snopes.com/computer/facebook/fbspying.asp). Who wrote the 'bombshell' story? Lisa Haven, a featured contributor on Beforeitsnews who has also been promoting seen/unseen.is in her writing there and on other sites and blogs [1]. [snip] Before Its News articles about Seen.Life vs. Facebook.
Excellent research. Can you imagine what this character does with someone's CC information once they bump up to premium? Truly, only a moron would identify himself with such a raggedy ass company.
No one is forced to upgrade to premium. Truly, only a moron would identify himself with such a raggedy ass company. You pimping for Facebook now? Seriously? Snopes? You idjits still use that liberal-leaning and discredited site to check facts? BeforeItsNews.com - anyone can post anything there. What a concept! Readers can actually decide for themselves what stories are factual. Seriously, Before It's News? Seriously, that the best ya got? It appears so. And here, anyone can make fun of your purveyors of bullshit.
KooK, it's no wonder your family moved far away from you. Did they leave a forwarding address or do you all congregate on this mess you're promoting?
You really are an ignorant little twat, aren't you? Still don't get it? NO ONE is being forced to upgrade to premium at the site. Keep using snopes as your guide to truth - it's no wonder you are perceived as a short-bus riding clown at this site. I already mentioned I use Facebook to keep in touch with family and distant friends. I'm guessing what few friends you have live in the same trailer park as you. KooK, can I 'friend' your family on Scambook?
#2. To: misterwhite (#1)
So we have seen.is, seen.life, and unseen.life.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#3. To: Deckard (#2)
"The use of the term "unseen"
#4. To: misterwhite (#3)
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#5. To: Deckard (#4)
#6. To: misterwhite (#3)
#7. To: Vinny (#6)
(Edited)
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#8. To: Deckard (#0)
#9. To: Vinny (#8)
(Edited)
Your unseen.is account is now ready to use, your email was successfully validated.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#10. To: Deckard (#9)
No one is forcing you to upgrade.
#11. To: Vinny (#10)
Anyone can do what I did to prove that you are promoting a scam.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#12. To: Deckard (#11)
To fully take advantage of your Icelandic email account, you should upgrade to premium
#13. To: Vinny (#12)
(Edited)
Given that there is now zero content upon opening an account,
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#14. To: Deckard (#0)
#15. To: Deckard (#13)
There is no content because YOU HAVEN'T ADDED ANY!
#16. To: Vinny (#15)
KooK, when I open up Liberty's Flame I see content w/o doing a bloody thing.
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#17. To: Deckard (#16)
I don't own the site. I posted this for those who may be interested in an alternative to Facebook.
#18. To: Deckard (#0)
#19. To: Tooconservative (#18)
Any news of alternatives to creepy left-wing Facebook should be explored by all of us who are effectively excluded from Facebook politically or who want a service that is not so creepy and invasive and so willing to sell all your most private info to any comer with a checkbook (including the feds and foreign governments).
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#20. To: Deckard (#19)
(Edited)
#21. To: Tooconservative (#20)
Did you decide to go premium ($49) or lifetime ($99) or a free account?
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#22. To: Deckard (#21)
But now that Trump is president, I'm sure all of the NSA spying on Americans will be ending soon.
#23. To: Deckard (#21)
I still have Facebook but I really only use that to keep in touch with my kids and relatives who are far away.
#24. To: Fred Mertz, Deckard (#22)
I'm still waiting for the Russian tape of him in the hotel room with hookers.
#25. To: Tooconservative (#20)
I'm a little leery due to my experience with being a Hushmail subscriber.
#26. To: misterwhite, Deckard, Vinny (#1)
So we have seen.is, seen.life, and unseen.life.
Some stuff I found out about how SEEN.IS/UNSEEN.IS/SEEN.LIFE social network might be a scam
#27. To: nolu chan, misterwhite, Deckard (#26)
#28. To: Vinny (#27)
Can you imagine what this character does with someone's CC information once they bump up to premium?
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#29. To: nolu chan, Vinny (#26)
(Edited)
Facebook privacy "bombshell" on January 1st 2015 - a story that has been established by independent researchers to be false (http://www.snopes.com/computer/facebook/fbspying.asp).
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#30. To: Deckard, Vinny (#29)
Seriously? Snopes?
BeforeItsNews.com - anyone can post anything there.
#31. To: Deckard, nolu chan (#28)
#32. To: Vinny (#31)
do you all congregate on this mess you're promoting?
“Truth is treason in the empire of lies.” - Ron Paul
Those who most loudly denounce Fake News are typically those most aggressively disseminating it.
#33. To: Deckard (#32)
I still have Facebook but I really only use that to keep in touch with my kids and relatives who are far, far away.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]