Creationism/Evolution
See other Creationism/Evolution Articles
Title: Paul Joseph Watson Blasts The MSM: "You're The F**king Experts Of Fake News"
Source:
Zero Hedge
URL Source: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016- ... asts-msm-truth-about-fake-news
Published: Nov 18, 2016
Author: Tyler Durden
Post Date: 2016-11-19 01:47:32 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 21505
Comments: 48
Paul Joseph Watson is back with another epic rant....this time eviscerating the mainstream media for spreading an obviously biased list of "fake news" sources compiled by a left-wing assistant professor in an obvious attempt to undermine conservative news outlets. We wrote about the list a couple days ago as Zero Hedge itself was actually a target of Melissa "Mish" Zimdars' fake news wrath. To our complete "shock", the list of fake news sources created by the self-described "feminist, activist" who is an avid supporter of numerous "neutral" political groups, like Occupy Wall Street, included several conservative news outlets like Breitbart and InfoWars but somehow missed leftist sites like The Huffington Post which was exposed by WikiLeaks to have been overtly colluding with the Hillary Clinton campaign. As always, here are a couple of our favorite lines though the full clip is a must see. Oh, and when they say "fake news," that includes any reporting or opinion that contradicts their leftist narrative. Who gave the mainstream media the right to be judge, jury and executioner of what constitutes "fake news"? All you do is put out fake news. You're the aficionado of fake news. You put out the fake news that Hillary Clinton was 98% likely to win the presidency. You printed out and shipped copies of Newsweek celebrating "Madam President." You put out fake, rigged polls that were proven spectacularly wrong. You create fake narratives like Trump being responsible for violence at his own rallies when it was DNC-funded agitators all along. You're the fucking experts of fake news. As WikiLeaks exposed, you're a public relations front for the Democratic Party. You lost the argument. You trashed your own credibility. And now you're trying to resurrect it by claiming that everyone that beat you is "fake news". Give me a break. Conveniently for the mainstream media, she ignored the following list of people who WikiLeaks exposed as having actually colluded with Hillary Clinton's campaign over the course of two years.
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
#1. To: Deckard (#0)
#2. To: Gatlin (#1)
(Edited)
Attaboy! Classic Gatslime - ignore the article and shoot the messenger. What's the matter - are you sad because he points out the lies of your beloved Mockingbird media? Man - you are such a whiny little bitch. ...the person who is interpreting the message I never considered you as someone who can accurately interpret any message. Who gave the mainstream media the right to be judge, jury and executioner of what constitutes "fake news"? All you do is put out fake news. You're the aficionado of fake news. You put out the fake news that Hillary Clinton was 98% likely to win the presidency. You printed out and shipped copies of Newsweek celebrating "Madam President." You put out fake, rigged polls that were proven spectacularly wrong. You create fake narratives like Trump being responsible for violence at his own rallies when it was DNC-funded agitators all along. You're the fucking experts of fake news. ***** The sane folks here would agree that Watson's "rant" is right on target.
Welcome out of the bozo box, I am glad to be reading your comments once again.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest Paul Joseph Watson is back with another epic rant....
That is what Paul Joseph Watson gets paid to do….make noise, and he must get paid well to do that because he is always making noise. Are his rants considered to be noise because there is a high degree of variance with respect to upbringing and life experiences between his being a "person who doesn't make sense" and the person who is interpreting the message conveyed by this nonsensical person? If not that, then what else?
Replies to Comment # 1.
#13. To: Gatlin (#1)
End Trace Mode for Comment # 1.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]