United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Armed Militias Prepping for Violence if Clinton Wins in “Stolen Election”
Source:
Free Thought Project
URL Source: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/ar ... -election/#tdvU0q1PlJJjiv6d.99
Published: Nov 3, 2016
Author: Matt Agorist
Post Date: 2016-11-04 07:25:59 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 27262
Comments: 115
As the insane circus act that is the 2016 election cycle comes to a head, Americans are playing right into the establishment’s plan of divide so that they can be conquered. 2016 is proving to be the year that America has lost its collective mind. On November 8th, Americans will go to the polls and decide to cast their vote for a megalomaniacal flip-flopping establishment cozying crony or a murderous war criminal controlled by Soros and Rothschild. Having failed to effectively support a third party candidate, America, once again, will be forced to choose between the lesser of two evils. While peaceful militias are certainly healthy for protecting the citizens from the violence of a rogue state, a report out of Reuters shows that militias are now preparing to act if their statist doesn’t win. As Reuters reports, “camouflaged members of the Three Percent Security Force have mobilized for rifle practice, hand-to-hand combat training – and an impromptu campaign rally for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.” A well-regulated militia is supposed to protect people from the state — not fight for a political candidate. “This is the last chance to save America from ruin,” Chris Hill, a paralegal who goes by the code name “Bloodagent,” told Reuters. “I’m surprised I was able to survive or suffer through eight years of Obama without literally going insane, but Hillary is going to be more of the same.” While the latter part of that statement is correct, Hill is missing the target widely if he thinks Trump will change anything. As Ron Paul said when Alex Jones attempted to trick him into supporting Trump, “Donald Trump would be the champion of the executive order.” “How many people are voting for Trump? Ooh-rah!” asks Hill. “Ooh-rah!” shouts back a dozen militia members. As the most divisive presidential election in recent memory nears its conclusion, some armed militia groups are preparing for the possibility of a stolen election on Nov. 8 and civil unrest in the days following a victory by Democrat Hillary Clinton, reports Reuters. Hillary Clinton would likely attempt to disarm Americans if she is elected. But Donald Trump is certainly no champion of the second Amendment either as he and Clinton both agree on the illegal and due process-removing notion of banning people on the terror watch list from buying guns. No one is advocating that terrorists should have guns, but using an arbitrary list that people have no way of disputing to strip them of their rights is not only inefficient, but it is against the constitution. Where are the constitutionalists on this call by Trump? “I will be there to render assistance to my fellow countrymen, and prevent them from being disarmed, and I will fight and I will kill and I may die in the process,” said Hill, as he conveniently ignores Trump’s anti-second amendment stance. Protecting his fellow countrymen from a government who wishes to disarm them is most certainly an honorable stance. However, this stance should be universally applied and uncompromised — even if it means not supporting Donald Trump. “If Trump loses, I’m grabbing my musket,” former Illinois Representative Joe Walsh wrote on Twitter last week. But, if Trump wins, Walsh could be stripped of his second amendment with no due process when he gets put on a terror watch list. .@KevinBuist If a person is a suspected terrorist, then charge him and present evidence. "Potential" is punished only in dystopian novels. — Justin Amash (@justinamash) June 16, 2016 “We’ve been building up for this, just like the Marines,” said Hill. “We are going to really train harder and try to increase our operational capabilities in the event that this is the day that we hoped would never come.” Unfortunately, as long as people are willing to compromise on their principles to fight for the lesser of two evils, that day will most certainly come and Trump will do nothing to stop it. The good news is the three percenters seem to have the interests of the people in mind and Hill vowed to protect those who want to exercise their first Amendment by marching on Washington to protest in the event of a rigged election. As we’ve already pointed out, Clinton’s only chance of winning is doing exactly that — rigging the election. Beginning in Iowa and eventually getting blown wide open in Arizona, the fraud and suppression of votes have already let Americans know that their rulers are selected not elected. Examples of this fraud were captured on video, documented on paper, and even broadcast live on television. A rigged election is almost a certainty and should most definitely be resisted. However, as long as Americans continue to buy into the political shitshow, that is the two-party paradigm, it will only continue to get worse — no matter the puppets in white marble buildings. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
#3. To: Deckard (#0)
Act? Like go on twitter and complain about it?
Militia is a misnomer that should never be used to categorize these nefarious groups. They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.” Just like the Paultard libertarian assholes who attempt to occupy limited space on LF, all these hoodlums do is “huff” while they never have any “puff.” They both just make noisy empty statements with no empirical support. They think that expressing themselves in a loud, aggressive, and indignant way will have some some effect….but in the end, bluster is all they have.
That is not true. Title 10 Section 311 Part (b)(2) fits the above which is not only a legal organization but fits within the confines of the constitution of the USA. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/311 (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. (b) The classes of the militia are— (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia. (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14; Pub. L. 85–861, § 1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, § 524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656.)
That is not true. [...] I am referring to those who have hijacked the noble and patriotic “militia” name and consist mainly of armed paramilitary groups with an anti-government conspiracy-oriented ideology….groups who call themselves “militia” that began to form shortly after the deadly Waco standoff and have now spread to every state. The “militia” movement along with the sovereign citizen movement and the tax protest movement have seared themselves into the American consciousness. Many members of “militia” groups have been arrested, usually on weapons, explosives and conspiracy charges thereby causing a number of problems for law enforcement and the communities in which "militia" groups are active Prominent “militia” arrests: Multiple members of the following groups have been arrested and convicted, usually on weapons, explosives, or conspiracy charges: Oklahoma Constitutional Militia, Georgia Republic Militia, Arizona Viper Militia, Washington State Militia, West Virginia Mountaineer Militia, Twin Cities Free Militia, North American Militia, San Joaquin County Militia. I agree in principle with the factual definition of “militia” in your post. In light of day reality, I will continue to stand by my statement: They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.” Just like the Paultard libertarian assholes who attempt to occupy limited space on LF, all these hoodlums do is “huff” while they never have any “puff.” They both just make noisy empty statements with no empirical support. They think that expressing themselves in a loud, aggressive, and indignant way will have some some effect….but in the end, bluster is all they have. I fear not since their extreme anti-government ideology combined with their elaborate conspiracy theories and obsessive fascination with weapons and paramilitary organization has lead many members of the “militias” to act out in ways that justify deep concerns. A ranking member of the Louisiana Tactical Militia was arrested this week on drug and gun charges by the FBI’s domestic terror team in New Orleans. James Moore, 46, of Talisheek, Louisiana, was allegedly involved in trafficking large quantities of meth and claimed to have access to more than 80 firearms, the Justice Department said. 2 Thirty-six members of 3% of Idaho, many in leadership positions, announced their resignations Tuesday evening after they said $2,901 in donations earmarked for four Idaho men accused in the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff in Nevada were improperly spent. 3 [They even lie, cheat and steal among themselves]. Twelve members of an anti-government group called the "Viper Militia" have been arrested in Phoenix Arizona. Their arrest was the culmination of a six-month investigation that allegedly uncovered a plot to blow up several government buildings in the Phoenix area. 4 An anti-government militia with ties to Fort Stewart is accused of killing two people and plotting to kill President Barack Obama. 5 Three members of a border militia group are behind bars, charged with conspiracy to sell cocaine. They were caught in an FBI sting operation, involving an undercover agent, a plot to steal drugs and money from cartel smugglers, an offer of murder for hire and a high speed chase through the streets of Phoenix. 6
When I read your response here the first thing that came to my mind was the standoff incident at Ruby Ridge with Randy Weaver and the federal agents who shot and killed his wife and child in the face. What the government did to him and his family was anti-government, extreme, and classifies the agents who did this as vigilantes. Just know this, Gatlin. Before Barbara Olson died on Sept 11, 2001, she had just finished her book, Hell to Pay in reference to Hillary Clinton. It is not the militias of this country that your ilk should be concerned about for they care about where this country is going. It is those that you protect (such as Hillary Clinton) who will deliver this country over to our enemies. Remember that she did this to US Ambassador Christoper Stevens.
I remember you stated in a previous post you always want the truth and that is important to you. Just to be technically truthful….Randy’s wife was not shot in the face. An HRT sniper fired at an armed Kevin Harris, a family friend staying with the Weavers, as he ran for cover….but hit Weaver's wife, Vicki, in the head. She was also running and may have entered into the line of fire. It has been a long time, if this information is not correct….I certainly stand to be corrected. I will comment some more as we exchange posts.
Randy’s wife was not shot in the face. An HRT sniper fired at an armed Kevin Harris, a family friend staying with the Weavers, as he ran for cover….but hit Weaver's wife, Vicki, in the head. You are seriously misinformed. Vicki was murdered by an FBI sniper named Lon Horiuchi. It was no "accident" as you seem to claim, in fact Horiuchi testified in court that he could hit within a quarter inch of a target at a distance of 200 yards. Horiuchi was charged with manslaughter for the death of Vicki Weaver Ruby Ridge: FBI Sniper Slays Mother Holding her Baby On Aug. 21, 1992, six heavily armed, camouflaged U.S. marshals sneaked onto Mr. Weaver’s property. Three agents threw rocks to get the attention of Mr. Weaver’s dogs. As Mr. Weaver’s 14-year-old son, Sammy, and Kevin Harris, a 25- year-old family friend living in the cabin, ran to see what the dogs were barking at, U.S. marshals killed one of the dogs. Sammy Weaver fired his gun in the direction the shots had come from. Randy Weaver came out and hollered for his son to come back to the cabin. Sammy yelled, “I’m coming, Dad,” and was running back to the cabin when a federal marshal shot him in the back and killed him. Kevin Harris responded to Sammy’s shooting by fatally shooting a U.S. marshal. Federal agents falsely testified in court that the U.S. marshal had been killed by the first shot of the exchange; evidence later showed that the marshal had fired seven shots before he was shot himself. (Self-defense) After the death of the U.S. marshal, the commander of the FBI’s Hostage Rescue Team was called in, and ordered federal agents to shoot any armed adult outside the Weaver cabin, regardless of whether that person was doing anything to threaten or menace federal agents. (Thanks to the surveillance, federal officials knew that the Weavers always carried guns when outside their cabin.) With the massive federal firepower surrounding the cabin — the automatic weapons, the sniper rifles, the night vision scopes — this was practically an order to assassinate the alleged wrongdoers. Four hundred government agents quickly swarmed in the mountains around the cabin. Most important, the federal agents at that time made no effort to contact Mr. Weaver to negotiate his surrender. The next day, Aug. 22, Randy Weaver walked to the little shack where his son’s body lay. As he was lifting the latch on the shack’s door, he was shot from behind by FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi. As he struggled back to the cabin, his wife, Vicki, stood in the doorway, holding a 10-month-old baby in her arms and calling for her husband to hurry. The FBI sniper fired again and hit Vicki Weaver in the temple, killing her instantly.
There are no replies to Comment # 19. End Trace Mode for Comment # 19.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWhile peaceful militias are certainly healthy for protecting the citizens from the violence of a rogue state, a report out of Reuters shows that militias are now preparing to act if their statist doesn’t win.
#4. To: TrappedInMd, Deckard (#3)
Act?
#6. To: Gatlin (#4)
(Edited)
They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”
#9. To: goldilucky (#6)
They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”
Militia is a misnomer that should never be used to categorize these nefarious groups.
From the article: A well-regulated militia is supposed to protect people from the state…
Are these resent day groups who call themselves militias “well-regulated” and are they “protecting people from the state?” Three members of a Kansas militia group were charged Friday with plotting to bomb an apartment complex that’s home to Somali immigrants in the western Kansas meatpacking town of Garden City, a thwarted attack prosecutors say was planned for the day after the November election. 1
You may, with all due respect, continue to refer to these groups of people as “militias”….I however prefer to refer to them as criminal “vigilantes.”
#10. To: Gatlin (#9)
(Edited)
#13. To: goldilucky (#10)
…federal agents who shot and killed his [Randy Weaver’s] wife and child in the face.
Just as you cannot accept my describing some militias as criminal vigilantes, I cannot accept you describing Randy Weaver’s son, Sammy, as a “child.” The “child” was 14-year-old boy who shot Bill Degan in retaliation for the shooting of the Weaver’s dog and then a running Sammy was shot in the back by a dying Bill Degan and/or other federal agents.
#19. To: Gatlin (#13)
(Edited)
The “child” was 14-year-old boy who shot Bill Degan in retaliation for the shooting of the Weaver’s dog and then a running Sammy was shot in the back by a dying Bill Degan and/or other federal agents.
Replies to Comment # 19.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]