United States News
See other United States News Articles
Title: Armed Militias Prepping for Violence if Clinton Wins in “Stolen Election”
Source:
Free Thought Project
URL Source: http://thefreethoughtproject.com/ar ... -election/#tdvU0q1PlJJjiv6d.99
Published: Nov 3, 2016
Author: Matt Agorist
Post Date: 2016-11-04 07:25:59 by Deckard
Keywords: None
Views: 25556
Comments: 115
As the insane circus act that is the 2016 election cycle comes to a head, Americans are playing right into the establishment’s plan of divide so that they can be conquered. 2016 is proving to be the year that America has lost its collective mind. On November 8th, Americans will go to the polls and decide to cast their vote for a megalomaniacal flip-flopping establishment cozying crony or a murderous war criminal controlled by Soros and Rothschild. Having failed to effectively support a third party candidate, America, once again, will be forced to choose between the lesser of two evils. While peaceful militias are certainly healthy for protecting the citizens from the violence of a rogue state, a report out of Reuters shows that militias are now preparing to act if their statist doesn’t win. As Reuters reports, “camouflaged members of the Three Percent Security Force have mobilized for rifle practice, hand-to-hand combat training – and an impromptu campaign rally for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump.” A well-regulated militia is supposed to protect people from the state — not fight for a political candidate. “This is the last chance to save America from ruin,” Chris Hill, a paralegal who goes by the code name “Bloodagent,” told Reuters. “I’m surprised I was able to survive or suffer through eight years of Obama without literally going insane, but Hillary is going to be more of the same.” While the latter part of that statement is correct, Hill is missing the target widely if he thinks Trump will change anything. As Ron Paul said when Alex Jones attempted to trick him into supporting Trump, “Donald Trump would be the champion of the executive order.” “How many people are voting for Trump? Ooh-rah!” asks Hill. “Ooh-rah!” shouts back a dozen militia members. As the most divisive presidential election in recent memory nears its conclusion, some armed militia groups are preparing for the possibility of a stolen election on Nov. 8 and civil unrest in the days following a victory by Democrat Hillary Clinton, reports Reuters. Hillary Clinton would likely attempt to disarm Americans if she is elected. But Donald Trump is certainly no champion of the second Amendment either as he and Clinton both agree on the illegal and due process-removing notion of banning people on the terror watch list from buying guns. No one is advocating that terrorists should have guns, but using an arbitrary list that people have no way of disputing to strip them of their rights is not only inefficient, but it is against the constitution. Where are the constitutionalists on this call by Trump? “I will be there to render assistance to my fellow countrymen, and prevent them from being disarmed, and I will fight and I will kill and I may die in the process,” said Hill, as he conveniently ignores Trump’s anti-second amendment stance. Protecting his fellow countrymen from a government who wishes to disarm them is most certainly an honorable stance. However, this stance should be universally applied and uncompromised — even if it means not supporting Donald Trump. “If Trump loses, I’m grabbing my musket,” former Illinois Representative Joe Walsh wrote on Twitter last week. But, if Trump wins, Walsh could be stripped of his second amendment with no due process when he gets put on a terror watch list. .@KevinBuist If a person is a suspected terrorist, then charge him and present evidence. "Potential" is punished only in dystopian novels. — Justin Amash (@justinamash) June 16, 2016 “We’ve been building up for this, just like the Marines,” said Hill. “We are going to really train harder and try to increase our operational capabilities in the event that this is the day that we hoped would never come.” Unfortunately, as long as people are willing to compromise on their principles to fight for the lesser of two evils, that day will most certainly come and Trump will do nothing to stop it. The good news is the three percenters seem to have the interests of the people in mind and Hill vowed to protect those who want to exercise their first Amendment by marching on Washington to protest in the event of a rigged election. As we’ve already pointed out, Clinton’s only chance of winning is doing exactly that — rigging the election. Beginning in Iowa and eventually getting blown wide open in Arizona, the fraud and suppression of votes have already let Americans know that their rulers are selected not elected. Examples of this fraud were captured on video, documented on paper, and even broadcast live on television. A rigged election is almost a certainty and should most definitely be resisted. However, as long as Americans continue to buy into the political shitshow, that is the two-party paradigm, it will only continue to get worse — no matter the puppets in white marble buildings. 
Post Comment Private Reply Ignore Thread
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/Latest
Begin Trace Mode for Comment # 112.
#3. To: Deckard (#0)
Act? Like go on twitter and complain about it?
Militia is a misnomer that should never be used to categorize these nefarious groups. They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.” Just like the Paultard libertarian assholes who attempt to occupy limited space on LF, all these hoodlums do is “huff” while they never have any “puff.” They both just make noisy empty statements with no empirical support. They think that expressing themselves in a loud, aggressive, and indignant way will have some some effect….but in the end, bluster is all they have.
That is not true. Title 10 Section 311 Part (b)(2) fits the above which is not only a legal organization but fits within the confines of the constitution of the USA. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/311 (a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard. (b) The classes of the militia are— (1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and (2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia. (Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 14; Pub. L. 85–861, § 1(7), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1439; Pub. L. 103–160, div. A, title V, § 524(a), Nov. 30, 1993, 107 Stat. 1656.)
That is not true. [...] I am referring to those who have hijacked the noble and patriotic “militia” name and consist mainly of armed paramilitary groups with an anti-government conspiracy-oriented ideology….groups who call themselves “militia” that began to form shortly after the deadly Waco standoff and have now spread to every state. The “militia” movement along with the sovereign citizen movement and the tax protest movement have seared themselves into the American consciousness. Many members of “militia” groups have been arrested, usually on weapons, explosives and conspiracy charges thereby causing a number of problems for law enforcement and the communities in which "militia" groups are active Prominent “militia” arrests: Multiple members of the following groups have been arrested and convicted, usually on weapons, explosives, or conspiracy charges: Oklahoma Constitutional Militia, Georgia Republic Militia, Arizona Viper Militia, Washington State Militia, West Virginia Mountaineer Militia, Twin Cities Free Militia, North American Militia, San Joaquin County Militia. I agree in principle with the factual definition of “militia” in your post. In light of day reality, I will continue to stand by my statement: They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.” Just like the Paultard libertarian assholes who attempt to occupy limited space on LF, all these hoodlums do is “huff” while they never have any “puff.” They both just make noisy empty statements with no empirical support. They think that expressing themselves in a loud, aggressive, and indignant way will have some some effect….but in the end, bluster is all they have. I fear not since their extreme anti-government ideology combined with their elaborate conspiracy theories and obsessive fascination with weapons and paramilitary organization has lead many members of the “militias” to act out in ways that justify deep concerns. A ranking member of the Louisiana Tactical Militia was arrested this week on drug and gun charges by the FBI’s domestic terror team in New Orleans. James Moore, 46, of Talisheek, Louisiana, was allegedly involved in trafficking large quantities of meth and claimed to have access to more than 80 firearms, the Justice Department said. 2 Thirty-six members of 3% of Idaho, many in leadership positions, announced their resignations Tuesday evening after they said $2,901 in donations earmarked for four Idaho men accused in the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff in Nevada were improperly spent. 3 [They even lie, cheat and steal among themselves]. Twelve members of an anti-government group called the "Viper Militia" have been arrested in Phoenix Arizona. Their arrest was the culmination of a six-month investigation that allegedly uncovered a plot to blow up several government buildings in the Phoenix area. 4 An anti-government militia with ties to Fort Stewart is accused of killing two people and plotting to kill President Barack Obama. 5 Three members of a border militia group are behind bars, charged with conspiracy to sell cocaine. They were caught in an FBI sting operation, involving an undercover agent, a plot to steal drugs and money from cartel smugglers, an offer of murder for hire and a high speed chase through the streets of Phoenix. 6
When I read your response here the first thing that came to my mind was the standoff incident at Ruby Ridge with Randy Weaver and the federal agents who shot and killed his wife and child in the face. What the government did to him and his family was anti-government, extreme, and classifies the agents who did this as vigilantes. Just know this, Gatlin. Before Barbara Olson died on Sept 11, 2001, she had just finished her book, Hell to Pay in reference to Hillary Clinton. It is not the militias of this country that your ilk should be concerned about for they care about where this country is going. It is those that you protect (such as Hillary Clinton) who will deliver this country over to our enemies. Remember that she did this to US Ambassador Christoper Stevens.
The US Marshalls screwed up at Ruby Ridge. A Justice Department review later found the shot that killed Vicki Weaver and Kevin Harris was unconstitutional and the lack of a request to surrender was inexcusable, since Harris and the two Weavers were running for cover and could not pose an imminent threat. The task force also specifically blamed Horiuchi, the sniper, for firing.
You protect public officers and officials and diplomats such as the following: city council members, governors, the President of the United States, the Pope and other public figures. And since you mention that the government did admit they made a grievous mistake, did they ever compensate the Weaver family?
But since you asked….Yes, they were compensated to the tune of $3.1 million taxpayers dollars.
That is not an assumptive statement. That is a fact. You are a public servant who is compensated to protect public officials and diplomats from the commoners. When the commoners even approach these high profile entities, they are immediately vetted out as if they are dangerous or scum. Worst of this is that the commoners are referred to as the great unwashed and belligerants. This is not the America I was taught. That White House, before it had that fence, was open to the public and people could freely correspond with their representatives and president. Not anymore. I've even noticed since the early nineties, that after the Ruby Ridge standoff, that our police force was turned into a professional standing army. This is EXACTLY why Title 10 Sec 311 (b)(2) applies because it was installed to protect the common folk from professional standing armies used by a corrupt government to attack on its own citizenry and constituents.
I have tried twice to get you to explain what you mean when you say that I am “a public servant who is compensated to protect public officials and diplomats from the commoners.” I have no way to either agree or disagree with you unless I understand what you mean….and I really would like to understand. Since I am unable to understand the meaning, I will therefore graciously place this subject in the Mute File and wait to discuss our next subject.
The commoners are on their own. www.firearmsandliberty.com/kasler-protection.html
The answer is: You do.
You register privileges to defend yourself but not Rights, Gatlin.
You license for confiscation in a world of privileges and not rights. And then there are those like former Attorney General Eric Holder who aid and abet in the distributing of unlicensed and tampered with serial numbers of guns to Mexico to cater to the drug trafficking business because its good for Washington D.C. and the drug muler/prostitutes who assist in this operation to the buyers in the White House.
You license for avoiding arrest.
If anybody needs to be arrested, cuffed and jailed it is those public servants and officers shipping unmarked built guns to drug traffickers outside the US who are never searched bv ICE or Customs but are given free pass thanks to NAFTA/GATT. In return, it is those same people bringing in those shitloads of cocaine, heroin, and maryjane into the White House. And the people who know this info are those working in the intelligence.
#113. To: Gatlin (#112)
And I stand by mine.
Top • Page Up • Full Thread • Page Down • Bottom/LatestWhile peaceful militias are certainly healthy for protecting the citizens from the violence of a rogue state, a report out of Reuters shows that militias are now preparing to act if their statist doesn’t win.
#4. To: TrappedInMd, Deckard (#3)
Act?
#6. To: Gatlin (#4)
(Edited)
They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”
#9. To: goldilucky (#6)
They are not “a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.” They are a group of hoodlums who will do nothing more than continue to go out in the woods and “play games.”
Militia is a misnomer that should never be used to categorize these nefarious groups.
From the article: A well-regulated militia is supposed to protect people from the state…
Are these resent day groups who call themselves militias “well-regulated” and are they “protecting people from the state?” Three members of a Kansas militia group were charged Friday with plotting to bomb an apartment complex that’s home to Somali immigrants in the western Kansas meatpacking town of Garden City, a thwarted attack prosecutors say was planned for the day after the November election. 1
You may, with all due respect, continue to refer to these groups of people as “militias”….I however prefer to refer to them as criminal “vigilantes.”
#10. To: Gatlin (#9)
(Edited)
#16. To: goldilucky (#10)
It is those that you protect …
Whom am I “protecting?”
#36. To: Gatlin (#16)
(Edited)
#42. To: goldilucky (#36)
You protect public officers and officials and diplomats such as the following: city council members, governors, the President of the United States, the Pope and other public figures.
That is an blanket coverall assumptive statement….you therefore need to show where I have “protected” those individuals. And since you mention that the government did admit they made a grievous mistake, did they ever compensate the Weaver family?
And since it was you who first quoted the Randy Weaver situation and seemed to know so much about it….you should already know the answer to your question.
#52. To: Gatlin (#42)
#66. To: goldilucky (#52)
#74. To: Gatlin (#66)
#76. To: goldilucky (#74)
Police Have No Duty To Protect Individuals
So then, who protects you if the police have no duty to do so? To avoid becoming a victim, you need to take charge of your own safety. While there are no guarantees, actively turning your thoughts and actions toward self-defense can help lower chances of becoming a victim. There's a saying in the martial arts world that the best form of self-defense is not putting yourself in a position where you have to defend yourself….we all have a responsibility to be safe. You always avoid dangerous situations in the first place and know how to defend yourself if you do find you're in them. You need to continually think and act defensively. Then you have hope not become a victim….instead, you are an active defender of your own life and property.
Everyone must protect themselves. Are you prepared to defend yourself? If not, then get prepared. Police officers may be tied up on other calls and will not be available to get there in time to help you if you call 911. You need to come to the realization that police simply cannot be everywhere at once and you must protect yourself. Milwaukee County Sheriff David Clarke advised local residents to buy firearms because “calling 911” might not be good enough. Clarke told residents that personal protection and safety was no longer a spectator sport: “I need you in the game.” “With officers laid off and furloughed, simply calling 911 and waiting is no longer your best option,” Clarke said. “You could beg for mercy from a violent criminal, hide under the bed, or you can fight back.”
The Second Amendment preserves your choice to defend yourself with arms against criminal violence. Those citizens who are licensed to carry a firearm….do so. Those citizens who are not licensed to carry a firearm….get licensed.
#80. To: Gatlin (#76)
(Edited)
#82. To: goldilucky (#80)
You register privileges to defend yourself but not Rights, Gatlin.
You license to carry a firearm to defend yourself….then you don’t piss and moan about not being protected, Golidlucky.
#99. To: Gatlin (#82)
(Edited)
#101. To: goldilucky (#99)
You license for confiscation.
Your ass gets confiscated off to jail if you conceal carry in many states without a license.
Three caught, arrested for carrying gun without permit in Kanawha County, WV.
#109. To: Gatlin (#101)
(Edited)
#112. To: goldilucky (#109)
If anybody needs to be arrested, cuffed and jailed it is those public servants and officers shipping unmarked built guns to drug traffickers outside the US who are never searched bv ICE or Customs but are given free pass thanks to NAFTA/GATT. In return, it is those same people bringing in those shitloads of cocaine, heroin, and maryjane into the White House. And the people who know this info are those working in the intelligence.
I agree, but that is not the arrest we are discussing. Goldilucky: You license for confiscation.
I stand by my point.
Gatlin: You license for avoiding arrest.
Gatlin; Your ass gets confiscated off to jail if you conceal carry in many states without a license.
Replies to Comment # 112.
End Trace Mode for Comment # 112.
[Home] [Headlines] [Latest Articles] [Latest Comments] [Post] [Mail] [Sign-in] [Setup] [Help] [Register]