[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Police Dispersing Student Protesters at USC - Breaking News Coverage (College Protests)

What Passover Means For The New Testament Believer

Are We Closer Than Ever To The Next Pandemic?

War in Ukraine Turns on Russia

what happened during total solar eclipse

Israel Attacks Iran, Report Says - LIVE Breaking News Coverage

Earth is Scorched with Heat

Antiwar Activists Chant ‘Death to America’ at Event Featuring Chicago Alderman

Vibe Shift

A stream that makes the pleasant Rain sound.

Older Men - Keep One Foot In The Dark Ages

When You Really Want to Meet the Diversity Requirements

CERN to test world's most powerful particle accelerator during April's solar eclipse

Utopian Visionaries Who Won’t Leave People Alone

No - no - no Ain'T going To get away with iT

Pete Buttplug's Butt Plugger Trying to Turn Kids into Faggots

Mark Levin: I'm sick and tired of these attacks

Questioning the Big Bang

James Webb Data Contradicts the Big Bang

Pssst! Don't tell the creationists, but scientists don't have a clue how life began

A fine romance: how humans and chimps just couldn't let go

Early humans had sex with chimps

O’Keefe dons bulletproof vest to extract undercover journalist from NGO camp.

Biblical Contradictions (Alleged)

Catholic Church Praising Lucifer

Raising the Knife

One Of The HARDEST Videos I Had To Make..

Houthi rebels' attack severely damages a Belize-flagged ship in key strait leading to the Red Sea (British Ship)

Chinese Illegal Alien. I'm here for the moneuy

Red Tides Plague Gulf Beaches

Tucker Carlson calls out Nikki Haley, Ben Shapiro, and every other person calling for war:

{Are there 7 Deadly Sins?} I’ve heard people refer to the “7 Deadly Sins,” but I haven’t been able to find that sort of list in Scripture.

Abomination of Desolation | THEORY, BIBLE STUDY

Bible Help

Libertysflame Database Updated

Crush EVERYONE with the Alien Gambit!

Vladimir Putin tells Tucker Carlson US should stop arming Ukraine to end war

Putin hints Moscow and Washington in back-channel talks in revealing Tucker Carlson interview

Trump accuses Fulton County DA Fani Willis of lying in court response to Roman's motion

Mandatory anti-white racism at Disney.

Iceland Volcano Erupts For Third Time In 2 Months, State Of Emergency Declared

Tucker Carlson Interview with Vladamir Putin

How will Ar Mageddon / WW III End?

What on EARTH is going on in Acts 16:11? New Discovery!

2023 Hottest in over 120 Million Years

2024 and beyond in prophecy

Questions

This Speech Just Broke the Internet

This AMAZING Math Formula Will Teach You About God!

The GOSPEL of the ALIENS | Fallen Angels | Giants | Anunnaki


Status: Not Logged In; Sign In

Corrupt Government
See other Corrupt Government Articles

Title: Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept
Source: Reuters
URL Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-u ... ction-foundation-idUSKBN12Z2SL
Published: Nov 4, 2016
Author: Jonathan Allen
Post Date: 2016-11-04 23:12:15 by U don't know me
Keywords: None
Views: 992
Comments: 6

Politics | Fri Nov 4, 2016 | 8:12pm EDT Clinton's charity confirms Qatar's $1 million gift while she was at State Dept

By Jonathan Allen | NEW YORK

The Clinton Foundation has confirmed it accepted a $1 million gift from Qatar while Hillary Clinton was U.S. secretary of state without informing the State Department, even though she had promised to let the agency review new or significantly increased support from foreign governments.

Qatari officials pledged the money in 2011 to mark the 65th birthday of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton's husband, and sought to meet the former U.S. president in person the following year to present him the check, according to an email from a foundation official to Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign chairman, John Podesta. The email, among thousands hacked from Podesta's account, was published last month by WikiLeaks.

Clinton signed an ethics agreement governing her family's globe-straddling foundation in order to become secretary of state in 2009. The agreement was designed to increase transparency to avoid appearances that U.S. foreign policy could be swayed by wealthy donors.

If a new foreign government wished to donate or if an existing foreign-government donor, such as Qatar, wanted to "increase materially" its support of ongoing programs, Clinton promised that the State Department's ethics official would be notified and given a chance to raise any concerns.

Clinton Foundation officials last month declined to confirm the Qatar donation. In response to additional questions, a foundation spokesman, Brian Cookstra, this week said that it accepted the $1 million gift from Qatar, but this did not amount to a "material increase" in the Gulf country's support for the charity. Cookstra declined to say whether Qatari officials received their requested meeting with Bill Clinton.

Officials at Qatar's embassy in Washington and in its Council of Ministers in the capital, Doha, declined to discuss the donation.

The State Department has said it has no record of the foundation submitting the Qatar gift for review, and that it was incumbent on the foundation to notify the department about donations that needed attention. A department spokeswoman did not respond to additional questions about the donation.

According to the foundation's website, which lists donors in broad categories by cumulative amounts donated, Qatar's government has directly given a total of between $1 million and $5 million over the years.

The Clinton Foundation has said it would no longer accept money from foreign governments if Clinton is elected president and would spin off those programs that are dependent on foreign governments.

"MATERIAL" INCREASE

Foundation officials told Reuters last year that they did not always comply with central provisions of the agreement with President Barack Obama's administration, blaming oversights in some cases.

At least eight other countries besides Qatar gave new or increased funding to the foundation, in most cases to fund its health project, without the State Department being informed, according to foundation and agency records. They include Algeria, which gave for the first time in 2010, and the United Kingdom, which nearly tripled its support for the foundation's health project to $11.2 million between 2009 and 2012.

Foundation officials have said some of those donations, including Algeria, were oversights and should have been flagged, while others, such as the UK increase, did not qualify as material increases.

The foundation has declined to describe what sort of increase in funding by a foreign government would have triggered notification of the State Department for review. Cookstra said the agreement was designed to "allow foreign funding for critical Clinton Foundation programs" to continue without disruption.

The State Department said it has no record of being asked by the foundation to review any increases in support by a foreign government. Also In Politics

Asked whether Qatar was funding a specific program at the foundation, Cookstra said the country supported the organization's "overall humanitarian work."

"Qatar continued supporting Clinton Foundation at equal or lower levels" compared with the country's pre-2009 support, he said. He declined to say if Qatar gave any money during the first three years of Clinton's four-year term at the State Department, or what its support before 2009 amounted to.

In another email released by WikiLeaks, a former Clinton Foundation fundraiser said he raised more than $21 million in connection with Bill Clinton's 65th birthday in 2011.

Spokesmen for Hillary Clinton's campaign and Bill Clinton did not respond to emailed questions about the donation.

Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has said that major donors to the Clinton Foundation may have obtained favored access to Clinton's State Department, but has provided little evidence to that effect. Clinton and her staff have dismissed this accusation as a political smear.

Last month, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman ordered the Donald J. Trump Foundation to stop fundraising in the state, saying it had not registered to solicit donations.

(Reporting by Jonathan Allen; Additional reporting by Tom Finn in Doha; Editing by Jonathan Oatis and Andrew Hay)

Post Comment   Private Reply   Ignore Thread  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

#1. To: U don't know me (#0)

According to the foundation's website, which lists donors in broad categories by cumulative amounts donated, Qatar's government has directly given a total of between $1 million and $5 million over the years.

The Clintons pocket twenty percent of the money they receive under the table to buy influence with them to live grand lives then spend the rest under the table to buy influence with sombody else. When the process in through, there is no accounting for most of it and the Clintons are kings of the hill after buying and selling anybody of consequence in the name of a charitable foundation.

rlk  posted on  2016-11-05   2:42:46 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#2. To: rlk (#1)

The Clintons pocket twenty percent of the money they receive under the table...

Do you have a reliable source for that statement? I have always suspected such but have yet to find an unbiased report.....

civilwarbuff  posted on  2016-11-05   6:42:17 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#3. To: rlk, U don't know me (#1)

The Clintons pocket twenty percent of the money they receive under the table to buy influence with them to live grand lives

I believe that is too simplistic. It is more involved than that. The money goes into a Clinton "charity," possibly whips through one or more other Clinton "charities," possibly flows through Teneo, and one of the Clintons gives a speech and is blessed with anywhere from $250K to $700K for a hour.

The multiple corporations are set up to create a financial bookkeeping maze.

Each "charity" is set up as a 501(c)(3) for tax exemption purposes.

https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-organizations/exemption-requirements-section-501-c-3-organizations

Exemption Requirements - 501(c)(3) Organizations

To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates.

Organizations described in section 501(c)(3) are commonly referred to as charitable organizations. Organizations described in section 501(c)(3), other than testing for public safety organizations, are eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions in accordance with Code section 170.

The organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, and no part of a section 501(c)(3) organization's net earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. If the organization engages in an excess benefit transaction with a person having substantial influence over the organization, an excise tax may be imposed on the person and any organization managers agreeing to the transaction.

Section 501(c)(3) organizations are restricted in how much political and legislative (lobbying) activities they may conduct. For a detailed discussion, see Political and Lobbying Activities. For more information about lobbying activities by charities, see the article Lobbying Issues; for more information about political activities of charities, see the FY-2002 CPE topic Election Year Issues.

Additional Information

Page Last Reviewed or Updated: 28-Jun-2016

Just piercing the tax-exempt status poses a very large multi-million dollar threat.

The proof that something hinky was going on is that Hillary stated they left office dead broke and in debt. About ten years later, they have well over $100M, perhaps $200M. Their total gross salaries was a small fraction of that amount, and their lifestyle incurs substantial living expenses.

Bankers were not paying all that money because they were addicted to hearing Clinton bullshit. Repeatedly, they donated generously and, as if by magic, contracts and money rained down in the form of government contracts and concessions. Viewed in isolation, any individual magic act could be explained away. Viewed as a whole, a pattern appears of pay to play.

A roadmap of what went on is described in Clinton Cash, by Peter Schweizer. The book did not tie up the loose ends, but it provided a guide to investigators of where to look. We are currently observing an internecine struggle between those who want to pursue the investigation, and those who want to shut it down.

nolu chan  posted on  2016-11-05   15:51:05 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#4. To: nolu chan (#3)

Money under the table to as bribery or to buy influence is not required to be reported to the IRS. First you need to look for it, then you need to find it. After that you need to litigate it before carefully chosen biased crooked prosecutors and judges. It's impossible to get a conviction.

rlk  posted on  2016-11-06   16:38:50 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#5. To: rlk (#4)

Money under the table

Just saying it is a much more sophisticated operation than old fashion money under the table.

nolu chan  posted on  2016-11-06   16:57:53 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


#6. To: nolu chan (#5)

Money under the table

Just saying it is a much more sophisticated operation than old fashion money under the table.

You can call it whatever you want. But it's still money under the table used to support a ideological mission. The fact that much of it comes from foreign sources supporting that mission that is difficult to account for and is endorced by high powered indigionous sources, including a sitting president who has infused the American government with subversives with elaborate titles supporting that mission, makes little difference. The Clintons have formed their own ideologically dedicated government that is financially supported and recognized by foreign anti-American goverments as well as indigionous elements. Call it whatever you want, but that's the way it's turned out.

rlk  posted on  2016-11-06   18:31:54 ET  Reply   Trace   Private Reply  


TopPage UpFull ThreadPage DownBottom/Latest

[Home]  [Headlines]  [Latest Articles]  [Latest Comments]  [Post]  [Mail]  [Sign-in]  [Setup]  [Help]  [Register] 

Please report web page problems, questions and comments to webmaster@libertysflame.com