Education
See other Education Articles
Title: Federalist: Democrat Michelle Rhee as Education Secretary ‘Would Be a Terrible Choice’
Source:
Breitbart
URL Source: http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern ... ion-secretary-terrible-choice/
Published: Nov 19, 2016
Author: Dr. Susan Berry
Post Date: 2016-11-19 07:59:58 by cranky
Keywords: None
Views: 5294
Comments: 16
President-elect Donald Trump is reportedly meeting Friday with Democrat Michelle Rhee, the former Washington, D.C., schools chancellor and potential candidate for the post of U.S. secretary of education. Andrew Ujifusa, writing at Education Week, reported the slated meeting Friday. “Trump’s search for education secretary appears to be crossing party lines,” writes Ujifusa. “Rhee, who has identified as a Democrat throughout her career, is a strong supporter of school choice (including vouchers), which appears to be the top K-12 priority for Trump.” Rhee, however, who was D.C. schools chancellor from 2007 to 2010, is a Common Core supporter, a fact that does not mesh with Trump’s stated goal of finally getting rid of any federal mechanisms that are keeping the boondoggle going. The Federalist’s Joy Pullmann writes that Rhee “doesn’t fit Trump at all.” “For one, she’s highly skeptical of school choice,” Pullmann says, and continues: She strongly supports charter schools, a good but highly managed government alternative to traditional public schools, and prominently reversed her opposition to vouchers in 2013. Yet she still supports a highly regulated version of vouchers driven by applying the tests to them that public schools use, which undercuts their very premise. We don’t want to use vouchers to mold private schools into the public schools whose failure justifies vouchers in the first place, but to provide diversity of parent choice in education. That requires light regulation. “There are a lot of people out there who sort of believe, the free market, let the free market reign, the market will correct itself — give every kid a backpack with their money in it and let them choose wherever they want to go,” Rhee said in a 2012 interview with Education Week. “I don’t believe in that model at all.” “Instead, she supports highly limited and highly regulated voucher programs just for poor families, not all taxpayers,” says Pullmann. Pullmann observes the all-important distinction among methods of bringing about school choice, and vouchers are a means that have been shown to create the greatest amount of regulation to private and other schools that agree to accept them for low-income students. A recent Education Next poll shows that while overall support for school choice is high in the United States, support for the use of vouchers to access choice programs has declined. “Program design matters,” Lindsey Burke, education fellow at Heritage Foundation, told Breitbart News. “The poll results found a drop in support for school vouchers, which could reflect recent experiences in states that have heavily regulated their school voucher programs, leading, paradoxically – as the regulations were promulgated in the name of accountability – to lower participation among high quality private schools.” In a 2010 study at the Cato Institute, Andrew Coulson found that voucher programs are more likely to “suffocate the very markets to which they aim to expand access” because state funds—which invariably invite state regulation—are directly transferred, in the form of vouchers, to parents to spend in an alternate education setting.” Instead, tax credit scholarships and education savings accounts are fast becoming the more popular means to create school choice. But the possible consideration of Rhee as U.S. education secretary raises other concerns. Rhee is married to current Sacramento Mayor and former NBA star Kevin Johnson, who was the focus of considerable scandal in 2015. In a piece titled “The Comeuppance of Creepy Obama Crony Kevin Johnson,” conservative author Michelle Malkin highlighted published reports by the Sacramento News & Review on Johnson’s alleged “use of public resources for personal gain.” Sports site Deadspin had also slammed Johnson for allegations of “sleazy financial dealings and personal perversities.” Malkin continued, “Among Deadspin’s damaging scoops: an exclusive interview with accuser Mandi Koba and video of her 1996 police interview in which the then-17-year-old victim graphically described repeated sexual molestation by Johnson, then 29 and a star member of the Phoenix Suns.” Having reported on similar behavior by Johnson in 2011, Malkin writes that then-federal inspector General Gerald Walpin of the Corporation for National and Community Service uncovered other examples of “inappropriate contact” between Johnson and several high school students while also probing into misuse of about $1 million in AmeriCorps funds at St. HOPE Academy of California, the charter school organization founded by Johnson. Malkin reported Walpin concluded Johnson used AmeriCorps funds for his own political and personal purposes. Additionally: Johnson’s attorney, Kevin Hiestand, approached at least one of the (St. HOPE) students describing himself only as “a friend of Johnson’s,” and “basically asked me to keep quiet.” She had complained to St. HOPE officials that Johnson groped her sexually after instructing her to grade papers with him in her apartment. According to her interview with Walpin’s investigators, “about one week later, Kevin Johnson offered her $1,000 a month until the end of the program, which she refused to accept.” Walpin’s office also found that Rhee, who was Johnson’s fiancé at the time and a St. HOPE board member, “played the role of a fixer, doing ‘damage control’” for Johnson, Malkin wrote. “The White House, which so ostentatiously crusades against sexual harassment and the War on Women, looked the other way,” she wrote. “The Obamas and Johnsons are close pals. Reminder: Johnson donated the maximum individual amount to Obama for America, campaigned across the country for Obama in 2008, and bragged to California media during his mayoral run about his friendship and access to both Barack and Michelle Obama.” Rhee now chairs the board of St. HOPE Public Schools, the charter school organization her husband started. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
#1. To: cranky (#0)
There is but one correct choice to head the Dept of Education and that is ME! I will within 2 weeks fire every employees, totally destroy it and bull doze under the buildings. What clinton did to the Branch Davidian compound I will do to the Dept of Education without the use of fbi snipers and the killing fields. There is no Constitutional justification or authorization for the Dept of Education, it must be destroyed, Education must be returned to the local communities. Elected and unelected Bureaucrats, leeches, and cockroaches are all part of the same family in the animal kingdom.
I agree. Then the local communities must get rid of the unions, K-12 tenure, and pensions (switch to 401k's like everyone else). All three are contributing to a lousy education and bankrupt cities.
Sounds like Rhee has a lot of baggage. The MSM will tear her to shreds if she's appointed. BWAHAHAHAHAHA! Just kidding.
we agree, push me to get rid of the dept of education.
Elected and unelected Bureaucrats, leeches, and cockroaches are all part of the same family in the animal kingdom.
What happens to the list of nationally recognized accrediting agencies? "[T]he Secretary of Education is required by law to publish a list of the Secretary of Education is required by law to publish a list of nationally recognized accrediting agencies that the Secretary determines to be reliable authorities as to the quality of education or training provided by the institutions of higher education and the higher education programs they accredit. that the Secretary determines to be reliable authorities as to the quality of education or training provided by the institutions of higher education and the higher education programs they accredit."
Figured that. She and her hubby are pretty much bulletproof in the Sacramento area. At least, up to now.
Because she's a liberal -- and the MSM is not going to beat up a liberal, no matter their past. Which was why I laughed.
were there no accredited schools before carter and the dept of education?
Elected and unelected Bureaucrats, leeches, and cockroaches are all part of the same family in the animal kingdom.
What happens to the list of nationally recognized accrediting agencies?
The ones who accredited the current crop of public schools?
The accrediting bodies for colleges and universities. What happens to the list of nationally recognized accrediting agencies?
Have the list administered by a brand new agency called the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. Catchy name. But I'd like the accrediting bodies for colleges and universities to consist of organizations involved in the various fields of study. For example, an accounting school would be accredited by "The United States Council of Accreditation Accountants" ... or some such. Take the politics out and let each industry set their own standards.
Switch the old name plates back at HHS? Doesn't seem much like an actual change. Assuming the continued existence of federally guaranteed student loans, would the loans apply for any institution that hangs out a shingle, regardless of their accrediting body or lack thereof? Would every school be eligible for federal research contracts, regardless of accreditation? Could federal contracting officers even use accreditation or accreditation lists as an evaluation criterion for award? Could education credits earned through military service be used at Bob's Happy Ending School of Business and Massage? The education industry is currently free to set its own multiple standards. However, institutions in both the public and commercial spheres are also free to accept or reject those standards. Thus the federal list, which businesses are free to ignore in their hiring and contracting practices.
I don't see what good they serve. Elected and unelected Bureaucrats, leeches, and cockroaches are all part of the same family in the animal kingdom.
Tongue in cheek. "That's just how it is right now." You brought up colleges and universities. I was referring to K-12 accreditation, given that college-age (and college-ready) applicants should be able to distinguish between a real college and a scam. Your list of "Fake College Accreditation Agencies" is an example of how the Internet makes that possible. (Unless, of course, the student already knows the college is a scam and is willing to take the chance that a future employer will look the other way.) "Assuming the continued existence of federally guaranteed student loans, would the loans apply for any institution that hangs out a shingle, regardless of their accrediting body or lack thereof?" Government student loans are a problem in so many ways: -- They're driving up the cost of college education. Privatize student loans again. Create a Pell Grant II program (under HEW) to help the qualified needy obtain a degree in a government-approved major -- eg., engineering, physics, nursing, etc. Something that will benefit the country. Unlike the Pell Grant program, loans under this program must be repaid (in full or in part). And bring back vocational schools where students can learn a trade. We need more plumbers and fewer lawyers.
#2. To: BobCeleste (#1)
"There is no Constitutional justification or authorization for the Dept of Education, it must be destroyed, Education must be returned to the local communities."
#3. To: cranky (#0)
#4. To: misterwhite (#2)
#5. To: BobCeleste (#4)
#6. To: misterwhite (#3)
Just kidding.
#7. To: cranky (#6)
"She and her hubby are pretty much bulletproof in the Sacramento area."
#8. To: Roscoe (#5)
#9. To: BobCeleste (#8)
#10. To: Roscoe (#5)
"What happens to the list of nationally recognized accrediting agencies?"
#11. To: misterwhite (#10)
The ones who accredited the current crop of public schools?
#12. To: Roscoe (#11)
(Edited)
"What happens to the list of nationally recognized accrediting agencies?"
#13. To: misterwhite (#12)
Have the list administered by a brand new agency called the Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
But I'd like the accrediting bodies for colleges and universities to consist of organizations involved in the various fields of study.
That's just how it is right now. And a student is free to attend any school accredited (or not accredited) by any accrediting body, on or off the list.
#14. To: Roscoe (#9)
What happens to the list of nationally recognized accrediting agencies?
#15. To: BobCeleste (#14)
#16. To: Roscoe (#13)
"Switch the old name plates back at HHS?"
-- They're dumbing down the curriculum to accomodate students who shouldn't even be in college.
-- Their mere existence creates these fake colleges as everyone tries to get a piece of the government pie.
-- Even at "good" colleges, students are using this easy money to get useless degrees -- just to have a degree.
-- And it's too tempting for politicians to promise to wipe out this debt if only you wil vote for them.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]