politics and politicians
See other politics and politicians Articles
Title: BREAKING : Michigan Court Rules in Trump’s Favor – Orders Recount to STOP Immediately
Source:
truthfeed.com
URL Source: http://truthfeed.com/breaking-michi ... unt-to-stop-immediately/40194/
Published: Dec 7, 2016
Author: Amy Moreno
Post Date: 2016-12-07 02:29:07 by Gatlin
Keywords: None
Views: 2782
Comments: 12
The Michigan Court of Appeals agreed that Jill Stein is not an aggrieved candidate and the recount must stop. That’s it! The recount in Michigan is over. The whole thing has collapsed, like the house of cards it always was. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#2. To: Gatlin (#0)
The issue hasn't been completely settled - you shouldn't post misleading statements. Despite dueling court rulings, Michigan recount keeps going A federal appeals court upheld the Michigan recount that's been under way since Monday in an opinion issued late Tuesday, just moments before a state appeals court issued an opinion saying the recount should never have been allowed to begin. The dueling appellate opinions set up further proceedings before U.S. District Judge Mark Goldsmith, who ordered the recount to begin Monday, two days before state officials had scheduled it to start. I find it ironic that Trump is criticizing this recount effort when he would have done the same thing had he lost.
You are correct. The opinions were issued "moments" apart and the author seemingly did not know the other decision was being issued. I find it ironic that you think that you always know exactly what Trump would and would not have done.
As you may recall, Trump is quoted as saying he would accept the results "if I win". It's a reasonable conclusion to say he would have demanded a recountd if he had lost.
Conclusions are reached only after someone makes certain assumptions of the meaning of the reasons. You are making an assumption.
The fact remains that Trump is quoted as saying he would accept the results "If I win". Anyone with a brain (I guess that leaves you out) would take that to mean that he would contest the results if he had lost.
#8. To: Deckard (#7)
Anyone with a brain (I guess that leaves you out) would take that to mean that he would contest the results if he had lost. Nope, anyone who has followed Trump would NEVER take that to mean he would contest the results if he had lost. Anyone with a brain (that definitely leaves you out) is smart enough to know by now that TRUMP is totally UNPREDICTABLE. You must learn that YOU simply cannot predict or assume what Trump will say or do at anytime. He has made that perfectly clear in his book.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestThe Michigan Court of Appeals agreed that Jill Stein is not an aggrieved candidate and the recount must stop.
#3. To: Deckard (#2)
(Edited)
The issue hasn't been completely settled -
#4. To: Gatlin (#3)
I find it ironic that you think that you always know exactly what Trump would and would not have done.
#5. To: Deckard (#4)
#7. To: Gatlin (#5)
Conclusions are reached only after someone makes certain assumptions of the meaning of the reasons.
Replies to Comment # 7. The fact remains that Trump is quoted as saying he would accept the results "If I win".
End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]