United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Armed Militias Prepping for Violence if Clinton Wins in “Stolen Election”
Source:
Free Thought Project
URL Source: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/ar ... -election/#tdvU0q1PlJJjiv6d.99
Published: Nov 3, 2016
Author: Matt Agorist
Post Date: 2016-11-04 07:25:59 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 26731
Comments: 115
As the insane circus act that is the 2016 election cycle comes to a head, Americans are playing right into the establishment’s plan of divide so that they can be conquered. 2016 is proving to be the year that America has lost its collective mind. On November 8th, Americans will go to the polls and decide to cast their vote for a megalomaniacal flip-flopping establishment cozying crony or a murderous war criminal controlled by Soros and Rothschild. Having failed to effectively support a third party candidate, America, once again, will be forced to choose between the lesser of two evils. While peaceful militias are certainly healthy for protecting the citizens from the violence of a rogue state, a report out of Reuters shows that militias are now preparing to act if their statist doesn’t win. As Reuters reports, “camouflaged members of the Three Percent Security Force have mobilized for rifle practice, hand-to-hand combat training – and an impromptu campaign rally for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.” A well-regulated militia is supposed to protect people from the state — not fight for a political candidate. “This is the last chance to save America from ruin,” Chris Hill, a paralegal who goes by the code name “Bloodagent,” told Reuters. “I’m surprised I was able to survive or suffer through eight years of Obama without literally going insane, but Hillary is going to be more of the same.” While the latter part of that statement is correct, Hill is missing the target widely if he thinks Trump will change anything. As Ron Paul said when Alex Jones attempted to trick him into supporting Trump, “Donald Trump would be the champion of the executive order.” “How many people are voting for Trump? Ooh-rah!” asks Hill. “Ooh-rah!” shouts back a dozen militia members. As the most divisive presidential election in recent memory nears its conclusion, some armed militia groups are preparing for the possibility of a stolen election on Nov. 8 and civil unrest in the days following a victory by Democrat Hillary Clinton, reports Reuters. Hillary Clinton would likely attempt to disarm Americans if she is elected. But Donald Trump is certainly no champion of the second Amendment either as he and Clinton both agree on the illegal and due process-removing notion of banning people on the terror watch list from buying guns. No one is advocating that terrorists should have guns, but using an arbitrary list that people have no way of disputing to strip them of their rights is not only inefficient, but it is against the constitution. Where are the constitutionalists on this call by Trump? “I will be there to render assistance to my fellow countrymen, and prevent them from being disarmed, and I will fight and I will kill and I may die in the process,” said Hill, as he conveniently ignores Trump’s anti-second amendment stance. Protecting his fellow countrymen from a government who wishes to disarm them is most certainly an honorable stance. However, this stance should be universally applied and uncompromised — even if it means not supporting Donald Trump. “If Trump loses, I’m grabbing my musket,” former Illinois Representative Joe Walsh wrote on Twitter last week. But, if Trump wins, Walsh could be stripped of his second amendment with no due process when he gets put on a terror watch list. .@KevinBuist If a person is a suspected terrorist, then charge him and present evidence. "Potential" is punished only in dystopian novels. — Justin Amash (@justinamash) June 16, 2016 “We’ve been building up for this, just like the Marines,” said Hill. “We are going to really train harder and try to increase our operational capabilities in the event that this is the day that we hoped would never come.” Unfortunately, as long as people are willing to compromise on their principles to fight for the lesser of two evils, that day will most certainly come and Trump will do nothing to stop it. The good news is the three percenters seem to have the interests of the people in mind and Hill vowed to protect those who want to exercise their first Amendment by marching on Washington to protest in the event of a rigged election. As we’ve already pointed out, Clinton’s only chance of winning is doing exactly that — rigging the election. Beginning in Iowa and eventually getting blown wide open in Arizona, the fraud and suppression of votes have already let Americans know that their rulers are selected not elected. Examples of this fraud were captured on video, documented on paper, and even broadcast live on television. A rigged election is almost a certainty and should most definitely be resisted. However, as long as Americans continue to buy into the political shitshow, that is the two-party paradigm, it will only continue to get worse — no matter the puppets in white marble buildings. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
#3. To: Deckard (#0)
Act? Like go on twitter and complain about it?
Militia is a misnomer that should never be used to categorize these nefarious groups. They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.” Just like the Paultard libertarian assholes who attempt to occupy limited space on LF, all these hoodlums do is “huff” while they never have any “puff.” They both just make noisy empty statements with no empirical support. They think that expressing themselves in a loud, aggressive, and indignant way will have some some effect….but in the end, bluster is all they have.
They think that expressing themselves in a loud, aggressive, and indignant way will have some some effect….but in the end, bluster is all they have. Seems so. They give MSNBC types something else to complain about.
#8. To: TrappedInMd (#7)
(Edited)
Well, if MSNBC has that to complain about our militia let's send those news crew overseas and show them what a real battle is all about. Then perhaps they will understand why every citizen is gearing up for battle at home because we cannot trust our own government to protect us at all except their own ilk and to hell with us. The Second Amendment was implemented because when our armies had to defend ourselves against the Benedict Arnolds betraying our country, it became the duty of every able-bodied citizen to defend their home (not homeland) from a professional standing army; an army that does not represent them at all but serves at the pleasure of a modern day Benedict Arnold who would deliver them unto their enemies. Now try and explain that to a journalist.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWhile peaceful militias are certainly healthy for protecting the citizens from the violence of a rogue state, a report out of Reuters shows that militias are now preparing to act if their statist doesn’t win.
#4. To: TrappedInMd, Deckard (#3)
Act?
#7. To: Gatlin (#4)
They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”
Replies to Comment # 7.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 7.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]