Creationism/Evolution
See other Creationism/Evolution Articles
Title: Paul Joseph Watson Blasts The MSM: "You're The F**king Experts Of Fake News"
Source:
Zero Hedge
URL Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016- ... asts-msm-truth-about-fake-news
Published: Nov 18, 2016
Author: Tyler Durden
Post Date: 2016-11-19 01:47:32 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 21496
Comments: 48
Paul Joseph Watson is back with another epic rant....this time eviscerating the mainstream media for spreading an obviously biased list of "fake news" sources compiled by a left-wing assistant professor in an obvious attempt to undermine conservative news outlets. We wrote about the list a couple days ago as Zero Hedge itself was actually a target of Melissa "Mish" Zimdars' fake news wrath. To our complete "shock", the list of fake news sources created by the self-described "feminist, activist" who is an avid supporter of numerous "neutral" political groups, like Occupy Wall Street, included several conservative news outlets like Breitbart and InfoWars but somehow missed leftist sites like The Huffington Post which was exposed by WikiLeaks to have been overtly colluding with the Hillary Clinton campaign. As always, here are a couple of our favorite lines though the full clip is a must see. Oh, and when they say "fake news," that includes any reporting or opinion that contradicts their leftist narrative. Who gave the mainstream media the right to be judge, jury and executioner of what constitutes "fake news"? All you do is put out fake news. You're the aficionado of fake news. You put out the fake news that Hillary Clinton was 98% likely to win the presidency. You printed out and shipped copies of Newsweek celebrating "Madam President." You put out fake, rigged polls that were proven spectacularly wrong. You create fake narratives like Trump being responsible for violence at his own rallies when it was DNC-funded agitators all along. You're the fucking experts of fake news. As WikiLeaks exposed, you're a public relations front for the Democratic Party. You lost the argument. You trashed your own credibility. And now you're trying to resurrect it by claiming that everyone that beat you is "fake news". Give me a break. Conveniently for the mainstream media, she ignored the following list of people who WikiLeaks exposed as having actually colluded with Hillary Clinton's campaign over the course of two years.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 26.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Attaboy! Classic Gatslime - ignore the article and shoot the messenger. What's the matter - are you sad because he points out the lies of your beloved Mockingbird media? Man - you are such a whiny little bitch. ...the person who is interpreting the message I never considered you as someone who can accurately interpret any message. Who gave the mainstream media the right to be judge, jury and executioner of what constitutes "fake news"? All you do is put out fake news. You're the aficionado of fake news. You put out the fake news that Hillary Clinton was 98% likely to win the presidency. You printed out and shipped copies of Newsweek celebrating "Madam President." You put out fake, rigged polls that were proven spectacularly wrong. You create fake narratives like Trump being responsible for violence at his own rallies when it was DNC-funded agitators all along. You're the fucking experts of fake news. ***** The sane folks here would agree that Watson's "rant" is right on target.
Here, the messenger needs to be summarily shot….figuratively speaking. All I see Paul Joseph Watson ever doing is fear mongering. That is what he get paid to do, isn’t it? Sure it is.
Your ignorance grows more tiresome by the day. Which part of this on-target "rant" is "fear-mongering"?
PJW is one of the biggest purveyor of Fake News around. He is now “the pot calling the kettle black” in the sense of accusing someone of hypocrisy. Your insane blind dedication to ignore the truth grows more apparent with each passing day.
Kindly provide specific examples. No doubt you have many, can't wait to see a few. Thanks in advance. By the way, did you buy the Babies thrown from incubators story - from the daughter of the ambassador (ROFL)? Did you think Saddam had WMD's? What happened at the Gulf of Tonkin? Do you think Anderson Vanderbuilt Cooper tells the truth? Why did Colin Powell hold up a vial of white powder? Anderson and Colon know- in America, there's a sucker born every minute.
Kindly provide specific examples. No doubt you have many, can't wait to see a few. If you are too dumb to have seen the numerous ones in the past, then you are too ignorant to believe it now. You are most welcome in the aftermath … To which I respond:
One specific example would be great. You can do that, right? Because, on another thread you write: Why can’t you do that? "Gatlin", demanding what he won't give in return You're a real piece of work. Fascinating, even. At least for a few seconds. You remind me of High School. Now put up a specific example or shut UP.
What you are asking for is simply a mundane task. Greatness is something Donald Trump will do starting in January. No doubt you have heard the catch phrase: “Make America Great Again.” Now I will say that if you can’t understand the difference between a question and a demand then you really are more ignorant than I thought earlier. You are severely more ignorant than Buckeroo and Deckard combined….surely they must know the difference between a question and a demand. I am glad we had this time to spnd together. Don’t be such a stranger, drop by more often….if you like.
Is that even possible?
#27. To: Roscoe (#26)
Is that even possible? That made me laugh ...
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Paul Joseph Watson is back with another epic rant....
That is what Paul Joseph Watson gets paid to do….make noise, and he must get paid well to do that because he is always making noise. Are his rants considered to be noise because there is a high degree of variance with respect to upbringing and life experiences between his being a "person who doesn't make sense" and the person who is interpreting the message conveyed by this nonsensical person? If not that, then what else?
#2. To: Gatlin (#1)
(Edited)
#3. To: Deckard (#2)
...shoot the messenger.
#7. To: Gatlin (#3)
(Edited)
All I see Paul Joseph Watson ever doing is fear mongering.
Who gave the mainstream media the right to be judge, jury and executioner of what constitutes "fake news"? All you do is put out fake news. You're the aficionado of fake news. You put out the fake news that Hillary Clinton was 98% likely to win the presidency. You printed out and shipped copies of Newsweek celebrating "Madam President." You put out fake, rigged polls that were proven spectacularly wrong. You create fake narratives like Trump being responsible for violence at his own rallies when it was DNC-funded agitators all along. You're the fucking experts of fake news.
#10. To: Deckard (#7)
Gatlin: All I see Paul Joseph Watson ever doing is fear mongering.
Don’t try to bait me with some cherry picked selected phrase.
Deckard: Your ignorance grows more tiresome by the day.
Which part of this on-target "rant" is "fear- mongering"?
#11. To: Gatlin (#10)
PJW is one of the biggest purveyor of Fake News around.
#14. To: Operation 40 (#11)
PJW is one of the biggest purveyor of Fake News around.
Thanks in advance.
….there's a sucker born every minute.
So goes the phrase closely associated with P. T. Barnum. Unfortunately for them, the few that are born every minute are the only ones that gravitate to PJW for “Fake News.”
#24. To: Gatlin (#14)
If you are too dumb to have seen the numerous ones in the past, then you are too ignorant to believe it now.
Your adolescent sophomoric ill-humored comment did nothing to show a list of the specific rambles that cause you to be “more nervous about this nation's future than ever before.”
#25. To: Operation 40 (#24)
One specific example would be great.
There would be nothing great in doing that. There can be to no extent, or any amount, or devoted intensity that would be considerably above the normal or average in me doing that. After all, that is what great is defined as. You can do that, right?
Of course, I CAN do that. But I WON’T….even though I can do everything. By reacting positively to you, it would be an egregious example of waste….because it would serve you no purpose. But, you already know that. Because, on another thread you write:
Yes, I did write that and it is an excellent example in the proper use of sentence structure….I would be tasked to find a way to improve on it. I am however please to learn that you follow my post so closely. Continue to do so and your education will be vastly improved.
Your adolescent sophomoric ill-humored comment did nothing to show a list of the specific rambles that cause you to be “more nervous about this nation's future than ever before.” Why can’t you do that?
Oh, I can….I just won’t. "Gatlin", demanding what he won't give in return.
I already said that: “If you are too dumb to have seen the numerous ones in the past, then you are too ignorant to believe it now. You're a real piece of work. Fascinating, even.
Yes, I have often been told that I am fascinating….so that is something we can agree on. This is nothing new, I have been told before that I do irresistibly draw the attention and interest of lots of folks. Now put up a specific example or shut UP.
LOL! Nope! I will do neither….I am extremely obstinate and therefore unyielding to any demands made upon me. So, you may want to learn to live with that….because there is nothing for you to do, if you can’t.
#26. To: Gatlin (#25)
You are severely more ignorant than Buckeroo and Deckard combined
Replies to Comment # 26. You are severely more ignorant than Buckeroo and Deckard combined
End Trace Mode for Comment # 26.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]