Creationism/Evolution
See other Creationism/Evolution Articles
Title: Paul Joseph Watson Blasts The MSM: "You're The F**king Experts Of Fake News"
Source:
Zero Hedge
URL Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016- ... asts-msm-truth-about-fake-news
Published: Nov 18, 2016
Author: Tyler Durden
Post Date: 2016-11-19 01:47:32 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 23334
Comments: 48
Paul Joseph Watson is back with another epic rant....this time eviscerating the mainstream media for spreading an obviously biased list of "fake news" sources compiled by a left-wing assistant professor in an obvious attempt to undermine conservative news outlets. We wrote about the list a couple days ago as Zero Hedge itself was actually a target of Melissa "Mish" Zimdars' fake news wrath. To our complete "shock", the list of fake news sources created by the self-described "feminist, activist" who is an avid supporter of numerous "neutral" political groups, like Occupy Wall Street, included several conservative news outlets like Breitbart and InfoWars but somehow missed leftist sites like The Huffington Post which was exposed by WikiLeaks to have been overtly colluding with the Hillary Clinton campaign. As always, here are a couple of our favorite lines though the full clip is a must see. Oh, and when they say "fake news," that includes any reporting or opinion that contradicts their leftist narrative. Who gave the mainstream media the right to be judge, jury and executioner of what constitutes "fake news"? All you do is put out fake news. You're the aficionado of fake news. You put out the fake news that Hillary Clinton was 98% likely to win the presidency. You printed out and shipped copies of Newsweek celebrating "Madam President." You put out fake, rigged polls that were proven spectacularly wrong. You create fake narratives like Trump being responsible for violence at his own rallies when it was DNC-funded agitators all along. You're the fucking experts of fake news. As WikiLeaks exposed, you're a public relations front for the Democratic Party. You lost the argument. You trashed your own credibility. And now you're trying to resurrect it by claiming that everyone that beat you is "fake news". Give me a break. Conveniently for the mainstream media, she ignored the following list of people who WikiLeaks exposed as having actually colluded with Hillary Clinton's campaign over the course of two years.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
Attaboy! Classic Gatslime - ignore the article and shoot the messenger. What's the matter - are you sad because he points out the lies of your beloved Mockingbird media? Man - you are such a whiny little bitch. ...the person who is interpreting the message I never considered you as someone who can accurately interpret any message. Who gave the mainstream media the right to be judge, jury and executioner of what constitutes "fake news"? All you do is put out fake news. You're the aficionado of fake news. You put out the fake news that Hillary Clinton was 98% likely to win the presidency. You printed out and shipped copies of Newsweek celebrating "Madam President." You put out fake, rigged polls that were proven spectacularly wrong. You create fake narratives like Trump being responsible for violence at his own rallies when it was DNC-funded agitators all along. You're the fucking experts of fake news. ***** The sane folks here would agree that Watson's "rant" is right on target.
Here, the messenger needs to be summarily shot….figuratively speaking. All I see Paul Joseph Watson ever doing is fear mongering. That is what he get paid to do, isn’t it? Sure it is.
Your ignorance grows more tiresome by the day. Which part of this on-target "rant" is "fear-mongering"?
PJW is one of the biggest purveyor of Fake News around. He is now “the pot calling the kettle black” in the sense of accusing someone of hypocrisy. Your insane blind dedication to ignore the truth grows more apparent with each passing day.
You do realize that the term "Fake News" is a term coined by the leftist-controlled MSM in reaction to the alternative news sources waging a war of truth against Hillary Clinton, right? Oh wait - I almost forgot who I was posting to - you don't get it and you never will. Just like when you and others of your repulsive ilk use the CIA-created, weaponized term "conspiracy theorist". It's Orwellian on its face - War Is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength. Now you can add to that "Truth is Fake News".
Wrong….definitely WRONG! Actually, Fake News, also called News Satire is a type of parody presented in a format typical of mainstream journalism, and calledsatire because of its content. I see Watson’s articles as irony, exaggeration, or ridicule as he makes a futile attempt expose and criticize people's stupidity or vices, particularly in the context of contemporary politics and other topical issues. I am always amused with satire and see right through Fake News But since the categorization of Watson’s articles as Fake News appears to offend you….I will gladly use Yellow Journalism to describe his articles….which in truth, is probably more appropriate. Thanks …
#20. To: Gatlin (#18)
Attaboy - predictable as the sunrise. You are one ignorant son of a bitch. Meet The Leftist Professor Who Wrote The 'Hit List' Of "Fake News" Sites Actually, Fake News, also called News Satire is a type of parody presented in a format typical of mainstream journalism, and calledsatire because of its content. Not all of the sites listed as "Fake News" are satire. Most are alternative sites run by tireless, dedicated, truth-seeking journalists (real journalists, not the kind you trust). "Fake News" used in this context is a term created by the leftist media (working from a "list" created by a leftist professor) because the alternative media were instrumental in enabling Hillary's defeat. Zimdars published and circulated a list of “fake, false, or regularly misleading websites that are shared on Facebook and social media.” She said she began writing the list because she didn’t approve of the sources her students were citing. The problem? In addition to some satirical and bogus sites, her list attacks the credibility of well-established news organizations such as Breitbart, BizPac Review, Red State, the Blaze, the Independent Journal Review, Twitchy, the Daily Wire, WND and James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas. In many cases (such as with her WND listing), she offers no explanation for why the news organizations were included on the list. Mainstream media outlets such as the Los Angeles Times circulated Zimdars’ growing list. The Times headlined its story, “Want to keep fake news out of your newsfeed? College professor creates list of sites to avoid.” The Times offered no details concerning Zimdars’ qualifications or background. News organizations such as CNN, the Washington Post, Boston Globe, New York Magazine, USA Today, Business Insider, the Austin American-Statesman, the Dallas Morning News and others spread the list like gospel and cited it in their reports. But nearly none of them considered Zimdars’ political leanings or questioned her criteria or qualifications for determining which news sources should be included on her list. ***** So basically what this entire psy-op has accomplished is to validate the veracity and credibility of the alternative media and has driven the final nail into the coffin of the controlled Mockingbird MSM (who have long thought of themselves as the sole arbiter of truth) and has exposed them for the lying, shilling, government-controlled propaganda outlets that they are and have been for decades. One more thing - Watson's employers (Alex Jones and Infowars) have been HUGE Trump supporters from the beginning. You are doing your side a grave disservice by denigrating those who helped to get Trump elected.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Paul Joseph Watson is back with another epic rant....
That is what Paul Joseph Watson gets paid to do….make noise, and he must get paid well to do that because he is always making noise. Are his rants considered to be noise because there is a high degree of variance with respect to upbringing and life experiences between his being a "person who doesn't make sense" and the person who is interpreting the message conveyed by this nonsensical person? If not that, then what else?
#2. To: Gatlin (#1)
(Edited)
#3. To: Deckard (#2)
...shoot the messenger.
#7. To: Gatlin (#3)
(Edited)
All I see Paul Joseph Watson ever doing is fear mongering.
Who gave the mainstream media the right to be judge, jury and executioner of what constitutes "fake news"? All you do is put out fake news. You're the aficionado of fake news. You put out the fake news that Hillary Clinton was 98% likely to win the presidency. You printed out and shipped copies of Newsweek celebrating "Madam President." You put out fake, rigged polls that were proven spectacularly wrong. You create fake narratives like Trump being responsible for violence at his own rallies when it was DNC-funded agitators all along. You're the fucking experts of fake news.
#10. To: Deckard (#7)
Gatlin: All I see Paul Joseph Watson ever doing is fear mongering.
Don’t try to bait me with some cherry picked selected phrase.
Deckard: Your ignorance grows more tiresome by the day.
Which part of this on-target "rant" is "fear- mongering"?
#16. To: Gatlin (#10)
(Edited)
PJW is one of the biggest purveyor of Fake News around.
#18. To: Deckard (#16)
You do realize that the term "Fake News" is a term coined by the leftist- controlled MSM in reaction to the alternative news sources waging a war of truth against Hillary Clinton, right?
Replies to Comment # 18. I will gladly use Yellow Journalism to describe his articles
End Trace Mode for Comment # 18.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]